[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 724064

2008-12-07 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 724064 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2100.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081207/build-2100.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081207
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 302 minutes 55 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Sun Dec 07 02:06:41 EST 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 446M/668M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20081207/logs-2100-tomcat/test.log
 
 
[INFO] snapshot org.apache.geronimo.framework:geronimo-plugin:2.2-SNAPSHOT: 
checking for updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] snapshot 
org.apache.geronimo.framework:geronimo-deploy-config:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking for 
updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] [geronimo:start-server {execution: start}]
[INFO] Using assembly configuration: tomcat
[INFO] snapshot 
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking 
for updates from apache.snapshots
[INFO] Using assembly artifact: 
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding: 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
 into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:41.552
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 34 test build(s)
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
---
[INFO] 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deployRUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deploySUCCESS (0:00:57.235) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshellRUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshellSUCCESS (0:00:27.679) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws SUCCESS (0:00:33.420) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown  RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdown  SUCCESS (0:00:15.845) 
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basicRUNNING
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basicSUCCESS (0:06:37.700) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced   RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced   SUCCESS (0:01:35.809) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic  RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basic  SUCCESS (0:01:41.841) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld SUCCESS (0:00:47.071) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalRUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshalSUCCESS (0:00:52.852) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime SUCCESS (0:00:44.656) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-testsSUCCESS (0:00:30.014) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests   RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests   SUCCESS (0:00:28.492) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsRUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-testsSUCCESS (0:00:30.090) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests   RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests   SUCCESS (0:00:48.581) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests   RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests   SUCCESS (0:00:50.293) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests   RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests   SUCCESS (0:12:06.644) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client  RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-client  SUCCESS (0:00:25.896) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests   RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests   SUCCESS (0:00:49.585) 
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security RUNNING
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4451) locking and unlocking for availability of a keystore results in duplicate attributes in config.xml

2008-12-07 Thread Christian Svensson (JIRA)
locking and unlocking for availability of a keystore results in duplicate 
attributes in config.xml
--

 Key: GERONIMO-4451
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4451
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public (Regular issues)
  Components: security
Affects Versions: 2.1.3
 Environment: Ubuntu Linux 8.10, Sun Java 1.6, Geronimo 2.1.3 w/ Jetty.
Reporter: Christian Svensson


Transcribing mail conversation:

Hello!

I've been trying for the better part of today getting keystores to 
automatically unlock on startup - with very limited success.
Is there something that I should know about keystore password / key password? 
Digging around some old mailing list threads said something about key password 
must be equal to keystore password - any more of those gotchas?

The problem is that I create (or change password on geronimo-default for that 
matter) a new keystore, assign SSL to use the certificate and restart the 
server:
org.apache.geronimo.management.geronimo.KeystoreIsLocked: Keystore 'plasma-ssl' 
is locked; please use the keystore page in the admin console to unlock it
at 
org.apache.geronimo.security.keystore.FileKeystoreManager.createSSLContext(FileKeystoreManager.java:343)
at 
org.apache.geronimo.jetty6.connector.GeronimoSelectChannelSSLListener.createSSLContext(GeronimoSelectChannelSSLListener.java:54)


Resetting the SSL connector to using geronimo-default / geronimo with secret / 
secret as passwords makes it work again - but why on earth doesn't Geronimo 
unlock my keystores on startup? I mean, it saves the password (or something 
like it) in config.xml.

-
This is how I created my setup:

1. Create a new keystore 'plasma-ssl'
2. Create a new private key 'wildcard'
3. Now the text on Available says trust only or something like that, I lock 
it and then unlock it in order for it to change to 1 key ready
4. Then I configure my HTTPS connector to use the new keystore
5. Since the web server does not seem to do anything when I press Shutdown in 
the console, I use Ctrl+C to kill it.
6. Start the server again
7. Message appears.

