On 14.12.2009 09:33, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Joerg Heinickejoerg.heini...@gmx.de wrote:
A long time ago I argued for renaming the FileGenerator to XMLGenerator
since the generators are usually named after the input they accept (Midi,
HTML, Directory, JSP, JXTemplate, etc.). I'm not sure SAXGenerator reflects
that exactly but it's good enough I guess.
I agree that we should have one consistent naming scheme and since we
usually use the input type, we shouldn't change it for this case.
I see two solutions in order to get a consistent naming of our components:
a) We rename SAXGenerator AND StAXGenerator to XMLGenerator
or
b) We add the SAX prefix to all pipeline components.
I'm in favor of a) because SAX or StAX is already part of the package
name and looking at the implemented interfaces makes it clear what
underlying event mechanism is used.
I agree with your reasoning.
Regards,
Joerg
