[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-856) Eclipse deployment to container add remove view shows deltaspike-jsf-module-impl-ee6-1.2.1 as if it was an app module - in weblogic we get a double jar file

2015-03-15 Thread Nuno G. de M (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14362428#comment-14362428
 ] 

Nuno G. de M commented on DELTASPIKE-856:
-

Quite bizarre,

I have just finished downloading the latest release of eclipse from the 
official site.
I've installed OEPE from the market place and even had to instlal JRE 8 to run 
the latest version of this plugin.

I've gone through the same motions, and here is the result:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_dEiNBGUsxqVUY5bmVYUDFUaTQ/view?usp=sharing

I still see this jar file as if it were an application module.

You can confirm in the docx that I've uploaded that I am indeed using the 
latest version of eclipse.

 Eclipse deployment to container add remove view shows 
 deltaspike-jsf-module-impl-ee6-1.2.1 as if it was an app module - in weblogic 
 we get a double jar file
 

 Key: DELTASPIKE-856
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-856
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: JSF-Module
Affects Versions: 1.2.1
 Environment: Windows 7 , Eclipse Version: Luna (4.4) Build id: 
 I20140606-1215, WTP plugin  Version: 
 1.2.100.v201405081709-797LBiCcNBHQFTGaGVbu3KEF
 Build id: 20131017041352, Oracle enterprise Pack for Ecliplse plugin: Build 
 id: 20131017041352
Reporter: Nuno G. de M
Assignee: Rafael Benevides
 Attachments: Screenshot 2015-03-13 18.05.21.png


 There is something special about the deltaspike-jsf-module-impl-ee6-1.2.1.jar 
 .
 This project dependency alone, unlike every other project dependency, it is 
 displayed itself by eclipse Add  Remove view to an application server as if 
 it were a module itself of the war application to be deployed.
 When a user, for example, configures weblogic 12.1.2 server to take in 
 deployments as exploded war files, what ends up happening after the 
 deployment goes through is that we see within
 Weblogic Domain  AdminServer  temp  mydeployment  war Web-inf/lib 
 we see the jar dependency twice.
 First we see the correct and expected dependency:
 deltaspike-jsf-module-impl-ee6-1.2.1.jar
 But then we have a second file in the lib folder called:
 deltaspike-jsf-module-impl-ee6-1.2.1.jar.jar
 This appears to be releated to the Add  Remove view of eclipse, since 
 normally under the project war file itself we only see other open project 
 modules.
 I am pasting in this post an url to a google driver sample application that 
 you can use to simulate the scenario.
 The zip file will contain both a sample application that I have once before 
 submitted to you already (regarding the view access scoped beans) and 
 document file illustrating the issue in my IDE.
 To simulate the issue simply:
 (a) create a domain
 (b) do mvn eclipse:eclipse and import the project
 (c) Configure your weblogic domain to accept exploded war deployment
 (d) click on add and remove on the domain you want to deploy to and see that 
 the JEE6 impl appears as a module.
 (e) deploy, and look at what happens within the weblogic deployment folder
 URL:
 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_dEiNBGUsxqOGZRUjBJQU85WXc/view?usp=sharing
 It is not yet clear if this phenomena may be creating problems for us when we 
 use eclipse to run the deployment.
 In the sample application we have no issues.
 Thank you for your support,
 My kindest regards.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
do you mean the jar size? the difference is just ~130kb when we shade asm
or not


2015-03-15 21:40 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:

 But owb has no link with ds need imo. Ds is a lib so need to care about
 user deps where owb doesnt.

 Not having an own module would be another reason to not use ds - which is
 already the case from my experience for its size but now it would also be
 to not be smart enough :(
 Le 15 mars 2015 21:20, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
 écrit :

  @romain:
  +0 for an own module
  -0.5 for an additional indirection (we also don't have/need it at owb)
 
  regards,
  gerhard
 
 
 
  2015-03-15 21:11 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko 
 andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
  :
 
   +0 for an extra module
  
   before i implemented the asm proxy for the partial bean module, i tried
  it
   many hours to understand and implement it with commons proxy
   as it was not possible out of the box, i switched to plain ASM
   If someone would like to evolve commons proxy and use it in DS - +0
  
   2015-03-15 20:53 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
  
Hmm,
   
shouldn't we provide this as another module? I'm not super happy to
  have
asm shade in core.
   
