[CRON] Broken: apache/druid#28139 (master - d36a0f6)
Build Update for apache/druid - Build: #28139 Status: Broken Duration: 2 mins and 37 secs Commit: d36a0f6 (master) Author: Gian Merlino Message: Clarify documentation on dimensions, dimensionExclusions. (#10265) In particular: exclusions are ignored if dimensions are set. View the changeset: https://github.com/apache/druid/compare/e273264332f5d1e619c50c6ee9727058ccdfb9b2...d36a0f61da2cf1001738fb3bf54231a1ac7e6678 View the full build log and details: https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/druid/builds/717429111?utm_medium=notification_source=email -- You can unsubscribe from build emails from the apache/druid repository going to https://travis-ci.org/account/preferences/unsubscribe?repository=578446_medium=notification_source=email. Or unsubscribe from *all* email updating your settings at https://travis-ci.org/account/preferences/unsubscribe?utm_medium=notification_source=email. Or configure specific recipients for build notifications in your .travis.yml file. See https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/notifications.
Re: SQL Support for Tuple Sketches
Hey Mithal, I'm not aware of anyone currently working on it, so you certainly are welcome to! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:56 AM Mithal Kothari wrote: > Hi Druid Dev team, > > I just wanted to follow up with you'll and find out if there is a > plan/possibility to introduce sql support for tuple sketches? > > -- > Regards, > Mithal >
Re: Study On Rejected Refactorings
Hey Jevgenija, I recently filled out the survey — hope the response is helpful! On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:05 PM Jevgenija Pantiuchina < jevgenija.pantiuch...@usi.ch> wrote: > Dear contributors, > > As part of a research team from Università della Svizzera italiana > (Switzerland) and University of Sannio (Italy), we have analyzed > refactoring pull requests in apache/druid repository and are looking for > developers for a short 5-10 min survey ( > https://usi.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cO6Ayah0D6q4eSF). Would you > please spare your time by answering some questions about > refactoring-related contributions? We would greatly appreciate your input — > it would help us understand how developers can improve the quality of > refactoring contributions, and benefit the development process. The > responses will be anonymized and handled confidentially! Thank you a lot! > >