---

Hmm...  the 3rd step is indeed unearthing a bug.  At that step, a second 
attribute element is getting added (instead of replacing the existing 
element) to the keystore gbean for keystorePassword and keyPasswords attributes 
in config.xml .  Can you create an issue in the JIRA [1]? The problem summary 
is, locking and unlocking for availability of a keystore results in duplicate 
attributes in config.xml.



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: svn commit: r718393 [1/2] - in /geronimo/server/trunk/plugins/monitoring: ./ agent-car-jmx/ agent-car-jmx/src/main/history/ agent-car-jmx/src/main/plan/ agent-ds/ agent-ds/src/main/plan/ agent-ejb

2008-12-07 Thread Trygve Hardersen
Seems like this has been fixed. Thanks a lot!

Trygve

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:42 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 I think I see one way to fix this. now for some time to try it out.
 I'm thinking of adding a realm that generates a subject with only the
 required mejb-user principal for the ejb timer to use.

 I added a comment to the jira issue to try to remind me about this :-/

 thanks
 david jencks

 On Nov 26, 2008, at 9:28 AM, Trygve Hardersen wrote:

 Yes I've changed the password.

 In /plugins/monitoring/agent/src/main/plan/plan.xml the monitoring-user
 is set to system/manager. If I set my local system password to manager, the
 server starts fine. If I don't, the server fails to start unless I disable
 the org.apache.geronimo.plugins.monitoring/agent/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car plugin.

 I build my own Geronimo distros (mainly to be able to run on 1.6, though
 this was fixed yesterday in the client plugin), and I get around this by
 picking up a password from Maven's settings.xml and putting that in the
 plan.xml for the monitoring/agent plugin.

 Thanks!

 Trygve

 On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:15 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

 It shouldn't.  Can you confirm that all you have changed is the password
 for system in var/security/users.properties?I'm focussed on a couple
 other projects at the moment but I'll try to find some time to investigate.
 thanks
 david jencks

 On Nov 26, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Trygve Hardersen wrote:

 Hi

 I'm developing a project that uses Geronimo trunk.

 Does the org.apache.geronimo.plugins.monitoring/agent/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car
 plugin require the password for the system user to be set to manager (i.e.
 the default)? My server fails to start when I use something else. Is there a
 way, besides changing plan.xml for the plugin, to set a different password?

 Thanks in advance!

 Trygve

 On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Author: djencks
 Date: Mon Nov 17 13:37:30 2008
 New Revision: 718393

 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=718393view=rev
 Log:
 GERONIMO-4415 start of code cleanup and use of jpa in console.  Also add
 a server assembly for testing








[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 724224

2008-12-07 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 724224 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2000.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081207/build-2000.log
 
 
See the unit test reports at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081207/unit-test-reports
 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

--
2 required artifacts are missing.

for artifact: 
  org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
  java.net (http://download.java.net/maven/1/),
  apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository),
  apache-snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository),
  codehaus-snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
  openqa (http://maven.openqa.org),
  apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/)

at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:556)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:280)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: 
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException: Missing:
--
1) org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers:selenium-java-client-driver:jar:0.8.1

  Try downloading the file manually from the project website.

  Then, install it using the command: 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers 
-DartifactId=selenium-java-client-driver \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers 
-DartifactId=selenium-java-client-driver \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) 
org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers:selenium-java-client-driver:jar:0.8.1

2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

  Try downloading the file manually from the project website.

  Then, install it using the command: 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

--
2 required artifacts are missing.

for artifact: 
  org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-550) Sharedlib problems when root directory of the project in the Eclipse workspace is different than project name

2008-12-07 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
Sharedlib problems when root directory of the project in the Eclipse workspace 
is different than project name
-

 Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-550
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-550
 Project: Geronimo-Devtools
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: eclipse-plugin
Affects Versions: 2.0.2, 2.2.0, 2.1.4
Reporter: Tim McConnell
Assignee: Tim McConnell
 Fix For: 2.0.2, 2.2.0, 2.1.4


Problem is that the first segment of the output directory in the classpath 
entry for the project is always the name of the project,, not the subdirectory 
in the Eclipse workspace where the project resides. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



Re: [DISCUSS] DayTrader 2.1.3 release

2008-12-07 Thread Joe Bohn
Does anybody have any information on this?  I'm a bit reluctant to vote 
+1 on this given that our released artifacts don't include everything 
produced by the build.


