slides for ApacheCon NA 2016?

2016-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández 
LF has changed the proposals system. But the new one also asks for the
presentation. Does anybody know where all slides will end-up? Are they
published somewhere?

Just something people kept asking these days...

Thanks in advance.

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Greg Chase 
I wasn't intending to create extra bureaucracy, just trying to see how we
might connect actual people with ideas.

However, maybe just having the existence of cross-topic lists will spur
conversations.

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler 
wrote:

> I should add that I wasn't applying that quote to anyone's opinion, and
> certainly not calling anyone a heathen ;-) I just thought it was humorous
> and I love Terry Pratchett who riffed on this quote for many years
> ("turtles all the way down").
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:56 AM
> > To: dev@community.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: cross-project communication space?
> >
> > -1 on a PMC to coordinate the coordination of a cross-project
> coordination :-)
> >
> > I just put the following quote in a deck I'll be using lately, seems
> applicable...
> >
> > My opponent’s reasoning reminds me of the heathen, who, being asked on
> > what the world stood, replied, “on a tortoise.” But on what does the
> tortoise
> > stand? “On another tortoise.”
> > Joseph Barker (1854)
> >
> > It's a mailing list, it's not that important in and of itself. If you
> want a home for
> > the kick-off (e.g. this conversation) and the eventual retirement (if
> that ever
> > comes) then ComDev is the place. It might make sense to formally assign
> the
> > ownership of the list to ComDev so that should it ever reach retirement
> that
> > PMC is empowered to request infra remove it. But otherwise it’s just a
> list.
> >
> > Ross
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:41 AM
> > > To: dev@community.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: cross-project communication space?
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Greg Chase 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Interesting topic.  I agree "community" is where the
> "meta-discussion"
> > > > of this happens. However, the actual implementation of cross
> > > > community collaboration will happen in the relevant and engaged
> > > > communities themselves.
> > > >
> > >
> > > exactly
> > >
> > >
> > > > Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
> > > > representatives from the engaged communities.
> > >
> > >
> > > well, I wouldn't want to go that far for now... but if this works for
> > > more case we may want to take a look what other foundations do, like
> > > the working groups in Eclipse:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ec
> > > lip
> > >
> > se.org%2forg%2fworkinggroups%2f=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40micro
> > >
> > soft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab
> > >
> > 2d7cd011db47%7c1=la%2bUOrpVSDTgImKGgsiooqD7XjU4LnHW01iv2o
> > > HJTNI%3d
> > >
> > >
> > > > The list would be archived if / when at any time the organizers
> > > > dwindled to 0.
> > > >
> > >
> > > +++1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sergio Fernández
> > > Partner Technology Manager
> > > Redlink GmbH
> > > m: +43 6602747925
> > > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > > w:
> > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fredlin
> > > k.co
> > >
> > =01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252
> > >
> > 108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=aYW9F
> > > c4X3NDHOekplDb7sZ2zCpS9JaXcR0faAXFQN6c%3d
>

RE: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Ross Gardler 
I should add that I wasn't applying that quote to anyone's opinion, and 
certainly not calling anyone a heathen ;-) I just thought it was humorous and I 
love Terry Pratchett who riffed on this quote for many years ("turtles all the 
way down").

> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:ross.gard...@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:56 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: RE: cross-project communication space?
> 
> -1 on a PMC to coordinate the coordination of a cross-project coordination :-)
> 
> I just put the following quote in a deck I'll be using lately, seems 
> applicable...
> 
> My opponent’s reasoning reminds me of the heathen, who, being asked on
> what the world stood, replied, “on a tortoise.” But on what does the tortoise
> stand? “On another tortoise.”
> Joseph Barker (1854)
> 
> It's a mailing list, it's not that important in and of itself. If you want a 
> home for
> the kick-off (e.g. this conversation) and the eventual retirement (if that 
> ever
> comes) then ComDev is the place. It might make sense to formally assign the
> ownership of the list to ComDev so that should it ever reach retirement that
> PMC is empowered to request infra remove it. But otherwise it’s just a list.
> 
> Ross
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:41 AM
> > To: dev@community.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: cross-project communication space?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Greg Chase 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Interesting topic.  I agree "community" is where the "meta-discussion"
> > > of this happens. However, the actual implementation of cross
> > > community collaboration will happen in the relevant and engaged
> > > communities themselves.
> > >
> >
> > exactly
> >
> >
> > > Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
> > > representatives from the engaged communities.
> >
> >
> > well, I wouldn't want to go that far for now... but if this works for
> > more case we may want to take a look what other foundations do, like
> > the working groups in Eclipse:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ec
> > lip
> >
> se.org%2forg%2fworkinggroups%2f=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40micro
> >
> soft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab
> >
> 2d7cd011db47%7c1=la%2bUOrpVSDTgImKGgsiooqD7XjU4LnHW01iv2o
> > HJTNI%3d
> >
> >
> > > The list would be archived if / when at any time the organizers
> > > dwindled to 0.
> > >
> >
> > +++1
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sergio Fernández
> > Partner Technology Manager
> > Redlink GmbH
> > m: +43 6602747925
> > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> > w:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fredlin
> > k.co
> >
> =01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252
> >
> 108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=aYW9F
> > c4X3NDHOekplDb7sZ2zCpS9JaXcR0faAXFQN6c%3d

