Re: --browserify workflow status?

2016-01-21 Thread Steven Gill 
Should we set a rough goal/timeline on when to make this default? Cordova
6.1.0? Put the non browserify workflow behind a --no-browserify flag.

I'll plan to write a blog post and put it up for review week after PGDAY.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal <nikhi...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Great! Looks like we just need to update the help text then. I sent a PR
> for this: https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/231
>
> Anyone wants to talk about the merits of using the browserify workflow?
> Our blog might be a good place for that.
>
> -Nikhil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dvpdin...@gmail.com [mailto:dvpdin...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Darryl Pogue
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:35 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: --browserify workflow status?
>
> I've been using the --browserify flag for several months and it's been
> working great
>
> On 21 January 2016 at 11:02, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal
> > <nikhi...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or
> >> all the work has been completed:
> >>
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fissu
> >> es.apache.org%2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-8801=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40mic
> >> rosoft.com%7c530238f80e1c41e776d308d32299e90a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2
> >> d7cd011db47%7c1=p1p5LVB7ywO29s8%2bmU%2fmhaiN9guzvp5qHDqroc2p1QU
> >> %3d
> >>
> >> Should it move out of experimental now?[1]
> >>
> >> It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as
> >> opposed to the current default workflow.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Nikhil
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>
>

RE: --browserify workflow status?

2016-01-21 Thread Nikhil Khandelwal 
Great! Looks like we just need to update the help text then. I sent a PR for 
this: https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/231

Anyone wants to talk about the merits of using the browserify workflow? Our 
blog might be a good place for that.

-Nikhil

-Original Message-
From: dvpdin...@gmail.com [mailto:dvpdin...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Darryl Pogue
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:35 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: --browserify workflow status?

I've been using the --browserify flag for several months and it's been working 
great

On 21 January 2016 at 11:02, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal 
> <nikhi...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or 
>> all the work has been completed:
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fissu
>> es.apache.org%2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-8801=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40mic
>> rosoft.com%7c530238f80e1c41e776d308d32299e90a%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2
>> d7cd011db47%7c1=p1p5LVB7ywO29s8%2bmU%2fmhaiN9guzvp5qHDqroc2p1QU
>> %3d
>>
>> Should it move out of experimental now?[1]
>>
>> It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as 
>> opposed to the current default workflow.
>>
>> [1] 
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nikhil
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

RE: --browserify workflow status?

2016-01-21 Thread Nikhil Khandelwal 
Thanks, Steve for taking up on writing the blog post. It would be great to use 
that to drive some usage and feedback loop. Also,  we might want to do JIRA 
triage of related issues to ensure that it does not result in any regressions. 
I took a quick look and most of it is not relevant currently [1]. Though 
CB-9967 might be a good one to fix.

I believe one of the advantages of browserify is that it results in lesser file 
loads - while this is mildly beneficial for local apps, it's perhaps a big deal 
for remote hosted cordova apps. Are there any downsides to using browserify?

Also, can a user reference arbitrary browserifiable[2] supported js libraries 
from node_modules in their cordova app with this. Docs and some walkthrough 
would be useful here. On a similar note, with this could a plugin add a 
reference to a nodejs module in its code? Of course, in that case, the plugin 
will *require* browserify workflow to function.

[1] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-9967?jql=project%20%3D%20CB%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20text%20~%20browserify%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
[2] http://browserifysearch.org/

Thanks,
Nikhil

-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 4:14 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: --browserify workflow status?

Should we set a rough goal/timeline on when to make this default? Cordova 
6.1.0? Put the non browserify workflow behind a --no-browserify flag.

I'll plan to write a blog post and put it up for review week after PGDAY.

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal <nikhi...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Great! Looks like we just need to update the help text then. I sent a 
> PR for this: https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/231
>
> Anyone wants to talk about the merits of using the browserify workflow?
> Our blog might be a good place for that.
>
> -Nikhil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dvpdin...@gmail.com [mailto:dvpdin...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
> Darryl Pogue
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:35 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: --browserify workflow status?
>
> I've been using the --browserify flag for several months and it's been 
> working great
>
> On 21 January 2016 at 11:02, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal 
> > <nikhi...@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most 
> >> or all the work has been completed:
> >>
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fis
> >> su 
> >> es.apache.org%2fjira%2fbrowse%2fCB-8801=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40m
> >> ic
> >> rosoft.com%7c530238f80e1c41e776d308d32299e90a%7c72f988bf86f141af91a
> >> b2 
> >> d7cd011db47%7c1=p1p5LVB7ywO29s8%2bmU%2fmhaiN9guzvp5qHDqroc2p1
> >> QU
> >> %3d
> >>
> >> Should it move out of experimental now?[1]
> >>
> >> It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as 
> >> opposed to the current default workflow.
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Nikhil
> >>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>
>

Re: --browserify workflow status?

2016-01-21 Thread Anis KADRI 
YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal 
wrote:

> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or all
> the work has been completed:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8801
>
> Should it move out of experimental now?[1]
>
> It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as opposed
> to the current default workflow.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>

Re: --browserify workflow status?

2016-01-21 Thread Darryl Pogue 
I've been using the --browserify flag for several months and it's been
working great

On 21 January 2016 at 11:02, Anis KADRI  wrote:
> YES YES YES! Please cordova_plugins.js is killing me.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:10 PM Nikhil Khandelwal 
> wrote:
>
>> Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or all
>> the work has been completed:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8801
>>
>> Should it move out of experimental now?[1]
>>
>> It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as opposed
>> to the current default workflow.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nikhil
>>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org

--browserify workflow status?

2016-01-20 Thread Nikhil Khandelwal 
Where are we with --browserify support? From what I can see, most or all the 
work has been completed:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8801

Should it move out of experimental now?[1]

It will help to document it and perhaps blog about its benefits as opposed to 
the current default workflow.

[1] https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/blob/master/doc/build.txt#L27

Thanks,
Nikhil