Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hello Uwe,

2015-11-21 13:21 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel :

> Java 1.6 would be old enough I think.
>
> But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema.
> So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change.
>

Are you referring to SemVer here? I'm not sure it contains any rules about
changes to the platform a component is running on. From an API PoV we won't
break anything.


> How will it handled in other Commons with projects two digit version
> schema?
>

Usually only have three digit versions when we release a bugfix. So we
start with for example 1.0, then release 1.1 and 1.2 and if we need to
bugfix 1.2 that will become 1.2.1. Maybe it would be better to have three
digit versions all the way around.


>
> Maybe should be used: http://www.mojohaus.org/animal-sniffer/


Doesn't work with Java < 1.5 :-(

Benedikt


>
>
> -- Uwe
>
>
> > On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:50, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the
> build
> > is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my
> machine,
> > so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't
> see
> > a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Benedikt
> >
> > --
> > http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> > http://github.com/britter
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Re: [VOTE] Release NET 3.4 based on RC2

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hello sebb,

I'm getting a difference when comparing the src archive with the tag:

$ diff -rwq commons-net-3.4-src NET_3_4_RC1/
Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: .svn
Only in NET_3_4_RC1/: doap_net.rdf
Files
commons-net-3.4-src/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/smtp/SimpleSMTPHeaderTestCase.java
and
NET_3_4_RC1/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/net/smtp/SimpleSMTPHeaderTestCase.java
differ

looks like something related to line breaks. Don't know why it only shows
up for SimpleSMTPHeaderTestCase.

Everything else looks good to me. I've build with Java 6,7 and 8. Net 3.4
can not be build with Java 9 EA because source option 1.5 has been removed.

+1

Benedikt

2015-11-19 14:09 GMT+01:00 sebb :

> It's probably about time to release NET.
> There have been quite a few improvements and fixes since the last version.
>
> ==
>
> Net 3.4 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/net/ (svn revision
> 11241)
>
>
> ./binaries/commons-net-3.4-bin.tar.gz.sha1:88411522395b4000b038a94ab007be89ebda2ec3
>
> ./binaries/commons-net-3.4-bin.zip.sha1:f252a45b1610346116c9dd966fec9a15171223d1
>
> ./source/commons-net-3.4-src.tar.gz.sha1:abfba84427a06341e113d59d8f75855e67093087
>
> ./source/commons-net-3.4-src.zip.sha1:f3b38dfcccd8fcdc9ac500a5f8580a19817b
>
>   Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1120/commons-net/commons-net/3.4/
>
> These are the artifacts and their hashes
>
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-test-sources.jar
> (SHA1: fdb74119054a2aacc134c56137660d7a0a40e4a8)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-javadoc.jar
> (SHA1: b882750c8dbd480e2b9afd357dcf71d962f2fa03)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-ftp.jar
> (SHA1: 6fc585e5f3dc8333b20110af22a8bae59f5246cb)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-tests.jar
> (SHA1: ce44ebc0e7be56c3bd650700be93c5b377b47573)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4.pom
> (SHA1: d1790447a41c848af8cba0919fae7a577fbc744a)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4.jar
> (SHA1: 5e984db9554728564d58e90da5d90eff8ae8cf2d)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-sources.jar
> (SHA1: 08439b8f20d7bdec502423732798a639501732c8)
> /commons-net/commons-net/3.4/commons-net-3.4-examples.jar
> (SHA1: 33abb13d790501fc9e4e77a40425bc381d39b9ca)
>
>   Details of changes since 3.3 are in the release notes:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/net/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.4-RC2/changes-report.html
>
>   I have tested this with JDK 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 using maven3.
>
>   The tag is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_3_4_RC2/
> (svn 1715166)
>   N.B. the SVN revision is required because SVN tags are not immutable.
>
>   Site:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.4-RC2/
>   (note some *relative* links are broken and the 3.4 directories are
>   not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
>
>   download_net.cgi does not work, but the template can be checked at
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.4-RC2/download_net.html
>
>   Clirr Report (compared to 3.3):
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.4-RC2/clirr-report.html
>
>   Note that adding methods to an interface is binary-compatible, but
> not source-compatible
>   This change is documented in the Release Notes
>
>   RAT Report:
> http://people.apache.org/~sebb/net-3.4-RC2/rat-report.html
>
>   KEYS:
>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>
>   Please review the release candidate and vote.
>   This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after
> 14:00 GMT 22-Nov 2015
>
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>   Thanks!
>
>   Sebb
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

[Gary Gregory]

I'd go with Java 7.

