[RESULTS][VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
The vote passes with 4 +1 (all pmc members) and no other votes. I'll get to work getting the binaries and site pushed out. As usual, it will take a little while for the images to get synced to the mirrors. Thanks! Joe Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
+1 Jarek On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
+1 Jay Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
[VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
+1 -Donald Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
Here's my +1 Joe Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs-parent 1.6
Which specs do we need to release before genesis 2 is available? thanks david jencks On Oct 28, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6. The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site generation. There are also some minor changes in specs- parent to facilitate maven site generation. Once released and leveraged by the individual spec projects we should be able to produce better maven site content. The rat-maven-plugin has been used to check the source and passed. Staging repo (maven artifacts): http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-repo/specs/ SVN source location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/specs- parent-1.6/ Generated Maven Site: http://people.apache.org/~jbohn/staging-site/specs/1.6/index.html The vote is open for 72 hours and will conclude on Friday (10/31) at 5:00 PM ET. [ ] +1 Release specs-parent 1.6 [ ] +0 No opinion [ ] -1 Don't release specs-parent 1.6 and reason why Thanks, Joe
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2 (passes)
The vote concludes with 6 +1 votes (binding) and no other votes thanks david jencks On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:03 PM, David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2 (passes)(pre announcement questions)
I did the release... In addition to the questions on genesis, I'm wondering about the site structure. I put specs-parent at geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/specs-parent/1.5 and servlet-2.5 at geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec/1.2 These are slightly different from the locations suggested by the poms siteId. I think we need to figure out how to make this new versioned site work with the pointers from http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/maven-generated-documentation.html and what to do about the old unversioned docs which you will tend to see first and only unless you know where to look. Any suggestions? thanks david jencks On Mar 16, 2008, at 11:35 AM, David Jencks wrote: The vote concludes with 6 +1 votes (binding) and no other votes thanks david jencks On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:03 PM, David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 Joe David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 ++Vamsi On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:33 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/http://people.apache.org/%7Edjencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/http://people.apache.org/%7Edjencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/http://people.apache.org/%7Edjencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/http://people.apache.org/%7Edjencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 Thanks for pulling in the GERONIMO-3896 patch. -Donald David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 Jarek On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:03 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 Jay David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
[VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [VOTE] release specs-parent 1.5 and geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2
+1 david jencks On Mar 12, 2008, at 4:03 PM, David Jencks wrote: Hi, (dependent on genesis 1.4 take 5 release vote passing). A user recently reported a bug in the servlet spec jar, see https:// issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3896 Tomcat has accepted the proposed fix in their trunk. While working to upgrade to genesis-1.4 and thus release a new specs parent I realized the current layout was confusing during release. The changes in this release: update to use genesis-1.4 (thus this vote is dependent on the current genesis 1.4 vote passing) GERONIMO-3908 reorganize the specs layout so the parent pom is in a different directory, specs-parent, so tagging does not copy the entire set of specs that happen to be in trunk at that moment. GERONIMO-3896 make HEAD forward/include requests work. Also I am moving the spec release numbering back to what I consider more sensible, namely x.y rather than x.y.z where the need for z or not is entirely up to the releaser. specs-parent: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/1.5/ geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.2: Staging repo: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-repo/specs/servlet-2.5/ Staging site: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/specs/servlet-2.5/1.2/ Vote open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 thanks david jencks
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release specs (Passed)
Thanks for handling that on my behalf, Kevan. My holiday in Mexico is nearly finished now ;-) And for the record, here´s my +1 On Feb 6, 2008 1:47 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since Guillaume is away (hopefully on a well-earned holiday), I'm calling this vote, in his stead. This vote passes with 8 +1 votes and no others. Note that I'm counting Guillaume as a '+1', although he didn't explicitly state this. I'll start distributing the binaries. --kevan On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release specs (Passed)
Since Guillaume is away (hopefully on a well-earned holiday), I'm calling this vote, in his stead. This vote passes with 8 +1 votes and no others. Note that I'm counting Guillaume as a '+1', although he didn't explicitly state this. I'll start distributing the binaries. --kevan On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). I'll plan on calling this vote, in Guillaume's stead, in 24 hours. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 Considering TCK has passed... ++Vamsi On Feb 1, 2008 4:34 PM, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/http://people.apache.org/%7Egnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). I'll plan on calling this vote, in Guillaume's stead, in 24 hours. --kevan Why wait? Enough time has passed and I think we have enough votes. I'm not exactly sure what is necessary to finally release these but I'm willing to help. Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
On Feb 5, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Why wait? Enough time has passed and I think we have enough votes. I'm not exactly sure what is necessary to finally release these but I'm willing to help. Well, seemed like there were a relatively small number of votes, and I forgot to post a 24 hour notice, yesterday. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 given TCK passed. -Donald Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 david jencks On Feb 1, 2008, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee- connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws- metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok).
