[vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Savory

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006, and as well  
as a steady stream of bug reports and patches, he is busy answering  
questions on the users list and engaging in discussions on the dev list.


He's been lively at recent GetTogethers, and he is also showing a  
willingness to contribute to the value of the community by talking at  
Apachecon Europe this year.


Please cast your votes.


Thanks,

Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658  Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
Sourcesense: http://www.sourcesense.com/




Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread hepabolu

Andrew Savory said the following on 5/3/07 09:19:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.


+1

Bye, Helma



Re: Reloading Classloader Plugin

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Giacomo Pati wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Giacomo Pati wrote:


How is the rcl-plugin related/overlapping with the deployer-plugin?

I've put some work making the deployer-plugin usable for block
development and now I'm asking
whether that work is becoming obsolete and I should migrate ev.
missing features into the rcl-plugin

I've started from scratch because the deployer-plugin contains some (a
lot of?) unused stuff and I want to clean up when we merge them.

What features of the deployer-plugin do you use?


applying xpatches
the ability to configure a custom log4j.xml
and probably others I cannot remember now.


and the optional use of the shielding classloader should complete the list.

   - o -

The reloading classloader stuff becomes useful if you want to run a block, the 
deployer if you want to create a web application. I propose that we start from 
the reloading classloader stuff and merge the missing functionality from the 
deployer modules into it.


The perfekt solution would even go one step further and abstract the deployer 
from Maven so that somebody could write an Ant task. I'm not sure if I will have 
time for this extra round.


As already said, I plan to have a first milestone release by the end of March, 
provided that commons-jci will be propertly relased by then.


--
Reinhard Pötz   Independent Consultant, Trainer  (IT)-Coach 


{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

   web(log): http://www.poetz.cc



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Andrew Savory wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006, and as well as 
a steady stream of bug reports and patches, he is busy answering 
questions on the users list and engaging in discussions on the dev list.


He's been lively at recent GetTogethers, and he is also showing a 
willingness to contribute to the value of the community by talking at 
Apachecon Europe this year.


Please cast your votes.


+1

--
Reinhard Pötz   Independent Consultant, Trainer  (IT)-Coach 


{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

   web(log): http://www.poetz.cc






___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On 3/5/07, Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


...I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer...


+1

-Bertrand


RunningModeDependentPipeline (was:RE: New stuff for Cocoon)

2007-03-05 Thread Ard Schrijvers
Hello,

  
 http://www.mindquarry.org/repos/mindquarry-jcr/trunk/mindquarr
 y-jcr-source/
 
 I'd say add it to the cocoon-jcr block but maybe one of the 
 original authors of 
 the jcr block can give some comments.
 
  And various components:
  
  - RunningModeDependentPipeline: (Pipeline)
  
  to automatically use different pipelines depending on the 
 running mode, 
  eg. no caching in dev, full caching in prod, and optionally 
 enabling 
  profiling with a single system property (I know this is possible by 
  putting two different xconf/spring bean files under dev/ or 
 prod/, but 
  this code is quite young in cocoon, so we don't have it 
 available in our 
  cocoon version)
  
  
  http://www.mindquarry.org/repos/mindquarry-webapp/trunk/mindqu
arry-webapp-resources/src/main/java/com/mindquarry/webapp/pipelines/RunningModeDependentPipeline.java
 

 hey, I was thinking about something similar just some time ago. I guess this 
 needs further discussions on this list.

IMHO, I really do not like people developing in another mode regarding caching 
and switch to another caching strategy on production (regarding profiling, ok). 
I have been trying to persuade everybody to *not* develop against uncaching 
pipelines, and switch to caching when the project needs to go live. 
Inefficiencies regarding implementations won't be noticed, untill the project 
needs to go live, and you end up hacking around to get some performance. I have 
seen to many projects end up like big slow hacky (hacky to get it performing in 
the end) projects, which never perform the way they should. By far the best 
projects around, are the ones that kept performance and caching in mind from 
the very start, and monitored response times during development against a 
production mode implementation. 

OTH, why would you ever want a pipeline to be noncaching in development mode 
and caching in production? If you do everything right, changes in code would 
also directly work in caching pipelines. Certainly when you use eventcache, it 
is important to develop in evencaching pipelines, otherwise, you might end up 
with a production version in which some parts do not invalidate. Finding out 
the problems later on are much harder. 

So a -1 for me because it would make me having to persuade everybody around me 
even more, to not develop against a caching strategy that is different in 
production.

