[dpdk-dev] doc: deprecate vhost-cuse
> > > Vhost-cuse was invented before vhost-user exist. The both are actually > > > doing the same thing: a vhost-net implementation in user space. But they > > > are not exactly the same thing. > > > > > > Firstly, vhost-cuse is harder for use; no one seems to care it, either. > > > Furthermore, since v2.1, a large majority of development effort has gone > > > to vhost-user. For example, we extended the vhost-user spec to add the > > > multiple queue support. We also added the vhost-user live migration at > > > v16.04 and the latest one, vhost-user reconnect that allows vhost app > > > restart without restarting the guest. Both of them are very important > > > features for product usage and none of them works for vhost-cuse. > > > > > > You now see that the difference between vhost-user and vhost-cuse is > > > big (and will be bigger and bigger as time moves forward), that you > > > should never use vhost-cuse, that we should drop it completely. > > > > > > The remove would also result to a much cleaner code base, allowing us > > > to do all kinds of extending easier. > > > > > > So here to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated in this release and will be > > > removed in the next release (v16.11). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > > > Acked-by: Ciara Loftus > > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > Acked-by: Rich Lane > > Acked-by: Jan Viktorin > Acked-by: Christian Ehrhardt Applied, thanks
[dpdk-dev] doc: deprecate vhost-cuse
Hi Thomas, just my two cents as Ubuntu DPDK maintainer (and part of the Debian Team that does the same). We never used vhost-cuse in any of our exampled, documentations or tests (It seems we started "late enough"). So again I think it is a good change to drop rather unmaintained parts to make the rest more stable: Acked-by: Christian Ehrhardt Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 20:28:33 +0800 > Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > > Vhost-cuse was invented before vhost-user exist. The both are actually > > doing the same thing: a vhost-net implementation in user space. But they > > are not exactly the same thing. > > > > Firstly, vhost-cuse is harder for use; no one seems to care it, either. > > Furthermore, since v2.1, a large majority of development effort has gone > > to vhost-user. For example, we extended the vhost-user spec to add the > > multiple queue support. We also added the vhost-user live migration at > > v16.04 and the latest one, vhost-user reconnect that allows vhost app > > restart without restarting the guest. Both of them are very important > > features for product usage and none of them works for vhost-cuse. > > > > You now see that the difference between vhost-user and vhost-cuse is > > big (and will be bigger and bigger as time moves forward), that you > > should never use vhost-cuse, that we should drop it completely. > > > > The remove would also result to a much cleaner code base, allowing us > > to do all kinds of extending easier. > > > > So here to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated in this release and will be > > removed in the next release (v16.11). > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > > Acked-by: Ciara Loftus > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Acked-by: Rich Lane > > Acked-by: Jan Viktorin >
[dpdk-dev] doc: deprecate vhost-cuse
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016 20:28:33 +0800 Yuanhan Liu wrote: > Vhost-cuse was invented before vhost-user exist. The both are actually > doing the same thing: a vhost-net implementation in user space. But they > are not exactly the same thing. > > Firstly, vhost-cuse is harder for use; no one seems to care it, either. > Furthermore, since v2.1, a large majority of development effort has gone > to vhost-user. For example, we extended the vhost-user spec to add the > multiple queue support. We also added the vhost-user live migration at > v16.04 and the latest one, vhost-user reconnect that allows vhost app > restart without restarting the guest. Both of them are very important > features for product usage and none of them works for vhost-cuse. > > You now see that the difference between vhost-user and vhost-cuse is > big (and will be bigger and bigger as time moves forward), that you > should never use vhost-cuse, that we should drop it completely. > > The remove would also result to a much cleaner code base, allowing us > to do all kinds of extending easier. > > So here to mark vhost-cuse as deprecated in this release and will be > removed in the next release (v16.11). > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu > Acked-by: Ciara Loftus > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon > Acked-by: Rich Lane Acked-by: Jan Viktorin
