Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

> Am 01.10.2017 um 21:27 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
> 
> On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, Stefan Bodewig  wrote:
>> - only add the automatic module name to commons-logging and release api
>> and adapter as they are.
> 
> Exactly. This is the right approach.

I’ll start working on the release once the vote for IO 2.6 passes.

Cheers,
Benedikt

> Stephen
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stephen Colebourne]

On 1 October 2017 at 11:34, Stefan Bodewig  wrote:
> - only add the automatic module name to commons-logging and release api
> and adapter as they are.

Exactly. This is the right approach.
Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

> Am 01.10.2017 um 19:00 schrieb Ralph Goers :
> 
> That isn’t what I suggested. Release all 3 but only turn commons-logging.jar 
> into a module.

Yes :o)

I’ll go ahead with this approach as soon as I find the time for it.

Cheers,
Benedikt

> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2017, at 1:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>> 
>> Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
>> distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.
>> 
>> Benedikt
>> 
>> Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um 03:39:
>> 
>>> On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
>>> modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea
>>> why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
>>> only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Makes sense to me.
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
 On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
 
 
> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne  
> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
> changed anything else in that commit.
> 
> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
 
 They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
>>> fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot
>>> project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
 
 I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
>>> understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
 
 Benedikt
 
 [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
>>> html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
 
> Stephen
> 
> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <
>>> scolebou...@joda.org
 :
>>> 
>>> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
>>> wrote:
 AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
>>> been part
 of any release in the last decade.
>>> 
>>> Simple then!
>> 
>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars,
>>> the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
>>> MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Benedikt
>> 
>>> Stephen
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Ralph Goers]

> On Oct 1, 2017, at 2:48 AM, sebb  wrote:
> 
> On 1 October 2017 at 10:08, Pascal Schumacher  > wrote:
>> Looks like commons-logging-api is used by some popular projects (Hibernate,
>> Hadoop, Camel):
>> 
>> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-api/usages
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> but I guess they can easily switch to commons-logging.
> 
> Not sure I agree with that.
> 
> The purpose of the api jar is to define the API only without bringing
> in the rest of the code.
> Potentially having the implementation as well could cause issues.
> 
>> Commons-logging-adatper seem to be very rarely used:
>> 
>> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-adapters/usages
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> As I understand it there is no other (realistic) choice than dropping the
>> api and the adpater jars, so +1 from me.
> 
> The split into API and implementation seems to me to be a
> well-established pattern, so if Maven or Java 9 cannot support that
> then it is Maven or Java 9 that needs to be fixed.

I would agree with you if commons-logging had done a proper job of splitting 
the api from the implementation. It did not. Everything is together in one 
source directory and the build picks and chooses what goes into each jar. Maven 
isn’t even in the picture here. If it was this probably would have been done 
properly. 

Java 9 isn’t going to be “fixed”. It simply does not allow classes in the same 
package to appear in more than one module. A proper separation of API from 
implementation would normally have put them in different packages.

Ralph

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Ralph Goers]

That isn’t what I suggested. Release all 3 but only turn commons-logging.jar 
into a module.

Ralph

> On Oct 1, 2017, at 1:25 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> 
> Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
> distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.
> 
> Benedikt
> 
> Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um 03:39:
> 
>> On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:
>> 
>> Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
>> modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea
>> why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
>> only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.
>> 
>> 
>> Makes sense to me.
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
 Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne >> :
 
 The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
 changed anything else in that commit.
 
 I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
 version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
 want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
 just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
>>> 
>>> They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
>> fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot
>> project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
>>> 
>>> I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
>> understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
>>> 
>>> Benedikt
>>> 
>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
>> html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
>>> 
 Stephen
 
 On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <
>> scolebou...@joda.org
>>> :
>> 
>> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
>> wrote:
>>> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
>> been part
>>> of any release in the last decade.
>> 
>> Simple then!
> 
> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars,
>> the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
>> MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
> 
> Regards,
> Benedikt
> 
>> Stephen
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stefan Bodewig]

On 2017-10-01, Benedikt Ritter wrote:

> So what options are we left with?
> - Do nothing -> logging can’t be used as a Java 9 module
> - Drop api and adapters -> users have to change their dependencies and get 
> more code than they want

- only add the automatic module name to commons-logging and release api
and adapter as they are.

I think that's been suggested before. That way people who want to
consume logging as a Java9 module can do so (and maybe need to adapt
their dependency) while all others can keep doing what they've done
before.

