[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.11.0 based on RC1

2021-08-08 Thread Gary Gregory
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons Pool 2.10.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons Pool 2.11.0.

Apache Commons Pool 2.11.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1
(svn revision 49387)

The Git tag commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1 commit for this RC is
b94e8bec1a056e2784799cba51c79bc3b801d4cd which you can browse here:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-pool.git;a=commit;h=b94e8bec1a056e2784799cba51c79bc3b801d4cd
You may checkout this tag using:
git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-pool.git
--branch commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1 commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1

Maven artifacts are here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1560/org/apache/commons/commons-pool2/2.11.0/

These are the artifacts and their hashes:

#Release SHA-512s
#Sun Aug 08 17:25:31 EDT 2021
commons-pool2-2.11.0-bin.tar.gz=e3fd5e2841ea5d357b875c2bf669b7f903e0c8914e45bd40ffbfe28ea9fe48a995b0c80a1d4a9e859b8bc9f69c0544701c302bfed6903e5a647a5ae388b17bac
commons-pool2-2.11.0-bin.zip=a9c500bff6d014e0ee0ab49c410e66c3777c55ae94c4490c3125bd7e0bb92ee55fc8067e7d8ecaecd1ac467c201ef1aae3dc73751bfb9bc94ec620dab7f48862
commons-pool2-2.11.0-javadoc.jar=e1c253021b5980bafb4ff11fd2f0dc46752c24d37b6b4b363ddd5ef1c8bd6e70c4b27b0ad95759d2102efb4d3f42128ec248809e11a977a39ebc55f8fd032619
commons-pool2-2.11.0-sources.jar=336ae1927ed517c8168ae3c85dd8b84eb45d46288fba3e64b324accbe07f1b8fd44eded3a5f62c36e0280f444a91a6659722e47149c926a8a4ecdf3bb7a6c53e
commons-pool2-2.11.0-src.tar.gz=1316ed17d3bb11f8fa15733dd79a09c9d117ed2410b2854ce72067fd5ea1ccde5612a2f3246d857d55913ddf81db6c03e94a0d17a05e8bfd11b045c982e3d40a
commons-pool2-2.11.0-src.zip=30686059d9932f75d413cdb93c6333ccbf432dd7864f3075981d1721ee87642c7b481fe84fd1fd3d075acf469f939ad4a753384177cafcd5bd90af722b0c34bb
commons-pool2-2.11.0-test-sources.jar=d983d4a97362cc74bdca1987697e482431e2f84ecc8943b8e1c1cc20a82e889b4d2b5aac57708fbafdcaa00a1fb6f135bd94072c7c956f0275d7a925a27396fc
commons-pool2-2.11.0-tests.jar=62a9b7d5a2f67933d72479efe59974578ed8eaf58a4be449aea6014fe9c0063cb1a7aca974eb45f9e69b4b0b495a01396aedd622a053f8c2d504b6efe64ef61c

I have tested this with

mvn -V -Prelease -Ptest-deploy -P jacoco -P japicmp clean package site deploy

using:

Apache Maven 3.8.1 (05c21c65bdfed0f71a2f2ada8b84da59348c4c5d)
Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.8.1/libexec
Java version: 1.8.0_292, vendor: AdoptOpenJDK, runtime:
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-8.jdk/Contents/Home/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.16", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"

Details of changes since 2.10.0 are in the release notes:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1/site/changes-report.html

Site:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1/site/index.html
(note some *relative* links are broken and the 2.11.0 directories
are not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed.)

JApiCmp Report (compared to 2.10.0):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1/site/japicmp.html

RAT Report:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/2.11.0-RC1/site/rat-report.html

KEYS:
  https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS

Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.

  [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
  [ ] +0 OK, but...
  [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
  [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...

Thank you,

Gary Gregory,
Release Manager (using key 86fdc7e2a11262cb)

For following is intended as a helper and refresher for reviewers.

Validating a release candidate
==

These guidelines are NOT complete.