Gary
On Nov 21, 2015 3:50 AM, "Benedikt Ritter"  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build
> is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine,
> so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't see
> a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.
>
> Thoughts?
> Benedikt
>
> --
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter
>

Re: Eirik Bjørsnøs' notsoserial deserialization protection agent, for Commons?

[Torsten Curdt]

>
> 1) Is notsoserial a "great solution" or a "useful solution" in mitigating
> the problem of promiscuous deserialization?
>

Useful? Certainly


2) Is it a "better" solution than IO-487?
>

Not sure - but does that really matter? It has a broader scope.


3) Is it in the interest of Commons and the community at large to accept a
> donation of this code and include it under its umbrella?
>

I bet we would be fine to accept it.

While this community is great, it does not mean you couldn't also build a
micro community around it on github.
I think it really depends if you are willing to take the extra step towards
the ASF.

cheers,
Torsten

commons-io 2.5 RC1 tomorrow

[Kristian Rosenvold]

I've been through the latest changes on the
ValidatingObjectInputStream and I think they look good.

RC1 vote starts in approx 20 hrs, if anyone else wants to take a final look.

Kristian

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [COLLECTIONS] Release road map for 4.1

[Thomas Neidhart]

On 11/21/2015 11:45 AM, Uwe Barthel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1?

the plan is to start the release process tomorrow.

There is only one issue open that needs to be resolved for a 4.1
release, and I am working on it.

Thomas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JXPath] duplicate JIRA

[Benedikt Ritter]

2015-11-21 9:39 GMT+01:00 Uwe Barthel :

> Hi,
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified
> duplicate of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED).
>
> Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item.
>

Done. Thank you!

Benedikt


>
> -- Uwe
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

Re: [JXPath] Pull requests available

[Benedikt Ritter]

I'll take care of pushing out a new release after I've reviewed the
proposed changes.

Benedikt

2015-11-21 2:27 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :

> Thank you Uwe.
>
> The next step here is to get a release manager to volunteer. Anyone?
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Uwe Barthel  wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’ve opened the first 3 pull requests for JXPath.
> > All of these are patches or tests attached on JIRA items.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-118
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-160
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-177
> >
> > Maybe merge the pull requests provided by eleumik too.
> > -- Uwe
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> 
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition 
> Spring Batch in Action 
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

[COLLECTIONS] Release road map for 4.1

[Uwe Barthel]

Hi,

How is the road map for the 4.1 release or is there a plan to provide 4.0.1?

-- Uwe



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [JXPATH] Java Version

[Uwe Barthel]

Java 1.6 would be old enough I think.

But, JXPath doesn't follow the three digit version schema.
So any change of Java dependency may should force a major change.
How will it handled in other Commons with projects two digit version schema?

Maybe should be used: http://www.mojohaus.org/animal-sniffer/ 

-- Uwe


> On 21 Nov 2015, at 12:50, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build
> is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine,
> so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't see
> a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Benedikt
> 
> -- 
> http://people.apache.org/~britter/
> http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
> http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
> http://github.com/britter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[JXPATH] Java Version

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hi,

any preference on which Java Version JXPath 1.4 target? Currently the build
is set to 1.3. I've only Java 1.6, 1.7 1.8 and 1.9 installed on my machine,
so I won't be able to test with 1.3, 1.4 and 1.5. Further more I don't see
a reason to keep support for such old Java versions.

Thoughts?
Benedikt

-- 
http://people.apache.org/~britter/
http://www.systemoutprintln.de/
http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter
http://github.com/britter

[JXPath] duplicate JIRA

[Uwe Barthel]

Hi,

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-170 (OPEN) is a verified duplicate 
of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-142 (RESOLVED).

Please mark JXPATH-170 as fixed or close this item.

-- Uwe
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org