Ard


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Savory

Hi,

On 5 Mar 2007, at 08:19, Andrew Savory wrote:


Please cast your votes.


My +1, of course ;-)



Thanks,

Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658  Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
Sourcesense: http://www.sourcesense.com/




Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Sylvain Wallez

Andrew Savory wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.


+1

Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net



Re: Reloading Classloader Plugin

2007-03-05 Thread Torsten Curdt


On 05.03.2007, at 07:31, Reinhard Poetz wrote:


Torsten Curdt wrote:

On 04.03.2007, at 18:40, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Torsten Curdt wrote:

On 04.03.2007, at 17:59, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:

Reinhard Poetz napisał(a):


Just a warning, AFAICS it's not a drop-in replacement  
because of some API changes.
Thanks for fixing this. Unfortunately, nothing changed after  
replacing jci with the current trunk. Still class reloading  
does not work while running outside the Eclipse and still  
there is problem with Scheme change not implemented.


I hope that Torsten will find some time to help us as soon as  
jci got released.
Sure will try ...actually adopting to the API changes would be  
good to do before the release of jci.


already done

Seriously? That would be awesome! :)


It wasn't that difficult because the API became cleaner and much  
easier to understand :-)


Cool :)

cheers
--
Torsten

Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Gianugo Rabellino

On 3/5/07, Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.


+1

--
Gianugo Rabellino
Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com
(blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)


Re: SVN Source for Cocoon

2007-03-05 Thread Lars Trieloff

Hi Reinhard,


- SVN source:
a source that reads a local subversion repository and provides the  
content, supports revisions etc. (read-only)
http://www.mindquarry.org/repos/mindquarry-workspace/trunk/ 
mindquarry-dma-source/


how to you access SVN? Are you using a ASL-compatible base library?  
(http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html)


We access SVN through the means of a Spring Bean. This Bean acts  
either as a wrapper to Subversion's native JavaHL API, which  
unfortunately requires native code or to SVNKit, which is not ASL- 
compatible. So while I see not much chances of integrating this into  
Cocoon, it sill might be interesting for projects using coocoon.




--
Lars Trieloff
visit http://www.mindquarry.com/





Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom

Andrew Savory skrev:

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

+1

/Daniel



Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Andrew Savory wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.
 
 Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006, and as well  
 as a steady stream of bug reports and patches, he is busy answering  
 questions on the users list and engaging in discussions on the dev list.
 
 He's been lively at recent GetTogethers, and he is also showing a  
 willingness to contribute to the value of the community by talking at  
 Apachecon Europe this year.
 
 Please cast your votes.
 
+1
Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Max Pfingsthorn
Andrew Savory wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

Definitely +1!

Bye,
max


Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Felix Knecht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I wonder how to create/add my own configuration for the
RunnableManager. At the moment, the given configuration is included in
the deployed jar file (having configured 2 pools (default,daemon)).
Changing this configuration seems not that easy as I need to 'patch'
the existing configuration in the deployed jar file.

Making configuration easier I'd prefer the the 'New Features for the
spring configurator' and introduce a new bean just containing the
configuration data for a pool which implementing a specific (helper)
interface. Thus everybody can add his own threadpool configuration.
The RunnableManager then will create thread pools for all found beans
implementing this (helper) interface.

Configuration could then look as following:

 bean name=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.RunnableManager
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager
scope=singleton init-method=init destroy-method=destroy
property name=threadFactory
value=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultThreadFactory/
property name=threadPools
configurator:bean-map
type=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig /
/property
/bean


bean
id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/default
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
   property name=name value=default/
   property name=priority value=NORM/
   property name=daemon value=false/
   property name=queue-size value=-1/
   property name=max-pool-size value=5/
   property name=min-pool-size value=5/
   property name=keep-alive-time-ms value=6/
   property name=block-policy value=ABORT/
   property name=shutdown-graceful value=false/
   property name=shutdown-wait-time-ms value=-1/
/bean

bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/daemon
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/MyPool
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


I will write a patch if I'm not the only one having this problem and I
get a positive feedback on this.

Regards
Felix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF7A3B2lZVCB08qHERAqy6AJwOENR7A+FhZWIEok1APe+hOk6oMgCfbsi9
tZT41dnSlTyv3P+4QN3C10Q=
=Q/E6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Sending CLA

2007-03-05 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:

Grzegorz Kossakowski napisał(a):

Hello,

I'm trying to figure out how to send CLA electronically as Vadim 
mentioned earlier[1]. I've tried to seek for instructions explaining 
in detail requirements and procedure but with no luck.