Requirements: Git, Java, Maven.

You can validate a release from a release candidate (RC) tag as follows.

1) Clone and checkout the RC tag

git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-pool.git
--branch commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1 commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1
cd commons-pool-2.11.0-RC1

2) Check Apache licenses

This step is not required if the site includes a RAT report page which
you then must check.

mvn apache-rat:check

3) Check binary compatibility

Older components still use Apache Clirr:

This step is not required if the site includes a Clirr report page
which you then must check.

mvn clirr:check

Newer components use JApiCmp with the japicmp Maven Profile:

This step is not required if the site includes a JApiCmp report page
which you then must check.

mvn install -DskipTests -P japicmp japicmp:cmp

4) Build the package

mvn -V clean package

You can record the Maven and Java version produced by -V in your VOTE reply.
To gather OS information from a command line:
Windows: ver
Linux: uname -a

5) Build the site for a single module project

Note: Some 

Re: [all] Binaries for example modules

2021-08-08 Thread Alex Herbert
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 04:01, Gilles Sadowski  wrote:

> Le ven. 6 août 2021 à 04:01, Matt Juntunen  a
> écrit :
> >
> > Gilles,
> >
> > > I do _not_ ask any work to be done in order to complicate the release
> > > process and/or review.
> > > My question was (cf. above and the other thread) whether singling out
> > > the "examples" module has any benefit (apart from saving a few bytes
> > > on Maven Central).
> >
> > Yes, I believe it is beneficial. If nothing else, it keeps maven
> > central and the project site uncluttered and reduces the chance of
> > user confusion.
>
> I do not see where the problem is supposed to be (with Maven Central).
> But, either way, it's not worth fighting over it, as long as the examples
> are kept in sync with the code (and this is done at the lastest as part
> of the current release process).  [The counter-example is "Commons
> Math", where the code examples were not kept up to date with the
> main code...]
> For the site, I believe that the examples should be there, as they are
> show-cases (for users!) of fully-working applications.[1]
>

I do not think that the layout of the site for maven modules is very
friendly for browsing the source. You are required to traverse down the
hierarchy to the module site index, then click the project reports link
then either the javadoc or xref reports. It takes a lot of finding and may
not be found at all by a new user of the modular site layout. Advertising
the examples at a higher level in the project site is better, so adding
them to the user guide is an appropriate place. The question then is should
the higher location point the user to the module site index, recommend
downloading the source release which contains all the examples (and not
having the module site published), or both.

I do not think pushing the artifacts to Maven Central is useful as the
applications are either developer testing tools or integration test demos.
These are not of use to be linked by a third party as a dependency, and
given they have no binary compatibility guarantee it would be unwise to
depend on them anyway.


>
> Gilles
>
> [1] See e.g.
> https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/commons-rng-examples/commons-rng-examples-quadrature/xref/index.html
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>


Re: [MATH][DESIGN] Design Discussion for Genetic Algorithm Library

2021-08-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello.

Le dim. 8 août 2021 à 07:22, Avijit Basak  a écrit :
>
> Hi All
>
> I have started to work in genetic module.

Great!

> I want to push the new
> module as part of a new feature branch "*feature/MATH-1563*". Changes
> include mostly the existing code and modfication due to the new Exception
> class. I have encountered the following error which indicates my Github Id "
> *avijitbasak*" is not permitted to check-in code in the repository.

Indeed, not all GitHub users are allowed to modify an ASF's project
repository. ;-)

> Could
> anyone kindly grant me access to the repository. Let me know if I need to
> do anything else regarding this.

Only ASF committers[1] are given write access.
For a contributor who is not (yet) a committer, the (nowadays[2]) usual way
to suggest changes is through GitHub pull requests (i.e. you have to "clone"
the repository into your projects' GH space and modify there).

Regards,
Gilles

[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#roles
[2] The alternative is uploading patches to the issue-tracking system:
https://commons.apache.org/patches.html

> [...]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org