[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Survey - about to close

[Glynn, Michael J]

-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Glynn, Michael J
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 6:14 PM
To: users at dpdk.org; dev at dpdk.org; announce at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] FW: DPDK Community Survey - about to close

> ... 
>
> Regarding improvement areas, the main feedback was:
> * Release Support (stable releases, LTS)
> * Documentation - certain aspects are outdated and need attention 
> (particularly the Programmers Guide)
> * No specific hotspots but performance bottlenecks seen in certain areas
> * Need for a continuous integration and test environment

Hi all - I just want to draw your attention to day 2 of the DPDK Userspace 
event in Dublin next week in which there will be a discussion on 'Usability 
(including packaging, stable releases, LTS releases etc.)' led by John McNamara 
(Intel), Christian Ehrhardt (Canonical), and Luca Boccassi (Brocade), and a 
presentation on 'Testing and Continuous Integration improvements in DPDK' by 
Qian Xu and Yuanhan Liu (both Intel). In addition, Bruce Richardson (Intel) 
will be giving a presentation on 'Identifying and Fixing Performance 
Bottlenecks in DPDK' using an example from the i40e driver illustrate the 
process.

The full planned agenda is located here https://dpdksummit.com/  

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Survey - about to close

[Thomas Monjalon]

Just 2 minutes for DPDK ;)
http://surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey


2016-08-02 14:39, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi all,
> 
> That's the first time a DPDK survey is published.
> It will help us in our future progress to decide what are the most
> important stuff to work on.
> 
> Please do not wait to fill it out. It closes on August 4.
> Thanks for taking 2 minutes now to give your feedback.
> When you will have done your duty, you might peacefully do
> your next task or just enjoy a nice August month :)
> 
> Each voice counts! Thanks
> 
> 
> 2016-07-28 16:45, Glynn, Michael J:
> > Hi all
> > 
> > As part of our ongoing efforts to improve DPDK, we'd like to hear
> > your feedback!
> > 
> > We have created a number of DPDK-related questions here
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey
> > and want to hear your views!!
> > 
> > The survey will close at midnight GMT on Thursday August 4th
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your feedback - the more responses we get
> > the more data we have to drive further features, improvements, etc...
> > so please respond!!
> > 
> > Regards
> > Mike
> 

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Survey

[Glynn, Michael J]

-Original Message-
From: users [mailto:users-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Glynn, Michael J
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:46 PM

Hi all

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve DPDK, we'd like to hear your feedback!

We have created a number of DPDK-related questions here 
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey and want to hear your 
views!!

The survey will close at midnight GMT on Thursday August 4th

> Hi all
> Just a reminder to submit your feedback by midnight GMT this Thursday, August 
> 4th 
> This is your opportunity to voice your feedback - the more we get the better 
> so appreciate if you can take a few minutes to respond using the link 
> provided.
> Thanks to those who have already responded!!
> Regards
> Mike

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Survey

[Glynn, Michael J]

Hi all

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve DPDK, we'd like to hear your feedback!

We have created a number of DPDK-related questions here 
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DPDK_Community_Survey and want to hear your 
views!!

The survey will close at midnight GMT on Thursday August 4th

Thanks in advance for your feedback - the more responses we get the more data 
we have to drive further features, improvements, etc...so please respond!!

Regards
Mike

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - 16.04 Retrospective - Wednesday May 11th

[Glynn, Michael J]

Meeting Minutes for Community Call - May 11th 2014

Topic: DPDK 16.04 Retrospective 
Facilitators: Mike Glynn (Intel), John McNamara (Intel)

Attendees: Christian Ehrhardt, Hemant Agrawal, Jan Viktorin, Mauricio Vasquez, 
Mike Holmes, Stephen Hemminger, Thomas Monjalon, Naoyuki Mori, Tom Gall, 
Konstantin Ananyev, Mike Glynn, John McNamara, Mohammad Abdul Awal, Bruce 
Richardson, Declan Doherty, Roy Fan Zhan, Ferruh Yigit, Bernard Iremonger, 
Reshma Pattan, Remy Horton, Vadim Sukhomlinov, Shanmukha Sreedhar Theerthala

Minutes:
*   IRC chat channel was opened up the discussion (see notes captured 
below). IRC Channel: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=%23dpdk
*   John McNamara reviewed some statistics from 16.04, which included;
o   Number of commits per release - averaging ~700
o   Number of contributors per release - ~100 for the past two releases
o   Unique "Reviewed-by" contributors is very low (7 in least release) 
o   Number of "fix" patches - 301 
o   Number of patches with a "Fixes:" line - has grown from 45 in DPDK2.0 
to 261 in 16.04 (attributed to greater compliance to using the "fixes" line)
o   Number of patchset revisions in v16.04 - vast majority at v1 (199) 
o   Days between Author Date and Commit Date - 50% of final patches are 
merged within 7 days, 75% of final patches are merged within 14 days, "Final" 
patch means the last version, when all v1..vN comments have been addressed

*   Discussion on Areas for Improvement:
o   John Mc: 'Reviewed by' numbers are low. Thomas: this is likely because 
people don't distinguish between 'reviewed by' and 'acked'. Agreed that there 
is still value in retaining the reviewed-by tag.
o   Stephen H: Need more active reviews in the community. Suggested that 
the Maintainers could delegate to others on the mailing list. Maintainers - 
please take note.
o   Thomas M: Having a large number of v1's being applied may not be a good 
thing...would prefer to see higher number of patch revisions since it shows 
community review process is working better. Reviews are the area which require 
the most improvement. 
o   Christian E: Packaging of DPDK - any community pushback to package 
something working almost everywhere but optimized where supported. No 
objections - Christian will post to the mailing list next week. 
http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html 
o   Documentation gaps in (1) RTE table library, and (2) ACL need to be 
addressed. Please discussion on the mailing list, submit patches, or ping John 
McNamara (documentation maintainer)
o   Mike G: Is the RFC process working? There is usually very little 
feedback on RFC's. Thomas commented that RFC's are still useful, suggested 
using header file (with Doxygen comments) as an RFC format.

IRC Chat Notes:
[16:09] == reshmapa [c0c6972b at gateway/web/freenode/ip.192.198.151.43] has 
joined #DPDK
[16:16]  Not enough public reviews
[16:17]  Fixes: lines are increasing (good for maintenance)
[16:20]  A lot of patches are committed late in the cycle
[16:22]  just for the minutes - since the call mentioned some missing 
commit stats - If I didn't mistype that should be 2.2 -> 16.04 - Authors: 
http://paste.ubuntu.com/16363502/   Domains: http://paste.ubuntu.com/16363543/ 
[16:29] == nijopa [~nijopa at 72.246.0.14] has quit [Quit: Leaving.]
[16:33] == nijopa [~nijopa at 72.246.0.14] has joined #DPDK
[16:35]  not for minutes: audio quality is bad from some speakers - 
really hard to understand
[16:36] == yliu [yliu131 at nat/intel/x-phwergujuqevebif] has joined #DPDK
[16:39]  I wanted at least see how the idea at all reflects with the 
community - http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html 
[16:39]  that would allow Distributions to package something working 
almost everywhere but optimized where supported
[16:39]  there were no hard opinions on it yet, I'll bring something 
to the mailing list (prob. next week)

Please feel free to reply if I missed something/captured incorrectly

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - 16.04 Retrospective - Wednesday May 11th

[Glynn, Michael J]

Hi all
Just a reminder about the 16.04 Retrospective Call tomorrow. All the call-in 
details are provided in Tim's email below 

Chat then!
Mike 


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 3:09 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - 16.04 Retrospective - Wednesday May 
11th

At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our 
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For 
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open 
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide their 
input and we can discuss any suggested improvements collectively.

Mike Glynn, who's our Program Manager for DPDK, will facilitate the discussion. 
John McNamara has gathered some stats on things like how many revisions patches 
typically went through etc., which we'll present to help initiate the 
discussion, but the meeting should mostly be an open discussion where people 
should feel free to suggest any improvements they think we should make.

If the approach is successful we can repeat it for future releases.


When:
London (United Kingdom - England)Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 4PMBST  
UTC+1 hour 
San Jose (USA - California)  Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 8AMPDT  
UTC-7 hours
Boston (USA - Massachusetts) Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 11AM   EDT  
UTC-4 hours
Paris (France - ?le-de-France)   Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 5PMCEST 
UTC+2 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi)Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 8:30PM IST  
UTC+5:30 hours 
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 11PM   CST  
UTC+8 hours
Tokyo (Japan)Midnight between Wednesday, May 11 and 
Thursday, May 12 JST  UTC+9 hours


GoToMeeting details:
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/634498213

You can also dial in using your phone. 
United States : +1 (312) 757-3117

Access Code: 634-498-213

More phone numbers
Australia : +61 2 8355 1039
Austria : +43 7 2088 1033
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7001
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9379
Denmark : +45 69 91 89 33
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5770
France : +33 (0) 170 950 585
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7303
Ireland : +353 (0) 19 030 050
Italy : +39 0 693 38 75 50
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 208
New Zealand : +64 9 925 0481
Norway : +47 21 54 82 21
Spain : +34 911 82 9890
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 817
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0167 65
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 330 221 0099

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - 16.04 Retrospective - Wednesday May 11th

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

At the end of each release, we typically hold a retrospective within our 
development team to discuss what went well, what could be improved etc. For 
16.04, we thought it would be a good idea to try doing this with the open 
source community, so that everybody involved in the project can provide their 
input and we can discuss any suggested improvements collectively.

Mike Glynn, who's our Program Manager for DPDK, will facilitate the discussion. 
John McNamara has gathered some stats on things like how many revisions patches 
typically went through etc., which we'll present to help initiate the 
discussion, but the meeting should mostly be an open discussion where people 
should feel free to suggest any improvements they think we should make.

If the approach is successful we can repeat it for future releases.


When:
London (United Kingdom - England)Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 4PMBST  
UTC+1 hour 
San Jose (USA - California)  Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 8AMPDT  
UTC-7 hours
Boston (USA - Massachusetts) Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 11AM   EDT  
UTC-4 hours
Paris (France - ?le-de-France)   Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 5PMCEST 
UTC+2 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi)Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 8:30PM IST  
UTC+5:30 hours 
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) Wednesday, May 11, 2016 at 11PM   CST  
UTC+8 hours
Tokyo (Japan)Midnight between Wednesday, May 11 and 
Thursday, May 12 JST  UTC+9 hours


GoToMeeting details:
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/634498213

You can also dial in using your phone. 
United States : +1 (312) 757-3117

Access Code: 634-498-213

More phone numbers
Australia : +61 2 8355 1039
Austria : +43 7 2088 1033
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7001
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9379
Denmark : +45 69 91 89 33
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5770
France : +33 (0) 170 950 585
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7303
Ireland : +353 (0) 19 030 050
Italy : +39 0 693 38 75 50
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 208
New Zealand : +64 9 925 0481
Norway : +47 21 54 82 21
Spain : +34 911 82 9890
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 817
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0167 65
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 330 221 0099

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[Dave Neary]

Is there any substantive feedback on this? It seems like silence =
consensus (or that the people who might care more are not on this list).

My suggestion is to go to the next stage, start drafting a membership
agreement and identify potential members to recruit. Will the Linux
Foundation take point on recruiting members, or does that fall to the
community too?

Thanks,
Dave.

