Behavior of extra installments for loan penalties charged after loan end date

2020-01-20 Thread Angel Cajas
Hi everyone.

For some time I've been making some test for loan accounts with penalty charges 
but didn't notice until recently the behavior I'm about to describe:

I create a loan with this parameters:
Principal amount: 6000
Loan term: 1
Number of repayments: 1
Repay every: month
Nominal interest: 20
Interest method: Declining balance
Amortization: Equal installments
Interest calculation period: Daily
Repayment strategy: default

Recalculate interest: enabled
Advance payment adjustment type: Reduce number of installments
Interest recalculation compounding on: None
Days in year: 360
Days in month: 30
Frequency for recalculate outstanding principal: same

Charges:
Overdue fee 50% of amount
Overdue fee 70% of interest

The essential part in this configuration is the penalty charges and interest 
recalculation enabled.

I disburse a new loan account on 05/December/2019 so the loan account is 
overdue. This is the original schedule

[cid:image003.jpg@01D5CF86.789C3C90]

Next, I run the job to Apply penalty to overdue loan and a new installment is 
created with the penalties amount.

[cid:image006.jpg@01D5CF86.789C3C90]

This extra installment is created exclusively by the penalties job. However 
there are some instances when it disappears, like after  I make a repayment

[cid:image009.jpg@01D5CF86.789C3C90]


[cid:image011.jpg@01D5CF86.789C3C90]

It also disappears when a transaction is undone and apparently when a scheduled 
job (which I haven't been able to identify) is run, when this happens the 
charges after end date are deactived and new ones need to be created when the 
Loan penalty job is run again.

This only happens to loan accounts with interest recalculation enabled as they 
are able of regenerate their schedule.

Is there an extra configuration not listed here that could help me avoid this 
behavior? If not, I'm trying to replicate the creation of the additional 
installment when the loan schedule is being generated.

Regards.









Re: Hyperstacks + Apache Fineract: Queries

2020-01-20 Thread Graham Jimenez
Hi Yemdjih,

You forgot to cc my colleague Janno, nonetheless, I've forwarded this to him


Graham Paul Jimenez CEO, Hyperstacks Inc. | Project Head, Haibe
www.hyperstacksinc.com | www.haibe.io

*This e-mail may contain confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged information solely for the intended recipient. The
contents do not represent the opinion of Hyperstacks Inc. except to the
extent that it relates to its official business. If you are not the
intended recipient, kindly delete this e-mail and any attachments hereto,
and inform the sender by return e-mail of your receipt hereof in error. Do
not disclose, copy, distribute the same or make use of the information
contained herein any manner. Your violation of any of these terms or the
use of this e-mail or the information herein for any illegal purpose or for
any other purpose than as permitted by Hyperstacks Inc. is strictly
prohibited. Such use may result in disciplinary and legal action.*




On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 7:29 PM Yemdjih Kaze Nasser 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please can you list the steps you used to to run the docker container?
>
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 09:49, Janno Tabamo 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a concern regarding tha Apache Fineract. When I run it using the
>> docker-compose command from the documentation, it gives me an error saying
>> - access denied root@localhost. I don't know if I'm doing something
>> wrong because I just followed the documentation (docker section).
>>
>> Also, I can't access the online MifosX Community demo app. Hoping you can
>> give me helpful feedback for my queries.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>