Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Slim Baltagi]

Hi Matthias

I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!

Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
Hadoop Users 74,333
Big Data, Low Latency19,949
Apache Storm   955
Apache Flink 205


Slim 

On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:

> Just published it. Spread the word :)
> 
> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
> 
> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>> 
>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>> any more comments on the draft.
>> 
>> -Matthias
>> 
>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
>>> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
>>> 
>>> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
>>> 
 Great post! Thanks!
 
 I have also made some comments in the commit.
 
 – Ufuk
 
> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
> me. This one looks even better!
> 
> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
> 
> Cheers,
> Max
> 
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
 wrote:
>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>> a PR.
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>> 
>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>> a second blog post later on
>> 
>> 
>> -Matthias
>> 
>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>> Matthias,
>>> 
>>> This is great blog!
>>> 
>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
 Apache Flink stream processing engine?
>>> Fixing the few typos
>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
 package that allows users
>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>> in not available -> is not available
>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
 running it on Flink.
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Slim Baltagi
>>> 
>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger 
 wrote:
>>> 
 Great, thank you for writing the article.
 
 I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
 Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
 reviewing
 it easier?
 
 On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
 wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
 the
> Storm compatibility layer.
> 
> You can find the draft here:
> 
> 
 https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
> 
> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
> 
> 
 https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
> 
> Looking forward to your feedback!
> 
> 
> -Matthias
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
 
 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Matthias J. Sax]

Awesome! Thanks a lot!

On 12/11/2015 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
> Hi Matthias
> 
> I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!
> 
> Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
> Hadoop Users 74,333
> Big Data, Low Latency19,949
> Apache Storm   955
> Apache Flink 205
> 
> 
> Slim 
> 
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
> 
>> Just published it. Spread the word :)
>>
>> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
>>
>> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>>>
>>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>>> any more comments on the draft.
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
 Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.

 On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi  wrote:

> Great post! Thanks!
>
> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>
> – Ufuk
>
>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>> me. This one looks even better!
>>
>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Max
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>> a PR.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>
>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>> a second blog post later on
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
 Matthias,

 This is great blog!

 I would like to suggest the following:
 Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
 Fixing the few typos
 For this reasons -> For these reasons
 Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
> package that allows users
 we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
 in not available -> is not available
 eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
 Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
> running it on Flink.
 Thanks

 Slim Baltagi

 On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger 
> wrote:

> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>
> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
> reviewing
> it easier?
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
> the
>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>
>> You can find the draft here:
>>
>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>
>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>
>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>


>>>
>
>

>>>
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Maximilian Michels]

Great! :)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Slim Baltagi  wrote:
> Hi Matthias
>
> I already shared your blog at Linkedin forums covering 255, 758 members!
>
> Big Data and Analytics 160, 316
> Hadoop Users 74,333
> Big Data, Low Latency19,949
> Apache Storm   955
> Apache Flink 205
>
>
> Slim
>
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
>
>> Just published it. Spread the word :)
>>
>> Thanks for all your valuable feedback!
>>
>> On 12/10/2015 01:17 PM, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>>> Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.
>>>
>>> I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
>>> any more comments on the draft.
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
 Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.

 On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi  wrote:

> Great post! Thanks!
>
> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>
> – Ufuk
>
>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>> me. This one looks even better!
>>
>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Max
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>>> a PR.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>>>
>>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>>> a second blog post later on
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
 Matthias,

 This is great blog!

 I would like to suggest the following:
 Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
 Fixing the few typos
 For this reasons -> For these reasons
 Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
> package that allows users
 we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
 in not available -> is not available
 eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
 Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
> running it on Flink.
 Thanks

 Slim Baltagi

 On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger 
> wrote:

> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>
> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
> reviewing
> it easier?
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
> the
>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>
>> You can find the draft here:
>>
>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>
>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>
>>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>>


>>>
>
>

>>>
>>
>

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Matthias J. Sax]

Thanks for all your feedback! I updated the PR.

I would like to publish the post today. Please let me know if you have
any more comments on the draft.

-Matthias

On 12/09/2015 08:12 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri wrote:
> Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.
> 
> On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi  wrote:
> 
>> Great post! Thanks!
>>
>> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>>
>> – Ufuk
>>
>>> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
>>> me. This one looks even better!
>>>
>>> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Max
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
>> wrote:
 Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
 a PR.

 https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15

 @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
 a second blog post later on


 -Matthias

 On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
> Matthias,
>
> This is great blog!
>
> I would like to suggest the following:
> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
>> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
> Fixing the few typos
> For this reasons -> For these reasons
> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
>> package that allows users
> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
> in not available -> is not available
> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
>> running it on Flink.
> Thanks
>
> Slim Baltagi
>
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger 
>> wrote:
>
>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>
>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
>> reviewing
>> it easier?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
>> the
>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>
>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>
>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>>
>
>

>>
>>
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

New Blog Post Draft

[Matthias J. Sax]

Hi,

after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
Storm compatibility layer.

You can find the draft here:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md

The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png

Looking forward to your feedback!


-Matthias



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Slim Baltagi]

Matthias,

This is great blog!