Joe


Joe Bohn wrote:

Donald Woods wrote:
I was thinking of going with what we have, which is to manually 
install the app clients.  There are instructions in the README on how 
to do that.


I'm confused by this.  The tomcat client plugins *are* built when you do 
a local build (as the README mentions) ... and supposedly they can be 
installed as plugins according to the README as well (I didn't try this).


So why are these tomcat client car files not included in the 
staging-repo content that we are voting on?


We're voting on both the source and the artifacts ... so if the source 
when built produces the artifacts it seems like we should be voting on 
those too.


BTW, only the tomcat cars exist as an archive file ... there are jetty 
versions but they only exist in an unpacked form.


Here are the artifacts for the clients produced by the build:
./daytrader-jetty/target/repository/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-streamer-client/2.1.3/daytrader-streamer-client-2.1.3.car 


./daytrader-tomcat/target/daytrader-streamer-client-2.1.3.car
./daytrader-tomcat/target/repository/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-streamer-client/2.1.3/daytrader-streamer-client-2.1.3.car 

./daytrader-jetty/target/repository/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-ws-client/2.1.3/daytrader-ws-client-2.1.3.car 


./daytrader-tomcat/target/daytrader-ws-client-2.1.3.car
./daytrader-tomcat/target/repository/org/apache/geronimo/daytrader/daytrader-ws-client/2.1.3/daytrader-ws-client-2.1.3.car 



Is there some strange build processing that is creating these which is 
not honored by the mvn release plugin?


Joe



Maybe we can get them setup as plugins in daytrader/trunk for the 2.2 
release.



-Donald


Lin Sun wrote:

Hi Donald,

Thanks for getting this out for vote!

Do we plan to allow users to install the app client as G plugin?  If
so, I think there is a manual work, that is to add the app client's
plugin.xml file to the plugin catalog (geronimo-plugins.xml).  I think
we've got code to pack the app client car file and copy it onto local
.m2 repo.

Thanks

Lin

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on updating the daytrader/branches/2.1 for a 2.1.3 
release (will
rename it to branches/2.1.3 shortly.)  Once everything is ready, 
I'll put it

up for a vote.

BTW - I'm not creating a branches/2.1 for on-going maintenance, as 
if it is
ever needed, we can copy over the 2.1.3 tag to create it.  I'm just 
wanting
to get this overdue Daytrader 2.1.x out so we can focus on the 2.2 
release.



-Donald












Re: [DISCUSS] Release Concurrent Spec jar (1.0) version 1.0-EA

2008-12-07 Thread Joe Bohn
ummm ... does anybody else want to vote (or comment) beyond Jarek and 
myself?


Joe


Joe Bohn wrote:

Discussion thread for Concurrent Spec release 1.0-EA

Joe





Re: license headers

2008-12-07 Thread Kevan Miller


On Dec 6, 2008, at 8:02 PM, David Jencks wrote:

I noticed that one plan file in samples/trunk had an obsolete  
license header.  Does anyone have a tool to check for correct  
headers and the time and inclination to run it on the samples?


Rat checks for Apache src license headers, but doesn't distinguish  
between old and new-style headers.


When we first made the change of license headers, I used a simple grep  
to look for offenders. I use to run before a release, but looks like a  
some bad headers have slipped in...