On 02/05/2016 12:20 PM, Bob Monkman wrote:
> Right. Yes, I can access it just fine.
> Thx,
> 
> 
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
> San Jose, Ca 95134
> M: +1.510.676.5490
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: O'Driscoll, Tim [mailto:tim.odriscoll at intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 9:09 AM
> To: Bob Monkman; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
>> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
>> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>>
>> Thanks very much for the minutes. Can we get Laura's draft deck re:
>> budget and tradeoffs/options?
> 
> There's no slide deck, just the spreadsheet at: 
> https://docs.google.com/a/linuxfoundation.org/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit?usp=sharing.
>  This outlines the minimum (column B) and optional (column C) alternatives 
> that Laura presented on Tuesday.
> 
> I believe access to the spreadsheet is open to everybody, but if anybody runs 
> into issues I'm sure Laura can help to grant access.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
>>
>> Robert (Bob) Monkman
>> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
>> 150 Rose Orchard Way
>> San Jose, Ca 95134
>> M: +1.510.676.5490
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
>> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>>
>> Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies
>> for the delay in sending these out.
>>
>> Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit,
>> Jim St Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin
>> Ananyev, Laura Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn,
>> Tetsuya Mukawa, Thomas Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima
>> Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people
>> joined/left at different times it may not be complete.
>>
>>
>> The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the
>> Userspace event in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a
>> lightweight governance model for DPDK. This would cover marketing,
>> event planning, trademarks, other legal issues etc. It would not cover
>> any technical governance of the project.
>>
>> Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group
>> of us (Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin,
>> me) met with the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is
>> available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-
>> 3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256.
>>
>> Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B
>> represents the minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k.
>> Column C shows a number of optional additions and totals $766k. Points
>> of discussion
>> included:
>> - The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered
>> by registration fees and sponsorship.
>> - Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't
>> currently included (row 23) but could be added if desired.
>> - The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general
>> consensus seemed to be that we wouldn't need these.
>>
>> Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd
>> be looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate
>> membership fee of ~$15-25k.
>>
>> There was a question on what member companies would get in return for
>> their contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the
>> likelihood is that they would get a seat on a board which would
>> determine how the DPDK budget is spent. The scope of this board would
>> be limited to marketing/event/legal issues. Technical governance would
>> continue to be handled separately via our Maintainers a

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[Bob Monkman]

Right. Yes, I can access it just fine.
Thx,


Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490


-Original Message-
From: O'Driscoll, Tim [mailto:tim.odrisc...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 9:09 AM
To: Bob Monkman; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation


> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Thanks very much for the minutes. Can we get Laura's draft deck re:
> budget and tradeoffs/options?

There's no slide deck, just the spreadsheet at: 
https://docs.google.com/a/linuxfoundation.org/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit?usp=sharing.
 This outlines the minimum (column B) and optional (column C) alternatives that 
Laura presented on Tuesday.

I believe access to the spreadsheet is open to everybody, but if anybody runs 
into issues I'm sure Laura can help to grant access.


Tim

>
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
> San Jose, Ca 95134
> M: +1.510.676.5490
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies
> for the delay in sending these out.
>
> Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit,
> Jim St Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin
> Ananyev, Laura Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn,
> Tetsuya Mukawa, Thomas Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima
> Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people
> joined/left at different times it may not be complete.
>
>
> The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the
> Userspace event in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a
> lightweight governance model for DPDK. This would cover marketing,
> event planning, trademarks, other legal issues etc. It would not cover
> any technical governance of the project.
>
> Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group
> of us (Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin,
> me) met with the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is
> available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-
> 3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256.
>
> Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B
> represents the minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k.
> Column C shows a number of optional additions and totals $766k. Points
> of discussion
> included:
> - The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered
> by registration fees and sponsorship.
> - Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't
> currently included (row 23) but could be added if desired.
> - The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general
> consensus seemed to be that we wouldn't need these.
>
> Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd
> be looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate
> membership fee of ~$15-25k.
>
> There was a question on what member companies would get in return for
> their contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the
> likelihood is that they would get a seat on a board which would
> determine how the DPDK budget is spent. The scope of this board would
> be limited to marketing/event/legal issues. Technical governance would
> continue to be handled separately via our Maintainers and our
> Architecture Board.
>
> Most people on the call felt that the proposal to use LF was a good
> idea and was worth pursuing further. However, we only had a small
> number of people on the call so that may not be representative of the
> views of the entire community. Therefore, if anybody has further
> thoughts or input on this, please feel free to reply to this email.
>
> Keith suggested holding a poll so that we can quantify the level of
> interest and give people a way to provide feedback anonymously in case
> they're unwilling to do so in public. I'll look into this.
>
> Feel free to post any corrections or additions if I missed anything.
>
>
> Tim
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
>

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:30 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> 
> Thanks very much for the minutes. Can we get Laura's draft deck re:
> budget and tradeoffs/options?

There's no slide deck, just the spreadsheet at: 
https://docs.google.com/a/linuxfoundation.org/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit?usp=sharing.
 This outlines the minimum (column B) and optional (column C) alternatives that 
Laura presented on Tuesday.

I believe access to the spreadsheet is open to everybody, but if anybody runs 
into issues I'm sure Laura can help to grant access.


Tim

> 
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
> San Jose, Ca 95134
> M: +1.510.676.5490
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> 
> Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies for
> the delay in sending these out.
> 
> Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit, Jim
> St Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin Ananyev,
> Laura Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn, Tetsuya
> Mukawa, Thomas Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima
> Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people
> joined/left at different times it may not be complete.
> 
> 
> The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the Userspace
> event in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a lightweight
> governance model for DPDK. This would cover marketing, event planning,
> trademarks, other legal issues etc. It would not cover any technical
> governance of the project.
> 
> Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group of
> us (Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin, me)
> met with the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is
> available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-
> 3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256.
> 
> Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B represents
> the minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k. Column C shows
> a number of optional additions and totals $766k. Points of discussion
> included:
> - The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered by
> registration fees and sponsorship.
> - Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't
> currently included (row 23) but could be added if desired.
> - The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general
> consensus seemed to be that we wouldn't need these.
> 
> Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd be
> looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate
> membership fee of ~$15-25k.
> 
> There was a question on what member companies would get in return for
> their contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the
> likelihood is that they would get a seat on a board which would
> determine how the DPDK budget is spent. The scope of this board would be
> limited to marketing/event/legal issues. Technical governance would
> continue to be handled separately via our Maintainers and our
> Architecture Board.
> 
> Most people on the call felt that the proposal to use LF was a good idea
> and was worth pursuing further. However, we only had a small number of
> people on the call so that may not be representative of the views of the
> entire community. Therefore, if anybody has further thoughts or input on
> this, please feel free to reply to this email.
> 
> Keith suggested holding a poll so that we can quantify the level of
> interest and give people a way to provide feedback anonymously in case
> they're unwilling to do so in public. I'll look into this.
> 
> Feel free to post any corrections or additions if I missed anything.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> > Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> >
> > At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed
> that
> > a few of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a
> > light-weight governance of DPDK. This would include things like

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[Bob Monkman]

Thanks very much for the minutes. Can we get Laura's draft deck re: budget and 
tradeoffs/options?

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 2:16 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org; Laura Kempke; Michael Dolan
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies for the 
delay in sending these out.

Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit, Jim St 
Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin Ananyev, Laura 
Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn, Tetsuya Mukawa, Thomas 
Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima
Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people 
joined/left at different times it may not be complete.


The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the Userspace event 
in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a lightweight governance model 
for DPDK. This would cover marketing, event planning, trademarks, other legal 
issues etc. It would not cover any technical governance of the project.

Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group of us 
(Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin, me) met with 
the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is available at: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256.

Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B represents the 
minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k. Column C shows a number 
of optional additions and totals $766k. Points of discussion included:
- The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered by 
registration fees and sponsorship.
- Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't currently 
included (row 23) but could be added if desired.
- The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general consensus 
seemed to be that we wouldn't need these.

Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd be 
looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate membership 
fee of ~$15-25k.

There was a question on what member companies would get in return for their 
contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the likelihood is 
that they would get a seat on a board which would determine how the DPDK budget 
is spent. The scope of this board would be limited to marketing/event/legal 
issues. Technical governance would continue to be handled separately via our 
Maintainers and our Architecture Board.

Most people on the call felt that the proposal to use LF was a good idea and 
was worth pursuing further. However, we only had a small number of people on 
the call so that may not be representative of the views of the entire 
community. Therefore, if anybody has further thoughts or input on this, please 
feel free to reply to this email.

Keith suggested holding a poll so that we can quantify the level of interest 
and give people a way to provide feedback anonymously in case they're unwilling 
to do so in public. I'll look into this.

Feel free to post any corrections or additions if I missed anything.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
>
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that
> a few of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a
> light-weight governance of DPDK. This would include things like
> management of DPDK events, registering trademarks, and any required
> legal support etc.
>
> Stephen, Thomas, Dave, Vincent and I met with the Linux Foundation to
> discuss this and came up with a draft budget proposal. We'd like to have
> a community call to discuss this and decide how we should proceed.
>
> The current budget estimate is ~$227k. LF guidance is that for this size
> of budget they'd propose a flat membership fee (i.e. no tiered
> membership) of ~$25k per member company, with a target of getting 10 or
> more companies to contribute.
>
> At the call we can discuss:
> - A breakdown of the proposed budget. LF are very flexible on this, so
> we can add or remove whatever we want for DPDK.
> - Proposed membership fee.
> - Matthew also highlight some recent changes to community representation
> at the Linux Foundation. We should discuss any concerns associated with
> this.
> - Next steps.
>
>
> When:
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

Here are some brief minutes of our discussion on Tuesday. Apologies for the 
delay in sending these out.

Attendees: Bob Monkman, Bruce Richardson, Dave Neary, Ferruh Yigit, Jim St 
Leger, John Bromhead, John McNamara, Keith Wiles, Konstantin Ananyev, Laura 
Kempke, M Jay, Martin Horne, Mike Dolan, Mike Glynn, Tetsuya Mukawa, Thomas 
Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro Nakajima 
Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people 
joined/left at different times it may not be complete.


The background to the call is that we had a discussion at the Userspace event 
in Dublin on using Linux Foundation to provide a lightweight governance model 
for DPDK. This would cover marketing, event planning, trademarks, other legal 
issues etc. It would not cover any technical governance of the project.

Following this and a follow-up call we had in December, a small group of us 
(Dave Neary, Thomas Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Vincent Jardin, me) met with 
the Linux Foundation to create a draft budget which is available at: 
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-3686Xb_jf4FtxdX8Mus9UwIxUb2vI_ppmJV5GnXcLg/edit#gid=302618256.

Laura walked through the spreadsheet at the meeting. Column B represents the 
minimum budget requirement for DPDK and totals $227k. Column C shows a number 
of optional additions and totals $766k. Points of discussion included:
- The minimum option assumes that some of the event costs are covered by 
registration fees and sponsorship.
- Jim asked about LF hosting DPDK IT infrastructure. This isn't currently 
included (row 23) but could be added if desired.
- The item for hackathons (row 29) is just a placeholder. The general consensus 
seemed to be that we wouldn't need these.

Taking the minimum budget requirement of ~$227k, that would mean we'd be 
looking for ~10-15 companies to contribute, each paying a flat-rate membership 
fee of ~$15-25k.

There was a question on what member companies would get in return for their 
contribution. We need to do some further work on this, but the likelihood is 
that they would get a seat on a board which would determine how the DPDK budget 
is spent. The scope of this board would be limited to marketing/event/legal 
issues. Technical governance would continue to be handled separately via our 
Maintainers and our Architecture Board.

Most people on the call felt that the proposal to use LF was a good idea and 
was worth pursuing further. However, we only had a small number of people on 
the call so that may not be representative of the views of the entire 
community. Therefore, if anybody has further thoughts or input on this, please 
feel free to reply to this email.

Keith suggested holding a poll so that we can quantify the level of interest 
and give people a way to provide feedback anonymously in case they're unwilling 
to do so in public. I'll look into this.

Feel free to post any corrections or additions if I missed anything.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2016 12:19 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> 
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that
> a few of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a
> light-weight governance of DPDK. This would include things like
> management of DPDK events, registering trademarks, and any required
> legal support etc.
> 
> Stephen, Thomas, Dave, Vincent and I met with the Linux Foundation to
> discuss this and came up with a draft budget proposal. We'd like to have
> a community call to discuss this and decide how we should proceed.
> 
> The current budget estimate is ~$227k. LF guidance is that for this size
> of budget they'd propose a flat membership fee (i.e. no tiered
> membership) of ~$25k per member company, with a target of getting 10 or
> more companies to contribute.
> 
> At the call we can discuss:
> - A breakdown of the proposed budget. LF are very flexible on this, so
> we can add or remove whatever we want for DPDK.
> - Proposed membership fee.
> - Matthew also highlight some recent changes to community representation
> at the Linux Foundation. We should discuss any concerns associated with
> this.
> - Next steps.
> 
> 
> When:
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET
> 
> 
> How to join:
> You can join from a computer, tablet or smartphone:
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/474154717
> 
> You can also dial in by phone.
> Access Code: 474-154-717
> 
> More phone numbers
> United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
> Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> Austria : +43 7 2088 1400
> Belgium : +32 (0) 92 98 0592
> Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[Dave Neary]

Hi Tim,

On 01/22/2016 07:19 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few 
> of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight 
> governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events, 
> registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc.
> 
> Stephen, Thomas, Dave, Vincent and I met with the Linux Foundation to discuss 
> this and came up with a draft budget proposal. We'd like to have a community 
> call to discuss this and decide how we should proceed.
> 
> The current budget estimate is ~$227k. LF guidance is that for this size of 
> budget they'd propose a flat membership fee (i.e. no tiered membership) of 
> ~$25k per member company, with a target of getting 10 or more companies to 
> contribute.
> 
> At the call we can discuss:
> - A breakdown of the proposed budget. LF are very flexible on this, so we can 
> add or remove whatever we want for DPDK.
> - Proposed membership fee.
> - Matthew also highlight some recent changes to community representation at 
> the Linux Foundation. We should discuss any concerns associated with this.
> - Next steps.

