Re: [VOTE] JMS 2 API alpha-2
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the quick turn around Romain.
On 12/02/15 20:43, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hello guys,
As stated in the other thread here the vote for the
geronimo-jms_2.0_spec module with the fixes from Martyn included.
Here is the staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1013/
My key can be found as last time at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}
here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts
On 12/02/15 09:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in
the previous version.
Fair enough. I have managed a successful ActiveMQ6 build against the
alpha-1, so the issues (for us at least) are non blocking. I'm happy to
proceed as suggested and incorporate the changes in a subsequent release.
Just make sure it properly gets committed in time.
If you don't have sufficient privileges to commit it yourself then just ping on
the list for a review and apply.
Yup, just sent a request for review.
LieGrue,
strub
Thanks
Martyn
On Wednesday, 11 February 2015, 11:28, Martyn Taylor wrote:
-1 (non-binding). There are a few issues with the JMS spec jar. There
is a PR open here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3
On 09/02/15 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hello guys,
As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
(thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small
blocking bugs fixed since weeks on SNAPSHOTs. Also note this release
train was mainly motivated by AMQ which is waiting JMS 2 API to
release their version 6 (thanks to John D Ament for the patch on the
API BTW).
Here is the list of artifacts included in this vote:
- geronimo-javamail_1.4 + geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail +
geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider
- geronimo-ejb_3.2_spec
- geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec
- geronimo-jaxrs_2.0_spec
- geronimo-jms_2.0_spec
- geronimo-jta_1.2_spec
Here is the staging repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1012
I bet you will find the source/javadoc/etc yourself.
My key can be found at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}
here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
geronimo-specs review request.
Hi all, Does anyone have time to review the following PR: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 Thanks in advance Martyn
Re: [VOTE] a few more geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts
-1 (non-binding). There are a few issues with the JMS spec jar. There
is a PR open here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3
On 09/02/15 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hello guys,
As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7
spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes
(thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too
much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small
blocking bugs fixed since weeks on SNAPSHOTs. Also note this release
train was mainly motivated by AMQ which is waiting JMS 2 API to
release their version 6 (thanks to John D Ament for the patch on the
API BTW).
Here is the list of artifacts included in this vote:
- geronimo-javamail_1.4 + geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail +
geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider
- geronimo-ejb_3.2_spec
- geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec
- geronimo-jaxrs_2.0_spec
- geronimo-jms_2.0_spec
- geronimo-jta_1.2_spec
Here is the staging repo
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1012
I bet you will find the source/javadoc/etc yourself.
My key can be found at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS
please VOTE
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] don't care
[-1] stop, because ${reason}
here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: Geronimo release request
I was just wondering if the beginning of next month is still likely for an alpha release. On 28/01/15 12:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully next week, for sure the one after) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor : Is there any update on this Romain? On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months? I see: -> jms 2 api -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?) -> jta 1.2 api -> jaxrs 2 api -> ejb 3.2 api All in alpha excepted current javamail version wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor : I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would suffice. Thanks gents Martyn On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec batch release like last time? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : Martyn, Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a release. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know. Kind regards Martyn [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Re: Geronimo release request
Is there any update on this Romain? On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months? I see: -> jms 2 api -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?) -> jta 1.2 api -> jaxrs 2 api -> ejb 3.2 api All in alpha excepted current javamail version wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor : I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would suffice. Thanks gents Martyn On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec batch release like last time? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : Martyn, Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a release. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know. Kind regards Martyn [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Re: Geronimo release request
Thanks Romain, This sounds great. A release beginning of next month would be ideal, as we are hoping to consume an alpha in ActiveMQ6 to aid us get out of IP clearance and propose an initial ActiveMQ6 release. Hopefully in the next couple of weeks. Regards Martyn On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months? I see: -> jms 2 api -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?) -> jta 1.2 api -> jaxrs 2 api -> ejb 3.2 api All in alpha excepted current javamail version wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor : I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would suffice. Thanks gents Martyn On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec batch release like last time? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : Martyn, Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a release. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know. Kind regards Martyn [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Re: Geronimo release request
I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would suffice. Thanks gents Martyn On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec batch release like last time? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : Martyn, Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a release. John On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor wrote: Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know. Kind regards Martyn [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Geronimo release request
Hi all, I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo. One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6 test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance, allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release. If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know. Kind regards Martyn [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2 [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Subscribe
[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6455) API jar for JSR 343 - JMS 2.0
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14232948#comment-14232948 ] Martyn Taylor commented on GERONIMO-6455: - HI [~johndament] I've spoke briefly to [~romain.manni-bucau], one of the Geronimo developers who is more than happy for a JMS API spec jar to be contributed to Geronimo and will push to get it in. Are you able to open a PR with your patch. I presume the correct place for the PR is here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/ Regards Martyn > API jar for JSR 343 - JMS 2.0 > - > > Key: GERONIMO-6455 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6455 > Project: Geronimo > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: public(Regular issues) >Reporter: Kevin Sutter > > Update jar for Java EE 7. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