I would like to kindly ask you for some information about. Especially:
1. Is e-mail signed by Thawte digital signature is sufficient?
2. What is expected resolution of scanned documents?

If nobody comes with solution I'll try to find some fax machine.
Ok, I was not patient enough and found fax machine. It wonders me how 
long I'll have to wait now...


Your CLA has been recorded. Next step - nominator should fire an email to create 
your account.


Vadim


Re: Sending CLA

2007-03-05 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom

Vadim Gritsenko skrev:

Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:

Grzegorz Kossakowski napisał(a):

Hello,

I'm trying to figure out how to send CLA electronically as Vadim 
mentioned earlier[1]. I've tried to seek for instructions explaining 
in detail requirements and procedure but with no luck.


I would like to kindly ask you for some information about. Especially:
1. Is e-mail signed by Thawte digital signature is sufficient?
2. What is expected resolution of scanned documents?

If nobody comes with solution I'll try to find some fax machine.
Ok, I was not patient enough and found fax machine. It wonders me how 
long I'll have to wait now...


Your CLA has been recorded. Next step - nominator should fire an email 
to create your account.
Yes, I'll do that as soon as Grzegorz gives his preferred user id and 
forward email address.


/Daniel



Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Ralph Goers



Andrew Savory wrote:


Please cast your votes.


+1


Strange behaviour during test phase

2007-03-05 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
While trying to build trunk with the allblocks profile I came across
something strange. When invoked from the top level directory, the unit
tests in the repository-impl block fail while an invocation of mvn in
the cocoon-repository directory runs the tests without any problems.

Any clue?

Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Andrew Savory wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

Please cast your votes.


+1

Vadim


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Jason Johnston

Andrew Savory wrote:

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.
Please cast your votes.


+1


Re: Sending CLA

2007-03-05 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski

Daniel Fagerstrom napisał(a):
Yes, I'll do that as soon as Grzegorz gives his preferred user id and 
forward email address.


I'm sorry, I missed your request for this information. Sending it now on 
priv.


--
Grzegorz Kossakowski


Re: Strange behaviour during test phase

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

While trying to build trunk with the allblocks profile I came across
something strange. When invoked from the top level directory, the unit
tests in the repository-impl block fail while an invocation of mvn in
the cocoon-repository directory runs the tests without any problems.

Any clue?


Are there any tests that load resources from the filesystem? If yes that could 
be the cause for this behaviour because the $basedir variable always resolves to 
the JVM working directory.


--
Reinhard Pötz   Independent Consultant, Trainer  (IT)-Coach 


{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

   web(log): http://www.poetz.cc



___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Peter Hunsberger

On 3/5/07, Andrew Savory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.



+1

--
Peter Hunsberger


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Leszek Gawron

Andrew Savory wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006, and as well as 
a steady stream of bug reports and patches, he is busy answering 
questions on the users list and engaging in discussions on the dev list.


He's been lively at recent GetTogethers, and he is also showing a 
willingness to contribute to the value of the community by talking at 
Apachecon Europe this year.


Please cast your votes.

+1, welcome!

--
Leszek Gawron http://www.mobilebox.pl/krs.html
CTO at MobileBox Ltd.



RE: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Ard Schrijvers

 
 Please cast your votes.

my unbiased +1!!

Ard

 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Andrew.
 --
 Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
 Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658  Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
 Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
 Sourcesense: http://www.sourcesense.com/
 
 
 


Re: Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

Felix Knecht wrote:

I wonder how to create/add my own configuration for the
RunnableManager. At the moment, the given configuration is included in
the deployed jar file (having configured 2 pools (default,daemon)).
Changing this configuration seems not that easy as I need to 'patch'
the existing configuration in the deployed jar file.

Making configuration easier I'd prefer the the 'New Features for the
spring configurator' and introduce a new bean just containing the
configuration data for a pool which implementing a specific (helper)
interface. Thus everybody can add his own threadpool configuration.
The RunnableManager then will create thread pools for all found beans
implementing this (helper) interface.

