Re: [compress] differences in implementation of Zip ibm vs. oracle?

[Simon Spero]

Is this jdk 8 vs.  java SDK 8? The oracle code picked up some fairly big
changes along the way that aren't present in the IBM library.  (jdk 9 is
really different from both. I haven't seen what the IBM Java 9 is like
yet).

I will see if anything looks blatantly obvious.

Simon


On Jul 10, 2017 3:32 PM, "Allison, Timothy B."  wrote:

Compress colleagues,

  Over on https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275, a user
submitted two .xlsx files generated with Apache POI, one by IBM's jvm and
one by Oracle's jvm.  The file generated with Oracle's jvm opens without
issue; however, MSOffice complains but can fix the file generated by IBM's
jvm.  Winzip opens both without complaining.

  Does this ring a bell?  Have you seen this before?  Anything we can do on
our (POI's) side to fix this?

   Thank you.

 Best,

   Tim

[compress] differences in implementation of Zip ibm vs. oracle?

[Allison, Timothy B.]

Compress colleagues,

  Over on https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275, a user 
submitted two .xlsx files generated with Apache POI, one by IBM's jvm and one 
by Oracle's jvm.  The file generated with Oracle's jvm opens without issue; 
however, MSOffice complains but can fix the file generated by IBM's jvm.  
Winzip opens both without complaining.

  Does this ring a bell?  Have you seen this before?  Anything we can do on our 
(POI's) side to fix this?

   Thank you.

 Best,

   Tim