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

> Am 01.10.2017 um 11:48 schrieb sebb :
> 
> On 1 October 2017 at 10:08, Pascal Schumacher  
> wrote:
>> Looks like commons-logging-api is used by some popular projects (Hibernate,
>> Hadoop, Camel):
>> 
>> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-api/usages
>> 
>> but I guess they can easily switch to commons-logging.
> 
> Not sure I agree with that.
> 
> The purpose of the api jar is to define the API only without bringing
> in the rest of the code.
> Potentially having the implementation as well could cause issues.
> 
>> Commons-logging-adatper seem to be very rarely used:
>> 
>> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-adapters/usages
>> 
>> As I understand it there is no other (realistic) choice than dropping the
>> api and the adpater jars, so +1 from me.
> 
> The split into API and implementation seems to me to be a
> well-established pattern, so if Maven or Java 9 cannot support that
> then it is Maven or Java 9 that needs to be fixed.

I don’t think that is going to happen :-)

So what options are we left with?
- Do nothing -> logging can’t be used as a Java 9 module
- Drop api and adapters -> users have to change their dependencies and get more 
code than they want

Anything else?

Benedikt

> 
>> Cheers,
>> Pascal
>> 
>> 
>> Am 01.10.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
>>> 
>>> Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
>>> distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.
>>> 
>>> Benedikt
>>> 
>>> Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um
>>> 03:39:
>>> 
 On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:
 
 Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
 modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no
 idea
 why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
 only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.
 
 
 Makes sense to me.
 
 Gary
 
 
 Ralph
 
> On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> 
> 
>> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne  
> :
>> 
>> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
>> changed anything else in that commit.
>> 
>> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
>> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
>> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
>> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
> 
> They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
 
 fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring
 Boot
 project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
> 
> I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
 
 understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
> 
> Benedikt
> 
> [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
 
 html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
>> 
>> Stephen
>> 
>> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
 
 wrote:
 
 Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <
 
 scolebou...@joda.org
> 
> :
 
 On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
 
 wrote:
> 
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
 
 been part
> 
> of any release in the last decade.
 
 Simple then!
>>> 
>>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those
>>> jars,
 
 the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
 MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Benedikt
>>> 
 Stephen
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> 

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[sebb]

On 1 October 2017 at 10:08, Pascal Schumacher  wrote:
> Looks like commons-logging-api is used by some popular projects (Hibernate,
> Hadoop, Camel):
>
> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-api/usages
>
> but I guess they can easily switch to commons-logging.

Not sure I agree with that.

The purpose of the api jar is to define the API only without bringing
in the rest of the code.
Potentially having the implementation as well could cause issues.

> Commons-logging-adatper seem to be very rarely used:
>
> http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-adapters/usages
>
> As I understand it there is no other (realistic) choice than dropping the
> api and the adpater jars, so +1 from me.

The split into API and implementation seems to me to be a
well-established pattern, so if Maven or Java 9 cannot support that
then it is Maven or Java 9 that needs to be fixed.

> Cheers,
> Pascal
>
>
> Am 01.10.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
>>
>> Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
>> distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.
>>
>> Benedikt
>>
>> Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um
>> 03:39:
>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
>>> modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no
>>> idea
>>> why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
>>> only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.
>>>
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
 On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:


> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne 
> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
> changed anything else in that commit.
>
> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)

 They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
>>>
>>> fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring
>>> Boot
>>> project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.

 I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
>>>
>>> understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.

 Benedikt

 [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
>>>
>>> html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
>
> Stephen
>
> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <
>>>
>>> scolebou...@joda.org

 :
>>>
>>> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
>>>
>>> wrote:

 AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
>>>
>>> been part

 of any release in the last decade.
>>>
>>> Simple then!
>>
>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those
>> jars,
>>>
>>> the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
>>> MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benedikt
>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Pascal Schumacher]

Looks like commons-logging-api is used by some popular projects 
(Hibernate, Hadoop, Camel):


http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-api/usages

but I guess they can easily switch to commons-logging.

Commons-logging-adatper seem to be very rarely used:

http://www.mvnrepository.com/artifact/commons-logging/commons-logging-adapters/usages

As I understand it there is no other (realistic) choice than dropping 
the api and the adpater jars, so +1 from me.


Cheers,
Pascal

Am 01.10.2017 um 10:25 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:

Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.

Benedikt

Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um 03:39:


On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:

Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea
why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.


Makes sense to me.

Gary


Ralph


On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:



Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne 

wrote:

Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <

scolebou...@joda.org

:

On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 

wrote:

AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not

been part

of any release in the last decade.

Simple then!

Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars,

the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.

Regards,
Benedikt


Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

Okay, so we agree to drop the api and adapters jars from the build and the
distribution? If that is the case, I think we are ready to release this.

