Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
Are we going to (and can we) add functionality to make the code
quality tools recognise it? (or is it just there to ignore?

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org wrote:
 It came in through the discussion on this thread
 http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw


 ~Rajani

 On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:

 If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to
 prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they
 find from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere. These
 methods are actually invoked through reflection.

 Thanks
 -min



  On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  H Kelven (or others),
 
  What are the plans with this annotation, ReflectionUse. Is there to be
  an implementation or folow up or is it maybe just there to ignore?
 
  --
  Daan




-- 
Daan


Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-28 Thread Laszlo Hornyak
Hi,

How about declaring those methods package protected? With that it is
still not considered a public api, but findbugs does not detect it as a bug.

Also, it would be nice to have some javadoc on these methods on how they
are used, what calls them, etc...

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Are we going to (and can we) add functionality to make the code
 quality tools recognise it? (or is it just there to ignore?

 On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Rajani Karuturi raj...@apache.org
 wrote:
  It came in through the discussion on this thread
  http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw
 
 
  ~Rajani
 
  On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
 
  If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven
 to
  prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they
  find from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere.
 These
  methods are actually invoked through reflection.
 
  Thanks
  -min
 
 
 
   On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 
  wrote:
  
   H Kelven (or others),
  
   What are the plans with this annotation, ReflectionUse. Is there to be
   an implementation or folow up or is it maybe just there to ignore?
  
   --
   Daan
 



 --
 Daan




-- 

EOF


Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-27 Thread Min Chen
If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to 
prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they find 
from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere. These methods 
are actually invoked through reflection.

Thanks
-min



 On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 H Kelven (or others),
 
 What are the plans with this annotation, ReflectionUse. Is there to be
 an implementation or folow up or is it maybe just there to ignore?
 
 -- 
 Daan


Re: [QUESTION] @ReflectionUse

2014-11-27 Thread Rajani Karuturi
It came in through the discussion on this thread
http://markmail.org/message/j7ird7yzb3pvszbw


~Rajani

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:

 If I understand this clearly, this annotation was introduced by Kelven to
 prevent people from mistakenly removing those annotated methods if they
 find from IDE that those methods are not explicitly called anywhere. These
 methods are actually invoked through reflection.

 Thanks
 -min



  On Nov 27, 2014, at 3:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  H Kelven (or others),
 
  What are the plans with this annotation, ReflectionUse. Is there to be
  an implementation or folow up or is it maybe just there to ignore?
 
  --
  Daan