Re: [Numbers] Outdated branches

2019-01-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Eric.

Le mar. 8 janv. 2019 à 19:05, Eric Barnhill  a écrit :
>
> I use fraction-dev for Fraction and complex-dev for Complex. cis-method,
> complex-constructors, eb-test were all I believe side branches I used for
> testing but did  not delete.

If you don't need any of those branches anymore, I think that you could
delete them.
I guess that, unless there is some large task where for which several
people want to work together, it's cleaner to use local branches and/or
GitHub.

Regards,
Gilles

>
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:39 AM Gilles Sadowski  wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Command
> >   $ git branch -a
> > shows several stale (?) branches:
> > ---CUT---
> >   remotes/origin/cis-method
> >   remotes/origin/complex-constructors
> >   remotes/origin/complex-dev
> >   remotes/origin/eb-test
> >   remotes/origin/feature__NUMBERS-69__autodiff
> >   remotes/origin/fraction-dev
> >   remotes/origin/hypot-change
> >   remotes/origin/master
> >   remotes/origin/multimodule
> >   remotes/origin/null-removal
> >   remotes/origin/numbers-56-bugfix
> >   remotes/origin/remove-nan-returns
> >   remotes/origin/task_NUMBERS-33__Gamma
> > ---CUT---
> >
> > Let's have a list of which are being used for development and
> > which could be deleted.
> > [I mean: Is there anyone who uses one of those as "upstream"?]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gilles

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

2019-01-09 Thread Matt Benson
[weaver] has already been migrated to gitbox. I see on review that the
website still reflects svn. I'll add that to my OSS TODO list.

Other than that, +1

Matt

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019, 10:33 AM Rob Tompkins  Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox."
>
> I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated:
>
> bcel/
> beanutils/
> bsf/
> chain/
> codec/
> commons-parent/
> commons-skin (???)
> commons-configuration/
> daemon/
> digester/
> email/
> exec/
> functor/
> jci/
> jcs/
> jelly/
> jexl/
> jxpath/
> logging/ (???)
> net/
> ognl/
> proxy/
> validator/
> vfs/
> weaver/
>
> I’m not quite sure if this list is complete. It would be good to have
> someone come behind me to check the list. After this vote my plan is to
> work peace meal through the repositories and move them up to gitbox.
>
> Cheers,
> -Rob
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

2019-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
Sweet!
And thank you.
Gary

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 09:59 Rob Tompkins  I forgot to put a 72 hour window on this [LAZY][VOTE], so I will do so
> beginning now.
>
> -Rob
>
> > On Jan 8, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Rob Tompkins  wrote:
> >
> > Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox."
> >
> > I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated:
> >
> > bcel/
> > beanutils/
> > bsf/
> > chain/
> > codec/
> > commons-parent/
> > commons-skin (???)
> > commons-configuration/
> > daemon/
> > digester/
> > email/
> > exec/
> > functor/
> > jci/
> > jcs/
> > jelly/
> > jexl/
> > jxpath/
> > logging/ (???)
> > net/
> > ognl/
> > proxy/
> > validator/
> > vfs/
> > weaver/
> >
> > I’m not quite sure if this list is complete. It would be good to have
> someone come behind me to check the list. After this vote my plan is to
> work peace meal through the repositories and move them up to gitbox.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Rob
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

2019-01-09 Thread Rob Tompkins
I forgot to put a 72 hour window on this [LAZY][VOTE], so I will do so 
beginning now.

-Rob

> On Jan 8, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Rob Tompkins  wrote:
> 
> Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox."
> 
> I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated:
> 
> bcel/
> beanutils/
> bsf/
> chain/
> codec/
> commons-parent/
> commons-skin (???)
> commons-configuration/
> daemon/
> digester/
> email/
> exec/
> functor/
> jci/
> jcs/
> jelly/
> jexl/
> jxpath/
> logging/ (???)
> net/
> ognl/
> proxy/
> validator/
> vfs/
> weaver/
> 
> I’m not quite sure if this list is complete. It would be good to have someone 
> come behind me to check the list. After this vote my plan is to work peace 
> meal through the repositories and move them up to gitbox.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Rob


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

2019-01-09 Thread Oliver Heger
+1

Oliver

Am 08.01.19 um 17:25 schrieb Rob Tompkins:
> Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox."
> 
> I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated:
> 
> bcel/
> beanutils/
> bsf/
> chain/
> codec/
> commons-parent/
> commons-skin (???)
> commons-configuration/
> daemon/
> digester/
> email/
> exec/
> functor/
> jci/
> jcs/
> jelly/
> jexl/
> jxpath/
> logging/ (???)
> net/
> ognl/
> proxy/
> validator/
> vfs/
> weaver/
> 
> I’m not quite sure if this list is complete. It would be good to have someone 
> come behind me to check the list. After this vote my plan is to work peace 
> meal through the repositories and move them up to gitbox.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Rob
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org