Sounds good to me. All of the times below work. :-)

Thanks,
Dave.

> When: 
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Tue, Feb 2, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET
> 
> 
> How to join:
> You can join from a computer, tablet or smartphone: 
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/474154717
> 
> You can also dial in by phone.
> Access Code: 474-154-717
> 
> More phone numbers
> United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
> Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> Austria : +43 7 2088 1400
> Belgium : +32 (0) 92 98 0592
> Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
> Denmark : +45 69 91 80 05
> Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
> France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
> Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7313
> Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
> Italy : +39 0 247 92 12 39
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 379
> New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
> Norway : +47 21 03 58 96
> Spain : +34 911 82 9782
> Sweden : +46 (0) 313 613 558
> Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
> United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
> 
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

At the community call we held on governance in December, we agreed that a few 
of us would work with the Linux Foundation on a proposal for a light-weight 
governance of DPDK. This would include things like management of DPDK events, 
registering trademarks, and any required legal support etc.

Stephen, Thomas, Dave, Vincent and I met with the Linux Foundation to discuss 
this and came up with a draft budget proposal. We'd like to have a community 
call to discuss this and decide how we should proceed.

The current budget estimate is ~$227k. LF guidance is that for this size of 
budget they'd propose a flat membership fee (i.e. no tiered membership) of 
~$25k per member company, with a target of getting 10 or more companies to 
contribute.

At the call we can discuss:
- A breakdown of the proposed budget. LF are very flexible on this, so we can 
add or remove whatever we want for DPDK.
- Proposed membership fee.
- Matthew also highlight some recent changes to community representation at the 
Linux Foundation. We should discuss any concerns associated with this.
- Next steps.


When: 
Tue, Feb 2, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Feb 2, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Feb 2, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Feb 2, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET


How to join:
You can join from a computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/474154717

You can also dial in by phone.
Access Code: 474-154-717

More phone numbers
United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
Austria : +43 7 2088 1400
Belgium : +32 (0) 92 98 0592
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark : +45 69 91 80 05
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7313
Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
Italy : +39 0 247 92 12 39
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 080 379
New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
Norway : +47 21 03 58 96
Spain : +34 911 82 9782
Sweden : +46 (0) 313 613 558
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

These are brief minutes of our community call on Wednesday. Please feel free to 
post any corrections or additions.

Attendees:  Amruta Zende, Andrey, Bruce Richardson, Chris Wright, Dave Neary, 
Frank Zdarsky, Heqing Zhu, Jerin Jacob, Jim St Leger, John Bromhead, John 
DiGiglio, Keith Wiles, Konstantin Ananyev, Lixuming, M Jay, Mike Dolan, Nan, 
Panu Matilainen, Rashid Khan, Sanjay Aiyagari, Scott Nicholas, Siobhan Butler, 
Stephen Hemminger, Tao Yang, Thomas Monjalon, Tim O'Driscoll, Yoshihiro 
Nakajima.
Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people 
joined/left at different times it may not be complete.

Architecture Board:
- Discussed the proposal on board composition that was made recently on the 
mailing list (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/030038.html).
- Stephen asked how frequently we should review membership. Agreed that we 
should review at least annually. Our next community event (we'll hold a 
follow-up to Userspace in Dublin in September-October) would be a good 
time/place to discuss how well this is working and any required changes.
- Jim asked if all the people nominated have confirmed that they're willing to 
participate. They have.

- Agreed that we now have an Architecture Board! The members will agree a time 
amongst themselves for a first meeting in January.
- Thanks to Thomas, Bruce, Stephen, Jerin, Panu, Olivier and Konstantin for 
agreeing to participate and provide technical direction for the project.


Linux Foundation:
- Mike Dolan presented the attached slides.
- Dave Neary asked if the LF model was all or nothing. Can a project pick and 
choose which elements it wants, or does it need to adopt the entire LF 
governance model? Mike confirmed that it's entirely up to each project which 
aspects they choose to adopt.
- There was some discussion on trademarks. As far as everybody on the call is 
aware, nobody has trademarked DPDK. Mike suggested that it's probably worth 
registering to prevent anybody else from doing so. LF can help with this 
process.
- There was a question on whether just the ownership of the dpdk.org domain 
would need to transition to LF, or if DNS would need to change too. Mike 
confirmed that it would just be a change in ownership of the domain and no DNS 
changes are required.
- Can you still have individuals who are not associated with an LF member 
participate as part of the decision-making process (e.g. a community rep on the 
board)? Mike confirmed that this is possible.
- Thomas asked about the scope of the project governance. Mike described it as 
a decision-making body that will determine how the project funds will be spent. 
This is completely separate from technical governance of the project, which 
we've dealt with separately via the Architecture Board.
- Agreed that we'll create a small team to work with the Linux Foundation to 
create a specific proposal for the project that will then be reviewed with the 
community. The following people volunteered on the call: Dave Neary, Thomas 
Monjalon, Stephen Hemminger, Tim O'Driscoll. If anybody else is interested in 
participating, please let me know. We did agree that we should keep this to a 
max of 5-6 people.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:02 PM
> To: Scott Nicholas; mdolan at linuxfoundation.org; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation
> 
> One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project
> governance at the Userspace event was to engage with the Linux
> Foundation to see if they can provide a lightweight model for DPDK. This
> would cover things like managing a marketing budget, event planning,
> trademarks etc. Scott Nicholas and Mike Dolan from the Linux Foundation
> will present the options that Linux Foundation can provide for DPDK.
> 
> Apologies for the short notice, but we'd like to fit this in before the
> holiday period.
> 
> When:
> Wed, Dec 16, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Wed, Dec 16, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Wed, Dec 16, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Wed, Dec 16, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET
> 
> How to join:
> You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone:
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/497889365
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> Access Code: 497-889-365
> 
> Phone numbers:
> United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
> Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
> Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
> Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
> Denmark : +45 69 91 80 05
> Finland : +358 (0) 931 58 1746
> France : +33 (0) 182 880 780
> Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
> Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
> Italy : +39 0 699 26 68 58
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
> New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
> Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
> Spain : +34 911 23 0

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Linux Foundation

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

One of the actions resulting from the discussion we had on project governance 
at the Userspace event was to engage with the Linux Foundation to see if they 
can provide a lightweight model for DPDK. This would cover things like managing 
a marketing budget, event planning, trademarks etc. Scott Nicholas and Mike 
Dolan from the Linux Foundation will present the options that Linux Foundation 
can provide for DPDK.

Apologies for the short notice, but we'd like to fit this in before the holiday 
period.

When: 
Wed, Dec 16, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Wed, Dec 16, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Wed, Dec 16, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Wed, Dec 16, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET

How to join:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/497889365

You can also dial in using your phone.
Access Code: 497-889-365

Phone numbers:
United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark : +45 69 91 80 05
Finland : +358 (0) 931 58 1746
France : +33 (0) 182 880 780
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
Italy : +39 0 699 26 68 58
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
Spain : +34 911 23 0850
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

These are brief minutes of our community call on Tuesday. Please feel free to 
post any corrections or additions.

Attendees: Jim St Leger, Tim O'Driscoll, Konstantin Ananyev, Cheryl Edwards, 
Pablo de Lara Guarch, Declan Doherty, Mike Glynn, Dave Hunt, Bernard Iremonger, 
M Jay, Jerin Jacob (Cavium), Jitendra Kanitkar, John DiGiglio, John McNamara, 
Keith Wiles, Patrick Lu, Mike Holmes (Linaro), Olivier Matz, Prasun Kapoor, Raj 
Murali (Linaro), Remy Horton, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy, Thomas Monjalon, Walt 
Gilmore, Yoshihiro Nakajima, Siobhan Butler, Bob Monkman, Jan Viktorin, Ola 
Liljedahl (ARM), Ankit Jindal (Applied Micro), Fan Zhang
Note: This list is taken from the GoToMeeting tool, but since people 
joined/left at different times it may not be complete.


Jim gave a quick summary of last week's meeting:
- Dave Hunt summarized the status of ARM v7/v8 support. See the attached 
slides. Maintainers for v7 will be Jan Viktorin and Jianbo Liu. Maintainers for 
v8 will be Jerin Jacob and Jianbo Liu.
- Venky presented on External Mempool Manager. There wasn't time to complete 
the presentation so this was continued at this week's meeting.
- Bob Monkman is working on coordinating contributions to DPDK from the ARM 
community. 


External Mempool Manager:
- Keith Wiles completed the presentation on this. Slides are attached.
- Goal is to support other memory management schemes. These could be HW or SW 
implementations.
- People should review the slides and post any other comments/questions on the 
mailing list.


Bob gave an update on plans for DPDK contributions from the ARM community:
- The original plan was to consolidate/coordinate contributions across vendors, 
but it looks like this may not be necessary. This may change, but at the moment 
there doesn't seem to be a need.
- Several ARM vendors (including Broadcom, Freescale) are monitoring the work 
being done in DPDK. They'll test with their hardware and engage with the 
community if/when they have issues or patches to contribute
- Bob will get others to review External Mempool Manager proposal to make sure 
it meets their needs.


Call to discuss Linux Foundation options for DPDK:
- This is a follow up to a discussion at the Userspace event.
- Jim St Leger would like to have a Linux Foundation rep present to the 
community on the options for using LF for DPDK. We'll discuss with the LF and 
arrange a time for this, before the holiday period if possible.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 5:51 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> 
> I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the
> outcomes was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to
> further discuss the External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:
> 
> When:
> Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Dec 8, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Tue, Dec 8, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET
> 
> How to join:
> You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone:
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/704010829
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> 
> Access Code: 704-010-829
> 
> Phone numbers
> United States : +1 (786) 358-5410
> Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
> Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
> Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
> Denmark : +45 69 91 88 62
> Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
> France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
> Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
> Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
> Italy : +39 0 699 36 98 80
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
> New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
> Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
> Spain : +34 911 23 0850
> Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
> Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
> United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Arm Status.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 155149 bytes
Desc: Arm Status.pdf
URL: 
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20151209/c41ee694/attachment-0002.pdf>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: External Mempool Manager.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 140199 bytes
Desc: External Mempool Manager.pdf
URL: 
<http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20151209/c41ee694/attachment-0003.pdf>

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[Jan Viktorin]

Hello,

I'd like to see the presentation as well.

Another point. Last time, I was confused a bit by who is talking as the 
gotomeeting system doesn't show it always and if it does it hides very quickly. 
The topic was not very clear sometimes. Could we agree on some rules? Could 
somebody be a moderator? There is the chat that can be used for this...

Finally, some conclusion should be sent into the mailing list.

Regards
Jan?Viktorin
RehiveTech
Sent?from?a?mobile?device
? P?vodn? zpr?va ?
Od: Bob Monkman
Odesl?no: ?ter?, 8. prosince 2015 1:55
Komu: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
Kopie: Prasun.Kapoor at caviumnetworks.com; Liu, Kin-Yip
P?edm?t: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

Tim,
Yes, and I have been meaning to ask Venky to send out the presentation again. 
This was asked at the meeting and it fell through the cracks. I had wanted to 
ping some of the ARM SoC folks to read it and come prepared to discuss. As it 
stands, I will send a note anyways and see if I can get some interested 
stakeholders there. I recall some of the Cavium folks were online last time.

Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 9:51 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes 
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the 
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:

When:
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET

How to join:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/704010829

You can also dial in using your phone.

Access Code: 704-010-829

Phone numbers
United States : +1 (786) 358-5410
Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark : +45 69 91 88 62
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
Italy : +39 0 699 36 98 80
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
Spain : +34 911 23 0850
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[Bob Monkman]

Tim,
Yes, and I have been meaning to ask Venky to send out the presentation again. 
This was asked at the meeting and it fell through the cracks. I had wanted to 
ping some of the ARM SoC folks to read it and come prepared to discuss. As it 
stands, I will send a note anyways and see if I can get some interested 
stakeholders there. I recall some of the Cavium folks were online last time.

Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 9:51 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes 
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the 
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:

When:
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET

How to join:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/704010829

You can also dial in using your phone.