Configuration could then look as following:

 bean name=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.RunnableManager
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager
scope=singleton init-method=init destroy-method=destroy
property name=threadFactory
value=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultThreadFactory/
property name=threadPools
configurator:bean-map
type=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig /
/property
/bean


bean
id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/default
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
   property name=name value=default/
   property name=priority value=NORM/
   property name=daemon value=false/
   property name=queue-size value=-1/
   property name=max-pool-size value=5/
   property name=min-pool-size value=5/
   property name=keep-alive-time-ms value=6/
   property name=block-policy value=ABORT/
   property name=shutdown-graceful value=false/
   property name=shutdown-wait-time-ms value=-1/
/bean

bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/daemon
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/MyPool
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


I will write a patch if I'm not the only one having this problem and I
get a positive feedback on this.


This looks like a sensible approach to me. +1

Vadim



Re: Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Felix Knecht

Thanks Vadim, I'll go on with this.

IIRC the interfaces of the core block are stable(freezed) because of 
RC1. Therefor I'm going to introduce a new RunnableManager called 
ConfigurableRunnableManager which is heavy based on the 
DefaultRunnableManager (otherwise I'd need to change the bean 
configuration/interface of the DefaultRunnableManager).


Felix



Felix Knecht wrote:

I wonder how to create/add my own configuration for the
RunnableManager. At the moment, the given configuration is included in
the deployed jar file (having configured 2 pools (default,daemon)).
Changing this configuration seems not that easy as I need to 'patch'
the existing configuration in the deployed jar file.

Making configuration easier I'd prefer the the 'New Features for the
spring configurator' and introduce a new bean just containing the
configuration data for a pool which implementing a specific (helper)
interface. Thus everybody can add his own threadpool configuration.
The RunnableManager then will create thread pools for all found beans
implementing this (helper) interface.

Configuration could then look as following:

 bean name=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.RunnableManager

class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultRunnableManager

scope=singleton init-method=init destroy-method=destroy
property name=threadFactory
value=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.DefaultThreadFactory/
property name=threadPools
configurator:bean-map
type=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig /
/property
/bean


bean
id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/default
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
   property name=name value=default/
   property name=priority value=NORM/
   property name=daemon value=false/
   property name=queue-size value=-1/
   property name=max-pool-size value=5/
   property name=min-pool-size value=5/
   property name=keep-alive-time-ms value=6/
   property name=block-policy value=ABORT/
   property name=shutdown-graceful value=false/
   property name=shutdown-wait-time-ms value=-1/
/bean

bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/daemon
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/MyPool
class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
snip /
/bean


I will write a patch if I'm not the only one having this problem and I
get a positive feedback on this.


This looks like a sensible approach to me. +1

Vadim





Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke

On 05.03.2007 09:19, Andrew Savory wrote:


I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.


+1, welcome.

Jörg


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Jorg Heymans

Andrew Savory wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.



+1


Jorg



[vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Felix Knecht wrote:

 I will write a patch ...

I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them himself. I 
want to propose Felix as a committer. Felix has been part of this community for 
more than 6! years. Recently he has provided about 10 patches which prove that 
he has a good unerstanding of how Cocoon works. And, as I was told, he was the 
initial author of the LDAPTransformer.


Please cast your votes!

--
Reinhard


___ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Felix Knecht wrote:

  I will write a patch ...

I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them 
himself. I want to propose Felix as a committer. Felix has been part of 
this community for more than 6! years. Recently he has provided about 10 
patches which prove that he has a good unerstanding of how Cocoon works. 
And, as I was told, he was the initial author of the LDAPTransformer.


Please cast your votes!


+1

--
Reinhard


Re: Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Felix Knecht wrote:

Thanks Vadim, I'll go on with this.

IIRC the interfaces of the core block are stable(freezed) because of 
RC1. 


No, they will be freezed *after* RC1 was released. (At least that's my 
understanding.)


--
Reinhard Pötz   Independent Consultant, Trainer  (IT)-Coach 


{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}

   web(log): http://www.poetz.cc



Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Antonio Gallardo

Andrew Savory escribió:

Hi,

I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

+1

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo



Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On 3/5/07, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


...I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them 
himself. I
want to propose Felix as a committer...


Enthusiastic +1 !

-Bertrand


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory napisał(a):
 Hi,

 I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.

 Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006, and as well
 as a steady stream of bug reports and patches, he is busy answering
 questions on the users list and engaging in discussions on the dev list.

 He's been lively at recent GetTogethers, and he is also showing a
 willingness to contribute to the value of the community by talking at
 Apachecon Europe this year.

 Please cast your votes.

