[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4532) Port the GERONIMO-4484 patch for V2.1

2009-05-11 Thread Kan Ogawa (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kan Ogawa updated GERONIMO-4532:


Attachment: sysdb-portlets.patch

Attached the sysdb-portlets patch.

 Port the GERONIMO-4484 patch for V2.1
 -

 Key: GERONIMO-4532
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4532
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4
Reporter: Kan Ogawa
Assignee: Kan Ogawa
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: console-core.patch, console-portal-driver.patch, 
 debugviews-portlets.patch, plancreator-portlets.patch, plugin-portlets.patch, 
 sysdb-portlets.patch


 I think that this issue is very important.
 After the GERONIMO-4485 patches are committed, I will try to port 
 GERONIMO-4484 patches for 2.1 version.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4622) Contribution: Linux service script for Geronimo/WAS CE

2009-05-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4622:
---

Attachment: gserviceReg.patch

Thanks ivan for your suggestion, and based on it, i updated this patch which 
can autostart after server boot time on Redhat 5.2, Suse 10 Sp2, Aix 
6.1,Solaris 10, and ubuntu (root).
Pls review and apply it.Thanks.



 Contribution: Linux service script for Geronimo/WAS CE  
 

 Key: GERONIMO-4622
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4622
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: startup/shutdown
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
 Environment: RedHat Enterprise Linux v5.3
 WAS CE 2.1.1.2
Reporter: Amir Mistric
Assignee: Ivan
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: gserviceReg.patch, wasce-linux-service.sh


 As per suggestion on WAS CE forum, I am attaching a shell script that can be 
 used for Linux services script in Geronimo/WAS CE.
 For more information please [see this 
 thread|http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=260135tstart=0]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4622) Contribution: Linux service script for Geronimo/WAS CE

2009-05-11 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

viola.lu updated GERONIMO-4622:
---

Attachment: (was: gserviceReg.patch)

 Contribution: Linux service script for Geronimo/WAS CE  
 

 Key: GERONIMO-4622
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4622
 Project: Geronimo
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: startup/shutdown
Affects Versions: 2.1.4
 Environment: RedHat Enterprise Linux v5.3
 WAS CE 2.1.1.2
Reporter: Amir Mistric
Assignee: Ivan
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: gserviceReg.patch, wasce-linux-service.sh


 As per suggestion on WAS CE forum, I am attaching a shell script that can be 
 used for Linux services script in Geronimo/WAS CE.
 For more information please [see this 
 thread|http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=260135tstart=0]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (DAYTRADER-68) A version of daytrader for Tomcat 6

2009-05-11 Thread Joe Bohn (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12708034#action_12708034
 ] 

Joe Bohn commented on DAYTRADER-68:
---

Another issue:   Although there are some problems with building daytrader trunk 
without this patch applied once it is applied there is a new problem:
Project 'org.apache.geronimo.daytrader:daytrader-web' is duplicated in the 
reactor
Looks like there is a conflict because we now have to projects named 
daytrader-web - the original one under modules/web/ and the new one.

 A version of daytrader for Tomcat 6
 ---

 Key: DAYTRADER-68
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-68
 Project: DayTrader
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Security Level: public(Regular issues) 
  Components: Web Tier
Affects Versions: 2.2
 Environment: Tomcat 6.0.18
Reporter: Forrest Xia
Assignee: Forrest Xia
 Attachments: daytrader-webonly-new.patch, daytrader-webonly-new.zip, 
 daytrader-webonly.patch


 I have a trimmed version of daytrader for tomcat 6, and want to contribute to 
 daytrader trunk, please help review and commit. thanks!

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 773634

2009-05-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 773634 built with tests included
 
See the full build-1500.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/build-1500.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 38 minutes 44 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon May 11 15:41:44 EDT 2009
[INFO] Final Memory: 397M/1010M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-1500-tomcat/test.log
 
 
[INFO] snapshot 
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:2.2-SNAPSHOT: checking 
for updates from codehaus-snapshots
[INFO] Using assembly artifact: 
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding: 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
 into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:44.634
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 36 test builds
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
---
[INFO] 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy  RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy  SUCCESS (0:01:13.215) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell  RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell  SUCCESS (0:00:30.500) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws   RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws   SUCCESS (0:00:35.491) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdownRUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdownSUCCESS (0:00:16.105) 
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic  RUNNING
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic  SUCCESS (0:06:23.505) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced SUCCESS (0:01:32.217) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/basicRUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basicSUCCESS (0:01:58.271) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld   RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld   SUCCESS (0:00:48.017) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal  RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal  SUCCESS (0:00:46.748) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime   RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime   SUCCESS (0:00:42.102) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests  RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests  SUCCESS (0:00:29.904) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:29.106) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests  RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests  SUCCESS (0:00:31.466) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:02.192) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:53.718) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:53.618) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-clientRUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-clientSUCCESS (0:00:27.390) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests FAILURE (0:00:37.337) Java 
returned: 1
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security   RUNNING
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security   SUCCESS (0:00:41.249) 
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jspsRUNNING
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jspsSUCCESS (0:00:29.517) 
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servletsRUNNING
[INFO] web-testsuite/test

WS-Security support for JAX-WS Web Services

2009-05-11 Thread rahul.soa
Hello everyone,

As you know I am working on the support of ws-security module, so I did some
research about integrating the modules in Apache Geronimo for the same.