BTW can't we just use [proxy2]? we can still make the code evolving
 if
needed.
   
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau |  Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github 
https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
   
-- Forwarded message --
From: tandrasc...@apache.org
Date: 2015-03-15 20:50 GMT+01:00
Subject: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move
  proxy-handling
   to
ds-core
To: comm...@deltaspike.apache.org
   
   
DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core
   
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo
Commit:
   http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/commit/fcf4d77d
Tree:
 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/tree/fcf4d77d
Diff:
 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/diff/fcf4d77d
   
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: fcf4d77d692971a6a93731e64d044f6cf1757d6c
Parents: d3a21c0
Author: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
Authored: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
Committer: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
Committed: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
   
   
 --
 deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml |  57 +++
 .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 +
 .../invocation/ManualInvocationContext.java | 187 
 ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 ++
 .../core/util/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java | 436
   +++
 .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxy.java|  28 ++
 .../DeltaSpikeProxyContextualLifecycle.java | 144 ++
 .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxyFactory.java | 274 
 .../DelegateManualInvocationHandler.java|  43 ++
 .../InterceptManualInvocationHandler.java   |  51 +++
 deltaspike/modules/jsf/impl/pom.xml |   6 -
 .../InjectionAwareApplicationWrapper.java   |   6 +-
 .../proxy/ConverterAndValidatorLifecycle.java   | 132 --
 .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java|  19 +-
 .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyFactory.java  |  78 
 .../proxy/ConverterInvocationHandler.java   |  13 +-
 .../proxy/DefaultPartialStateHolder.java|   3 +
 .../proxy/DelegatingMethodHandler.java  |  58 ---
 .../injection/proxy/MethodHandlerProxy.java |  42 --
 .../jsf/impl/injection/proxy/ProxyMarker.java   |  23 -
 .../proxy/ValidatorInvocationHandler.java   |  12 +-
 .../test/jsf/impl/util/ArchiveUtils.java|   1 -
 deltaspike/modules/partial-bean/impl/pom.xml|  56 ---
 .../impl/PartialBeanBindingExtension.java   |  16 +-
 .../partialbean/impl/PartialBeanLifecycle.java  | 142 --
 .../impl/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java   |  62 +++
 .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 -
 .../interception/ManualInvocationContext.java   | 187 
 ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 --
 .../impl/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java  | 423
  --
 .../proxy/CallSuperManualInvocationHandler.java |  50 ---
 .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxy.java|  28 --
 .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java | 263 ---
 .../proxy/RedirectManualInvocationHandler.java  |  42 --
 .../core/api/partialbean/util/ArchiveUtils.java |   7 -
 35 files changed, 1510 insertions(+), 1641 deletions(-)
   
 --
   
   
  

Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
javassist is about 600kb and the user needs to manage it

2015-03-15 21:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:

 do you mean the jar size? the difference is just ~130kb when we shade asm
 or not


 2015-03-15 21:40 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:

 But owb has no link with ds need imo. Ds is a lib so need to care about
 user deps where owb doesnt.

 Not having an own module would be another reason to not use ds - which is
 already the case from my experience for its size but now it would also be
 to not be smart enough :(
 Le 15 mars 2015 21:20, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
 écrit :

  @romain:
  +0 for an own module
  -0.5 for an additional indirection (we also don't have/need it at owb)
 
  regards,
  gerhard
 
 
 
  2015-03-15 21:11 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko 
 andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
  :
 
   +0 for an extra module
  
   before i implemented the asm proxy for the partial bean module, i
 tried
  it
   many hours to understand and implement it with commons proxy
   as it was not possible out of the box, i switched to plain ASM
   If someone would like to evolve commons proxy and use it in DS - +0
  
   2015-03-15 20:53 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 :
  
Hmm,
   
shouldn't we provide this as another module? I'm not super happy to
  have
asm shade in core.
   
