Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo Spring Boot Project (Incubating) 2.7.0 [RC4]

2019-02-10 Thread Mercy

We’ve received 4 +1 binding and 1 +1 non-binding votes:

+1 binding, Ian Luo
+1 binding, Mercy Ma
+1 binding, Huxing Zhang
+1 binding, Jun Liu
+1 non-binding, Mark Tomas

The issue about the working directory will be solved in next release.

I will create a new vote thread in the Apache community now.

Kind regards,

Mercy Ma

在 2019/2/6 下午6:48, Mark Thomas 写道:

On 01/02/2019 09:51, Mercy Ma wrote:




[X] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Mark


Notes (no action required):
Signatures and hashes match
.gitignore file not included in source release
Maven wrapper not present in source release
mvn verify completed successfully

Minor issues (fix for next release):
There are a lot of .flattened-pom.xml files in the source release that
are not in the repo.


回复: why spring tools suite application.properties auto-complete nopop tip??need install anyOne plugin??

2019-02-10 Thread 一直以来
but must use STS?  :D


maybe i need lookup:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/blob/master/dubbo-spring-boot-autoconfigure/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring-configuration-metadata.json




-- 原始邮件 --
发件人: "LiZhenNet";
发送时间: 2019年2月11日(星期一) 上午10:52
收件人: "dev";

主题: Re: why spring tools suite application.properties auto-complete nopop 
tip??need install anyOne plugin??



You can use Intellij IDEA. 

一直以来 <279377...@qq.com> 于2019年2月11日周一 上午10:49写道:

> 非常感谢!
> thank you very!

Re: why spring tools suite application.properties auto-complete no pop tip??need install anyOne plugin??

2019-02-10 Thread LiZhenNet
You can use Intellij IDEA. 

一直以来 <279377...@qq.com> 于2019年2月11日周一 上午10:49写道:

> 非常感谢!
> thank you very!


why spring tools suite application.properties auto-complete no pop tip??need install anyOne plugin??

2019-02-10 Thread ????????
??
thank you very!

Re: where find dubbo for spring boot application.properties all config list??

2019-02-10 Thread LiZhenNet
You can look at this:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-spring-boot-project/blob/master/dubbo-spring-boot-autoconfigure/src/main/resources/META-INF/spring-configuration-metadata.json

一直以来 <279377...@qq.com> 于2019年2月11日周一 上午10:43写道:

> 非常感谢~thank you very!


Re: [DISCUSS]: Some thoughts on What Dubbo 3.0 is, we really should start it ASAP

2019-02-10 Thread Ian Luo
Agree. Pls. keep discussing the wish list for dubbo 3.0. I will init a
project on GitHub, and keep collecting good ideas into it.

-Ian.

On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 6:34 PM Kun Song  wrote:

