Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ? It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class directly. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi all guys! the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal status for a long time and I haven't had time/chances to make it working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make the build work (and possibly cut a release). Any objection? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
Hi Mark! until v3.2 the Digester supported runtime annotations to generate the XML parser - the idea was having a processor that generates the XML parser at compile-time, but unfortunately I haven't had enough time to continue working on it... So, since it is even broken and still at the early stage, I propose to drop it to cut soon a new release, and postpone it to new versions. Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ? It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class directly. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi all guys! the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal status for a long time and I haven't had time/chances to make it working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make the build work (and possibly cut a release). Any objection? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? You could do both. Currently the only 'plugin' for the weaver is Matts privilizer. This one only 'enhances' an existing class. But there is no further restriction and I see no reason why you could not generate classes. But please note that this classes are only available _after_ the compilation. So they cannot (sanely) be referenced by any java source code. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi Mark! until v3.2 the Digester supported runtime annotations to generate the XML parser - the idea was having a processor that generates the XML parser at compile-time, but unfortunately I haven't had enough time to continue working on it... So, since it is even broken and still at the early stage, I propose to drop it to cut soon a new release, and postpone it to new versions. Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ? It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class directly. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi all guys! the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal status for a long time and I haven't had time/chances to make it working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make the build work (and possibly cut a release). Any objection? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
thanks for the explanation, I'll have a look at it! :) all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? You could do both. Currently the only 'plugin' for the weaver is Matts privilizer. This one only 'enhances' an existing class. But there is no further restriction and I see no reason why you could not generate classes. But please note that this classes are only available _after_ the compilation. So they cannot (sanely) be referenced by any java source code. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi Mark! until v3.2 the Digester supported runtime annotations to generate the XML parser - the idea was having a processor that generates the XML parser at compile-time, but unfortunately I haven't had enough time to continue working on it... So, since it is even broken and still at the early stage, I propose to drop it to cut soon a new release, and postpone it to new versions. Does weaver enhances the class bytecode or even generate classes? TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: I have no clue what the annotation processing is for, but might that be a candidate for the upcoming commons-weaver (formerly privilizer) ? It takes CLASS/RUNTIME annotations a modifies the bytecode in the class directly. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Cc: Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:48 PM Subject: [digester] dropping the annotations-processor module Hi all guys! the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal status for a long time and I haven't had time/chances to make it working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make the build work (and possibly cut a release). Any objection? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
[digester] dropping the annotations-processor module
Hi all guys! the annotations-processor module in Digester has been in a prototypal status for a long time and I haven't had time/chances to make it working, so, since it has never been released before and I am busy as heel and won't have the opportunity to work on it, unless someone submits a patch to DIGESTER-158, I would be for dropping it and make the build work (and possibly cut a release). Any objection? Many thanks in advance, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