BTW can't we just use [proxy2]? we can still make the code evolving
 if
needed.
   
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau |  Blog
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github 
https://github.com/rmannibucau |
LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
http://www.tomitribe.com
   
-- Forwarded message --
From: tandrasc...@apache.org
Date: 2015-03-15 20:50 GMT+01:00
Subject: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move
  proxy-handling
   to
ds-core
To: comm...@deltaspike.apache.org
   
   
DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core
   
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo
Commit:
   http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/commit/fcf4d77d
Tree:
 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/tree/fcf4d77d
Diff:
 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/diff/fcf4d77d
   
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: fcf4d77d692971a6a93731e64d044f6cf1757d6c
Parents: d3a21c0
Author: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
Authored: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
Committer: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
Committed: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
   
   
 --
 deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml |  57 +++
 .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 +
 .../invocation/ManualInvocationContext.java | 187 
 ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 ++
 .../core/util/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java | 436
   +++
 .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxy.java|  28 ++
 .../DeltaSpikeProxyContextualLifecycle.java | 144 ++
 .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxyFactory.java | 274 
 .../DelegateManualInvocationHandler.java|  43 ++
 .../InterceptManualInvocationHandler.java   |  51 +++
 deltaspike/modules/jsf/impl/pom.xml |   6 -
 .../InjectionAwareApplicationWrapper.java   |   6 +-
 .../proxy/ConverterAndValidatorLifecycle.java   | 132 --
 .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java|  19 +-
 .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyFactory.java  |  78 
 .../proxy/ConverterInvocationHandler.java   |  13 +-
 .../proxy/DefaultPartialStateHolder.java|   3 +
 .../proxy/DelegatingMethodHandler.java  |  58 ---
 .../injection/proxy/MethodHandlerProxy.java |  42 --
 .../jsf/impl/injection/proxy/ProxyMarker.java   |  23 -
 .../proxy/ValidatorInvocationHandler.java   |  12 +-
 .../test/jsf/impl/util/ArchiveUtils.java|   1 -
 deltaspike/modules/partial-bean/impl/pom.xml|  56 ---
 .../impl/PartialBeanBindingExtension.java   |  16 +-
 .../partialbean/impl/PartialBeanLifecycle.java  | 142 --
 .../impl/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java   |  62 +++
 .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 -
 .../interception/ManualInvocationContext.java   | 187 
 ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 --
 .../impl/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java  | 423
  --
 .../proxy/CallSuperManualInvocationHandler.java |  50 ---
 .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxy.java|  28 --
 .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java | 263 ---
 .../proxy/RedirectManualInvocationHandler.java  |  42 --
 .../core/api/partialbean/util/ArchiveUtils.java |   7 -
 35 

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-851) move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Andraschko resolved DELTASPIKE-851.
--
Resolution: Fixed

 move proxy-handling to ds-core
 --

 Key: DELTASPIKE-851
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-851
 Project: DeltaSpike
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core, JSF-Module, PartialBean
Affects Versions: 1.3.0
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
Assignee: Thomas Andraschko
 Fix For: 1.3.1


 with that we can get rid of the optional dependency to javassist in the 
 jsf-module...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+0 for an extra module

before i implemented the asm proxy for the partial bean module, i tried it
many hours to understand and implement it with commons proxy
as it was not possible out of the box, i switched to plain ASM
If someone would like to evolve commons proxy and use it in DS - +0

2015-03-15 20:53 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:

 Hmm,

 shouldn't we provide this as another module? I'm not super happy to have
 asm shade in core.

 BTW can't we just use [proxy2]? we can still make the code evolving if
 needed.

