[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] l2fwd/l3fwd: rework long options parsing

2016-11-22 Thread Olivier Matz
Hi,

On 11/22/2016 02:52 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> These 2 patches were part of this RFC, which will not be integrated:
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046974.html
> 
> It does not bring any functional change, it just reworks the way long
> options are parsed in l2fwd and l3fwd to avoid uneeded strcmp() calls
> and to ease the addition of a new long option in the future.
> 
> I send them in case maintainers think it is better this way, but I have
> no real need.
> 
> Olivier Matz (2):
>   l3fwd: rework long options parsing
>   l2fwd: rework long options parsing
> 
>  examples/l2fwd/main.c |  30 +++--
>  examples/l3fwd/main.c | 169 
> ++
>  2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)
> 

Sorry, I missed some checkpatch issues. I'll fix them in v2.
I'm waiting a bit for other comments, in case of.


Olivier


[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] l2fwd/l3fwd: rework long options parsing

2016-11-22 Thread Olivier Matz
These 2 patches were part of this RFC, which will not be integrated:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-September/046974.html

It does not bring any functional change, it just reworks the way long
options are parsed in l2fwd and l3fwd to avoid uneeded strcmp() calls
and to ease the addition of a new long option in the future.

I send them in case maintainers think it is better this way, but I have
no real need.

Olivier Matz (2):
  l3fwd: rework long options parsing
  l2fwd: rework long options parsing

 examples/l2fwd/main.c |  30 +++--
 examples/l3fwd/main.c | 169 ++
 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 88 deletions(-)

-- 
2.8.1