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 Jay Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok).
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
+1 All TCK tests passed with these candidate specs. Joe Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok).
[VOTE] Release specs
Third try ... Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
Kevan Miller wrote: On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... is the charm... ;-) Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). K. I'm sure we can find a volunteer. Thanks for all the quick turn-around. These all look good. Pending positive TCK test results, here's my +1 --kevan These looks good to me too. I've pick them up and updated my local image to use them (along with switching from the axis2-saaj-api to the new geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0). I've run a few tck tests and they look promising. The next step for me is to get the changes on a machine that I can let run for a while and go through all of the TCK tests. The full tests will take a few days to complete. Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release specs
On Feb 1, 2008, at 6:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Third try ... is the charm... ;-) Tags are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-el_1.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jms_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jta_1.1_spec-1.1.1/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.0.0/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.2/ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/specs-1.4/ Staging repo is http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-specs/ I'm calling a single vote, as it is imho easier, but if there is any concern, I can create other vote threads if needed. [ ] +1 release these specs [ ] -1 another problem ? FYI, I won't be able for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to close the votes and move the specs to their final location. Hopefully someone can do it (provided that this vote is ok). K. I'm sure we can find a volunteer. Thanks for all the quick turn- around. These all look good. Pending positive TCK test results, here's my +1 --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
On Aug 4, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: On Aug 4, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what license so I have to withdraw my vote for http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz entirely. This is not a +-0 vote, it is no vote for that spec jar. I'm still +1 for the other two. Good point, David. Tim, IMO, we can't conclude a vote on geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec, until we get some further guidance from legal-discuss. I'm convinced that these specs are ok for release. They are not based on CDDL licensed materials. Their license and notice files are valid. Restating my earlier vote: Here's my +1. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
After a little more discussion on legal-discuss and considering that the legal-discuss discussion is about cddl licensed schemas which are not the ones we are using and we are following the same procedure we have used before I'm reinstating my +1 vote. thanks david jencks On Aug 4, 2007, at 10:51 AM, David Jencks wrote: As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what license so I have to withdraw my vote for http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz entirely. This is not a +-0 vote, it is no vote for that spec jar. I'm still +1 for the other two. thanks david jencks On Aug 2, 2007, at 10:21 AM, David Jencks wrote: +1 david jencks On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what license so I have to withdraw my vote for http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz entirely. This is not a +-0 vote, it is no vote for that spec jar. I'm still +1 for the other two. thanks david jencks On Aug 2, 2007, at 10:21 AM, David Jencks wrote: +1 david jencks On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
On Aug 4, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what license so I have to withdraw my vote for http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz entirely. This is not a +-0 vote, it is no vote for that spec jar. I'm still +1 for the other two. Good point, David. Tim, IMO, we can't conclude a vote on geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec, until we get some further guidance from legal-discuss. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
Hi Jarek, There apparently is a bug in the 2.0.2 version of the maven-source-plugin code that is causing this behavior. The latest 2.0.3 version of the plugin fixes this problem. That was a good find. Thanks much Jarek Gawor wrote: I'm +1 on all but... I think the geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1-sources.jar should be re-generated. Looks like the source files are duplicated. They are placed in the right package name directory and also in the root directory (without the package name). Jarek On 7/30/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