 Romain Manni-Bucau
 @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau |  Blog
 http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github 
 https://github.com/rmannibucau |
 LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
 http://www.tomitribe.com

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: tandrasc...@apache.org
 Date: 2015-03-15 20:50 GMT+01:00
 Subject: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to
 ds-core
 To: comm...@deltaspike.apache.org


 DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

 Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo
 Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/commit/fcf4d77d
 Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/tree/fcf4d77d
 Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/diff/fcf4d77d

 Branch: refs/heads/master
 Commit: fcf4d77d692971a6a93731e64d044f6cf1757d6c
 Parents: d3a21c0
 Author: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
 Authored: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
 Committer: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
 Committed: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100

 --
  deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml |  57 +++
  .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 +
  .../invocation/ManualInvocationContext.java | 187 
  ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 ++
  .../core/util/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java | 436 +++
  .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxy.java|  28 ++
  .../DeltaSpikeProxyContextualLifecycle.java | 144 ++
  .../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxyFactory.java | 274 
  .../DelegateManualInvocationHandler.java|  43 ++
  .../InterceptManualInvocationHandler.java   |  51 +++
  deltaspike/modules/jsf/impl/pom.xml |   6 -
  .../InjectionAwareApplicationWrapper.java   |   6 +-
  .../proxy/ConverterAndValidatorLifecycle.java   | 132 --
  .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java|  19 +-
  .../ConverterAndValidatorProxyFactory.java  |  78 
  .../proxy/ConverterInvocationHandler.java   |  13 +-
  .../proxy/DefaultPartialStateHolder.java|   3 +
  .../proxy/DelegatingMethodHandler.java  |  58 ---
  .../injection/proxy/MethodHandlerProxy.java |  42 --
  .../jsf/impl/injection/proxy/ProxyMarker.java   |  23 -
  .../proxy/ValidatorInvocationHandler.java   |  12 +-
  .../test/jsf/impl/util/ArchiveUtils.java|   1 -
  deltaspike/modules/partial-bean/impl/pom.xml|  56 ---
  .../impl/PartialBeanBindingExtension.java   |  16 +-
  .../partialbean/impl/PartialBeanLifecycle.java  | 142 --
  .../impl/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java   |  62 +++
  .../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 -
  .../interception/ManualInvocationContext.java   | 187 
  ...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 --
  .../impl/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java  | 423 --
  .../proxy/CallSuperManualInvocationHandler.java |  50 ---
  .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxy.java|  28 --
  .../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java | 263 ---
  .../proxy/RedirectManualInvocationHandler.java  |  42 --
  .../core/api/partialbean/util/ArchiveUtils.java |   7 -
  35 files changed, 1510 insertions(+), 1641 deletions(-)
 --



 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/blob/fcf4d77d/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
 --
 diff --git a/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml b/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
 index c5793f4..94b489d 100644
 --- a/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
 +++ b/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
 @@ -33,6 +33,42 @@

  nameApache DeltaSpike Core-API/name

 +build
 +plugins
 +plugin
 +groupIdorg.apache.maven.plugins/groupId
 +artifactIdmaven-shade-plugin/artifactId
 +version2.3/version
 +configuration
 +shadedArtifactAttachedfalse/shadedArtifactAttached
 +
 createDependencyReducedPomfalse/createDependencyReducedPom
 +
 promoteTransitiveDependenciestrue/promoteTransitiveDependencies
 +relocations
 +relocation
 +patternorg.objectweb.asm/pattern
 +
 

Re: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core

2015-03-15 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
But owb has no link with ds need imo. Ds is a lib so need to care about
user deps where owb doesnt.

Not having an own module would be another reason to not use ds - which is
already the case from my experience for its size but now it would also be
to not be smart enough :(
Le 15 mars 2015 21:20, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a
écrit :

 @romain:
 +0 for an own module
 -0.5 for an additional indirection (we also don't have/need it at owb)

 regards,
 gerhard



 2015-03-15 21:11 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
 :

  +0 for an extra module
 
  before i implemented the asm proxy for the partial bean module, i tried
 it
  many hours to understand and implement it with commons proxy
  as it was not possible out of the box, i switched to plain ASM
  If someone would like to evolve commons proxy and use it in DS - +0
 
  2015-03-15 20:53 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com:
 
   Hmm,
  
   shouldn't we provide this as another module? I'm not super happy to
 have
   asm shade in core.
  
   BTW can't we just use [proxy2]? we can still make the code evolving if
   needed.
  