> An issue will be fine, maybe we can discuss features on mail list, and add
> more serious conclusions in that issue. What others think?
>
> > 在 2019年2月2日,下午7:10,Imteyaz Khan  写道:
> >
> > +1 in the suggestion.
> >
> > On Saturday, February 2, 2019, Ian Luo  wrote:
> >
> >> I am thinking of firing an issue on Github to collect 3.0 wishlist from
> the
> >> community. What do you say?
> >>
> >> -Ian.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 6:12 AM Kun Song  wrote:
> >>
> >>> I especially interested in reactive programming and cloud native
> support.
> >>>
> >>> A reactive Dubbo will be attractive, as the community point out. I even
> >>> propose to make Dubbo implements the Reactive Streams specification,
> >> which
> >>> will integrate back pressure(flow control) and make Dubbo a choice for
> >>> stream processing(which is a booming area). Stream processing has many
> >>> advantages such as better resource utilization, as far as I know, Java
> >>> 9/RxJava/Akka-Streams have already implements Reactive Streams spec,
> and
> >>> have already gained great success.
> >>>
> >>> Of course cloud native support is a must, we should do it, and HTTP 2 &
> >>> RSocket are also interesting feature to me.
> >>>
> >>> When decide what features Dubbo 3 should have, I think we can make each
> >>> feature a proposal, which could including motivation/proposed
> >>> changes/interfaces/compatibility/deprecation/test plan …, so more
> >>> contributors can get involved in it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.reactive-streams.org/  >
> >>>
>  在 2019年1月28日,下午10:44,Ian Luo  >>> ian@gmail.com>> 写道:
> 
>  Agree, we should consider seriously both HTTP/2 and rsocket.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  -Ian.
> 
> 
>  On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 10:59 AM Taosheng, Wei <
> >> weitaosh...@foxmail.com
> >>> >
>  wrote:
> 
> > Lan,
> > Yes, I think http2 and some new protocols such as rsocket can be
> > considered.
> > I will spend some time to study this issue.
> >
> >
> > Warm regards,
> > Taosheng
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Original --
> > From: Ian Luo mailto:ian@gmail.com>>
> > Date: Thu,Jan 24,2019 9:58 AM
> > To: dev mailto:dev@dubbo.apache.org>>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: Some thoughts on What Dubbo 3.0 is, we really
> > should start it ASAP
> >
> >
> >
> > Taosheng,
> >
> > In this scenario, it looks like we should use http2 to transport the
> > payload, what do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Ian.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:35 PM Taosheng Wei <
> >> tswstarpla...@apache.org
> >>> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think we can find a binary protocol with strong potential to be a
> > public
> >> application protocol like http, and extend it with security
> function.
> >>> Or
> > if
> >> there aren't such suitable protocols, we can try to formulate a new
> >> protocol. Then make Dubbo support it.
> >> In my opinion, this way may not only solve the security problems,
> but
> > also
> >> solve the cross-language RPC with Dubbo.
> >>
> >> zhi_guang_...@163.com  <
> >>> zhi_guang_...@163.com > 于2019年1月23日周三
> >>> 下午5:47写道:
> >>
> >>> I have a similar Question as this mail:
> >>> Is Dubbo designed for use on internet?
> >>> I have just join a company last year and our business is all around
> >>> the
> >>> world.
> >>> So we have servers on US and ASIA and EU.
> >>> In this condition we use dubbo on internet and keep security by
> > security
> >>> rules that only allow the servers connect to each other.
> >>>
> >>> I think this is not a  pretty useage of dubbo,but I cann't find
> >> Strong
> >>> evidences to change the situation.
> >>>
> >>> Can any one help me to answer this questions? Thanks a lot.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 您的朋友:刘志广
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *From:* Yuhao Bi mailto:byh0...@gmail.com>>
> >>> *Date:* 2019-01-22 22:55
> >>> *To:* dev mailto:dev@dubbo.apache.org>>
> >>> *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS]: Some thoughts on What Dubbo 3.0 is, we
> >>> really
> >>> should start it ASAP
> >>> Hi lan and community,
> >>>
> >>> Although I have already heard "Dubbo" a few years ago,
> >>> but I just started to learn dubbo after the meetup last year in
> >>> Chengdu
> >>> after it became the Apache Dubbo.
> >>> Maybe I'm not such that familiar with the underlying details, but
> >>> after
> >>> the continuous 

where find dubbo for spring boot application.properties all config list??

2019-02-10 Thread ????????
~thank you very!

Re: Non-apache releases and old releases

2019-02-10 Thread Ian Luo
Just come back from Chinese Spring Festival. I have renamed all releases
after 2.6.1 so now they have the prefix of apache-dubbo to distinguish from
the previous releases, for example: from dubbo-2.7.0 to apache-dubbo-2.7.0.

Regards,
-Ian.

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 6:48 AM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> HI,
>
> i was looking at the releases here [1] and not there was two unapproved
> releases made after you entered incubation dubbo-2.6.1 and dubbo-2.5.10.
> 2.6.1 has come up in conversion on this list before but not the previous
> release.
>
> It not clear on the GitHub page what isn Apache release and what is not. I
> think it would be a good idea to changing the names of the pre Apache and
> unofficial releases to make that clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/releases