For the integrating/enabling WS-Security support, I think we need to have
the following jars and modules in Geronimo:

*Apache CXF:*

For WS-Security support we need to have following jar files from the CXF:

- bcprov-jdk15.jar
- xalan.jar
- serializer.jar
- wss4j.jar
- xmlsec.jar


*Apache Axis2*

1. We need to integrate Rampart* module of axis2,

2. for step 1, need to download the Java Cryptography Extension (JCE)
Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files corresponding to JDK version
and extract the jar files local_policy.jar and US_export_policy.jar to
$JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security

3. for step 1, need to download bouncycastle according to java version
separately

*Rampart is the security module of Axis2


Please let me know if I am missing something and please also guide me how
can I get them in Geronimo.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Rahul


Re: WS-Security support for JAX-WS Web Services

2009-05-11 Thread David Jencks


On May 11, 2009, at 3:24 PM, rahul.soa wrote:


Hello everyone,

As you know I am working on the support of ws-security module, so I  
did some research about integrating the modules in Apache Geronimo  
for the same.


For the integrating/enabling WS-Security support, I think we need to  
have the following jars and modules in Geronimo:


Apache CXF:

For WS-Security support we need to have following jar files from the  
CXF:


- bcprov-jdk15.jar


Previously when we used some bouncy castle classes the jar included  
some classes that may well have infringed some us patents.  I think I  
saw somewhere that bouncy castle had finally released a jar without  
thses classes.  We should verify that this jar does not contain these  
classes.  Also, we have copies of a bunch of the bc classes we need  
for other purposes in the geronimo-crypto module, so we should check  
that we don't already have the needed classes.


- xalan.jar


really?  I'd like to know why the xml transform support in the jdk is  
not sufficient.


- serializer.jar
- wss4j.jar
- xmlsec.jar


Apache Axis2

1. We need to integrate Rampart* module of axis2,

2. for step 1, need to download the Java Cryptography Extension  
(JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files corresponding to  
JDK version and extract the jar files local_policy.jar and  
US_export_policy.jar to $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security


These are not something we can include, right?  they'd have to be  
installed by the end user?



3. for step 1, need to download bouncycastle according to java  
version separately


*Rampart is the security module of Axis2


Please let me know if I am missing something and please also guide  
me how can I get them in Geronimo.


That depends partly on the classloader relationships needed between  
the main cxf/axis2 jars and these new ones.  If appropriate cxf/axis2  
jars and these jars can be in a classloader that is a child of the cxf/ 
axis2 main plugin classloaders, you should probably make cxf-wss and  
axis2-wss plugins with all the security related jars as dependencies.   
If this doesn't work and the classes need to be in the main cxf/axis2  
plugin classloader then you probably need to just add these as  
dependencies.


thanks
david jencks





Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Rahul




Re: WS-Security support for JAX-WS Web Services

2009-05-11 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Mon May 11 2009 7:16:46 pm David Jencks wrote:
 On May 11, 2009, at 3:24 PM, rahul.soa wrote:
  Hello everyone,
 
  As you know I am working on the support of ws-security module, so I
  did some research about integrating the modules in Apache Geronimo
  for the same.
 
  For the integrating/enabling WS-Security support, I think we need to
  have the following jars and modules in Geronimo:
 
  Apache CXF:
 
  For WS-Security support we need to have following jar files from the
  CXF:
 
  - bcprov-jdk15.jar

 Previously when we used some bouncy castle classes the jar included
 some classes that may well have infringed some us patents.  I think I
 saw somewhere that bouncy castle had finally released a jar without
 thses classes.  We should verify that this jar does not contain these
 classes.  Also, we have copies of a bunch of the bc classes we need
 for other purposes in the geronimo-crypto module, so we should check
 that we don't already have the needed classes.

Version 140 and later in maven have the patent covered algorithms removed.   
Not an issue anymore.


  - xalan.jar

 really?  I'd like to know why the xml transform support in the jdk is
 not sufficient.

xmlsec uses some of the internal xalan classes.   I could never get a good 
reason as to why. 

  - serializer.jar

This goes with Xalan.


  - wss4j.jar
  - xmlsec.jar

Note:  all of those jars will be required for Axis2 as well.


  Apache Axis2
 
  1. We need to integrate Rampart* module of axis2,
 
  2. for step 1, need to download the Java Cryptography Extension
  (JCE) Unlimited Strength Jurisdiction Policy Files corresponding to
  JDK version and extract the jar files local_policy.jar and
  US_export_policy.jar to $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security

 These are not something we can include, right?  they'd have to be
 installed by the end user?

Correct.   However, for unit tests and such, we can PROBABLY use less secure 
algorithms.   I have someone looking into the same issue for the CXF test 
cases.   We don't want to make every developer have to install the strong 
crypto libraries.  Basically, if the user needs the strong crypto stuff, they 
WILL need to download and install the strong crypto libs from Sun.

