Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

2017-11-07 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala 
Testing on Windows 10.  I am seeing this error:

Installer version 3.3.0 (windows)
Using Locale: en_US
Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI.
SDK version Apache Flex SDK 4.16.0
AIR version 23.0
Flash Player version 23.0
Creating Apache Flex home
Creating temporary directory
Downloading Apache Flex SDK from:
http://apache.osuosl.org/flex/4.16.0/binaries/apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-bin.zip
Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature
The Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature of the downloaded files matches the
reference. The file is valid.
Uncompressing: C:\temp\flex\4.16\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-bin.zip
Finished uncompressing:
C:\temp\flex\4.16\temp\apache-flex-sdk-4.16.0-bin.zip
Downloading Adobe AIR Runtime Kit for Windows from:
http://airdownload.adobe.com/air/win/download/23.0//AdobeAIRSDK.zip
Validating download: C:\temp\flex\4.16/in/AdobeAIRSDK.zip
Error #1009
TypeError: Error #1009
at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Unzip/cleanUpAfterUnzipWin()
at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Unzip/onUnzipWinComplete()
Installation aborted:
http://flex.apache.org/track-installer.html?failure=true=Apache Flex
SDK 4.16.0=4.16.0=windows=3.3.0=Error #1009
TypeError: Error #1009
at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Unzip/cleanUpAfterUnzipWin()
at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Unzip/onUnzipWinComplete()


Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks,
Om

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Alex Harui  wrote:

> AFAICT, the releasecandidate.xml is not signing the binaries, it is
> calling build.xml to build and sign the binaries, tag the repo, etc.  It
> is just scripting the steps an RM would otherwise do manually.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/7/17, 8:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >Just move our discussion here. I was started to think more about that -
> >since our build.xml script is signing our binary artifacts, why we are
> >doing this once again in releasecandidate.xml script ? What actually is
> >the
> >purpose ?
> >
> >Thanks, Piotr
> >
> >
> >2017-11-06 20:49 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
> >
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> This is official thread for discuss related to started VOTE for release.
> >>
> >> Thread started once again cause gmail tend to merge threads. :) Thanks
> >>Om!
> >> :)
> >>
> >> Piotr,
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon:
> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe
> 3a
> >>d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63645669619500=
> >>EN2XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0
> >>
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe
> 3a
> >>d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63645669619500=
> >>EN2XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe
> 3ad9
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63645669619500=EN2
> >XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0
> > https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe
> 3ad9
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63645669619500=EN2
> >XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0>*
>
>

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

2017-11-07 Thread Alex Harui 
Sounds like you are having trouble with Exec on Windows.  Wasn't the
signing executable also hanging for the installer signing?  What version
of Ant are you using?  Run some simple ant scripts that launch other apps.
I saw on Apache Ant forums that some version of Ant did have hanging
issues.