HI Kevan/David, I fully understand, but I'm not sure it makes much sense to release the other two yet since they are both dependent on the servlet spec. At this point based on these legal issues and the fact that I would like to ensure they are all released using the latest maven-source-plugin, I would feel more comfortable waiting till all issues are resolved and putting all three up for a single vote again. Does that seem like a reasonable approach to you (and everyone else) ?? Kevan Miller wrote: On Aug 4, 2007, at 1:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: As a result of recent discussion on the legal-discuss list it has become clear to me that I don't understand whether or not we are allowed to redistribute sun schemas and in what form or under what license so I have to withdraw my vote for http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz entirely. This is not a +-0 vote, it is no vote for that spec jar. I'm still +1 for the other two. Good point, David. Tim, IMO, we can't conclude a vote on geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec, until we get some further guidance from legal-discuss. --kevan -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
On Aug 4, 2007, at 4:07 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: HI Kevan/David, I fully understand, but I'm not sure it makes much sense to release the other two yet since they are both dependent on the servlet spec. At this point based on these legal issues and the fact that I would like to ensure they are all released using the latest maven-source-plugin, I would feel more comfortable waiting till all issues are resolved and putting all three up for a single vote again. Does that seem like a reasonable approach to you (and everyone else) ?? Perfectly reasonable... --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 david jencks On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 David On Jul 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
I'm +1 on all but... I think the geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1-sources.jar should be re-generated. Looks like the source files are duplicated. They are placed in the right package name directory and also in the root directory (without the package name). Jarek On 7/30/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd.
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
I was looking at the schemas included in the servlet specs jar: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1/src/main/schema/ Why are the following not included? javaee_5.xsd javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd Why is j2ee_web_services_1_1.xsd included? Do we need to include jsp_2.0.xsd and jsp_2.1.xsd? Thanks Anita Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=listsid=396545469
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd.
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
I have not ever reviewed/voted on specs and I wanted to know what should be checked before voting. Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd.
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
On Jul 31, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote: I have not ever reviewed/voted on specs and I wanted to know what should be checked before voting. Hi Jay, Good question. Here's a start of a list 1. Do the poms look correct? 2. Are the legal t's and i's crossed and dotted? License/Notice files in all the jars and in the source. Apache source license headers in all of the source files. 3. Do the specs work? Usually this means we satisfied with their bahavior in tck testing. Others? --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 +1. Looks good. One comment -- I'm not a big fan of the NOTICE file contents, however. For example: // -- // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, // Version 2.0, in this case for Servlet 2.5 // -- Servlet 2.5 Copyright 2003-2007 The Apache Software Foundation ... I think it would be better if it was: // -- // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, // Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Geronimo Servlet 2.5 Specification // -- Apache Geronimo Servlet 2.5 Specification Copyright 2003-2007 The Apache Software Foundation ... Not necessary that this be changed, but could be updated, also... --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
Ok, good info to know. Thanks Kevan Miller wrote: On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 +1. Looks good. One comment -- I'm not a big fan of the NOTICE file contents, however. For example: // -- // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, // Version 2.0, in this case for Servlet 2.5 // -- Servlet 2.5 Copyright 2003-2007 The Apache Software Foundation ... I think it would be better if it was: // -- // NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4d of The Apache License, // Version 2.0, in this case for the Apache Geronimo Servlet 2.5 Specification // -- Apache Geronimo Servlet 2.5 Specification Copyright 2003-2007 The Apache Software Foundation ... Not necessary that this be changed, but could be updated, also... --kevan -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 for your first release Tim. Cheers Prasad On 7/30/07, Tim McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 -Donald Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 ... good job On Jul 30, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo- servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
+1 Tim McConnell wrote: Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd.