Benedikt

Gary Gregory  schrieb am So. 1. Okt. 2017 um 03:39:

> On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:
>
> Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
> modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea
> why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
> only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.
>
>
> Makes sense to me.
>
> Gary
>
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne  >:
> >>
> >> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
> >> changed anything else in that commit.
> >>
> >> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
> >> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
> >> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
> >> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
> >
> > They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
> fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot
> project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
> >
> > I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
> understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
> >
> > Benedikt
> >
> > [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
> html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
> >
> >> Stephen
> >>
> >> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne <
> scolebou...@joda.org
> >:
> 
>  On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
> wrote:
> > AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
> been part
> > of any release in the last decade.
> 
>  Simple then!
> >>>
> >>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars,
> the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
> MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Benedikt
> >>>
>  Stephen
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Gary Gregory]

On Sep 30, 2017 11:24, "Ralph Goers"  wrote:

Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters
modules contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea
why this is but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest
only modularizing commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.


Makes sense to me.

Gary


Ralph

> On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>
>
>> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
>>
>> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
>> changed anything else in that commit.
>>
>> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
>> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
>> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
>> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
>
> They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In
fact I saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot
project. So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
>
> I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I
understand correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
>
> Benedikt
>
> [1] http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.
html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
>
>> Stephen
>>
>> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter 
wrote:
>>>
 Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :

 On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible 
wrote:
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not
been part
> of any release in the last decade.

 Simple then!
>>>
>>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars,
the Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar
MANIFEST.MF with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Benedikt
>>>
 Stephen

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Ralph Goers]

Looking at the build script it appears that both the api and adapters modules 
contain a subset of what is in commons-logging.jar. I have no idea why this is 
but all three of them cannot be modularized. I would suggest only modularizing 
commons-logging.jar and ignoring the other two.

Ralph

> On Sep 30, 2017, at 1:28 AM, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> 
> 
>> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
>> 
>> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
>> changed anything else in that commit.
>> 
>> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
>> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
>> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
>> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
> 
> They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In fact I 
> saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot project. 
> So it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.
> 
> I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I understand 
> correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.
> 
> Benedikt
> 
> [1] 
> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution
> 
>> Stephen
>> 
>> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>>> 
 Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
 
 On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible  wrote:
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been 
> part
> of any release in the last decade.
 
 Simple then!
>>> 
>>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars, the 
>>> Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar MANIFEST.MF 
>>> with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Benedikt
>>> 
 Stephen
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

> Am 26.09.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
> 
> The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
> changed anything else in that commit.
> 
> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)

They are part of our standard distribution (I don’t know why) [1]. In fact I 
saw commons-logging-api.jar fly by last time I build my Spring Boot project. So 
it seems that those additional artifacts are still in use.

I don’t know how well this plays with Automatic-Module-Name. If I understand 
correctly only one jar can have org.apache.common.logging.

Benedikt

[1] 
http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-logging/guide.html#Jars_Included_in_the_Standard_Distribution

> Stephen
> 
> On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>> 
>>> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
>>> 
>>> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible  wrote:
 AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part
 of any release in the last decade.
>>> 
>>> Simple then!
>> 
>> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars, the 
>> Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar MANIFEST.MF 
>> with value org.apache.commons.logging.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Benedikt
>> 
>>> Stephen
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stephen Colebourne]

On 27 September 2017 at 00:01, Emmanuel Bourg  wrote:
> I wonder if we should do the same for commons-lang 2.x, it's still
> commonly used.

Yes. This would be very helpful
Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Jörg Schaible]

Hi Benedikt,

Benedikt Ritter wrote:

[snip]

>> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been
>> part of any release in the last decade.
> 
> It looks like those artifacts have been published to maven central under
> commons-logging:commons-logging coordinates [1].

I see. Nevertheless, commons-logging stays as main artifact.

> I’m currently unsure
> whether it is possible to reference them from a maven build.

You can. Use classifier "api" or "adapters". But I see no way to add useful 
module names for these artifacts.

Cheers,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Emmanuel Bourg]

Le 26/09/2017 à 23:34, Stephen Colebourne a écrit :

> I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
> version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
> want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
> just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)

Or maybe even safer: branch from the last release tag and just add the
manifest entry for the new release.

I wonder if we should do the same for commons-lang 2.x, it's still
commonly used.

Emmanuel Bourg

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stephen Colebourne]

The contents of pom.xml look OK. I can't seem to browse to see if you
changed anything else in that commit.