RE: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Ross Gardler 
-1 on a PMC to coordinate the coordination of a cross-project coordination :-)

I just put the following quote in a deck I'll be using lately, seems 
applicable...

My opponent’s reasoning reminds me of the heathen, who, being asked on what the 
world stood, replied, “on a tortoise.” But on what does the tortoise stand? “On 
another tortoise.” 
Joseph Barker (1854)

It's a mailing list, it's not that important in and of itself. If you want a 
home for the kick-off (e.g. this conversation) and the eventual retirement (if 
that ever comes) then ComDev is the place. It might make sense to formally 
assign the ownership of the list to ComDev so that should it ever reach 
retirement that PMC is empowered to request infra remove it. But otherwise it’s 
just a list.

Ross

> -Original Message-
> From: Sergio Fernández [mailto:wik...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 10:41 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cross-project communication space?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Greg Chase 
> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting topic.  I agree "community" is where the "meta-discussion"
> > of this happens. However, the actual implementation of cross community
> > collaboration will happen in the relevant and engaged communities
> > themselves.
> >
> 
> exactly
> 
> 
> > Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
> > representatives from the engaged communities.
> 
> 
> well, I wouldn't want to go that far for now... but if this works for more 
> case
> we may want to take a look what other foundations do, like the working
> groups in Eclipse:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.eclip
> se.org%2forg%2fworkinggroups%2f=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40micro
> soft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab
> 2d7cd011db47%7c1=la%2bUOrpVSDTgImKGgsiooqD7XjU4LnHW01iv2o
> HJTNI%3d
> 
> 
> > The list would be archived if / when at any time the organizers
> > dwindled to 0.
> >
> 
> +++1
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fredlink.co
> =01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c6232faf60e814115252
> 108d37a8ca212%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=aYW9F
> c4X3NDHOekplDb7sZ2zCpS9JaXcR0faAXFQN6c%3d

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Rich Bowen 


On 05/12/2016 10:30 AM, Greg Chase wrote:
> Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
> representatives from the engaged communities.  The list would be archived
> if / when at any time the organizers dwindled to 0.

Oh, heavens, I hope not. I can't imagine we'd want to add more layers of
management here. It's a place for cross-project discussion and community
building, nothing more.

I can see a lot of places where such lists would be beneficial, and
should be something that com-dev encourages communities to do.

On a related note, I encourage you all to watch Stephen O'Grady's
keynote from ApacheCon this week. It's not up yet but will be at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCthvmTSlmIcMH93LIJNe-2w in the next day
or two.

-- 
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández 
Hi,

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Greg Chase  wrote:
>
> Interesting topic.  I agree "community" is where the "meta-discussion" of
> this happens. However, the actual implementation of cross community
> collaboration will happen in the relevant and engaged communities
> themselves.
>

exactly


> Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
> representatives from the engaged communities.


well, I wouldn't want to go that far for now... but if this works for more
case we may want to take a look what other foundations do, like the working
groups in Eclipse: http://www.eclipse.org/org/workinggroups/


> The list would be archived if / when at any time the organizers dwindled
> to 0.
>

+++1



-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Greg Chase 
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Sergio Fernández 
wrote:

> I agree with Rich on making the email address as simple as possible. But
> the point William brought is actually very interesting, because Community
> is where this cross-project communication should be really happen. So I'll
> try to figure out how to accommodate that in https://community.apache.org
>
>
>
Interesting topic.  I agree "community" is where the "meta-discussion" of
this happens. However, the actual implementation of cross community
collaboration will happen in the relevant and engaged communities
themselves.

Its almost like the "cross topic" would have its own mini PMC with
representatives from the engaged communities.  The list would be archived
if / when at any time the organizers dwindled to 0.

For example, I could see a list for PostgreSQL + Apache email with MADlib &
HAWQ representatives.







