Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
On Jul 12, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > If no more vote, I would push this out on this Friday. Sounds good, Forrest. Thanks! Just to be complete you'll be: 1) calling the vote 2) pushing the source and binaries to dist/ 3) pushing the maven binaries --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
If no more vote, I would push this out on this Friday. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Any more vote on this release? or I will push the binaries to our web site. > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Jarek >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> > Hi Devs, >> > >> > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release >> > candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. >> > >> > The server code up for vote is: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip >> > >> > The binary code up for vote is: >> > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip >> > >> > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip >> > >> > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip >> > >> > Staging repo is: >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 >> > >> > The tag has created at: >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 >> > >> > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! >> > >> > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. >> > [ ] +1 approve >> > [ ] +0 no opinion >> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks! >> > >> > Regards, Forrest >> > >> > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
Any more vote on this release? or I will push the binaries to our web site. On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:06 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: > +1 > > Jarek > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release > > candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > > > The server code up for vote is: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > > > The binary code up for vote is: > > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > > > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > > > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > > > Staging repo is: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > > > The tag has created at: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > -- > > Thanks! > > > > Regards, Forrest > > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 Jarek On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release > candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > The server code up for vote is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > The binary code up for vote is: > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > The tag has created at: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest >
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 -David On Jul 3, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate > for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > The server code up for vote is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > The binary code up for vote is: > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > The tag has created at: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest >
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 Thanks, Forrest ! 2012/7/6 Yi Xiao > the build is ok, Signature/checksum looks good, > +1 > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Rex Wang wrote: > >> +1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest! >> >> -Rex >> >> >> 2012/7/6 Forrest Xia >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder which only exists in the binary distro. > > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… > > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… > Kevan, your vote? Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give this a few more days to gather additional votes… >>> OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. >>> --kevan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, Forrest >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Lei Wang (Rex) >> rwonly AT apache.org >> > > > > -- > Best regards! > > > John Xiao > > -- Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
the build is ok, Signature/checksum looks good, +1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Rex Wang wrote: > +1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest! > > -Rex > > > 2012/7/6 Forrest Xia > >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: >>> > >>> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've >>> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually >>> in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the >>> binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder >>> which only exists in the binary distro. >>> > >>> > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure >>> which style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more >>> accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that >>> license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… >>> > >>> > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what >>> applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to >>> easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… >>> > Kevan, your vote? >>> >>> Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give >>> this a few more days to gather additional votes… >>> >> OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. >> >>> >>> --kevan >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> >> > > > -- > Lei Wang (Rex) > rwonly AT apache.org > -- Best regards! John Xiao
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1, All looked good to me, great to see 3.0!! Thanks Forrest! -Rex 2012/7/6 Forrest Xia > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> > >> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've >> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually >> in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the >> binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder >> which only exists in the binary distro. >> > >> > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which >> style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more >> accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that >> license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… >> > >> > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what >> applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to >> easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… >> > Kevan, your vote? >> >> Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give >> this a few more days to gather additional votes… >> > OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. > >> >> --kevan > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
Signature/checksum looks good +1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> > >> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've >> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually >> in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the >> binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder >> which only exists in the binary distro. >> > >> > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which >> style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more >> accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that >> license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… >> > >> > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what >> applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to >> easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… >> > Kevan, your vote? >> >> Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give >> this a few more days to gather additional votes… >> > OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. > >> >> --kevan > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Best regards! John Xiao
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> > >> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've >> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually >> in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the >> binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder >> which only exists in the binary distro. >> > >> > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which >> style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more >> accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that >> license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… >> > >> > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what >> applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to >> easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… >> > Kevan, your vote? >> >> Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give >> this a few more days to gather additional votes… >> > OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. > >> >> --kevan > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Best regards, Han Hong Fang (Janet) hanhongfang AT apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > >> >> On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: >> >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> > >> > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've >> been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually >> in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the >> binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder >> which only exists in the binary distro. >> > >> > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which >> style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more >> accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that >> license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… >> > >> > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what >> applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to >> easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… >> > Kevan, your vote? >> >> Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give >> this a few more days to gather additional votes… >> > OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. > >> >> --kevan > > > > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- viola Apache Geronimo