I would suggest being extra cautious when releasing, as a newer
version of maven may have changed some of the config, and you don't
want to release the two extra jars to maven central. (In fact, why not
just delete their creation in pom.xml ?)
Stephen

On 26 September 2017 at 22:05, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>
>> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
>>
>> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible  wrote:
>>> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part
>>> of any release in the last decade.
>>
>> Simple then!
>
> Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars, the 
> Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar MANIFEST.MF with 
> value org.apache.commons.logging.
>
> Regards,
> Benedikt
>
>> Stephen
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

> Am 26.09.2017 um 22:54 schrieb Stephen Colebourne :
> 
> On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible  wrote:
>> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part
>> of any release in the last decade.
> 
> Simple then!

Please review revision 1809785. The build still creates all those jars, the 
Automatic-Module-Name header is added to commons-logging.jar MANIFEST.MF with 
value org.apache.commons.logging.

Regards,
Benedikt

> Stephen
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stephen Colebourne]

On 26 September 2017 at 18:48, Jörg Schaible  wrote:
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part
> of any release in the last decade.

Simple then!
Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hello Jörg,

> Am 26.09.2017 um 19:48 schrieb Jörg Schaible :
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> 
>> On 26 September 2017 at 16:06, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>>> commons-logging.jar
>>> commons-logging-adapters.jar
>>> commons-logging-api.jar
>>> 
>>> All jars have org.apache.commons.logging as root package, so if I
>>> understand correctly we can’t do the Automatic-Module-Name trick, because
>>> this would require the build producing a single jar with one top level
>>> package.
>> 
>> Is the user allowed to have all three on the classpath at the same time?
>> 
>> I'd expect the api jar probably gets the Automatic-Module-Name, and
>> maybe the other two can't be modularised.
> 
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part 
> of any release in the last decade.

It looks like those artifacts have been published to maven central under 
commons-logging:commons-logging coordinates [1]. I’m currently unsure whether 
it is possible to reference them from a maven build.

Benedikt

[1] 
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22commons-logging%22%20AND%20a%3A%22commons-logging%22

> 
> Cheers,
> Jörg
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Gary Gregory]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Jörg Schaible 
wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > On 26 September 2017 at 16:06, Benedikt Ritter 
> wrote:
> >> commons-logging.jar
> >> commons-logging-adapters.jar
> >> commons-logging-api.jar
> >>
> >> All jars have org.apache.commons.logging as root package, so if I
> >> understand correctly we can’t do the Automatic-Module-Name trick,
> because
> >> this would require the build producing a single jar with one top level
> >> package.
> >
> > Is the user allowed to have all three on the classpath at the same time?
> >
> > I'd expect the api jar probably gets the Automatic-Module-Name, and
> > maybe the other two can't be modularised.
>
> AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part
> of any release in the last decade.
>

Pruning time!

Gary

>
> Cheers,
> Jörg
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Jörg Schaible]

Hi Stephen,

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

> On 26 September 2017 at 16:06, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
>> commons-logging.jar
>> commons-logging-adapters.jar
>> commons-logging-api.jar
>>
>> All jars have org.apache.commons.logging as root package, so if I
>> understand correctly we can’t do the Automatic-Module-Name trick, because
>> this would require the build producing a single jar with one top level
>> package.
> 
> Is the user allowed to have all three on the classpath at the same time?
> 
> I'd expect the api jar probably gets the Automatic-Module-Name, and
> maybe the other two can't be modularised.

AFAICS we have only commons-logging. The other artifacts have not been part 
of any release in the last decade.

Cheers,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Stephen Colebourne]

On 26 September 2017 at 16:06, Benedikt Ritter  wrote:
> commons-logging.jar
> commons-logging-adapters.jar
> commons-logging-api.jar
>
> All jars have org.apache.commons.logging as root package, so if I understand 
> correctly we can’t do the Automatic-Module-Name trick, because this would 
> require the build producing a single jar with one top level package.

Is the user allowed to have all three on the classpath at the same time?

I'd expect the api jar probably gets the Automatic-Module-Name, and
maybe the other two can't be modularised.
Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hi again,

> Am 26.09.2017 um 16:54 schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> since LOGGING-165 [1] has been raised, I’m planning to add the 
> Automatic-Module-Name to logging and get a new release out of the door.

Looks like I was a bit over enthusiastic here… The logging build creates three 
artifacts:

commons-logging.jar
commons-logging-adapters.jar
commons-logging-api.jar

All jars have org.apache.commons.logging as root package, so if I understand 
correctly we can’t do the Automatic-Module-Name trick, because this would 
require the build producing a single jar with one top level package.

I’m not sure what to do now… Any idea?

Cheers,
Benedikt

> 
> Regards,
> Benedikt
> 
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-165
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[LOGGING] Release with Java 9 Module support

[Benedikt Ritter]

Hello,

since LOGGING-165 [1] has been raised, I’m planning to add the 
Automatic-Module-Name to logging and get a new release out of the door.

Regards,
Benedikt

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-165
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org