>
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Rich Bowen  wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 05/12/2016 09:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > > What committee is responsible for such lists?
> > >
> > > I think community itself is a good choice, parking these lists within
> > > geospatial-dev@community.a.o would better reflect that relationship.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I was talking with someone about this - George Percivall, I believe -
> > and the intent is that such a list would be promoted to the Geospatial
> > communities, who are largely outside of Apache, to engage them in the
> > discussion happening here. As such, the simplest possible email address
> > has the benefit of people remembering it when it appears on slides at
> > other Geospatial conferences.  geospatial-dev@community.a.o is quite a
> > mouthful.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bill
> > > On May 12, 2016 10:47 AM, "Rich Bowen"  wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some
> of
> > >> the
> > >>> projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly
> SIS
> > >> and
> > >>> Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common
> space
> > >>> where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common
> > >> space
> > >>> for other topics.
> > >>>
> > >>> A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as
> an
> > >> entry
> > >>> point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
> > >>>
> > >>> So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it
> > up
> > >>> here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> This absolutely needs to happen, and I applaud you for making it
> happen.
> > >> As Ross says, you can open a ticket with Infra, but I'll bet that if
> one
> > >> of you who is here in Vancouver approaches one of the Infra guys, you
> > >> can make it happen even faster. They're awesome and helpful.
> > >>
> > >> I would also love to see some of our other project groups do a similar
> > >> thing. It's also a great point of engagement for people that are new
> to
> > >> our projects, who understand the technology areas, but aren't familiar
> > >> with individual project names..
> > >>
> > >> The question that I would have would be where we can most effectively
> > >> promote these cross-project lists. I presume that each participating
> > >> project would list it on their mailing lists pages, but we'd also want
> > >> to have them on projects.apache.org. Where else?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> > >> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Partner Technology Manager
> Redlink GmbH
> m: +43 6602747925
> e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
> w: http://redlink.co
>

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández 
I agree with Rich on making the email address as simple as possible. But
the point William brought is actually very interesting, because Community
is where this cross-project communication should be really happen. So I'll
try to figure out how to accommodate that in https://community.apache.org



On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Rich Bowen  wrote:

>
>
> On 05/12/2016 09:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > What committee is responsible for such lists?
> >
> > I think community itself is a good choice, parking these lists within
> > geospatial-dev@community.a.o would better reflect that relationship.
> >
>
>
> I was talking with someone about this - George Percivall, I believe -
> and the intent is that such a list would be promoted to the Geospatial
> communities, who are largely outside of Apache, to engage them in the
> discussion happening here. As such, the simplest possible email address
> has the benefit of people remembering it when it appears on slides at
> other Geospatial conferences.  geospatial-dev@community.a.o is quite a
> mouthful.
>
>
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bill
> > On May 12, 2016 10:47 AM, "Rich Bowen"  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of
> >> the
> >>> projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS
> >> and
> >>> Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
> >>> where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common
> >> space
> >>> for other topics.
> >>>
> >>> A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an
> >> entry
> >>> point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
> >>>
> >>> So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it
> up
> >>> here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This absolutely needs to happen, and I applaud you for making it happen.
> >> As Ross says, you can open a ticket with Infra, but I'll bet that if one
> >> of you who is here in Vancouver approaches one of the Infra guys, you
> >> can make it happen even faster. They're awesome and helpful.
> >>
> >> I would also love to see some of our other project groups do a similar
> >> thing. It's also a great point of engagement for people that are new to
> >> our projects, who understand the technology areas, but aren't familiar
> >> with individual project names..
> >>
> >> The question that I would have would be where we can most effectively
> >> promote these cross-project lists. I presume that each participating
> >> project would list it on their mailing lists pages, but we'd also want
> >> to have them on projects.apache.org. Where else?
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> >> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>
>


-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Rich Bowen 


On 05/12/2016 09:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> What committee is responsible for such lists?
> 
> I think community itself is a good choice, parking these lists within
> geospatial-dev@community.a.o would better reflect that relationship.
> 


I was talking with someone about this - George Percivall, I believe -
and the intent is that such a list would be promoted to the Geospatial
communities, who are largely outside of Apache, to engage them in the
discussion happening here. As such, the simplest possible email address
has the benefit of people remembering it when it appears on slides at
other Geospatial conferences.  geospatial-dev@community.a.o is quite a
mouthful.