I would like to suggest the following: 
Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache 
Flink stream processing engine?
Fixing the few typos
For this reasons -> For these reasons
Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package 
that allows users 
 we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it 
in not available -> is not available
eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus running 
it on Flink. 
Thanks

Slim Baltagi

On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger  wrote:

> Great, thank you for writing the article.
> 
> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
> it easier?
> 
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>> Storm compatibility layer.
>> 
>> You can find the draft here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>> 
>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>> 
>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>> 
>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>> 
>> 
>> -Matthias
>> 
>> 

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Maximilian Michels]

Hi Matthias,

Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
me. This one looks even better!

I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.

Cheers,
Max

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
> a PR.
>
> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>
> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
> a second blog post later on
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>> Matthias,
>>
>> This is great blog!
>>
>> I would like to suggest the following:
>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache 
>> Flink stream processing engine?
>> Fixing the few typos
>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility 
>> package that allows users
>>  we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>> in not available -> is not available
>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus 
>> running it on Flink.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Slim Baltagi
>>
>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger  wrote:
>>
>>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>>
>>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
>>> it easier?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
>>>
 Hi,

 after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
 would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
 Storm compatibility layer.

 You can find the draft here:

 https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md

 The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:

 https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png

 Looking forward to your feedback!


 -Matthias


>>
>>
>

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Robert Metzger]

Great, thank you for writing the article.

I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
it easier?

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
> Storm compatibility layer.
>
> You can find the draft here:
>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>
> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>
> Looking forward to your feedback!
>
>
> -Matthias
>
>

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Matthias J. Sax]

Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
a PR.

https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15

@Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
a second blog post later on


-Matthias

On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
> Matthias,
> 
> This is great blog!
> 
> I would like to suggest the following: 
> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache 
> Flink stream processing engine?
> Fixing the few typos
> For this reasons -> For these reasons
> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility package 
> that allows users 
>  we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it 
> in not available -> is not available
> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus 
> running it on Flink. 
> Thanks
> 
> Slim Baltagi
> 
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger  wrote:
> 
>> Great, thank you for writing the article.
>>
>> I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>> Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
>> it easier?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
>>> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
>>> Storm compatibility layer.
>>>
>>> You can find the draft here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
>>>
>>> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback!
>>>
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>>
> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Vasiliki Kalavri]

Thanks Matthias! This is a very nice blog post and reads easily.

On 9 December 2015 at 19:21, Ufuk Celebi  wrote:

> Great post! Thanks!
>
> I have also made some comments in the commit.
>
> – Ufuk
>
> > On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
> > me. This one looks even better!
> >
> > I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Max
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
> >> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
> >> a PR.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
> >>
> >> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
> >> a second blog post later on
> >>
> >>
> >> -Matthias
> >>
> >> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
> >>> Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> This is great blog!
> >>>
> >>> I would like to suggest the following:
> >>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on
> Apache Flink stream processing engine?
> >>> Fixing the few typos
> >>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
> >>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility
> package that allows users
> >>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
> >>> in not available -> is not available
> >>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
> >>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus
> running it on Flink.
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Slim Baltagi
> >>>
> >>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Great, thank you for writing the article.
> 
>  I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
>  Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make
> reviewing
>  it easier?
> 
>  On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax 
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> > would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about
> the
> > Storm compatibility layer.
> >
> > You can find the draft here:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
> >
> > The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
> >
> > Looking forward to your feedback!
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: New Blog Post Draft

[Ufuk Celebi]

Great post! Thanks!

I have also made some comments in the commit.

– Ufuk

> On 09 Dec 2015, at 14:19, Maximilian Michels  wrote:
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> Thank you for the blog post. You had already shared a first draft with
> me. This one looks even better!
> 
> I've made some minor comments. +1 to merge if these are addressed.
> 
> Cheers,
> Max
> 
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
>> Just updated the draft (thanks to Till and Slim for feedback) and opened
>> a PR.
>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/15
>> 
>> @Slim: we discussed about benchmark result beforehand and decided to do
>> a second blog post later on
>> 
>> 
>> -Matthias
>> 
>> On 12/09/2015 12:14 PM, Slim Baltagi wrote:
>>> Matthias,
>>> 
>>> This is great blog!
>>> 
>>> I would like to suggest the following:
>>> Change the title to: How to run your existing Storm applications on Apache 
>>> Flink stream processing engine?
>>> Fixing the few typos
>>> For this reasons -> For these reasons
>>> Storm compatibility package which allows users -> Storm compatibility 
>>> package that allows users
>>> we need to translated it  -> we need to translate it
>>> in not available -> is not available
>>> eg, StormWordCount.jar  -> e.g., StormWordCount.jar
>>> Provide some benchmarks on running a storm application as it is versus 
>>> running it on Flink.
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Slim Baltagi
>>> 
>>> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:10 AM, Robert Metzger  wrote:
>>> 
 Great, thank you for writing the article.
 
 I like the general idea, but I've found some small typos.
 Can you open a pull request against the "flink-web" repo to make reviewing
 it easier?
 
 On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matthias J. Sax  wrote:
 
> Hi,
> 
> after talking to several people and getting some feedback already, I
> would like to suggest a new blog post for the project web site about the
> Storm compatibility layer.
> 
> You can find the draft here:
> 
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/_posts/2015-12-07-storm-compatibility.md
> 
> The missing (just not rendered) picture is this one:
> 
> https://github.com/mjsax/flink-web/blob/stormCompatibilityBlogPost/img/blog/flink-storm.png
> 
> Looking forward to your feedback!
> 
> 
> -Matthias
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>