Access Code: 704-010-829

Phone numbers
United States : +1 (786) 358-5410
Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark : +45 69 91 88 62
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
Italy : +39 0 699 36 98 80
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
Spain : +34 911 23 0850
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

I missed Tuesday's call as I was travelling, but I believe one of the outcomes 
was to hold another call at the same time on Tuesday 8th to further discuss the 
External Mempool Manager. Here are the details:

When: 
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Dec 8, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 CET

How to join:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/704010829

You can also dial in using your phone.

Access Code: 704-010-829

Phone numbers
United States : +1 (786) 358-5410
Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
Austria : +43 7 2088 0034
Belgium : +32 (0) 28 93 7018
Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
Denmark : +45 69 91 88 62
Finland : +358 (0) 942 41 5778
France : +33 (0) 182 880 456
Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
Italy : +39 0 699 36 98 80
Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
New Zealand : +64 9 442 7358
Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
Spain : +34 911 23 0850
Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

This is just a reminder that this call is on tomorrow, at 15:00 GMT. I'll be 
travelling, but Jim St Leger has agreed to host the call.

The agenda is:
ARMv7 & v8 ports:
- Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps are 
(Dave Hunt)
- Discussion on plans for further contributions in this area

External Memory Manager:
- Summary of our plans for DPDK 2.3 (Venky Venkatesan)
- Do others plan to do work in this area?

Other DPDK/ARM plans:
- Does anybody else have plans for ARM-related work in DPDK that they can share?

The link for the online meeting is: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101. Further details on the meeting 
time in other timezones, and dial-in numbers for various countries are included 
below.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 11:20 AM
> To: Bob Monkman; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> 
> Thanks for following up on this Bob. It's great to see this level of
> engagement from the ARM ecosystem. In order to facilitate this, we'll
> move our call out by a week. New details for the meeting are:
> 
> When:
> Tue, Dec 1, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Dec 1, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Dec 1, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Tue, Dec 1, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST
> 
> Meeting Details:
> You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone:
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> 
> Access Code: 535-221-101
> 
> Phone numbers:
> United States: +1 (224) 501-3217
> Australia: +61 2 9087 3605
> Austria: +43 7 2088 1403
> Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019
> Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351
> Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64
> Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781
> France: +33 (0) 182 880 458
> Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210
> Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979
> Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67
> Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381
> New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214
> Norway: +47 21 03 58 98
> Spain: +34 955 32 0845
> Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836
> Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09
> United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:27 PM
> > To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> >
> > Tim, et al,
> > Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to
> discuss
> > what support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for
> > networking segment software strategy within ARM and, as some of your
> > colleagues already know, I am coordinating collaborative work on DPDK
> > for ARM with multiple members of our ARM ecosystem.
> >
> > My concern on this first discussion is that I, and other key
> > stakeholders from engineering management will be out all week for the
> US
> > Thanksgiving holiday. I suspect other key ARM stakeholder reps who may
> > want to join in this conversation may be in the same boat. Would the
> > group here be willing to consider same day and time the following
> week?
> > Tuesday Dec 1?
> >
> > We would greatly appreciate and I think you will have a better
> > chance of critical mass of the right people.
> > Regards,
> > Bob
> >
> > Robert (Bob) Monkman
> > Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
> > 150 Rose Orchard Way
> > San Jose, Ca 95134
> > M: +1.510.676.5490
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:09 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> >
> > There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK
> > support for ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to
> embrace
> > a new architecture.
> >
> > We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would
> > make a good topic for a community call. This will give everybody a
> > chance to share their plans so we can be clear on who's doing what and
> > make sure that we avoid overlaps.
> >
> > We'll host a community call on this next Tuesday (24th Nov) at 15:00-
> > 16:00 GMT. Details on the proposed agenda, the time in a couple of
> other
> > timezones, and how to join the online meeting are included below.
> >
> >
> > Agenda:
> > ARMv7 & v8 ports:
> > - Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps
> > are (Dave Hunt)

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[Bagh Fares]

Thank you Tim for addressing this. We are very interested in this activities. 
Our interest is having common API for our customer between various arch to ease 
the life of their sw developers. 
We are already writing code to contribute here.

-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:09 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for 
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.

We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a 
good topic for a community call. This will give everybody a chance to share 
their plans so we can be clear on who's doing what and make sure that we avoid 
overlaps.

We'll host a community call on this next Tuesday (24th Nov) at 15:00-16:00 GMT. 
Details on the proposed agenda, the time in a couple of other timezones, and 
how to join the online meeting are included below.


Agenda:
ARMv7 & v8 ports:
- Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps are 
(Dave Hunt)
- Discussion on plans for further contributions in this area

External Memory Manager:
- Summary of our plans for DPDK 2.3 (Venky Venkatesan)
- Do others plan to do work in this area?

Other DPDK/ARM plans:
- Does anybody else have plans for ARM-related work in DPDK that they can share?


When: 
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST


Meeting Details:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101

You can also dial in using your phone. 

Access Code: 535-221-101 

Phone numbers:
United States: +1 (224) 501-3217   
Australia: +61 2 9087 3605   
Austria: +43 7 2088 1403   
Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019   
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351   
Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64   
Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781   
France: +33 (0) 182 880 458   
Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210   
Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979   
Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67   
Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381   
New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214   
Norway: +47 21 03 58 98   
Spain: +34 955 32 0845   
Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836   
Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09   
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

Thanks for following up on this Bob. It's great to see this level of engagement 
from the ARM ecosystem. In order to facilitate this, we'll move our call out by 
a week. New details for the meeting are:

When:
Tue, Dec 1, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Dec 1, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Dec 1, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Dec 1, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST

Meeting Details:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101

You can also dial in using your phone.

Access Code: 535-221-101

Phone numbers:
United States: +1 (224) 501-3217
Australia: +61 2 9087 3605
Austria: +43 7 2088 1403
Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351
Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64
Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781
France: +33 (0) 182 880 458
Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210
Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979
Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67
Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381
New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214
Norway: +47 21 03 58 98
Spain: +34 955 32 0845
Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836
Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Monkman [mailto:Bob.Monkman at arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:27 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> 
> Tim, et al,
> Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to discuss
> what support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for
> networking segment software strategy within ARM and, as some of your
> colleagues already know, I am coordinating collaborative work on DPDK
> for ARM with multiple members of our ARM ecosystem.
> 
> My concern on this first discussion is that I, and other key
> stakeholders from engineering management will be out all week for the US
> Thanksgiving holiday. I suspect other key ARM stakeholder reps who may
> want to join in this conversation may be in the same boat. Would the
> group here be willing to consider same day and time the following week?
> Tuesday Dec 1?
> 
> We would greatly appreciate and I think you will have a better
> chance of critical mass of the right people.
> Regards,
> Bob
> 
> Robert (Bob) Monkman
> Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
> 150 Rose Orchard Way
> San Jose, Ca 95134
> M: +1.510.676.5490
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:09 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support
> 
> There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK
> support for ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace
> a new architecture.
> 
> We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would
> make a good topic for a community call. This will give everybody a
> chance to share their plans so we can be clear on who's doing what and
> make sure that we avoid overlaps.
> 
> We'll host a community call on this next Tuesday (24th Nov) at 15:00-
> 16:00 GMT. Details on the proposed agenda, the time in a couple of other
> timezones, and how to join the online meeting are included below.
> 
> 
> Agenda:
> ARMv7 & v8 ports:
> - Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps
> are (Dave Hunt)
> - Discussion on plans for further contributions in this area
> 
> External Memory Manager:
> - Summary of our plans for DPDK 2.3 (Venky Venkatesan)
> - Do others plan to do work in this area?
> 
> Other DPDK/ARM plans:
> - Does anybody else have plans for ARM-related work in DPDK that they
> can share?
> 
> 
> When:
> Tue, Nov 24, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
> Tue, Nov 24, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
> Tue, Nov 24, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
> Tue, Nov 24, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST
> 
> 
> Meeting Details:
> You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone:
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> 
> Access Code: 535-221-101
> 
> Phone numbers:
> United States: +1 (224) 501-3217
> Australia: +61 2 9087 3605
> Austria: +43 7 2088 1403
> Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019
> Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351
> Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64
> Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781
> France: +33 (0) 182 880 458
> Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210
> Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979
> Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67
> Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381
> New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214
> Norway: +47 21 03 58 98
> Spain: +34 955 32 0845
> Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836
> Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09
> United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy
> the information in any medium. Thank you.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[Bob Monkman]

Tim, et al,
Thanks for this call to the ARM community to convene to discuss what 
support is out there in ARM ecosystem. I am responsible for networking segment 
software strategy within ARM and, as some of your colleagues already know, I am 
coordinating collaborative work on DPDK for ARM with multiple members of our 
ARM ecosystem.

My concern on this first discussion is that I, and other key 
stakeholders from engineering management will be out all week for the US 
Thanksgiving holiday. I suspect other key ARM stakeholder reps who may want to 
join in this conversation may be in the same boat. Would the group here be 
willing to consider same day and time the following week? Tuesday Dec 1?

We would greatly appreciate and I think you will have a better chance 
of critical mass of the right people.
Regards,
Bob

Robert (Bob) Monkman
Enterprise Segment Marketing Manager
150 Rose Orchard Way
San Jose, Ca 95134
M: +1.510.676.5490


-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:09 AM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for 
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.

We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a 
good topic for a community call. This will give everybody a chance to share 
their plans so we can be clear on who's doing what and make sure that we avoid 
overlaps.

We'll host a community call on this next Tuesday (24th Nov) at 15:00-16:00 GMT. 
Details on the proposed agenda, the time in a couple of other timezones, and 
how to join the online meeting are included below.


Agenda:
ARMv7 & v8 ports:
- Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps are 
(Dave Hunt)
- Discussion on plans for further contributions in this area

External Memory Manager:
- Summary of our plans for DPDK 2.3 (Venky Venkatesan)
- Do others plan to do work in this area?

Other DPDK/ARM plans:
- Does anybody else have plans for ARM-related work in DPDK that they can share?


When:
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST


Meeting Details:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101

You can also dial in using your phone.

Access Code: 535-221-101

Phone numbers:
United States: +1 (224) 501-3217
Australia: +61 2 9087 3605
Austria: +43 7 2088 1403
Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351
Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64
Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781
France: +33 (0) 182 880 458
Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210
Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979
Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67
Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381
New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214
Norway: +47 21 03 58 98
Spain: +34 955 32 0845
Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836
Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086




-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - ARM Support

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

There's been a lot of activity on the mailing list recently on DPDK support for 
ARM. It's great to see the project being enhanced to embrace a new architecture.

We have seen some duplication of efforts on this, so we think it would make a 
good topic for a community call. This will give everybody a chance to share 
their plans so we can be clear on who's doing what and make sure that we avoid 
overlaps.

We'll host a community call on this next Tuesday (24th Nov) at 15:00-16:00 GMT. 
Details on the proposed agenda, the time in a couple of other timezones, and 
how to join the online meeting are included below.


Agenda:
ARMv7 & v8 ports:
- Summary of what's been submitted for 2.2 and what the remaining gaps are 
(Dave Hunt)
- Discussion on plans for further contributions in this area

External Memory Manager:
- Summary of our plans for DPDK 2.3 (Venky Venkatesan)
- Do others plan to do work in this area?

Other DPDK/ARM plans:
- Does anybody else have plans for ARM-related work in DPDK that they can share?


When: 
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 15:00 - 16:00 GMT
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 07:00 - 08:00 PST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 10:00 - 11:00 EST
Tue, Nov 24, 2015 16:00 - 17:00 PST


Meeting Details:
You can join from your computer, tablet or smartphone: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/535221101

You can also dial in using your phone. 

Access Code: 535-221-101 

Phone numbers:
United States: +1 (224) 501-3217   
Australia: +61 2 9087 3605   
Austria: +43 7 2088 1403   
Belgium: +32 (0) 28 93 7019   
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9351   
Denmark: +45 69 91 88 64   
Finland: +358 (0) 942 41 5781   
France: +33 (0) 182 880 458   
Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7210   
Ireland   +353 (0) 14 845 979   
Italy: +39 0 553 98 95 67   
Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 381   
New Zealand: +64 4 974 7214   
Norway: +47 21 03 58 98   
Spain: +34 955 32 0845   
Sweden: +46 (0) 853 527 836   
Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0167 09   
United Kingdom: +44 (0) 330 221 0086

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

Some great input Dave. We discussed a number of issues yesterday which, while 
related, should probably be treated separately for clarity. For each of these, 
I think we need to start with a clear problem statement and a concrete proposal 
for change.

I've added some further comments on the specific items below.

> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> 
> Thanks for the notes Tim!
> 
> I had intended to participate, but didn't realise that there was a
> conflict with an OPNFV call at the same time, and a calendaring snafu.
> 
> In the interests of having some more focussed discussion, I have some
> questions on the notes to get beyond passive voice. I think it will be
> useful to have concrete proposals and understand the positions of
> various entities participating in the project (both individuals and
> companies).
> 
> On 05/13/2015 07:19 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Thanks to all who attended and contributed to yesterday's discussion.
> For the benefit of those who couldn't attend, here's a brief summary of
> what was covered. Please feel free to point out any errors or omissions.
> >
> > Decision Making
> > - There was a discussion on whether we need a Technical Steering
> Committee or similar decision-making forum. The scope would be to make
> long-term, strategic decisions and to provide a resolution for issues
> that do not reach a consensus on the mailing list.
> > - Some felt that this was a good idea and would help to reach a timely
> conclusion on contentious issues. Others felt that these issues should
> be resolved on the mailing list and/or by the Maintainer.
> 
> In this case, the problem statement could be that it's unclear how items
> can be proposed for inclusion in future releases, and how decisions on
> inclusion are made once proposals are made. Is that correct?
> 
> I am a big fan of transparency in the decision making processes of a
> project. The Linux decision process might be described as: "Subsystem
> owners are kings of their space, but if there is a lack of consensus,
> Linus decides". That works because people trust Linus to be an unbiased
> arbitor of what is best for Linux.
> 
> What would the equivalent de facto decision making process for DPDK be?
> And does it need changing? In the interests of clarity, my understanding
> is that "the Maintainer" in the note above is Thomas Monjalon - can I
> just confirm that this is true and understood by all?

Yes, the Maintainer is Thomas. We do have the concept of separate Maintainers 
for each library (documented in the MAINTAINERS file), but Thomas is the 
overall Maintainer.

As a follow-on to yesterday's call, I'm going to start a separate thread 
specifically on decision making and the role of a TSC.

> > Github
> > - There was some discussion on the merits of github. As with the
> mailing list discussion on this, some were in favour and some against.
> > - Nothing is stopping people using github today and then submitting
> pull requests.
> 
> My feeling is that the tools discussion belies something deeper - it
> could be "reviewing patches and getting a list of unreviewed patches is
> hard", it could be "patches are not reviewed quickly enough", it could
> be "there is no way to tell once a patch has been reviewed what, if any,
> remediation is needed for the patch to be committed". I would like to
> get some feeling on what people see as the underlying fundamental issue
> which the tools change might address.
> 
> Can someone deeply involved in the project have a go at defining a patch
> review workflow problem statement, please?

+1 Any volunteers?

> > DPDK Industry Representation
> > - At the moment, we don't have any project-level DPDK entity or budget
> that would ensure DPDK representation at relevant events. It's left to
> individual contributors to do this.
> >
> > Independent Ownership
> > - It was suggested that it would be better to have independent
> community ownership of the DPDK project.
> > - The argument against this is that the ownership of the
> infrastructure (website, git repo) is not important and can be easily
> cloned if required.
> 
> Were there any concrete proposals or requirements laid out in the call?
> 
> From my point of view, there are a few things which are important here:
>  - Community ownership of the DPDK trademark
>  - The ability to pool resources and enter into contracts for things
> like marketing, developer event organisation, ordering swag
>  - The perception of a level playing field
>  - A framework for commercial entities to indicate their support for
> (and intention to participate in) the project
> 
> The key word here is perception: DPDK is seen as an Intel platform only
> project by those outside the project, and dpdk.org is seen as a 6WIND
> owned community space.
> 
> I think that it would be valuable to have an independent entity who
> could, without a huge cost structure, manage the trademark, enable the
> pooling of resources, and provide a framework for 

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

Thanks to all who attended and contributed to yesterday's discussion. For the 
benefit of those who couldn't attend, here's a brief summary of what was 
covered. Please feel free to point out any errors or omissions.

Decision Making
- There was a discussion on whether we need a Technical Steering Committee or 
similar decision-making forum. The scope would be to make long-term, strategic 
decisions and to provide a resolution for issues that do not reach a consensus 
on the mailing list.
- Some felt that this was a good idea and would help to reach a timely 
conclusion on contentious issues. Others felt that these issues should be 
resolved on the mailing list and/or by the Maintainer.

Github
- There was some discussion on the merits of github. As with the mailing list 
discussion on this, some were in favour and some against.
- Nothing is stopping people using github today and then submitting pull 
requests. 

DPDK Industry Representation
- At the moment, we don't have any project-level DPDK entity or budget that 
would ensure DPDK representation at relevant events. It's left to individual 
contributors to do this.

Independent Ownership
- It was suggested that it would be better to have independent community 
ownership of the DPDK project.
- The argument against this is that the ownership of the infrastructure 
(website, git repo) is not important and can be easily cloned if required.

Next Steps
- The conclusion was to have further discussion on the mailing list, and 
possibly schedule a follow-up call in 2-3 weeks.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 4:35 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0
> 
> This is just a reminder that this call is on tomorrow, at the following
> times, which is just under 24 hours from now.
> 
> Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00
> AM PDT UTC-7 hours
> Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST
> UTC-7 hours
> Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM
> EDT UTC-4 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT
> UTC-4 hours
> Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT
> UTC-4 hours
> London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM
> BST UTC+1 hour
> Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
> Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
> New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST
> UTC+5:30 hours
> Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at
> 11:00:00 PM CST
> UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00
> 
> 
> It would be good to have as much representation as possible from DPDK
> contributors and users, so that the discussion reflects the views and
> needs of the community.
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> >
> > > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> > >
> > > When were you thinking of having the call?
> >
> > I put the day and time at the end of the email, but it probably should
> > have been at the start! Apologies that this wasn't clear.
> >
> > Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
> > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00
> > AM PDT UTC-7 hours
> > Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST
> > UTC-7 hours
> > Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM
> > EDT UTC-4 hours
> > New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM
> EDT
> > UTC-4 hours
> > Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT
> > UTC-4 hours
> > London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00
> PM
> > BST UTC+1 hour
> > Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
> > Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3
> hours
> > Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
> > New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST
> > UTC+5:30 hours
> > Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at
> > 11:00:00 PM CST
> > UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00
> >
> > > It's not been explicit, but can

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[Dave Neary]

Thanks for the notes Tim!

I had intended to participate, but didn't realise that there was a
conflict with an OPNFV call at the same time, and a calendaring snafu.

In the interests of having some more focussed discussion, I have some
questions on the notes to get beyond passive voice. I think it will be
useful to have concrete proposals and understand the positions of
various entities participating in the project (both individuals and
companies).

On 05/13/2015 07:19 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> Thanks to all who attended and contributed to yesterday's discussion. For the 
> benefit of those who couldn't attend, here's a brief summary of what was 
> covered. Please feel free to point out any errors or omissions.
> 
> Decision Making
> - There was a discussion on whether we need a Technical Steering Committee or 
> similar decision-making forum. The scope would be to make long-term, 
> strategic decisions and to provide a resolution for issues that do not reach 
> a consensus on the mailing list.
> - Some felt that this was a good idea and would help to reach a timely 
> conclusion on contentious issues. Others felt that these issues should be 
> resolved on the mailing list and/or by the Maintainer.

In this case, the problem statement could be that it's unclear how items
can be proposed for inclusion in future releases, and how decisions on
inclusion are made once proposals are made. Is that correct?

I am a big fan of transparency in the decision making processes of a
project. The Linux decision process might be described as: "Subsystem
owners are kings of their space, but if there is a lack of consensus,
Linus decides". That works because people trust Linus to be an unbiased
arbitor of what is best for Linux.

What would the equivalent de facto decision making process for DPDK be?
And does it need changing? In the interests of clarity, my understanding
is that "the Maintainer" in the note above is Thomas Monjalon - can I
just confirm that this is true and understood by all?

> Github
> - There was some discussion on the merits of github. As with the mailing list 
> discussion on this, some were in favour and some against.
> - Nothing is stopping people using github today and then submitting pull 
> requests. 

My feeling is that the tools discussion belies something deeper - it
could be "reviewing patches and getting a list of unreviewed patches is
hard", it could be "patches are not reviewed quickly enough", it could
be "there is no way to tell once a patch has been reviewed what, if any,
remediation is needed for the patch to be committed". I would like to
get some feeling on what people see as the underlying fundamental issue
which the tools change might address.

Can someone deeply involved in the project have a go at defining a patch
review workflow problem statement, please?


> DPDK Industry Representation
> - At the moment, we don't have any project-level DPDK entity or budget that 
> would ensure DPDK representation at relevant events. It's left to individual 
> contributors to do this.
> 
> Independent Ownership
> - It was suggested that it would be better to have independent community 
> ownership of the DPDK project.
> - The argument against this is that the ownership of the infrastructure 
> (website, git repo) is not important and can be easily cloned if required.

Were there any concrete proposals or requirements laid out in the call?

>From my point of view, there are a few things which are important here:
 - Community ownership of the DPDK trademark
 - The ability to pool resources and enter into contracts for things
like marketing, developer event organisation, ordering swag
 - The perception of a level playing field
 - A framework for commercial entities to indicate their support for
(and intention to participate in) the project

The key word here is perception: DPDK is seen as an Intel platform only
project by those outside the project, and dpdk.org is seen as a 6WIND
owned community space.

I think that it would be valuable to have an independent entity who
could, without a huge cost structure, manage the trademark, enable the
pooling of resources, and provide a framework for commercial engagement
(whether that be through membership, sponsorship, a user advisory group,
whatever avenue is most appropriate).

Some options I see for that entity are the Software Freedom Conservancy,
the Linux Foundation (although I suspect the cost structure would be too
high for what we need), Software in the Public Interest, or some new
non-profit we create just for DPDK. There are a few other options too.
But to evaluate the options, we need the problem statement, and a set of
requirements. I don't think we have that yet (my effort at defining the
requirements is above).

Thanks,
Dave.

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

This is just a reminder that this call is on tomorrow, at the following times, 
which is just under 24 hours from now.

Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM PDT 
UTC-7 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST UTC-7 hours
Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT 
UTC-4 hours
New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 
hours
Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 hours
London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM BST 
UTC+1 hour
Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST UTC+5:30 
hours
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 PM 
CST
UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00


It would be good to have as much representation as possible from DPDK 
contributors and users, so that the discussion reflects the views and needs of 
the community.


Tim

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> 
> > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> >
> > When were you thinking of having the call?
> 
> I put the day and time at the end of the email, but it probably should
> have been at the start! Apologies that this wasn't clear.
> 
> Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00
> AM PDT UTC-7 hours
> Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST
> UTC-7 hours
> Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM
> EDT UTC-4 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT
> UTC-4 hours
> Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT
> UTC-4 hours
> London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM
> BST UTC+1 hour
> Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
> Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
> New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST
> UTC+5:30 hours
> Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at
> 11:00:00 PM CST
> UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00
> 
> > It's not been explicit, but can I assume that this call will also be
> > promoted among potential supporters of the project who may not be on
> > this list? I would be interested to get the perspective from the
> people
> > who are perhaps not developers who decide whether their organization
> > engages strategically with a project or not.
> 
> I think this is a great idea. Anybody should feel free to pass this on
> to other interested parties. If we have more contributors to the
> discussion then the output should be more representative of current and
> future community needs.
> 
> 
> Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

> From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary at redhat.com]
> 
> When were you thinking of having the call?

I put the day and time at the end of the email, but it probably should have 
been at the start! Apologies that this wasn't clear.

Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM PDT 
UTC-7 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST UTC-7 hours
Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT 
UTC-4 hours
New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 
hours
Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 hours
London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM BST 
UTC+1 hour
Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST UTC+5:30 
hours
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 PM 
CST
UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00

> It's not been explicit, but can I assume that this call will also be
> promoted among potential supporters of the project who may not be on
> this list? I would be interested to get the perspective from the people
> who are perhaps not developers who decide whether their organization
> engages strategically with a project or not.

I think this is a great idea. Anybody should feel free to pass this on to other 
interested parties. If we have more contributors to the discussion then the 
output should be more representative of current and future community needs.


Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[O'Driscoll, Tim]

There's been a good discussion on the mailing list on the Beyond DPDK 2.0 
thread. To supplement this, we'd like to have a community call for people to 
air their views, and to help progress things towards a conclusion. It'll be an 
open format, so people can bring up whatever issues they want, but some topics 
for discussion might include:
- Decision-making process. What do we do if issues don't reach a conclusion on 
the mailing list? Does stalemate just mean no change, or do we need some other 
mechanism to decide? A good example of an issue that may not reach a clear 
conclusion is the proposal move to github, where some seem to be in favour and 
others against.
- How do we encourage more contributors to DPDK?
- What tool/process improvements do we need to make? Further discussion of 
github is one obvious example.

