Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Vadim Gritsenko

On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:


On 16.02.2008, at 17:12, Reinhard Poetz wrote:

After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl'  
means, I propose to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application  
which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web  
application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage  
of the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it  
'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I  
think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing.  
If we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut  
'cocoon:wb'.


wrap-block ??? Hm ...I cannot really see how that is much better -  
sorry ;)


What about cocoon:webapp-loader


cocoon:reloader (shorter), or cocoon:webapp-reloader (more descriptive)

Vadim


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 08:16 -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
 On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
 
  On 16.02.2008, at 17:12, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
 
  After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl'  
  means, I propose to change it to some better name.
 
  The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application  
  which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web  
  application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage  
  of the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it  
  'cocoon:rcl'.
 
  I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I  
  think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing.  
  If we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut  
  'cocoon:wb'.
 
  wrap-block ??? Hm ...I cannot really see how that is much better -  
  sorry ;)
 
  What about cocoon:webapp-loader
 
 cocoon:reloader (shorter), or cocoon:webapp-reloader (more descriptive)

cocoon:loader

salu2
-- 
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java  consulting, training and solutions



Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Felix Knecht

Reinhard Poetz schrieb:


After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl' means, I 
propose to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application 
which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web 
application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage of 
the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it 
'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I 
think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing. If 
we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut 'cocoon:wb'.


WDOT? Other proposals?


cocoon:run

My 2 cents
Felix


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Felix Knecht wrote:

Reinhard Poetz schrieb:


After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl' means, I 
propose to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application 
which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web 
application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage of 
the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it 
'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I 
think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing. If 
we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut 'cocoon:wb'.


WDOT? Other proposals?


cocoon:run


Actually it doesn't run the block but only creates the environment (i.e. a web 
application that wraps a block) for it.


--
Reinhard PötzManaging Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
  http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Thorsten Scherler wrote:

cocoon:loader


For me the best suggestion so far. But what do native speaker feel when they 
read/enter this? Does it sound natural?


Think that you usually enter

mvn cocoon:loader jetty:run

when you want to run a block.

--
Reinhard PötzManaging Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
  http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:

What about cocoon:webapp-loader


cocoon:reloader (shorter), or cocoon:webapp-reloader (more descriptive)


That this goal supports the usage of a reloading classloader is just a feature 
but (at least in trunk) configureable. Hence I'm not that enthusiastic about 
loader or reloader.


... or am I too picky?

--
Reinhard PötzManaging Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
  http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Torsten Curdt


On 20.02.2008, at 15:50, Reinhard Poetz wrote:


Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:

What about cocoon:webapp-loader
cocoon:reloader (shorter), or cocoon:webapp-reloader (more  
descriptive)


That this goal supports the usage of a reloading classloader is  
just a feature but (at least in trunk) configureable. Hence I'm not  
that enthusiastic about loader or reloader.


... or am I too picky?


No ...I was thinking the same :) ...which is why I would think  
'cocoon:loader' (not reloader) would be OK. On the other hand this  
looks quite consistent:


 mvn cocoon:run jetty:run

It might be technically not really correct but looks nice and  
straight forward. Think users might like that.


cheers
--
Torsten


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Jason Johnston

Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Felix Knecht wrote:

Reinhard Poetz schrieb:


After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl' means, 
I propose to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application 
which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web 
application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage of 
the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it 
'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I 
think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing. If 
we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut 
'cocoon:wb'.


WDOT? Other proposals?


cocoon:run


Actually it doesn't run the block but only creates the environment (i.e. 
a web application that wraps a block) for it.




cocoon:package
cocoon:assemble

(Though package has a specific connotation in the Maven world of 
creating a jar/war/etc. ... does this goal do that as well?)


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Rainer Pruy
Then

cocoon:prepare

or (more verbose)

cocoon:prepare-run

does sound appropriate

Jason Johnston schrieb:
 Reinhard Poetz wrote:
 Felix Knecht wrote:
 Reinhard Poetz schrieb:

 After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl' means,
 I propose to change it to some better name.

 The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application
 which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web
 application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage of
 the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it
 'cocoon:rcl'.

 I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I
 think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing. If
 we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut
 'cocoon:wb'.

 WDOT? Other proposals?

 cocoon:run

 Actually it doesn't run the block but only creates the environment
 (i.e. a web application that wraps a block) for it.

 
 cocoon:package
 cocoon:assemble
 
 (Though package has a specific connotation in the Maven world of
 creating a jar/war/etc. ... does this goal do that as well?)


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 16:19 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
 On 20.02.2008, at 15:50, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
 
  Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
  On Feb 16, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
  What about cocoon:webapp-loader
  cocoon:reloader (shorter), or cocoon:webapp-reloader (more  
  descriptive)
 
  That this goal supports the usage of a reloading classloader is  
  just a feature but (at least in trunk) configureable. Hence I'm not  
  that enthusiastic about loader or reloader.
 
  ... or am I too picky?
 
 No ...I was thinking the same :) ...which is why I would think  
 'cocoon:loader' (not reloader) would be OK. 

Maybe even shorter and c-64 style: ;)

mvn cocoon:load jetty:run

salu2
-- 
Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org
Open Source Java  consulting, training and solutions



Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Reinhard Poetz

Thorsten Scherler wrote:

Maybe even shorter and c-64 style: ;)

mvn cocoon:load jetty:run


after reading all the mails again, here are my two favorits:

mvn cocoon:load jetty:run
mvn cocoon:prepare jetty:run

WDOT?

--
Reinhard PötzManaging Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
  http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Reinhard Poetz pisze:
 Thorsten Scherler wrote:
 Maybe even shorter and c-64 style: ;)

 mvn cocoon:load jetty:run
 
 after reading all the mails again, here are my two favorits:
 
 mvn cocoon:load jetty:run
 mvn cocoon:prepare jetty:run
 
 WDOT?

+1 for cocoon:prepare provided it helps people...

Grzegorz


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-20 Thread Joerg Heinicke

On 20.02.2008 12:47, Reinhard Poetz wrote:


mvn cocoon:load jetty:run


after reading all the mails again, here are my two favorits:

mvn cocoon:load jetty:run
mvn cocoon:prepare jetty:run


Considering your explanation [1] I slightly prefer cocoon:prepare.

Joerg

[1] http://marc.info/?l=xml-cocoon-devm=120351863516460w=4


Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-16 Thread Reinhard Poetz


After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl' means, I propose 
to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application which wraps 
the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web application in a web container. 
Additionally it enables the usage of the reloading classloader (commons-jci) 
which made me name it 'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I think it's 
closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing. If we want to keep the 
name short, we could even add a shortcut 'cocoon:wb'.


WDOT? Other proposals?

--
Reinhard PötzManaging Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
  http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_


Re: Rename cocoon:rcl to cocoon:wrap-block

2008-02-16 Thread Torsten Curdt


On 16.02.2008, at 17:12, Reinhard Poetz wrote:



After having seen quite a few people wonder what 'cocoon:rcl'  
means, I propose to change it to some better name.


The general idea is that this Maven goal creates a web application  
which wraps the block and makes it runable as a 'normal' web  
application in a web container. Additionally it enables the usage  
of the reloading classloader (commons-jci) which made me name it  
'cocoon:rcl'.


I propose to use 'cocoon:wrap-block' instead. Though it's longer I  
think it's closer to the actual meaning and hence less confusing.  
If we want to keep the name short, we could even add a shortcut  
'cocoon:wb'.


wrap-block ??? Hm ...I cannot really see how that is much better -  
sorry ;)


What about cocoon:webapp-loader

cheers
--
Torsten