Dan

  3. for step 1, need to download bouncycastle according to java
  version separately
 
  *Rampart is the security module of Axis2
 
 
  Please let me know if I am missing something and please also guide
  me how can I get them in Geronimo.

 That depends partly on the classloader relationships needed between
 the main cxf/axis2 jars and these new ones.  If appropriate cxf/axis2
 jars and these jars can be in a classloader that is a child of the cxf/
 axis2 main plugin classloaders, you should probably make cxf-wss and
 axis2-wss plugins with all the security related jars as dependencies.
 If this doesn't work and the classes need to be in the main cxf/axis2
 plugin classloader then you probably need to just add these as
 dependencies.

 thanks
 david jencks

  Thanks in advance.
 
  Regards,
  Rahul

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog


Latest trunk builds are not the latest.

2009-05-11 Thread Shawn Jiang
The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/


http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/While
the latest binary here
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
 indicates
the latest build should be 12-May-2009

Is there any problem with the build system ?
-- 
Shawn


Re: Latest trunk builds are not the latest.

2009-05-11 Thread David Jencks
I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april,  
thus preventing copying to the latest location.


Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my  
mac, but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info  
on the test failure that is occurring in the automated builds?


thanks
david jencks

On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:


The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009  according to 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/


While the latest binary here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/ 
  indicates the latest build should be 12-May-2009


Is there any problem with the build system ?
--
Shawn




[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 773734

2009-05-11 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 773734 built with tests included
 
See the full build-2100.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/build-2100.log
 
Download the binaries from 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] 
[INFO] Total time: 36 minutes 23 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Mon May 11 21:39:30 EDT 2009
[INFO] Final Memory: 666M/1003M
[INFO] 
 
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=
See detailed results at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
 
Assembly: tomcat
=
See the full test.log file at 
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/test.log
 
 
[INFO] Using assembly artifact: 
org.apache.geronimo.assemblies:geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5:zip:bin:2.2-SNAPSHOT:provided
[INFO] Using geronimoHome: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] Installing assembly...
[INFO] Expanding: 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2-SNAPSHOT/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
 into /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target
[INFO] Starting Geronimo server...
[INFO] Selected option set: default
[INFO] Redirecting output to: 
/home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/target/geronimo-logs/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.StartServerMojo.log
[INFO] Waiting for Geronimo server...
[INFO] Geronimo server started in 0:00:40.789
[INFO] [shitty:install {execution: default}]
[INFO] Installing /home/geronimo/geronimo/trunk/testsuite/pom.xml to 
/home/geronimo/.m2/repository/org/apache/geronimo/testsuite/testsuite/2.2-SNAPSHOT/testsuite-2.2-SNAPSHOT.pom
[INFO] [shitty:test {execution: default}]
[INFO] Starting 36 test builds
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
---
[INFO] 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy  RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/deploy  SUCCESS (0:01:00.359) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell  RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/gshell  SUCCESS (0:00:28.421) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws   RUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/jaxws   SUCCESS (0:00:33.552) 
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdownRUNNING
[INFO] commands-testsuite/shutdownSUCCESS (0:00:16.033) 
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic  RUNNING
[INFO] concurrent-testsuite/concurrent-basic  SUCCESS (0:06:29.953) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced RUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/advanced SUCCESS (0:01:28.862) 
[INFO] console-testsuite/basicRUNNING
[INFO] console-testsuite/basicSUCCESS (0:01:53.673) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld   RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-helloworld   SUCCESS (0:00:51.151) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal  RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-marshal  SUCCESS (0:00:42.502) 
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime   RUNNING
[INFO] corba-testsuite/corba-mytime   SUCCESS (0:00:43.436) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests  RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/deployment-tests  SUCCESS (0:00:30.752) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/jca-cms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:32.012) 
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests  RUNNING
[INFO] deployment-testsuite/manifestcp-tests  SUCCESS (0:00:33.224) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/ejb-tests SUCCESS (0:01:01.048) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jms-tests SUCCESS (0:00:54.579) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/jpa-tests SUCCESS (0:00:53.158) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-clientRUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-clientSUCCESS (0:00:27.438) 
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests RUNNING
[INFO] enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests FAILURE (0:00:38.380) Java 
returned: 1
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security   RUNNING
[INFO] security-testsuite/test-security   FAILURE (0:00:38.305) Java 
returned: 1
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jspsRUNNING
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.1-jspsSUCCESS (0:00:31.912) 
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servletsRUNNING
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-2.5-servletsSUCCESS (0:00:29.101) 
[INFO] web-testsuite/test-myfaces RUNNING
[INFO] web

Re: Latest trunk builds are not the latest.

2009-05-11 Thread Jarek Gawor
Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.

You can browse the results at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
(under logs-testtime-container directories).

For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt

Jarek

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april, thus
 preventing copying to the latest location.
 Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my mac,
 but I haven't looked very hard into why.  Can anyone supply info on the test
 failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
 thanks
 david jencks
 On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

 The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
 http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/

 While the latest binary
 here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/  indicates
 the latest build should be 12-May-2009
 Is there any problem with the build system ?
 --
 Shawn