[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] Intel X710 dropping 802.1ad packets?
I sent this to dpdk-users, but maybe dpdk-dev is a better target list? Thanks, Sean >Hello, > >I am seeing a problem with receiving 802.1ad packets on an intel X710 >card, running the 16.04 dpdk release. All the 802.1ad packets are silently >dropped. The port is in promiscuous mode. As far as counters go, ibytes >are incremented for these packets, but not ipackets. Some of the extended >stats are incremented as well (the histogram sizes, etc.) > >Has anyone else seen this? > >Thanks, >Sean > >
[dpdk-dev] ethdev: replacement for rte_pci_dev_ids.h?
>2016-04-07 18:10, Sean Hope: >> Hello, >> >> I see that rte_pci_dev_ids.h has been removed. > >No it has not been removed (yet): > > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_de >v_ids.h > >> We are using it on our product to get supported device ids. >> >> I understand the desire to move that data out of a central place and >>into >> each driver. Any chance that instead of living in a .c file, that each >> driver could hold it in a .h file so that it could be easily consumed by >> an external program? > >Yes there is a plan to move the PCI ids in the drivers but >we need to make a tool to retrieve the ids from the ELF files. >Why do you want to get them from a .h file? The need for a .h file isn't an absolute, but we have some code that was using the existing file. If each driver had their Ids in a per-driver .h file then we just include one h file per driver instead of rte_pci_dev_ids.h and our tool still works. Thanks, Sean
[dpdk-dev] ethdev: replacement for rte_pci_dev_ids.h?
Hello, I see that rte_pci_dev_ids.h has been removed. We are using it on our product to get supported device ids. I understand the desire to move that data out of a central place and into each driver. Any chance that instead of living in a .c file, that each driver could hold it in a .h file so that it could be easily consumed by an external program? Thanks, Sean