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller > wrote: > > > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've > been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually > in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the > binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder > which only exists in the binary distro. > > > > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which > style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more > accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that > license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… > > > > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what > applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to > easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… > > Kevan, your vote? > > Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give this > a few more days to gather additional votes… > OK, that's fine to wait a couple days for this vote. > > --kevan -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
On Jul 5, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been > > telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the > > source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary > > distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder which > > only exists in the binary distro. > > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which style > I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more accurate, but > they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that license/notice in jar files > should be source licenses… > > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what applies > to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to easily > sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… > Kevan, your vote? Was waiting for build to finish. Given the US holidays, etc. I'd give this a few more days to gather additional votes… --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
All looked good to me. Signature/checksum, RAT, build, license/notice, tests… +1 --kevan On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate > for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > The server code up for vote is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > The binary code up for vote is: > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > The tag has created at: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest >
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: > > > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've > been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually > in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the > binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder > which only exists in the binary distro. > > That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which > style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more > accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that > license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… > > In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what > applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to > easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… > Kevan, your vote? > > --kevan -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:23 PM, David Jencks wrote: > I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been > telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the > source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary > distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder which > only exists in the binary distro. That can be debated. And I've seen both styles used. I'm not sure which style I prefer. Separate source and binary license files may be more accurate, but they also may be misinterpreted. I do agree that license/notice in jar files should be source licenses… In any event, the current source LICENSE file clearly indicates what applies to source and binaries. A consumer of the source should be able to easily sort out what applies/doesn't apply… So, I'm fine with it as is… --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 I built from the source tar.gz and tried the 3 servers a little bit. I noticed we seem to be starting a non-bundle: [ 159] [Active ] [] [ 60] reference:file:/Users/david/tmp/geronimo/geronimo-3.0.0/t3/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0/repository/org/apache/karaf/org.apache.karaf.util/2.2.1/org.apache.karaf.util-2.2.1.jar [ at least in the minimal server. (osgi:headers indicates this is not a bundle). I'm a little confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE in the source. I've been telling people for years that these should apply to what is actually in the source, however these appear to be the ones appropriate for the binary distros. For instance they point to files in the repository folder which only exists in the binary distro. However I don't think these warrant holding up the release. thanks david jencks On Jul 3, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate > for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > The server code up for vote is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > The binary code up for vote is: > Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Little-G Tomcat Assemblies: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > Staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > The tag has created at: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest >
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
More votes are welcome On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > build OK, simple testing OK, +1 > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> >> With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release >> candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. >> >> *The server code up for vote is:* >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip >> >> *The binary code up for vote is:* >> *Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip >> >> *Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip >> >> *Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:* >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip >> >> *Staging repo is:* >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 >> >> *The tag has created at:* >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 >> >> Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! >> >> Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> >> > > > -- > Shawn > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
build OK, simple testing OK, +1 On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release > candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > *The server code up for vote is:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > *The binary code up for vote is:* > *Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Staging repo is:* > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > *The tag has created at:* > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Shawn
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
+1 myself On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi Devs, > > With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release > candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. > > *The server code up for vote is:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip > > *The binary code up for vote is:* > *Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:* > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip > > *Staging repo is:* > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 > > *The tag has created at:* > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 > > Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! > > Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > -- > Thanks! > > Regards, Forrest > > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
[VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.0 (3rd Try)
Hi Devs, With correction of repositoryList URL, here we have the 3rd release candidate for vote. Please help vote at your earliest convenient time. *The server code up for vote is:* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0.0/geronimo-3.0.0-source-release.zip *The binary code up for vote is:* *Java EE 6 Full Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.0-bin.zip *Java EE 6 Web Profile Tomcat Assemblies:* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-web-3.0.0-bin.zip *Little-G Tomcat Assemblies:* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal/3.0.0/geronimo-tomcat7-minimal-3.0.0-bin.zip *Staging repo is:* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-015 *The tag has created at:* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-3.0.0 Java EE 6 TCKs all passed! Vote will be at least open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