+100

(100 factor for the activity on users list)


-- 
Grzegorz Kossakowski


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz napisał(a):
 Felix Knecht wrote:

  I will write a patch ...

 I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them
 himself. I want to propose Felix as a committer. Felix has been part
 of this community for more than 6! years. Recently he has provided
 about 10 patches which prove that he has a good unerstanding of how
 Cocoon works. And, as I was told, he was the initial author of the
 LDAPTransformer.

 Please cast your votes!

without any hesitation, +1 and welcome!

-- 
Grzegorz Kossakowski


Re: Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Felix Knecht

Reinhard Poetz schrieb:

Felix Knecht wrote:

Thanks Vadim, I'll go on with this.

IIRC the interfaces of the core block are stable(freezed) because of RC1. 


No, they will be freezed *after* RC1 was released. (At least that's my 
understanding.)




If the API isn't freezed yet I suggest to change it.

Felix


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Peter Hunsberger

On 3/5/07, Reinhard Poetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them himself. I
want to propose Felix as a committer.


+1

--
Peter Hunsberger


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke

On 05.03.2007 20:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:


I want to propose Felix as a committer.


+1 and welcome.

Jörg


RE: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Ard Schrijvers
 
 Please cast your votes!

+1!

Ard

 
 --
 Reinhard
 
   
 ___ 
 Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: 
 http://messenger.yahoo.de
 


[jira] Created: (COCOON-2019) Make DefaultRunnableManager custom configurable

2007-03-05 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)
Make DefaultRunnableManager custom configurable
---

 Key: COCOON-2019
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2019
 Project: Cocoon
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: * Cocoon Core
Affects Versions: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
Reporter: Felix Knecht
 Fix For: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
 Attachments: DefaultRunnableManager.diff

Introduce data beans for configuration of the DefaultRunnableManager. This will 
give the chance to add customized configurations without the need of patch the 
configuration deployed with the jar file.
The new way of configuration uses a bean-map to get the configurations - Every 
bean implementing the interface 
''org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfiguration will be taken as 
single thread-pool configuration. The two (already existing) configurations 
default, daemon will still be deployed with the jar.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (COCOON-2019) Make DefaultRunnableManager custom configurable

2007-03-05 Thread Felix Knecht (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Felix Knecht updated COCOON-2019:
-

Attachment: DefaultRunnableManager.diff

The patch

 Make DefaultRunnableManager custom configurable
 ---

 Key: COCOON-2019
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2019
 Project: Cocoon
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: * Cocoon Core
Affects Versions: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
Reporter: Felix Knecht
 Fix For: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)

 Attachments: DefaultRunnableManager.diff


 Introduce data beans for configuration of the DefaultRunnableManager. This 
 will give the chance to add customized configurations without the need of 
 patch the configuration deployed with the jar file.
 The new way of configuration uses a bean-map to get the configurations - 
 Every bean implementing the interface 
 ''org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfiguration will be taken 
 as single thread-pool configuration. The two (already existing) 
 configurations default, daemon will still be deployed with the jar.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Savory

Hi,

On 5 Mar 2007, at 19:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:


Please cast your votes!


A huge +1. Welcome aboard, Felix!


Thanks,

Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory, Managing Director, Luminas Limited
Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658  Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Web: http://www.luminas.co.uk/
Sourcesense: http://www.sourcesense.com/






Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread David Crossley
Andrew Savory wrote:
 
 Please cast your votes.

+1

-David


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread David Crossley
Reinhard Poetz wrote:
 
 Please cast your votes!

+1

-David


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Andrew Savory andrew at luminas.co.uk writes:

 I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.
 
 Jeroen has been active on the lists since September 2006

Wondering about this short time I had a look into the archives. And so, just for
the records: Jeroen has been active quite regularly since November 2003:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=10686344733r=1w=4 (Nov 2003 - Apr 2004)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=10820541843r=3w=4 (Apr 2004, Aug 2004 -
Mar 2007)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=10949040572r=5w=4 (Sep 2004, Sep 2005 -
Mar 2007)

Jörg



Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Antonio Gallardo

Reinhard Poetz escribió:

Felix Knecht wrote:

 I will write a patch ...

I want to propose Felix as a committer.

+1

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo



Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Jason Johnston

Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Felix Knecht wrote:

  I will write a patch ...

I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them 
himself. I want to propose Felix as a committer. Felix has been part of 
this community for more than 6! years. Recently he has provided about 10 
patches which prove that he has a good unerstanding of how Cocoon works. 
And, as I was told, he was the initial author of the LDAPTransformer.