   Romain Manni-Bucau
   @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau |  Blog
   http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com | Github 
   https://github.com/rmannibucau |
   LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau | Tomitriber
   http://www.tomitribe.com
  
   -- Forwarded message --
   From: tandrasc...@apache.org
   Date: 2015-03-15 20:50 GMT+01:00
   Subject: [2/2] deltaspike git commit: DELTASPIKE-851 move
 proxy-handling
  to
   ds-core
   To: comm...@deltaspike.apache.org
  
  
   DELTASPIKE-851 move proxy-handling to ds-core
  
   Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo
   Commit:
  http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/commit/fcf4d77d
   Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/tree/fcf4d77d
   Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/diff/fcf4d77d
  
   Branch: refs/heads/master
   Commit: fcf4d77d692971a6a93731e64d044f6cf1757d6c
   Parents: d3a21c0
   Author: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
   Authored: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
   Committer: Thomas Andraschko tandrasc...@apache.org
   Committed: Sun Mar 15 20:50:24 2015 +0100
  
   --
deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml |  57 +++
.../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 +
.../invocation/ManualInvocationContext.java | 187 
...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 ++
.../core/util/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java | 436
  +++
.../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxy.java|  28 ++
.../DeltaSpikeProxyContextualLifecycle.java | 144 ++
.../core/util/proxy/DeltaSpikeProxyFactory.java | 274 
.../DelegateManualInvocationHandler.java|  43 ++
.../InterceptManualInvocationHandler.java   |  51 +++
deltaspike/modules/jsf/impl/pom.xml |   6 -
.../InjectionAwareApplicationWrapper.java   |   6 +-
.../proxy/ConverterAndValidatorLifecycle.java   | 132 --
.../ConverterAndValidatorProxyExtension.java|  19 +-
.../ConverterAndValidatorProxyFactory.java  |  78 
.../proxy/ConverterInvocationHandler.java   |  13 +-
.../proxy/DefaultPartialStateHolder.java|   3 +
.../proxy/DelegatingMethodHandler.java  |  58 ---
.../injection/proxy/MethodHandlerProxy.java |  42 --
.../jsf/impl/injection/proxy/ProxyMarker.java   |  23 -
.../proxy/ValidatorInvocationHandler.java   |  12 +-
.../test/jsf/impl/util/ArchiveUtils.java|   1 -
deltaspike/modules/partial-bean/impl/pom.xml|  56 ---
.../impl/PartialBeanBindingExtension.java   |  16 +-
.../partialbean/impl/PartialBeanLifecycle.java  | 142 --
.../impl/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java   |  62 +++
.../AbstractManualInvocationHandler.java| 104 -
.../interception/ManualInvocationContext.java   | 187 
...nualInvocationThrowableWrapperException.java |  27 --
.../impl/proxy/AsmProxyClassGenerator.java  | 423
 --
.../proxy/CallSuperManualInvocationHandler.java |  50 ---
.../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxy.java|  28 --
.../impl/proxy/PartialBeanProxyFactory.java | 263 ---
.../proxy/RedirectManualInvocationHandler.java  |  42 --
.../core/api/partialbean/util/ArchiveUtils.java |   7 -
35 files changed, 1510 insertions(+), 1641 deletions(-)
   --
  
  
  
  
 
 http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/blob/fcf4d77d/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
   --
   diff --git a/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml b/deltaspike/core/api/pom.xml
   index c5793f4..94b489d 

Re: multithreaded repository issues

2015-03-15 Thread Karl Kildén
Hello,

I have not really noticed any perf issues with deltaspike data but then
again I did not measure it either. We use it a lot. Would be great to learn
more about it for sure.

I always assumed the method name query syntax and the other static stuff
would be cached etc so I don't really get why it would be any major penalty
all though I understand each abstraction will have some kind of impact...




On 15 March 2015 at 21:40, hwaastad he...@waastad.org wrote:

 Hi guys,
 and thanks for answering.

 I'll try to get something out on github tomorrow.

 Br hw



 --
 View this message in context:
 http://apache-deltaspike-incubator-discussions.2316169.n4.nabble.com/multithreaded-repository-issues-tp4660132p4660145.html
 Sent from the Apache DeltaSpike Incubator Discussions mailing list archive
 at Nabble.com.