Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[piotrz]

Peter,

I think we should have SWF version. This framework has two faces, so it
would be nice to show that both looks same. 

Piotr



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58223.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Peter Ent]

The repo has been created. I added a small file to make it official.

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flex-tourjs.git


On 1/12/17, 9:18 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com> wrote:

>I've put the request in for the flex-tourjs repo; should have that today.
>I honestly do not know how the original Tour de Flex is set up, so I'll
>research that today. I'm assuming there is no active service behind it and
>that its all just pulling from a file system guided by some control file,
>like a JSON list or an index list with multiple points.
>
>Since we have been talking about "modules" for this, I'm guessing each
>leaf of the tree should be a module. Self contained with documentation (or
>at least a reference link to the ASDoc) and one or more source files for
>presentation and, optionally, a loadable live example.
>
>Do you think there is any reason to have a SWF version or should it just
>be JS? 
>
>Regards,
>Peter
>
>On 1/11/17, 6:03 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler@usmc.mil>
>wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>-Mark
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Peter Ent [mailto:p...@adobe.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:33 PM
>>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour
>>de Flex", I thought I might start a repository to hold it. We have a lot
>>of material now and people could begin contributing to it.
>>
>>Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think
>>keeping the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be
>>released on its own schedule and not tie up the FlexJS release with more
>>issues.
>>
>>Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example as
>>the starting point.
>>
>>Regards,
>>Peter Ent
>>Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project
>>
>

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Peter Ent]

I've put the request in for the flex-tourjs repo; should have that today.
I honestly do not know how the original Tour de Flex is set up, so I'll
research that today. I'm assuming there is no active service behind it and
that its all just pulling from a file system guided by some control file,
like a JSON list or an index list with multiple points.

Since we have been talking about "modules" for this, I'm guessing each
leaf of the tree should be a module. Self contained with documentation (or
at least a reference link to the ASDoc) and one or more source files for
presentation and, optionally, a loadable live example.

Do you think there is any reason to have a SWF version or should it just
be JS? 

Regards,
Peter

On 1/11/17, 6:03 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler@usmc.mil>
wrote:

>+1
>
>-Mark
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Peter Ent [mailto:p...@adobe.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:33 PM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS
>
>Hi,
>
>Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour
>de Flex", I thought I might start a repository to hold it. We have a lot
>of material now and people could begin contributing to it.
>
>Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think
>keeping the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be
>released on its own schedule and not tie up the FlexJS release with more
>issues.
>
>Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example as
>the starting point.
>
>Regards,
>Peter Ent
>Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project
>

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Carlos Rovira]

So cool PKumar :)

Are you doing this outside of Apache Flex. I think that would be a great
module to be part of Apache FlexJS, and I think many of us will help you to
get working and help testing or with the mapping part you mention.

Thanks! :)



2017-01-11 17:39 GMT+01:00 PKumar <prashaku...@gmail.com>:

> This is really great. i am porting AMFJS in FlexJS and half part done and
> now
> figuring the class mapping part.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58160.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[PKumar]

This is really great. i am porting AMFJS in FlexJS and half part done and now
figuring the class mapping part.



--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58160.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Carlos Rovira]

2017-01-10 21:07 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui :

>
> This might be a good first place to implement non-unloadable modules.
> Each "example" could be a module.
>
>
Without doubt, I was think as well use modules in MDLExample, but this is a
great place as well :)

Thanks



> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> [1] http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/index.html
>
>


-- 

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

RE: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Kessler CTR Mark J]

+1

-Mark

-Original Message-
From: Peter Ent [mailto:p...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:33 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

Hi,

Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour de 
Flex", I thought I might start a repository to hold it. We have a lot of 
material now and people could begin contributing to it.

Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think keeping 
the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be released on its 
own schedule and not tie up the FlexJS release with more issues.

Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example as the 
starting point.