Please cast your votes!


+1


Re: [vote] Jeroen Reijn as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 05 March 2007 16:19, Andrew Savory wrote:

 I'd like to propose Jeroen Reijn as a Cocoon committer.


+1. Welcome!

Cheers
Niclas


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 03:38, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

+1 Welcome

Cheers
Niclas


Re: SVN Source for Cocoon

2007-03-05 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 05 March 2007 17:49, Lars Trieloff wrote:
 Hi Reinhard,

  - SVN source:
  a source that reads a local subversion repository and provides the
  content, supports revisions etc. (read-only)
  http://www.mindquarry.org/repos/mindquarry-workspace/trunk/
  mindquarry-dma-source/
 
  how to you access SVN? Are you using a ASL-compatible base library?
  (http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html)

 We access SVN through the means of a Spring Bean. This Bean acts
 either as a wrapper to Subversion's native JavaHL API, which
 unfortunately requires native code or to SVNKit, which is not ASL-
 compatible. So while I see not much chances of integrating this into
 Cocoon, it sill might be interesting for projects using coocoon.

How does Maven2 access SVN remote repositories?? Doesn't whatever they use be 
able to help out in this case?


Cheers
Niclas


Re: [vote] Felix Knecht as a new Cocoon committer

2007-03-05 Thread Ralph Goers



Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Felix Knecht wrote:

 I will write a patch ...

I think that Felix shouldn't write patches any longer but commit them 
himself. I want to propose Felix as a committer. Felix has been part 
of this community for more than 6! years. Recently he has provided 
about 10 patches which prove that he has a good unerstanding of how 
Cocoon works. And, as I was told, he was the initial author of the 
LDAPTransformer.


Please cast your votes!



+1

Ralph


cocoon.processPipelineTo()

2007-03-05 Thread Mark Lundquist

Hi,

I seem to remember from a long time ago, some mention of something that 
could be used in place of processPipelineTo().  Something that might 
have been better, or... not sure.  Anyway, does this ring any bells?  
I can't seem to find the reference now...


best regards,
—ml—



Re: Configuration of RunnableManager

2007-03-05 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Felix

Felix Knecht wrote:
 I wonder how to create/add my own configuration for the
 RunnableManager. At the moment, the given configuration is included in
 the deployed jar file (having configured 2 pools (default,daemon)).
 Changing this configuration seems not that easy as I need to 'patch'
 the existing configuration in the deployed jar file.
 
 Making configuration easier I'd prefer the the 'New Features for the
 spring configurator' and introduce a new bean just containing the
 configuration data for a pool which implementing a specific (helper)
 interface. Thus everybody can add his own threadpool configuration.
 The RunnableManager then will create thread pools for all found beans
 implementing this (helper) interface.

I'd suggest instead of only breaking out the configuration of a thread pool, 
break out the hole
thread pool itself into a bean. This would reduce the complexity of the 
RunnableManager and would
make the ThreadPool beans have a little more responsability than just holding 
config values.

WDYT?

Ciao

 configurator:bean-map
 type=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig /
 /property
 /bean
 
 
 bean
 id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/default
 class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
property name=name value=default/
property name=priority value=NORM/
property name=daemon value=false/
property name=queue-size value=-1/
property name=max-pool-size value=5/
property name=min-pool-size value=5/
property name=keep-alive-time-ms value=6/
property name=block-policy value=ABORT/
property name=shutdown-graceful value=false/
property name=shutdown-wait-time-ms value=-1/
 /bean
 
 bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/daemon
 class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
 snip /
 /bean
 
 
 bean id=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfig/MyPool
 class=org.apache.cocoon.components.thread.ThreadPoolConfigImpl
 snip /
 /bean
 
 
 I will write a patch if I'm not the only one having this problem and I
 get a positive feedback on this.
 
 Regards
 Felix
 

- --
Otego AG  Tel:   +41 (0)1  240 00 55
Giacomo Pati, CTO Mobile:+41 (0)79 262 21 04
Apache Software Foundation Member Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hohlstrasse 216   Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CH-8004 Zuerich   http://www.otego.com

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7RPpLNdJvZjjVZARAmaxAKCu16RwJP9CiPDZ3NzH1a7buxiBpwCcCOmT
1uWov1o/rgnNy8f6guqeKss=
=1ozv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-