This works pretty well:

grep -Rni --include=*.java --include=*.xml copyright 2 *

or

grep -Rni --exclude=NOTICE --exclude=LICENSE copyright 2 *

--kevan





[BUILD] branches/2.0: Failed for Revision: 724266

2008-12-07 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 724266 built with tests included
 
See the full build-0200.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081208/build-0200.log
 
 
See the unit test reports at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.0/20081208/unit-test-reports
 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

--
2 required artifacts are missing.

for artifact: 
  org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2),
  java.net (http://download.java.net/maven/1/),
  apache.snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository),
  apache-snapshots (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository),
  codehaus-snapshots (http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org),
  openqa (http://maven.openqa.org),
  apache-incubator (http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/)

at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:556)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:280)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: 
org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.MultipleArtifactsNotFoundException: Missing:
--
1) org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers:selenium-java-client-driver:jar:0.8.1

  Try downloading the file manually from the project website.

  Then, install it using the command: 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers 
-DartifactId=selenium-java-client-driver \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers 
-DartifactId=selenium-java-client-driver \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) 
org.openqa.selenium.client-drivers:selenium-java-client-driver:jar:0.8.1

2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

  Try downloading the file manually from the project website.

  Then, install it using the command: 
  mvn install:install-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file
Alternatively, if you host your own repository you can deploy the file there:   
mvn deploy:deploy-file -DgroupId=org.openqa.selenium.server 
-DartifactId=selenium-server \
  -Dversion=0.8.1 -Dpackaging=jar -Dfile=/path/to/file \
   -Durl=[url] -DrepositoryId=[id]

  Path to dependency: 
1) 
org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT
2) org.openqa.selenium.server:selenium-server:jar:0.8.1

--
2 required artifacts are missing.

for artifact: 
  org.apache.geronimo.testsupport:testsupport-selenium:jar:2.0.3-SNAPSHOT

from the specified remote repositories:
  central 

Re: [Doc]Duplicate pages on monitoring topic, your comments appreciated.

2008-12-07 Thread Kang Ge
Thanks for pointing this out. A couple of comments from me:

1. Maybe merging the two is better than simply keeping the second link. For 
example the first link mentioned that we can Select more information to 
display by adding a second graph. As the two data series scroll in time, we 
will be able to detect any correlation between the data.  

2. If we keep the second link, and remove the first one, I suggest that we edit 
their parent page as well: 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22/Monitoring+the+health+of+the+Apache+Geronimo+server

Teresa





From: chi runhua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, December 5, 2008 2:05:00 PM
Subject: [Doc]Duplicate pages on monitoring topic, your comments appreciated.

Hi all,

I found two pages about monitoring status of servers  with similar content. 
So I'm suggesting to keep only one of them in G2.2 Doc.. 

1. 
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22/Monitoring+status+of+servers

2. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC22/Monitoring

Personally, I prefer No.2  because this one is more in detail.

Jeff Chi


  

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3655) Invalid MdbInstanceFactory behaviour

2008-12-07 Thread Manu T George (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12654328#action_12654328
 ] 

Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-3655:
-

Still fails in 2.1 branch. Will need to bump up the openejb version to 3.1 to 
fix this

 Invalid MdbInstanceFactory behaviour
 

 Key: GERONIMO-3655
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3655
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Bug
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.0.1, 2.0.2
 Environment: Microsoft Windows XP, Sun Java 1.5.0_10, Apache Geronimo 
 2.0.1
Reporter: Alexei Akimov
 Attachments: badmdb.zip


 org.apache.openejb.core.mdb.MdbInstanceFactory class pass invalid 
 ThreadContext instance to ThreadContext.exit method at line 263 of its 
 constructBean method. This brokes stack-like usage of ThreadContext objects 
 and leads to problems during lazy initialization of ejb components when they 
 called for the first time from the web tier. In particular ClassCastException 
 is thrown in 
 org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.interceptor.InstanceContextBeforeAfter.before() at 
 line 49, because ConnectorInstanceContextImpl instance is returned instead of 
 SharedConnectorInstanceContext instance. This error results in that 
 org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.listener.DispatchListener.beforeDispatch method 
 does not put any data into the current context stack so when the 
 afterDispatch method is called the current context stack throws 
 java.util.EmptyStackException.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.