Re: Flume 1.7.0 release
I would like to help out managing Jira's but never heard back from the community about the graph sink that I've been working on. Does it make sense to do a google hangout to discuss roadmap/upcoming features? Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 11, 2016, at 10:19 AM, Lior Zenowrote: > > Let's first examine our JIRA issues. We have fixed issues with an empty > fixVersion. In addition, we still have unresolved issues with > fixVersion=v1.7.0. Let's deal with these first. I would do it myself, but I > don't have the appropriate permissions for that. > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Hari Shreedharan > wrote: > >> Sound good to me. If we have a volunteer to run the release I will gladly >> help out. >>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:54 AM Lior Zeno wrote: >>> >>> Anybody? >>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Lior Zeno wrote: Hi guys, I think we should work together towards a new release. It has been a >> year since the last release, and there are many new features that were added >>> in this year. What do you think? Lior >>
Re: Flume 1.7.0 release
Let's first examine our JIRA issues. We have fixed issues with an empty fixVersion. In addition, we still have unresolved issues with fixVersion=v1.7.0. Let's deal with these first. I would do it myself, but I don't have the appropriate permissions for that. On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Hari Shreedharanwrote: > Sound good to me. If we have a volunteer to run the release I will gladly > help out. > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:54 AM Lior Zeno wrote: > > > Anybody? > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Lior Zeno wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I think we should work together towards a new release. It has been a > year > > > since the last release, and there are many new features that were added > > in > > > this year. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Lior > > > > > >
Re: Flume 1.7.0 release
Sound good to me. If we have a volunteer to run the release I will gladly help out. On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:54 AM Lior Zenowrote: > Anybody? > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Lior Zeno wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I think we should work together towards a new release. It has been a year > > since the last release, and there are many new features that were added > in > > this year. > > What do you think? > > > > Lior > > >
Enforce coding conventions at compilation time
Hi guys, we should make the reviewing process easier and more focused on correctness rather than style issues. I suggest enforcing our code style ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLUME/Code+Formatting) at compile time using the maven checkstyle plugin ( https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-checkstyle-plugin/). This will make the reviewing process easier, and will make sure that all committed code is strictly following our code style. What do you think? Thanks
Dangling JIRA issues
Hi guys, there are many JIRA issues that are still open but are not relevant anymore. We also have lots of unresolved issues with a submitted patch linked to them, that we should review and commit or reject. We should definitely reorganize our issues and discard old/irrelevant issues and commit/reject issues with submitted patches. Thanks
[jira] [Commented] (FLUME-2567) Remove unneeded repository declarations in pom.xml
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325884#comment-15325884 ] Lior Zeno commented on FLUME-2567: -- Why hasn't this patch been committed? > Remove unneeded repository declarations in pom.xml > -- > > Key: FLUME-2567 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2567 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Santiago M. Mola >Assignee: Santiago M. Mola >Priority: Minor > Attachments: FLUME-2567-0.patch > > > pom.xml contains multiple repository declarations that do not seem to be > needed (jboss, maven central, cloudera). Actually, it seems to me that none > of these is needed. > Can we remove all repository declarations and let it use just the default > (Maven Central)? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLUME-2853) Allow for YAML configuration files
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2853?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325880#comment-15325880 ] Lior Zeno commented on FLUME-2853: -- +1. Can I be assigned for this? > Allow for YAML configuration files > -- > > Key: FLUME-2853 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2853 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Configuration >Reporter: Christopher White >Priority: Minor > > Allow for YAML formatted configuration files > (http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html). > This provides: > * A more condensed format than properties files > * Less 'typo' prone for repetitive common prefixes > * Ability to define a value once and reuse via references (see [spec - > Structures - Example 2.10|http://www.yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2760395] > For example compare the following properties file and potential YAML > equivalent: > {code:title=agent.properties} > host1.sources = source1 > host1.channels = channel1 > host1.sinks = sink1 > host1.sources.source1.type = seq > host1.sources.source1.channels = channel1 > host1.channels.channel1.type = memory > host1.channels.channel1.capacity = 1 > host1.sinks.sink1.type = null > host1.sinks.sink1.channel = channel1 > {code} > {code:title=agent.yaml} > host1: > sources: > _: source1 > source1: > type: seq > channels: channel1 > > channels: > _: channel1 > channel1: > type: memory > capacity: 1 > > sinks: > _: sink1 > sink1: > type: null > channel: channel1 > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLUME-2494) ElasticSearchSink: Allow the ttl to be set from the header.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325878#comment-15325878 ] Lior Zeno commented on FLUME-2494: -- The _ttl field is deprecated since Elasticsearch 2.0 (https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/mapping-ttl-field.html), I think we should remove it from the configuration and follow the suggestion of time-based rolling indices instead. > ElasticSearchSink: Allow the ttl to be set from the header. > --- > > Key: FLUME-2494 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-2494 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Sinks+Sources >Reporter: Susie Murphy >Priority: Minor > > Currently the ttl of documents is set based on the ttl field in the config > file. It would be good if the ttl could be set by a field in the document's > header. > This would allow for more flexibility, making it easier if you want different > ttls for different documents. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLUME-1589) FlumeDeveloperGuide legacyThrift
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325876#comment-15325876 ] Lior Zeno commented on FLUME-1589: -- This issue can be closed. > FlumeDeveloperGuide legacyThrift > > > Key: FLUME-1589 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1589 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Documentation > Components: Docs >Reporter: Roy >Priority: Trivial > > flume-ng-doc/sphinx/FlumeUserGuide.rst > On line 351 & 366: > org.apache.source.thriftLegacy.ThriftLegacySource > Should be: > org.apache.flume.source.thriftLegacy.ThriftLegacySource > Will you guys accept pull requests on github for simple things like this? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (FLUME-1592) Remove appendTimeout from HDFS sink docs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15325875#comment-15325875 ] Lior Zeno commented on FLUME-1592: -- This issue can be closed > Remove appendTimeout from HDFS sink docs > > > Key: FLUME-1592 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1592 > Project: Flume > Issue Type: Documentation >Reporter: Mike Percy >Assignee: Jeff Lord >Priority: Trivial > > appendTimeout is no longer used -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
Re: Flume 1.7.0 release
Anybody? On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Lior Zenowrote: > Hi guys, > > I think we should work together towards a new release. It has been a year > since the last release, and there are many new features that were added in > this year. > What do you think? > > Lior >