> Cheers,
> 
> Bill
> On May 12, 2016 10:47 AM, "Rich Bowen"  wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of
>> the
>>> projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS
>> and
>>> Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
>>> where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common
>> space
>>> for other topics.
>>>
>>> A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an
>> entry
>>> point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
>>>
>>> So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
>>> here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
>>>
>>
>> This absolutely needs to happen, and I applaud you for making it happen.
>> As Ross says, you can open a ticket with Infra, but I'll bet that if one
>> of you who is here in Vancouver approaches one of the Infra guys, you
>> can make it happen even faster. They're awesome and helpful.
>>
>> I would also love to see some of our other project groups do a similar
>> thing. It's also a great point of engagement for people that are new to
>> our projects, who understand the technology areas, but aren't familiar
>> with individual project names..
>>
>> The question that I would have would be where we can most effectively
>> promote these cross-project lists. I presume that each participating
>> project would list it on their mailing lists pages, but we'd also want
>> to have them on projects.apache.org. Where else?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
>> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread William A Rowe Jr 
What committee is responsible for such lists?

I think community itself is a good choice, parking these lists within
geospatial-dev@community.a.o would better reflect that relationship.

Cheers,

Bill
On May 12, 2016 10:47 AM, "Rich Bowen"  wrote:

>
>
> On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of
> the
> > projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS
> and
> > Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
> > where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common
> space
> > for other topics.
> >
> > A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an
> entry
> > point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
> >
> > So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
> > here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
> >
>
> This absolutely needs to happen, and I applaud you for making it happen.
> As Ross says, you can open a ticket with Infra, but I'll bet that if one
> of you who is here in Vancouver approaches one of the Infra guys, you
> can make it happen even faster. They're awesome and helpful.
>
> I would also love to see some of our other project groups do a similar
> thing. It's also a great point of engagement for people that are new to
> our projects, who understand the technology areas, but aren't familiar
> with individual project names..
>
> The question that I would have would be where we can most effectively
> promote these cross-project lists. I presume that each participating
> project would list it on their mailing lists pages, but we'd also want
> to have them on projects.apache.org. Where else?
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
>
>

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández 
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Daniel Gruno  wrote:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?geospat...@apache.org ?:)
>

awesome!

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Daniel Gruno 
On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of the
> projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS and
> Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
> where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common space
> for other topics.
> 
> A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an entry
> point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
> 
> So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
> here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
> 
> Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
> 

https://lists.apache.org/list.html?geospat...@apache.org ?:)

Re: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Rich Bowen 


On 05/12/2016 08:01 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of the
> projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS and
> Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
> where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common space
> for other topics.
> 
> A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an entry
> point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).
> 
> So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
> here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.
> 
> Thanks in advance for all your feedback.
> 

This absolutely needs to happen, and I applaud you for making it happen.
As Ross says, you can open a ticket with Infra, but I'll bet that if one
of you who is here in Vancouver approaches one of the Infra guys, you
can make it happen even faster. They're awesome and helpful.

I would also love to see some of our other project groups do a similar
thing. It's also a great point of engagement for people that are new to
our projects, who understand the technology areas, but aren't familiar
with individual project names..

The question that I would have would be where we can most effectively
promote these cross-project lists. I presume that each participating
project would list it on their mailing lists pages, but we'd also want
to have them on projects.apache.org. Where else?


-- 
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

RE: cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Ross Gardler 
Request a SL from infra.



Sent from my Windows 10 phone



From: Sergio Fernández
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 8:02 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: cross-project communication space?



Hi,

as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of the
projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS and
Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common space
for other topics.

A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an entry
point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).

So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.

Thanks in advance for all your feedback.

--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fredlink.co=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c0f2c8b4eb4004a3b24f208d37a766d93%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=0anrccFom5sevuwJWyfiAgZOiPxVLtdvTA51KuskQjU%3d

cross-project communication space?

2016-05-12 Thread Sergio Fernández 
Hi,

as part of the discussions we have had these days in Vancouver, some of the
projects involved in the Geospatial track of the conference (mainly SIS and
Marmotta) we have been discussing that we'd like to have a common space
where discussing about common things. So far I do no see such common space
for other topics.

A geospatial@a.o mailing list could serve that purpose, as well as an entry
point for other communities (OGC, Eclipse LocationTech, etc).

So, after discussing it with some folks here, I feel like bringing it up
here is a good way to figure out how we can materialize such idea.

Thanks in advance for all your feedback.

-- 
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co

Re: [ApacheCon] Volunteers needed, Audio processing

2016-05-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz 
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> I will try to remember to bring my GoPro and a tripod

Note that IMO the key to session recordings is good audio, which you
might not get with just a gopro.

(of course blending this with a direct PA recording of the audio
works, but that's more work)

-Bertrand