GoToMeeting Details:
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/556212525

You can also dial in using your phone.
Ireland +353 (0) 19 030 010

Access Code: 556-212-525

More phone numbers
United States (Long distance): +1 (646) 749-3129
Australia (Long distance): +61 2 8355 1020
Austria (Long distance): +43 (0) 7 2088 1047
Belgium (Long distance): +32 (0) 28 08 4368
Canada (Long distance): +1 (647) 497-9353
Denmark (Long distance): +45 (0) 69 91 89 28
Finland (Long distance): +358 (0) 942 59 7850
France (Long distance): +33 (0) 170 950 594
Germany (Long distance): +49 (0) 692 5736 7317
Italy (Long distance): +39 0 247 92 13 01
Netherlands (Long distance): +31 (0) 208 080 219
New Zealand (Long distance): +64 (0) 9 280 6302
Norway (Long distance): +47 75 80 32 07
Spain (Long distance): +34 911 82 9906
Sweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 852 500 186
Switzerland (Long distance): +41 (0) 435 0167 13
United Kingdom (Long distance): +44 (0) 330 221 0088

Here's the time in a variety of time zones:
Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM PDT 
UTC-7 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST UTC-7 hours
Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT 
UTC-4 hours
New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 
hours
Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 hours
London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM BST 
UTC+1 hour
Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST UTC+5:30 
hours
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 PM 
CST
UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Beyond DPDK 2.0

[Dave Neary]

Hi Tim,

When were you thinking of having the call?

It's not been explicit, but can I assume that this call will also be
promoted among potential supporters of the project who may not be on
this list? I would be interested to get the perspective from the people
who are perhaps not developers who decide whether their organization
engages strategically with a project or not.

Thanks,
Dave.

On 05/01/2015 06:20 PM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> There's been a good discussion on the mailing list on the Beyond DPDK 2.0 
> thread. To supplement this, we'd like to have a community call for people to 
> air their views, and to help progress things towards a conclusion. It'll be 
> an open format, so people can bring up whatever issues they want, but some 
> topics for discussion might include:
> - Decision-making process. What do we do if issues don't reach a conclusion 
> on the mailing list? Does stalemate just mean no change, or do we need some 
> other mechanism to decide? A good example of an issue that may not reach a 
> clear conclusion is the proposal move to github, where some seem to be in 
> favour and others against.
> - How do we encourage more contributors to DPDK?
> - What tool/process improvements do we need to make? Further discussion of 
> github is one obvious example.
> 
> GoToMeeting Details:
> Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/556212525
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> Ireland +353 (0) 19 030 010
> 
> Access Code: 556-212-525
> 
> More phone numbers
> United States (Long distance): +1 (646) 749-3129
> Australia (Long distance): +61 2 8355 1020
> Austria (Long distance): +43 (0) 7 2088 1047
> Belgium (Long distance): +32 (0) 28 08 4368
> Canada (Long distance): +1 (647) 497-9353
> Denmark (Long distance): +45 (0) 69 91 89 28
> Finland (Long distance): +358 (0) 942 59 7850
> France (Long distance): +33 (0) 170 950 594
> Germany (Long distance): +49 (0) 692 5736 7317
> Italy (Long distance): +39 0 247 92 13 01
> Netherlands (Long distance): +31 (0) 208 080 219
> New Zealand (Long distance): +64 (0) 9 280 6302
> Norway (Long distance): +47 75 80 32 07
> Spain (Long distance): +34 911 82 9906
> Sweden (Long distance): +46 (0) 852 500 186
> Switzerland (Long distance): +41 (0) 435 0167 13
> United Kingdom (Long distance): +44 (0) 330 221 0088
> 
> Here's the time in a variety of time zones:
> Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM IST UTC+1 hour
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM PDT 
> UTC-7 hours
> Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM MST UTC-7 
> hours
> Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT 
> UTC-4 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 
> hours
> Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT UTC-4 
> hours
> London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM BST 
> UTC+1 hour
> Paris (France) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM CEST UTC+2 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM IDT UTC+3 hours
> Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM MSK UTC+3 hours
> New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM IST UTC+5:30 
> hours
> Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality) - Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 11:00:00 
> PM CST
> UTC+8 hours Corresponding UTC (GMT) Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 15:00:00
> 
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS

[Thomas Monjalon]

2015-04-24 09:14, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Thank you for your help in recording this readout!
> The slides that you attached to the email are dropped by the dpdk.org email 
> server.

No, they are not dropped:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016842.html

http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20150423/17a4d8de/attachment-0001.pdf

> Thomas,
> 
> I suggest we setup a page on dpdk.org to keep track of all the community 
> readouts,
> we can store there the slides and a link to the Youtube video, when available.
> What do you think?

I think first that we must focus on having a good and up-to-date official 
documentation.

The document you attached and the audio explanation are a snapshot which can be
referenced in a page dedicated to not updated or external documents. So it will
be important to put a date on these entries and sort them by date.

I suggest to create a page "discussion supports" which will be linked from
http://dpdk.org/doc in the "Archives" section.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS

[Dumitrescu, Cristian]

> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:17 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> Cc: O'Driscoll, Tim; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
> 
> 2015-04-24 09:14, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > Thank you for your help in recording this readout!
> > The slides that you attached to the email are dropped by the dpdk.org
> email server.
> 
> No, they are not dropped:
>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-April/016842.html
>   http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/attachments/20150423/17a4d8de/
> attachment-0001.pdf
> 
> > Thomas,
> >
> > I suggest we setup a page on dpdk.org to keep track of all the community
> readouts,
> > we can store there the slides and a link to the Youtube video, when
> available.
> > What do you think?
> 
> I think first that we must focus on having a good and up-to-date official
> documentation.
> 
> The document you attached and the audio explanation are a snapshot which
> can be
> referenced in a page dedicated to not updated or external documents. So it
> will
> be important to put a date on these entries and sort them by date.
> 
> I suggest to create a page "discussion supports" which will be linked from
> http://dpdk.org/doc in the "Archives" section.

Yes, any section that provides a list of "discussions" works for me. I think we 
only need a one-liner per discussion: Date, topic, event, author, link to 
slides/doc, link to video. Thanks, Thomas!

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS

[Dumitrescu, Cristian]

Hi Tim,

Thank you for your help in recording this readout! The slides that you attached 
to the email are dropped by the dpdk.org email server.

Thomas,

I suggest we setup a page on dpdk.org to keep track of all the community 
readouts, we can store there the slides and a link to the Youtube video, when 
available. What do you think?

Regards,
Cristian

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 2:24 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
> 
> Thanks to Cristian for a great presentation on QoS on Tuesday. For anybody
> who missed it, the slides are attached and the video is available at:
> https://youtu.be/_PPklkWGugs
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:41 PM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
> >
> > Agenda:
> > - Software Quality of Service (Cristian Dumitrescu)
> >
> >
> > Tue, Apr 21, 4:00-5:30 PM GMT Daylight Time
> >
> > Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
> > https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/293233645
> >
> > You can also dial in using your phone.
> > Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
> > United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
> > Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> > Austria : +43 (0) 7 2088 0034
> > Belgium : +32 (0) 28 08 9321
> > Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
> > Denmark : +45 (0) 69 91 80 05
> > Finland : +358 (0) 931 58 1746
> > France : +33 (0) 182 880 780
> > Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
> > Italy : +39 0 699 26 68 58
> > Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
> > New Zealand : +64 (0) 9 442 7358
> > Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
> > Spain : +34 911 23 0850
> > Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
> > Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
> > United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
> >
> > Access Code: 293-233-645
> > Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
> >

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS

[O'driscoll, Tim]

This was meant to be sent as a calendar invite, so the time would automatically 
convert to your local time zone. That didn't seem to work though. I'm not sure 
if that's just the way the mailing list works, or if it's an outlook config 
error on my side.

Anyway, here's the date and time in a variety of time zones:

Dublin (Ireland) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM  IST  UTC+1 hour 
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM  
PDT  UTC-7 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 8:00:00 AM  MST  UTC-7 
hours
Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT  
UTC-4 hours
New York (U.S.A. - New York) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT  
UTC-4 hours
Ottawa (Canada - Ontario) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM EDT  UTC-4 
hours
London (United Kingdom - England) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 4:00:00 PM  BST  
UTC+1 hour 
Paris (France) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 5:00:00 PM  CEST UTC+2 hours
Tel Aviv (Israel) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM  IDT  UTC+3 hours
Moscow (Russia) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 6:00:00 PM  MSK  UTC+3 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 8:30:00 PM  IST  
UTC+5:30 hours 
Beijing (China - Beijing Municipality) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 11:00:00 PM 
CST  UTC+8 hours
Corresponding UTC (GMT) - Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 15:00:00

Apologies for any confusion.


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:41 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call - Software QoS
> 
> Agenda:
> - Software Quality of Service (Cristian Dumitrescu)
> 
> 
> Tue, Apr 21, 4:00-5:30 PM GMT Daylight Time
> 
> Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/293233645
> 
> You can also dial in using your phone.
> Ireland : +353 (0) 15 290 180
> United States : +1 (312) 757-3126
> Australia : +61 2 9087 3604
> Austria : +43 (0) 7 2088 0034
> Belgium : +32 (0) 28 08 9321
> Canada : +1 (647) 497-9350
> Denmark : +45 (0) 69 91 80 05
> Finland : +358 (0) 931 58 1746
> France : +33 (0) 182 880 780
> Germany : +49 (0) 692 5736 7211
> Italy : +39 0 699 26 68 58
> Netherlands : +31 (0) 208 908 267
> New Zealand : +64 (0) 9 442 7358
> Norway : +47 21 54 32 44
> Spain : +34 911 23 0850
> Sweden : +46 (0) 853 527 835
> Switzerland : +41 (0) 435 0006 96
> United Kingdom : +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
> 
> Access Code: 293-233-645
> Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
> 

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00 GMT

[O'driscoll, Tim]

> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> 
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
> > "O'driscoll, Tim"  wrote:
> >
> > > We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over
> > the holiday period. I think we should reinstate these, so I've scheduled the
> > next one for Monday 2nd February. Since our last call was at a time
> > convenient for Asia, this one is at a time that's more convenient for people
> > based in the USA. As for previous calls, I'll post a recording to youtube
> > afterwards for anybody who can't make it.
> > >
> > > I don't have an agenda yet, but will send one out in advance of the
> > meeting.
> >
> > This is right after FOSDEM and many people will be returning home.
> 
> Good point. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll move the meeting to avoid this
> clash.

To avoid the clash, I've moved this to Thursday 5th Feb, at the same time 
(17:00 GMT). Hopefully that's a more convenient time for most people.

Meeting time:
Dublin (Ireland), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:00:00 PMGMT UTC   
 
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 9:00:00 AM   
 PST UTC-8 hours
Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 10:00:00 AM   MST 
UTC-7 hours
New York (U.S.A. - New York), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:00:00 Noon EST 
UTC-5 hours
Ottawa (Canada - Ontario), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:00:00 Noon EST 
UTC-5 hours
Paris (France), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 6:00:00 PMCET UTC+1 hour 
Tel Aviv (Israel), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 7:00:00 PMIST UTC+2 hours  
  
Moscow (Russia), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:00:00 PMMSK UTC+3 hours
New Delhi (India - Delhi), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 10:30:00 PM   IST 
UTC+5:30 hours 
Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality), Friday, February 6, 2015 at 1:00:00 
AM   CST UTC+8 hours
Tokyo (Japan), Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:00:00 AM   JST UTC+9 hours
Corresponding UTC (GMT), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 17:00:00

GoToMeeting Details:
To join, follow the meeting link: 
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/557845085. This will start the GoToMeeting 
web viewer. You then have two options for audio:

1. To use your computer's audio via a headset, you need to switch to the 
desktop version of GoToMeeting. You can do this by clicking the GoToMeeting 
icon on the top right hand side of the web viewer, and then selecting "Switch 
to the desktop version". The desktop version will need to download and install, 
so if you plan to use this you may want to get it set up in advance. Once it 
starts, under the Audio section, you can select "Mic & Speakers". The desktop 
version is only available for Windows and Mac, so if you're using Linux then 
you need to use option 2 below.