HTH,
-Alex

On 11/7/17, 3:49 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>I was started to prepare RC1 for SDK. I run build ant -f build.xml release
>on Windows 10 and it's stuck completely on target PackageMXP.[1] Anyone
>experience something like that ?
>
>Target look like that [2]. I was waiting about 40 min and nothing
>happened.
>
>[1] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
>che.org%2Fnhxl=02%7C01%7C%7Ce28e146d769940e5065f08d5263c3084%7Cfa7b1b
>5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636456962311776580=l%2FVvN%2FHh
>Nw71gF9jai7NsirElKZtNG%2FVMLZPV9dEN3g%3D=0
>[2] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaste.apa
>che.org%2FhWnp=02%7C01%7C%7Ce28e146d769940e5065f08d5263c3084%7Cfa7b1b
>5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636456962311776580=YLSVlWSs1leq
>IrC7DP%2F%2FqPz4g7OMVHurkRPKmc7LC6Y%3D=0
>
>Thanks, Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-04 7:41 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :
>
>> I updated and ran the approval script.  It found some tests without
>> headers.  I added headers and kicked off a new nightly build.  Looks
>>like
>> it takes a couple of hours to build on my slow Azure VM.  Other than
>>that
>> and the license thing Justin found, I think it is ok to release.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 11/3/17, 7:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>>
>> >Cool! License has been added.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Piotr
>> >
>> >On Sat, Nov 4, 2017, 03:14 Justin Mclean 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> > Is it not enough if that file has header with those license
>> >>information ?
>> >>
>> >> It’s enough to satisfy the MIT license conditions but not quite
>>enough
>> >>for
>> >> ASF policy. [1] Adding it to LICENSE also make it clear to any users
>> >>that
>> >> their’s MIT licensed software included without them looking for it /
>> >> accidentally coming across it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Justin
>> >>
>> >> 1.
>> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
>> >>e.org%2Fdev%2Flicensing-howto.html%23permissive-deps&
>> data=02%7C01%7C%7C22
>> >>af1e8362cd4fea10ce08d5232ca106%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0
>> >>%7C636453596969259739=h2na%2Boz6K6HlgyYHWJhQcDicw9URDGyOV
>> 4BrejO2z8E
>> >>%3D=0
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7Ce28e146d769940e5065f08d5263c3084
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636456962311776580=tPA
>9aNhqBaV%2FwL%2FPhur8IQp10BKGLNbQaX0pT9HWoZc%3D=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7Ce28e146d769940e5065f08d5263c3084
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636456962311776580=tPA
>9aNhqBaV%2FwL%2FPhur8IQp10BKGLNbQaX0pT9HWoZc%3D=0>*

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1

2017-11-07 Thread Alex Harui 
+1
Package 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.3/rc1/apache-flex-s
dk-installer-3.3.0-src.tar.gz
Java 1.8
OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.12.5
Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y




On 11/6/17, 11:38 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi Folks,
>
>This is official thread for Vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer
>version 3.3 to be released.
>
>This version address fix for one major issue:
>- Unable to download Apache Flex SDK with Air greater than 23 - Windows
>[1]
>
>In order to test issue [1] you have to use Nightly Build of SDK, cause
>during work on fix I have discovered that script in SDK which installer is
>using was broken [2]. Release process for SDK has been started.
>
>[1] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.ap
>ache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35295=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec165
>4d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645593913043
>0166=TEpFrC1%2FlwCBg55aCZDBvM3IN4D4%2B%2BJSm5RjpxccdRI%3D=0
>[2] 
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.ap
>ache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FFLEX-35364=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec165
>4d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645593913043
>0166=VOGCnxH0zR%2BMaJwTOOpno7gOuXZUDdK%2BAg6B9tqf3GU%3D=0
>
>Sources can be found:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac
>he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3%2Frc1%2F=02%7C01
>%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%
>7C0%7C0%7C636455939130430166=8%2FwvXZ%2Br3LZsFKupE3kt0BKkMLcvnko2Gs6
>8iOLmtck%3D=0
>
>Binary distributions for Windows and Mac:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apac
>he.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fflex%2Finstaller%2F3.3%2Frc1%2Fbinaries%2F
>ata=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636455939130430166=GathFuAvqK0Lw0C7RZZtwqRxOzgz
>gekb0S9GWK%2F7Bd4%3D=0
>
>Before voting review ASF requirements:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache
>.org%2Fdev%2F=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5
>a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636455939130430166=ZyLkYiq0ZOARV
>yWG5YxIzShEK34HQ20s7ngJMhtkipY%3D=0
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache
>.org%2Flegal%2Frelease-policy.html%23approving-a-release=02%7C01%7C%7
>Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7
>C0%7C636455939130430166=9q%2FOuaJAj%2BPAw43pQ9cHdcOl8l6AgZyAK3az7dDD
>bls%3D=0
>
>Vote
>[ ] +1 Approve the release
>[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
>
>This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
>If I miss something let me know, this is my first time being RM. :)
>
>Thanks,
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636455939130430166=OKB
>XGurKIedXC3cNgIJ5n%2FV7KXZJJrl%2BfqM7cfva1tc%3D=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7Cc048fb05c3004ec1654d08d5254df669
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636455939130430166=OKB
>XGurKIedXC3cNgIJ5n%2FV7KXZJJrl%2BfqM7cfva1tc%3D=0>*

Re: [LAST CALL] Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1

2017-11-07 Thread Piotr Zarzycki 
I was started to prepare RC1 for SDK. I run build ant -f build.xml release
on Windows 10 and it's stuck completely on target PackageMXP.[1] Anyone
experience something like that ?

