Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-31 Thread liu ron 
+1,

Best,
Ron

Yun Tang  于2023年7月26日周三 14:19写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
> 
> From: Yu Li 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 14:10
> To: dev@flink.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to
> o.a.f.state.rocksdb package
>
> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:47, Yanfei Lei  wrote:
>
> > +1 for moving all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under
> > the classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> >
> > I have always been curious about the relationship between
> > o.a.f.contrib.xx and the flink-contrib module. :)
> >
> > Best,
> > Yanfei
> >
> > Jing Ge  于2023年7月25日周二 17:50写道：
> > >
> > > make sense.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Jing
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter
> > >  wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler 
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose
> > to
> > > > move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the
> classes
> > to
> > > > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-26 Thread Yun Tang 
+1 (binding)

Best
Yun Tang

From: Yu Li 
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 14:10
To: dev@flink.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to 
o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

+1

Best Regards,
Yu


On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:47, Yanfei Lei  wrote:

> +1 for moving all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under
> the classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
>
> I have always been curious about the relationship between
> o.a.f.contrib.xx and the flink-contrib module. :)
>
> Best,
> Yanfei
>
> Jing Ge  于2023年7月25日周二 17:50写道：
> >
> > make sense.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter
> >  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose
> to
> > > move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes
> to
> > > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
> > >
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-26 Thread Yu Li 
+1

Best Regards,
Yu


On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 10:47, Yanfei Lei  wrote:

> +1 for moving all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under
> the classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
>
> I have always been curious about the relationship between
> o.a.f.contrib.xx and the flink-contrib module. :)
>
> Best,
> Yanfei
>
> Jing Ge  于2023年7月25日周二 17:50写道：
> >
> > make sense.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jing
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter
> >  wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose
> to
> > > move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes
> to
> > > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
> > >
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-25 Thread Yanfei Lei 
+1 for moving all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under
the classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.

I have always been curious about the relationship between
o.a.f.contrib.xx and the flink-contrib module. :)

Best,
Yanfei

Jing Ge  于2023年7月25日周二 17:50写道：
>
> make sense.
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter
>  wrote:
>
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler  wrote:
> > >
> > > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose to
> > move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes to
> > o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
> >
> >

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-25 Thread Jing Ge 
make sense.

Best regards,
Jing

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stefan Richter
 wrote:

>
> +1
>
>
>
> > On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler  wrote:
> >
> > To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose to
> move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes to
> o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-25 Thread Stefan Richter 

+1



> On 24. Jul 2023, at 12:25, Chesnay Schepler  wrote:
> 
> To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose to move 
> all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes to 
> o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
> 
> 
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%253A%2BMove%2BRocksDB%2Bstatebackend%2Bclasses%2Bto%2Bo.a.f.state.rocksdb%2Bpackage=gmail-imap=169079912800=AOvVaw3OiTwgsLEiTcJpNTVM-Y8y
>

Re: [DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-24 Thread Xintong Song 
+1

Best,

Xintong



On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 6:25 PM Chesnay Schepler  wrote:

> To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose to
> move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes
> to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.
>
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%3A+Move+RocksDB+statebackend+classes+to+o.a.f.state.rocksdb+package
>
>

[DISCUSS][2.0] FLIP-349: Move RocksDB statebackend classes to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package

2023-07-24 Thread Chesnay Schepler 
To properly reflect the state of the rocksdb statebackend I propose to 
move all classes in the state-backend-rocksdb module under the classes 
to o.a.f.state.rocksdb package.



https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-349%3A+Move+RocksDB+statebackend+classes+to+o.a.f.state.rocksdb+package