2. You can join using a phone via one of the numbers listed below. The Access 
Code is 557-845-085. You'll also be asked for an Audio PIN, which is accessible 
by clicking the phone icon in the GoToMeeting web viewer after you've joined 
the meeting.
Canada +1 (647) 497-9391
France +33 (0) 170 950 593
Ireland +353 (0) 15 290 180
United Kingdom +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
United States +1 (646) 982-0002
More phone numbers: https://global.gotomeeting.com/557845085/numbersdisplay.html

Info on downloading the desktop app is available at: 
http://support.citrixonline.com/en_US/meeting/help_files/G2M010002?title=Download%7D
Info on the web viewer is available at: 
http://support.citrixonline.com/en_US/GoToMeeting/help_files/GTM130019?title=Web+Viewer+FAQs


Thanks,
Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00 GMT

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:39:17 +
"O'driscoll, Tim"  wrote:

> > From: O'driscoll, Tim
> > 
> > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> > >
> > > On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
> > > "O'driscoll, Tim"  wrote:
> > >
> > > > We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over
> > > the holiday period. I think we should reinstate these, so I've scheduled 
> > > the
> > > next one for Monday 2nd February. Since our last call was at a time
> > > convenient for Asia, this one is at a time that's more convenient for 
> > > people
> > > based in the USA. As for previous calls, I'll post a recording to youtube
> > > afterwards for anybody who can't make it.
> > > >
> > > > I don't have an agenda yet, but will send one out in advance of the
> > > meeting.
> > >
> > > This is right after FOSDEM and many people will be returning home.
> > 
> > Good point. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll move the meeting to avoid 
> > this
> > clash.
> 
> To avoid the clash, I've moved this to Thursday 5th Feb, at the same time 
> (17:00 GMT). Hopefully that's a more convenient time for most people.
> 
> Meeting time:
> Dublin (Ireland), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:00:00 PMGMT UTC 
>
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 9:00:00 AM 
>PST UTC-8 hours
> Phoenix (U.S.A. - Arizona), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 10:00:00 AM   MST 
> UTC-7 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:00:00 Noon EST 
> UTC-5 hours
> Ottawa (Canada - Ontario), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 12:00:00 Noon EST 
> UTC-5 hours
> Paris (France), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 6:00:00 PMCET UTC+1 hour
>  
> Tel Aviv (Israel), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 7:00:00 PMIST UTC+2 
> hours
> Moscow (Russia), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 8:00:00 PMMSK UTC+3 hours  
>   
> New Delhi (India - Delhi), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 10:30:00 PM   IST 
> UTC+5:30 hours 
> Shanghai (China - Shanghai Municipality), Friday, February 6, 2015 at 1:00:00 
> AM   CST UTC+8 hours
> Tokyo (Japan), Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:00:00 AM   JST UTC+9 hours
> Corresponding UTC (GMT), Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 17:00:00
> 
> GoToMeeting Details:
> To join, follow the meeting link: 
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/557845085. This will start the 
> GoToMeeting web viewer. You then have two options for audio:
> 
> 1. To use your computer's audio via a headset, you need to switch to the 
> desktop version of GoToMeeting. You can do this by clicking the GoToMeeting 
> icon on the top right hand side of the web viewer, and then selecting "Switch 
> to the desktop version". The desktop version will need to download and 
> install, so if you plan to use this you may want to get it set up in advance. 
> Once it starts, under the Audio section, you can select "Mic & Speakers". The 
> desktop version is only available for Windows and Mac, so if you're using 
> Linux then you need to use option 2 below.
> 
> 2. You can join using a phone via one of the numbers listed below. The Access 
> Code is 557-845-085. You'll also be asked for an Audio PIN, which is 
> accessible by clicking the phone icon in the GoToMeeting web viewer after 
> you've joined the meeting.
> Canada +1 (647) 497-9391
> France +33 (0) 170 950 593
> Ireland +353 (0) 15 290 180
> United Kingdom +44 (0) 20 3713 5028
> United States +1 (646) 982-0002
> More phone numbers: 
> https://global.gotomeeting.com/557845085/numbersdisplay.html
> 
> Info on downloading the desktop app is available at: 
> http://support.citrixonline.com/en_US/meeting/help_files/G2M010002?title=Download%7D
> Info on the web viewer is available at: 
> http://support.citrixonline.com/en_US/GoToMeeting/help_files/GTM130019?title=Web+Viewer+FAQs
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
>  

Great thanks

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00 GMT

[O'driscoll, Tim]

> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 5:11 PM
> To: O'driscoll, Tim
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00
> GMT
> 
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
> "O'driscoll, Tim" <tim.o'driscoll at intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over
> the holiday period. I think we should reinstate these, so I've scheduled the
> next one for Monday 2nd February. Since our last call was at a time
> convenient for Asia, this one is at a time that's more convenient for people
> based in the USA. As for previous calls, I'll post a recording to youtube
> afterwards for anybody who can't make it.
> >
> > I don't have an agenda yet, but will send one out in advance of the
> meeting.
> 
> This is right after FOSDEM and many people will be returning home.

Good point. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll move the meeting to avoid this 
clash.


Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Call, Monday 2nd February, 17:00 GMT

[Stephen Hemminger]

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:21:40 +
"O'driscoll, Tim"  wrote:

> We had our last community call in December, and then took a break over the 
> holiday period. I think we should reinstate these, so I've scheduled the next 
> one for Monday 2nd February. Since our last call was at a time convenient for 
> Asia, this one is at a time that's more convenient for people based in the 
> USA. As for previous calls, I'll post a recording to youtube afterwards for 
> anybody who can't make it.
> 
> I don't have an agenda yet, but will send one out in advance of the meeting.

This is right after FOSDEM and many people will be returning home.

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[Kevin Wilson]

Tim,
Great, thanks! Keep on the good work and recording in the future.

The quality of the Audio is superb!

Kevin

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:26 AM, O'driscoll, Tim
 wrote:
> The video is now accessible at: http://youtu.be/AbHQ4YaWY90. Thomas may want 
> to add a link to this from somewhere on the dpdk.org page.
>
>
> Tim
>
>> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
>>
>> Hi,
>> >I'll post a recording of it soon.
>> Great idea! most welcomed!
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, O'driscoll, Tim > intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Kevin,
>> >
>> >> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
>> >> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
>> >> Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?
>> >
>> > We had our second call earlier this week, on Tuesday. I'll post a 
>> > recording of
>> it soon.
>> >
>> > The next call will be in 2 weeks' time, probably on Tuesday December 2nd. I
>> just need to finalise the time before confirming this. We have had a couple 
>> of
>> requests to alternate between a time that's suitable for USA/Europe, and
>> one that's more suitable for Asia. So, the next call will probably be early 
>> in the
>> morning in Europe, afternoon in Asia, and the middle of the night in the USA.
>> >
>> >
>> > Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[O'driscoll, Tim]

The video is now accessible at: http://youtu.be/AbHQ4YaWY90. Thomas may want to 
add a link to this from somewhere on the dpdk.org page.


Tim

> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> 
> Hi,
> >I'll post a recording of it soon.
> Great idea! most welcomed!
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:13 PM, O'driscoll, Tim 
> wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> >> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> >> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
> >> Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?
> >
> > We had our second call earlier this week, on Tuesday. I'll post a recording 
> > of
> it soon.
> >
> > The next call will be in 2 weeks' time, probably on Tuesday December 2nd. I
> just need to finalise the time before confirming this. We have had a couple of
> requests to alternate between a time that's suitable for USA/Europe, and
> one that's more suitable for Asia. So, the next call will probably be early 
> in the
> morning in Europe, afternoon in Asia, and the middle of the night in the USA.
> >
> >
> > Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[O'driscoll, Tim]

Hi Kevin,

> From: Kevin Wilson [mailto:wkevils at gmail.com]
> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
> Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?

We had our second call earlier this week, on Tuesday. I'll post a recording of 
it soon.

The next call will be in 2 weeks' time, probably on Tuesday December 2nd. I 
just need to finalise the time before confirming this. We have had a couple of 
requests to alternate between a time that's suitable for USA/Europe, and one 
that's more suitable for Asia. So, the next call will probably be early in the 
morning in Europe, afternoon in Asia, and the middle of the night in the USA.


Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[Kevin Wilson]

Hi, Tim,

> We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time
Just a short question - is this still intended to be held ?

Kevin

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:36 PM, O'driscoll, Tim
<tim.o'driscoll at intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people found 
> it useful.
>
> We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that we do want 
> to look into is an easy way to allow screen sharing, so that we can use some 
> slides to guide the discussion. Internally within Intel we use MS Lync. We 
> can try that, but it's not always very user-friendly for external 
> participants, and doesn't have a Linux client. Other options would include 
> GoToMeeting or WebEx. If anybody has input on a good tool for this, let me 
> know.
>
> We covered the following features from our 2.0 list today, and will discuss 
> the remainder on the next call. I've called out below who on our side was 
> describing each of the features, and included their email addresses. If 
> anybody has further questions on these, feel free to either ask openly on the 
> mailing list, or else contact the relevant person directly.
>
> Bifurcated Driver (Danny.Zhou at intel.com)
> Packet Reordering/Packet Distributor (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com)
> New Hardware Support (Walter.E.Gilmore at intel.com)
> Fortville features (Heqing.Zhu at intel.com)
> Support Multiple Threads per Core (Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
> Cuckoo Hash (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com, Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
>
> The Cuckoo Hash paper that was mentioned is available at: 
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dongz/papers/cuckooswitch.pdf.
>
> Finally, if anybody has suggestions for topics for future calls, please let 
> me know.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
>> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
>> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
>> October
>>
>> This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be on in 
>> 30
>> minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK 2.0 
>> release
>> in March 2015.
>>
>> Audio bridge details are:
>> France:   +33 1588 77298
>> Germany:  +49 8999 143191
>> Israel:   +972 2589 6577
>> Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
>> UK:   +44 1793 402663
>> USA/Canada:   +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
>>
>> Bridge: 5
>> Conference ID: 1264677285
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: O'driscoll, Tim
>> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
>> > To: dev at dpdk.org
>> > Subject: DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
>> >
>> > We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday
>> > 31st October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so
>> > we've chosen to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is
>> > the morning in the USA. This does unfortunately limit participation
>> > from PRC, Japan and other parts of the world. Here's the time and date in a
>> variety of time zones:
>> >
>> > Dublin (Ireland)Friday, October 31, 2014 at
>> > 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
>> > Paris (France)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
>> > 5:00:00
>> > PMCET UTC+1 hour
>> > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 9:00:00
>> > AMPDT UTC-7 hours
>> > New York (U.S.A. - New York)Friday, October 31, 2014 at
>> 12:00:00
>> > Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
>> > Tel Aviv (Israel)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at
>> 6:00:00
>> > PMIST UTC+2 hours
>> > Moscow (Russia) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
>> > PMMSK UTC+3 hours
>> >
>> >
>> > Audio bridge details are:
>> > France: +33 1588 77298
>> > Germany:+49 8999 143191
>> > Israel: +972 2589 6577
>> > Russia: +7 495 641 4663
>> > UK: +44 1793 402663
>> > USA:+1 916 356 2663
>> >
>> > Bridge: 5
>> > Conference ID: 1264677285
>> >
>> > If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.
>> >
>> >
>> > Agenda:
>> > Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
>> > Suggestions for topics for future calls.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[Vincent JARDIN]

+1 for hangout
Le 1 nov. 2014 13:59, "Neil Horman"  a ?crit :

> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +, O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> > Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people
> found it useful.
> >
> > We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that we do
> want to look into is an easy way to allow screen sharing, so that we can
> use some slides to guide the discussion. Internally within Intel we use MS
> Lync. We can try that, but it's not always very user-friendly for external
> participants, and doesn't have a Linux client. Other options would include
> GoToMeeting or WebEx. If anybody has input on a good tool for this, let me
> know.
> >
> Don't use Lync, its a horrid tool.  As you note, there is no linux client
> (nor a
> mac client that I'm aware of).  Google hangouts offers screen sharing, and
> is
> free for anyone to use.
>
> > We covered the following features from our 2.0 list today, and will
> discuss the remainder on the next call. I've called out below who on our
> side was describing each of the features, and included their email
> addresses. If anybody has further questions on these, feel free to either
> ask openly on the mailing list, or else contact the relevant person
> directly.
> >
> > Bifurcated Driver (Danny.Zhou at intel.com)
> > Packet Reordering/Packet Distributor (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com)
> > New Hardware Support (Walter.E.Gilmore at intel.com)
> > Fortville features (Heqing.Zhu at intel.com)
> > Support Multiple Threads per Core (Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
> > Cuckoo Hash (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com, Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
> >
> > The Cuckoo Hash paper that was mentioned is available at:
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dongz/papers/cuckooswitch.pdf.
> >
> > Finally, if anybody has suggestions for topics for future calls, please
> let me know.
> >
> ABI versioning, in support of packaging the DPDK for non-rebuilding users.
>
> Neil
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> > > To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> > > October
> > >
> > > This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be
> on in 30
> > > minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK
> 2.0 release
> > > in March 2015.
> > >
> > > Audio bridge details are:
> > > France: +33 1588 77298
> > > Germany:+49 8999 143191
> > > Israel: +972 2589 6577
> > > Russia: +7 495 641 4663
> > > UK: +44 1793 402663
> > > USA/Canada: +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
> > >
> > > Bridge: 5
> > > Conference ID: 1264677285
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: O'driscoll, Tim
> > > > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> > > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > > Subject: DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
> > > >
> > > > We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday
> > > > 31st October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so
> > > > we've chosen to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is
> > > > the morning in the USA. This does unfortunately limit participation
> > > > from PRC, Japan and other parts of the world. Here's the time and
> date in a
> > > variety of time zones:
> > > >
> > > > Dublin (Ireland)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > > > 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
> > > > Paris (France)Friday, October 31, 2014
> at 5:00:00
> > > > PMCET UTC+1 hour
> > > > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California)   Friday, October 31, 2014
> at 9:00:00
> > > > AMPDT UTC-7 hours
> > > > New York (U.S.A. - New York)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > > 12:00:00
> > > > Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
> > > > Tel Aviv (Israel) Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > > 6:00:00
> > > > PMIST UTC+2 hours
> > > > Moscow (Russia)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
> > > > PMMSK UTC+3 hours
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Audio bridge details are:
> > > > France:   +33 1588 77298
> > > > Germany:  +49 8999 143191
> > > > Israel:   +972 2589 6577
> > > > Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
> > > > UK:   +44 1793 402663
> > > > USA:  +1 916 356 2663
> > > >
> > > > Bridge: 5
> > > > Conference ID: 1264677285
> > > >
> > > > If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Agenda:
> > > > Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
> > > > Suggestions for topics for future calls.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Tim
> >
>

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[Neil Horman]

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +, O'driscoll, Tim wrote:
> Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people found 
> it useful.
> 
> We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that we do want 
> to look into is an easy way to allow screen sharing, so that we can use some 
> slides to guide the discussion. Internally within Intel we use MS Lync. We 
> can try that, but it's not always very user-friendly for external 
> participants, and doesn't have a Linux client. Other options would include 
> GoToMeeting or WebEx. If anybody has input on a good tool for this, let me 
> know.
> 
Don't use Lync, its a horrid tool.  As you note, there is no linux client (nor a
mac client that I'm aware of).  Google hangouts offers screen sharing, and is
free for anyone to use.

> We covered the following features from our 2.0 list today, and will discuss 
> the remainder on the next call. I've called out below who on our side was 
> describing each of the features, and included their email addresses. If 
> anybody has further questions on these, feel free to either ask openly on the 
> mailing list, or else contact the relevant person directly.
> 
> Bifurcated Driver (Danny.Zhou at intel.com)
> Packet Reordering/Packet Distributor (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com)
> New Hardware Support (Walter.E.Gilmore at intel.com)
> Fortville features (Heqing.Zhu at intel.com)
> Support Multiple Threads per Core (Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
> Cuckoo Hash (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com, Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
> 
> The Cuckoo Hash paper that was mentioned is available at: 
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dongz/papers/cuckooswitch.pdf.
> 
> Finally, if anybody has suggestions for topics for future calls, please let 
> me know.
> 
ABI versioning, in support of packaging the DPDK for non-rebuilding users.

Neil

> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> > To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> > October
> > 
> > This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be on 
> > in 30
> > minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK 2.0 
> > release
> > in March 2015.
> > 
> > Audio bridge details are:
> > France: +33 1588 77298
> > Germany:+49 8999 143191
> > Israel: +972 2589 6577
> > Russia: +7 495 641 4663
> > UK: +44 1793 402663
> > USA/Canada: +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
> > 
> > Bridge: 5
> > Conference ID: 1264677285
> > 
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: O'driscoll, Tim
> > > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> > > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > > Subject: DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
> > >
> > > We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday
> > > 31st October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so
> > > we've chosen to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is
> > > the morning in the USA. This does unfortunately limit participation
> > > from PRC, Japan and other parts of the world. Here's the time and date in 
> > > a
> > variety of time zones:
> > >
> > > Dublin (Ireland)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > > 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
> > > Paris (France)Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> > > 5:00:00
> > > PMCET UTC+1 hour
> > > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> > > 9:00:00
> > > AMPDT UTC-7 hours
> > > New York (U.S.A. - New York)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > 12:00:00
> > > Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
> > > Tel Aviv (Israel) Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > 6:00:00
> > > PMIST UTC+2 hours
> > > Moscow (Russia)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
> > > PMMSK UTC+3 hours
> > >
> > >
> > > Audio bridge details are:
> > > France:   +33 1588 77298
> > > Germany:  +49 8999 143191
> > > Israel:   +972 2589 6577
> > > Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
> > > UK:   +44 1793 402663
> > > USA:  +1 916 356 2663
> > >
> > > Bridge: 5
> > > Conference ID: 1264677285
> > >
> > > If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.
> > >
> > >
> > > Agenda:
> > > Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
> > > Suggestions for topics for future calls.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tim
> 

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[O'driscoll, Tim]

Thanks again to those who attended the call earlier. Hopefully people found it 
useful.

We'll schedule a follow-up call for 2 weeks' time. One thing that we do want to 
look into is an easy way to allow screen sharing, so that we can use some 
slides to guide the discussion. Internally within Intel we use MS Lync. We can 
try that, but it's not always very user-friendly for external participants, and 
doesn't have a Linux client. Other options would include GoToMeeting or WebEx. 
If anybody has input on a good tool for this, let me know.

We covered the following features from our 2.0 list today, and will discuss the 
remainder on the next call. I've called out below who on our side was 
describing each of the features, and included their email addresses. If anybody 
has further questions on these, feel free to either ask openly on the mailing 
list, or else contact the relevant person directly.

Bifurcated Driver (Danny.Zhou at intel.com)
Packet Reordering/Packet Distributor (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com)
New Hardware Support (Walter.E.Gilmore at intel.com)
Fortville features (Heqing.Zhu at intel.com)
Support Multiple Threads per Core (Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)
Cuckoo Hash (Bruce.Richardson at intel.com, Venky.Venkatesan at intel.com)

The Cuckoo Hash paper that was mentioned is available at: 
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dongz/papers/cuckooswitch.pdf.

Finally, if anybody has suggestions for topics for future calls, please let me 
know.


Thanks,
Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:35 PM
> To: 'dev at dpdk.org'
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st
> October
> 
> This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be on in 
> 30
> minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK 2.0 
> release
> in March 2015.
> 
> Audio bridge details are:
> France:   +33 1588 77298
> Germany:  +49 8999 143191
> Israel:   +972 2589 6577
> Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
> UK:   +44 1793 402663
> USA/Canada:   +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370
> 
> Bridge: 5
> Conference ID: 1264677285
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: O'driscoll, Tim
> > Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
> >
> > We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday
> > 31st October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so
> > we've chosen to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is
> > the morning in the USA. This does unfortunately limit participation
> > from PRC, Japan and other parts of the world. Here's the time and date in a
> variety of time zones:
> >
> > Dublin (Ireland)Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> > 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
> > Paris (France)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> > 5:00:00
> > PMCET UTC+1 hour
> > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 9:00:00
> > AMPDT UTC-7 hours
> > New York (U.S.A. - New York)Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> 12:00:00
> > Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
> > Tel Aviv (Israel)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> 6:00:00
> > PMIST UTC+2 hours
> > Moscow (Russia) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
> > PMMSK UTC+3 hours
> >
> >
> > Audio bridge details are:
> > France: +33 1588 77298
> > Germany:+49 8999 143191
> > Israel: +972 2589 6577
> > Russia: +7 495 641 4663
> > UK: +44 1793 402663
> > USA:+1 916 356 2663
> >
> > Bridge: 5
> > Conference ID: 1264677285
> >
> > If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.
> >
> >
> > Agenda:
> > Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
> > Suggestions for topics for future calls.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[O'driscoll, Tim]

This is just a reminder for anybody who's interested that this will be on in 30 
minutes, and that we'll be discussing the feature list for the DPDK 2.0 release 
in March 2015.

Audio bridge details are:
France: +33 1588 77298
Germany:+49 8999 143191
Israel: +972 2589 6577
Russia: +7 495 641 4663
UK: +44 1793 402663
USA/Canada: +1 916 356 2663 or +1-888-875-9370

Bridge: 5
Conference ID: 1264677285


Tim

> -Original Message-
> From: O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 10:22 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
> 
> We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday 31st
> October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so we've chosen
> to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is the morning in the
> USA. This does unfortunately limit participation from PRC, Japan and other
> parts of the world. Here's the time and date in a variety of time zones:
> 
> Dublin (Ireland)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
> Paris (France)Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> 5:00:00
> PMCET UTC+1 hour
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 9:00:00
> AMPDT UTC-7 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at 12:00:00
> Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> 6:00:00
> PMIST UTC+2 hours
> Moscow (Russia)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
> PMMSK UTC+3 hours
> 
> 
> Audio bridge details are:
> France:   +33 1588 77298
> Germany:  +49 8999 143191
> Israel:   +972 2589 6577
> Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
> UK:   +44 1793 402663
> USA:  +1 916 356 2663
> 
> Bridge: 5
> Conference ID: 1264677285
> 
> If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.
> 
> 
> Agenda:
> Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
> Suggestions for topics for future calls.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[Michael Marchetti]

> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of O'driscoll, Tim
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 5:22 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October
> 
> We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday 31st
> October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so we've chosen
> to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is the morning in the
> USA. This does unfortunately limit participation from PRC, Japan and other
> parts of the world. Here's the time and date in a variety of time zones:
> 
> Dublin (Ireland)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at
> 4:00:00 PMGMT UTC
> Paris (France)Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> 5:00:00
> PMCET UTC+1 hour
> San Francisco (U.S.A. - California)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 9:00:00
> AMPDT UTC-7 hours
> New York (U.S.A. - New York)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at 12:00:00
> Noon EDT UTC-4 hours
> Tel Aviv (Israel) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
> 6:00:00
> PMIST UTC+2 hours
> Moscow (Russia)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00
> PMMSK UTC+3 hours
> 
> 
> Audio bridge details are:
> France:   +33 1588 77298
> Germany:  +49 8999 143191
> Israel:   +972 2589 6577
> Russia:   +7 495 641 4663
> UK:   +44 1793 402663
> USA:  +1 916 356 2663
> 
> Bridge: 5
> Conference ID: 1264677285
> 
> If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.

Can you provide a number for Canada?  thanks, Mike.


> 
> 
> Agenda:
> Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
> Suggestions for topics for future calls.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Community Conference Call - Friday 31st October

[O'driscoll, Tim]

We're planning to hold our first community conference call on Friday 31st 
October. It's impossible to find a time that suits everybody, so we've chosen 
to do this in the afternoon/evening in Europe, which is the morning in the USA. 
This does unfortunately limit participation from PRC, Japan and other parts of 
the world. Here's the time and date in a variety of time zones:

Dublin (Ireland)Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
4:00:00 PMGMT UTC 
Paris (France)  Friday, October 31, 2014 at 5:00:00 PM  
  CET UTC+1 hour  
San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 9:00:00 AM  
  PDT UTC-7 hours 
New York (U.S.A. - New York)Friday, October 31, 2014 at 12:00:00 
Noon EDT UTC-4 hours 
Tel Aviv (Israel)   Friday, October 31, 2014 at 
6:00:00 PMIST UTC+2 hours 
Moscow (Russia) Friday, October 31, 2014 at 7:00:00 PMMSK 
UTC+3 hours


Audio bridge details are:
France: +33 1588 77298
Germany:+49 8999 143191
Israel: +972 2589 6577
Russia: +7 495 641 4663
UK: +44 1793 402663
USA:+1 916 356 2663

Bridge: 5
Conference ID: 1264677285

If anybody needs an access number for another country, let me know.


Agenda:
Discuss feature list for DPDK 2.0 (Q1 2015).
Suggestions for topics for future calls.


Thanks,
Tim

[dpdk-dev] DPDK community

[Vincent JARDIN]

Welcome to the DPDK community. Please, use this mailing list to share 
your patches, your questions and we'll provide you a best effort follow 
up. Please, note that this mailing list cannot be used for a commercial 
support. It is provided as-is.

Anyone can contribute, you are welcomed.

Best regards,
   Vincent