Target look like that [2]. I was waiting about 40 min and nothing happened.

[1] https://paste.apache.org/nhxl
[2] https://paste.apache.org/hWnp

Thanks, Piotr


2017-11-04 7:41 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

> I updated and ran the approval script.  It found some tests without
> headers.  I added headers and kicked off a new nightly build.  Looks like
> it takes a couple of hours to build on my slow Azure VM.  Other than that
> and the license thing Justin found, I think it is ok to release.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 11/3/17, 7:34 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> >Cool! License has been added.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Piotr
> >
> >On Sat, Nov 4, 2017, 03:14 Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> > Is it not enough if that file has header with those license
> >>information ?
> >>
> >> It’s enough to satisfy the MIT license conditions but not quite enough
> >>for
> >> ASF policy. [1] Adding it to LICENSE also make it clear to any users
> >>that
> >> their’s MIT licensed software included without them looking for it /
> >> accidentally coming across it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> >>
> >> 1.
> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apach
> >>e.org%2Fdev%2Flicensing-howto.html%23permissive-deps&
> data=02%7C01%7C%7C22
> >>af1e8362cd4fea10ce08d5232ca106%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0
> >>%7C636453596969259739=h2na%2Boz6K6HlgyYHWJhQcDicw9URDGyOV
> 4BrejO2z8E
> >>%3D=0
>
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

2017-11-07 Thread Alex Harui 
AFAICT, the releasecandidate.xml is not signing the binaries, it is
calling build.xml to build and sign the binaries, tag the repo, etc.  It
is just scripting the steps an RM would otherwise do manually.

-Alex

On 11/7/17, 8:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

>Hi Alex,
>
>Just move our discussion here. I was started to think more about that -
>since our build.xml script is signing our binary artifacts, why we are
>doing this once again in releasecandidate.xml script ? What actually is
>the
>purpose ?
>
>Thanks, Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-06 20:49 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> This is official thread for discuss related to started VOTE for release.
>>
>> Thread started once again cause gmail tend to merge threads. :) Thanks
>>Om!
>> :)
>>
>> Piotr,
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: 
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe3a
>>d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645669619500=
>>EN2XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0
>> 
>>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe3a
>>d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645669619500=
>>EN2XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0>*
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon: 
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe3ad9
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645669619500=EN2
>XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki=02%7C01%7C%7C4c7017c0d4484bf3534708d525fe3ad9
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63645669619500=EN2
>XgAPPcR%2F8P4gPb0YBKJQcMF7btryx1YsGU9xj1q0%3D=0>*

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

2017-11-07 Thread Piotr Zarzycki 
Never mind I figure out why there is sign in releasecandidate.xml.

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-07 17:40 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Hi Alex,
>
> Just move our discussion here. I was started to think more about that -
> since our build.xml script is signing our binary artifacts, why we are
> doing this once again in releasecandidate.xml script ? What actually is the
> purpose ?
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
>
> 2017-11-06 20:49 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> This is official thread for discuss related to started VOTE for release.
>>
>> Thread started once again cause gmail tend to merge threads. :) Thanks
>> Om! :)
>>
>> Piotr,
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> *
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3 - RC1*

2017-11-07 Thread Piotr Zarzycki 
Hi Alex,

Just move our discussion here. I was started to think more about that -
since our build.xml script is signing our binary artifacts, why we are
doing this once again in releasecandidate.xml script ? What actually is the
purpose ?

Thanks, Piotr


2017-11-06 20:49 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki :

> Hi Folks,
>
> This is official thread for discuss related to started VOTE for release.
>
> Thread started once again cause gmail tend to merge threads. :) Thanks Om!
> :)
>
> Piotr,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*