Regards,
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Alex Harui  wrote:

>
>
> On 1/10/17, 11:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>  wrote:
>
> >
> >> Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example
> >>as
> >> the starting point.
> >>
> >>
> >I think the MDLExample would be a good scaffolding website.  The ASDoc
> >example, fontawesome example, etc. can go in each as a tab.
>
> Designing the top-level will be the fun part ;-).
>

I think this is a well defined problem that a designer could take on and
build a concept.  If FlexJS does not support such a design, we just need to
go build it.


>
> The regular Tour De Flex is here [1]  It uses a Tree as the top-level.
> IMO, that's more scalable than tabs, if I understand what you were
> thinking.  IOW, a vertical list can show more things than a row of tabs.
> To be clear, I didn't mean to suggest starting with ASDoc Example as much
> as borrowing the Tree from ASDoc Example as the shell.
>

The MDLExample has a side drawer.  That is what I meant.  And then each
example type will probably have tabs to show variety.  Or maybe just one
tab depending on how many examples we want to show for each type.


>
> IMO, we don't need to match the current Tour De Flex at all in terms of
> look-and-feel and content, but I was thinking Tour de FlexJS could have
> component sets at the top-level of the tree and maybe some example apps at
> the top-level as well.
>
> I'm also wondering if we should carve out room in the UI for more words to
> describe what's going on like in Flex Examples.
>

Yes, a description along with the MXML code that went into building each
example would be very important.  More than showing 'FlexJS can do this',
showing 'See how easy FlexJS makes this' is critical.


>
> This might be a good first place to implement non-unloadable modules.
> Each "example" could be a module.
>

+1


>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
> [1] http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/index.html
>
>

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Alex Harui]

On 1/10/17, 11:49 AM, "omup...@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
 wrote:

>
>> Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example
>>as
>> the starting point.
>>
>>
>I think the MDLExample would be a good scaffolding website.  The ASDoc
>example, fontawesome example, etc. can go in each as a tab.

Designing the top-level will be the fun part ;-).

The regular Tour De Flex is here [1]  It uses a Tree as the top-level.
IMO, that's more scalable than tabs, if I understand what you were
thinking.  IOW, a vertical list can show more things than a row of tabs.
To be clear, I didn't mean to suggest starting with ASDoc Example as much
as borrowing the Tree from ASDoc Example as the shell.

IMO, we don't need to match the current Tour De Flex at all in terms of
look-and-feel and content, but I was thinking Tour de FlexJS could have
component sets at the top-level of the tree and maybe some example apps at
the top-level as well.

I'm also wondering if we should carve out room in the UI for more words to
describe what's going on like in Flex Examples.

This might be a good first place to implement non-unloadable modules.
Each "example" could be a module.

Thoughts?
-Alex

[1] http://flex.apache.org/tourdeflex/index.html

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[OmPrakash Muppirala]

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Peter Ent  wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  We have a lot of material now
>

Yes indeed :-)


> Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think
> keeping the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be
> released on its own schedule and not tie up the FlexJS release with more
> issues.
>

+1 for flex-tourjs as repo name.

I'm guessing we could make this as a publishable site using gitpubsub like
Chris had suggested.  Or at least a part of it.


> Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example as
> the starting point.
>
>
I think the MDLExample would be a good scaffolding website.  The ASDoc
example, fontawesome example, etc. can go in each as a tab.

Thanks,
Om



> Regards,
> Peter Ent
> Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project
>
>

Re: [FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[piotrz]

Hi Peter,

Great! +1 for new repository and your proposed name.

Piotr



-
Apache Flex PMC
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tour-de-FlexJS-tp58119p58125.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[FlexJS] Tour de FlexJS

[Peter Ent]

Hi,

Regarding the notation of a "Tour de FlexJS" in the spirit of the "Tour de 
Flex", I thought I might start a repository to hold it. We have a lot of 
material now and people could begin contributing to it.

Perhaps the repo could be "flex-tourjs" or something similar. I think keeping 
the project separate from the FlexJS SDK would allow it to be released on its 
own schedule and not tie up the FlexJS release with more issues.

Let me know what you think. Alex has suggested using the ASDoc example as the 
starting point.

Regards,
Peter Ent
Adobe Systems/Apache Flex Project