[VOTE] Release specs for JACC, JSP, Servlet
Hi, Please review and vote on the release of the following Geronimo specs: -- geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 -- geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The corresponding tar files are here: http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0.tar.gz http://people.apache.org/~mcconne/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.tar.gz The current svn locations are here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/branches/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The future svn locations will be here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 The vote will conclude at 10:00 PM EST on Thursday, August 2nd. -- Thanks, Tim McConnell
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
The voting ends with 11 ayes. I shall release the specs now. Cheers Prasad On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Regards, Alan On Jul 10, 2007, at 6:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Joe Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
[VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Jarek On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right? Jarek On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Lin Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
Yeah.. Maybe I didn't want to spook this vote again with a Friday the 13th deadline ;-) Cheers Prasad On 7/10/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw, I assume you meant Friday the 13th, right? Jarek On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Vamsi On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 Jacek On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 On Jul 10, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
And my +1 too Cheers Prasad On 7/10/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation and StAX - rc2
+1 -Donald Prasad Kashyap wrote: The activation and stax specs had almost passed the vote the first time around. It got dinged on missing scm section in the poms. I have fixed it now and am resubmitting them for a vote. Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2/ Voting concludes on Monday, July 13th at 1000 ET. The other outstanding specs (depending on servlet) that would be released together are servlet_2.5_spec-1.1 jsp_2.1_spec-1.0 jacc_1.1_spec-1.0 Cheers Prasad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 -Donald Jarek Gawor wrote: I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for Axis2). Jarek On 7/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and activation specs. Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that. thanks david jencks On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 Vamsi On 6/9/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/ ~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. OK. In my eyes, this vote has been concluded. Can we stop voting on the follow-up discussion? We need to update the problem specs and spin up a new release vote. Volunteers? --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
Kevan, I'll work on it. Cheers Prasad On 7/9/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 13, 2007, at 9:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. OK. In my eyes, this vote has been concluded. Can we stop voting on the follow-up discussion? We need to update the problem specs and spin up a new release vote. Volunteers? --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
On Jul 9, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Kevan, I'll work on it. Cool. Thanks, Prasad. --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for Axis2). Jarek On 7/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and activation specs. Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that. thanks david jencks On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 on releasing these specs. Lin Jarek Gawor wrote: I second that. I'm also waiting for Activation spec to be released in order to publish a new javamail snapshot (need latest javamail for Axis2). Jarek On 7/4/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and activation specs. Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that. thanks david jencks On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
Unless someone actually wants to try to fix the scm sections right now (not it!) I think we should release the existing stax, jacc and activation specs. Either that or delete the questionable scm sections since it doesn't seem to be actually possible to get them right and release that. thanks david jencks On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
+1 Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
+1 ... On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
On Jun 13, 2007, at 5:13 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. +1 --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
+1 Vamsi On 6/14/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
+1 Jarek On 6/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Vamsi On 6/14/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
+1 -Donald Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
I am going to release Deployment as it passed with all +1's The other specs either had issues or were dependent on specs that had issues so I'll spin up a new vote for them. Thanks for your critical eyes. On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
[VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
do none of the spec releases get md5 sums nor pgp signatures? Filip Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, WS-Metadata - rc2
Hi Filip, Like Ragu, its in there. Looks like Prasad provided the tar ball of the artifacts as they'd reside in the Maven Repo: geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-javadoc.jar geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-javadoc.jar.asc geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-javadoc.jar.md5 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-javadoc.jar.sha1 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-sources.jar geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-sources.jar.asc geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-sources.jar.md5 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0-sources.jar.sha1 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.jar geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.jar.asc geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.jar.md5 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.jar.sha1 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.pom geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.pom.asc geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.pom.md5 