KEYS file, where's the official location?
We seem to have two locations for our KEYS file, http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS and http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS. Which one is the official one? Regards, Alan
Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0
+1 Regards, Alan On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-08-20 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : >> Hi, >> >> As said in a mail last week I'm starting a vote for xbean 4.0 release. >> >> The main changes are: >> 1) force AnnotationFinder to respect archive in its scanning (don't >> leak in external classes) >> 1bis) skip java.* classes since we'll not get their bytecode for sure >> (protected method if needed) >> 2) Remove asynchronous finder which was really specific and can lead >> to some classloading issue pretty quickly on recent JVMs >> >> Binaries: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1003/ >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.0/ >> >> Vote open 72h. >> >> [ ] +1 release this >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0
in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-23 20:07 GMT+02:00 Alan D. Cabrera : > Is your signature in http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS? > > > Regards, > Alan > > On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;) >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-08-20 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : >>> Hi, >>> >>> As said in a mail last week I'm starting a vote for xbean 4.0 release. >>> >>> The main changes are: >>> 1) force AnnotationFinder to respect archive in its scanning (don't >>> leak in external classes) >>> 1bis) skip java.* classes since we'll not get their bytecode for sure >>> (protected method if needed) >>> 2) Remove asynchronous finder which was really specific and can lead >>> to some classloading issue pretty quickly on recent JVMs >>> >>> Binaries: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1003/ >>> >>> Tag: >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.0/ >>> >>> Vote open 72h. >>> >>> [ ] +1 release this >>> [ ] 0 don't care >>> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >>> >>> >>> Here is my +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >
Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0
Is your signature in http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/KEYS? Regards, Alan On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > a little up since it makes 2 days the vote started already ;) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-08-20 19:23 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : >> Hi, >> >> As said in a mail last week I'm starting a vote for xbean 4.0 release. >> >> The main changes are: >> 1) force AnnotationFinder to respect archive in its scanning (don't >> leak in external classes) >> 1bis) skip java.* classes since we'll not get their bytecode for sure >> (protected method if needed) >> 2) Remove asynchronous finder which was really specific and can lead >> to some classloading issue pretty quickly on recent JVMs >> >> Binaries: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1003/ >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.0/ >> >> Vote open 72h. >> >> [ ] +1 release this >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0
well it is exactly the expected case (well guessing but AFAIK it should): the archive was not complete and the app was expecting the finder to leak outside the archive. I expect to handle it in 4.1 if needed (ie the app can't create the archive correctly cause it ignores totally what it scans) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-23 18:40 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Is there an easy way to fix those OSGi issues? If so +0, if there is no > _easy_ way then +1 and let's fix this later. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > On Friday, 22 August 2014, 15:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > +0 (non binding) > > I have some issue on OSGi (but I think it was expected ;)). > > Regards > JB > > On 08/20/2014 07:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As said in a mail last week I'm starting a vote for xbean 4.0 release. >> >> The main changes are: >> 1) force AnnotationFinder to respect archive in its scanning (don't >> leak in external classes) >> 1bis) skip java.* classes since we'll not get their bytecode for sure >> (protected method if needed) >> 2) Remove asynchronous finder which was really specific and can lead >> to some classloading issue pretty quickly on recent JVMs >> >> Binaries: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1003/ >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.0/ >> >> Vote open 72h. >> >> [ ] +1 release this >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.0
Is there an easy way to fix those OSGi issues? If so +0, if there is no _easy_ way then +1 and let's fix this later. LieGrue, strub On Friday, 22 August 2014, 15:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > >+0 (non binding) > >I have some issue on OSGi (but I think it was expected ;)). > >Regards >JB > > >On 08/20/2014 07:23 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As said in a mail last week I'm starting a vote for xbean 4.0 release. >> >> The main changes are: >> 1) force AnnotationFinder to respect archive in its scanning (don't >> leak in external classes) >> 1bis) skip java.* classes since we'll not get their bytecode for sure >> (protected method if needed) >> 2) Remove asynchronous finder which was really specific and can lead >> to some classloading issue pretty quickly on recent JVMs >> >> Binaries: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1003/ >> >> Tag: >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-4.0/ >> >> Vote open 72h. >> >> [ ] +1 release this >> [ ] 0 don't care >> [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain) >> >> >> Here is my +1 >> >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >-- >Jean-Baptiste Onofré >jbono...@apache.org >http://blog.nanthrax.net >Talend - http://www.talend.com > >