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-j2ee- management_1.1_spec-1.0.pom.sha1 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/maven-metadata.xml geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/maven-metadata.xml.md5 geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec-1.0/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec/maven-metadata.xml.sha1 If you download the tar ball and unpack it this is what you'll see. I even verified the .asc files and it really is Prasad :) On Jun 13, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: do none of the spec releases get md5 sums nor pgp signatures? Filip Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc2 The only changes that were made to the binaries that passed a vote over the past weekend was to add the scm section to the pom.xml. I have dropped jsp specs from the vote now. ws-metadata will have a 3 digit version number (1.1.1) because 1.1.0 was already released some 6 weeks ago. This is a minor update to the released version. Voting concludes on Saturday, June 16th at 1700 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:32 AM, David Jencks wrote: el: + 0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml j2ee-management: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. Is the spec still called j2ee management? jsp-2.1: -1 unless the comments in the following files are not from sun or there is a written licensing trail showing we can redistribute them: --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/jspxml.xsd --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd I also wonder if it's intentional that there are apparent duplications: javax/servlet/jsp/resources/jsp_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/resources/jsp_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd If memory serves me, Tomcat looked for these files in one location and Jetty looked in the other. If we decide to leave the files, we should leave both copies since there is likely to be code that depends on both locations. -dain
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 Regards, Alan On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
+1 Regards, Alan On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
+1 Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
+1 Note -- I am planning to replace Geronimo's copy of the EL and JSP specs with the originals from Tomcat when they release and publish the next stable version to maven central. See: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200705.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200706.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best wishes, Paul On Jun 8, 2007, at 11:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 Joe Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
+1 Joe Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
+1 The geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1-sources.jar has some extra source files in it. But the binary looks ok. Best wishes, Paul On Jun 8, 2007, at 5:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
+1 Anita --- Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mailp=graduation+giftscs=bz
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
A couple of questions about the spec releases: 1) Why does activation-1.1 still have a trunk branch in svn? 2) Why hasn't the javamail-1.4 spec been released? Geronimo has an indirect dependency on the 1.4 spec through the javamail uber-jar, which also needs to made into a release. Rick Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
Activation: + 0.1 pom is missing scm section Jacc: +1 Deployment : +1 Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd and javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_5.xsd. Also scm section is missing in pom Stax: +0.1 missing scm section. I think the servlet one needs to be re-rolled. It might be worth fixing the poms in the activation and stax at the same time just to make it easier to find the source code, but I'm not adamant about that. thanks david jencks On Jun 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Please review the specifications located at http:// people.apache.org/~hogstrom/specs-rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 1800 ET. Thanks
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for El, J2EE Management, JSP, WS-Metadata
el: + 0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml j2ee-management: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. Is the spec still called j2ee management? jsp-2.1: -1 unless the comments in the following files are not from sun or there is a written licensing trail showing we can redistribute them: --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/jspxml.xsd --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_1.dtd --- javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_1_2.dtd I also wonder if it's intentional that there are apparent duplications: javax/servlet/jsp/resources/jsp_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/jsp/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/resources/jsp_2_1.xsd javax/servlet/resources/web-jsptaglibrary_2_1.xsd Also scm section is missing ws-metadata: Why does this have a 3 digit version compared with all the others that have 2 digit versions?: +0.1 missing scm section in pom.xml. I'd prefer to understand about the version number also. thanks david jencks On Jun 8, 2007, at 8:06 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: Please review the specifications located at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/specs_rc1/ We are voting these in a block. Failures will be removed from the block and others will proceed forward. Voting concludes on Monday, June 11th at 2300 ET. Cheers Prasad
Re: [VOTE] Release specs for Activation, JACC, Deployment, Servlet and StAX
On Jun 11, 2007, at 1:07 PM, David Jencks wrote: Servlet: -1 unless someone can explain why its ok to include the sun explanatory comments in javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_2.dtd and javax/servlet/resources/web-app_2_5.xsd. Also scm section is missing in pom I mentioned earlier that we could switch over to tomcat's JSP and EL specs when they publish their next stable release (probably 6.0.14) to maven central. But I think we should be able to use their current version of the servlet spec because last time I took a look it passed all tests. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tomcat/servlet-api/6.0.13/ Their spec jar contains the same XSDs with the suspicious explanatory comments that you object to in geronimo's copy, so I don't know if using their copy instead of releasing our own addresses your concerns. Just wanting to get this option out on the table. Best wishes, Paul
