Re: [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-11 Thread David Jencks
+1

David Jencks

On May 7, 2010, at 5:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:

 Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the 
 transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
 
 The main changes in this release are:
 - connector 1.6 support
 - retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).
 
 The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to 
 handling of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289) and some more tests, and a 
 little more build cleanup.
 
 Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed 
 incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.
 
 I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the manifests.
 
 Staging repo is here:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/
 
 Tag is here:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/
 
 Vote open 72 hours
 
 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)
 
 thanks
 david jencks



[RESULT] [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-11 Thread David Jencks
Vote passes with 5 +1 PMC votes and no other votes

Jarek Gawor
Vamsavardhana Reddy
Rick McGuire
Kevan Miller
David Jencks

I'll promote the staging repo.

thanks
david jencks

On May 7, 2010, at 5:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:

 Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the 
 transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
 
 The main changes in this release are:
 - connector 1.6 support
 - retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).
 
 The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to 
 handling of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289) and some more tests, and a 
 little more build cleanup.
 
 Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed 
 incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.
 
 I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the manifests.
 
 Staging repo is here:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/
 
 Tag is here:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/
 
 Vote open 72 hours
 
 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)
 
 thanks
 david jencks



Re: [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-10 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
+1


On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:00 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of
 the transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.

 The main changes in this release are:
 - connector 1.6 support
 - retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).

 The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to
 handling of heuristic exceptions 
 (GERONIMO-5289https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5289
 ) and some more tests, and a little more build cleanup.

 Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed
 incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.

 I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the
 manifests.

 Staging repo is here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/

 Tag is here:


 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/

 Vote open 72 hours

 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

 thanks
 david jencks




-- 
Vamsi


Re: [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-10 Thread Rick McGuire

+1

On 5/7/2010 8:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting 
of the transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.


The main changes in this release are:
- connector 1.6 support
- retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).

The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to 
handling of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5289) and some more 
tests, and a little more build cleanup.


Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have 
changed incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.


I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the 
manifests.


Staging repo is here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/

Tag is here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/

Vote open 72 hours

[ ] +1 release this
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

thanks
david jencks




Re: [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-10 Thread Kevan Miller
+1

Source, signature/checksums, build, license/notice all look good.

--kevan

On May 7, 2010, at 8:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:

 Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the 
 transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
 
 The main changes in this release are:
 - connector 1.6 support
 - retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).
 
 The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to 
 handling of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289) and some more tests, and a 
 little more build cleanup.
 
 Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed 
 incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.
 
 I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the manifests.
 
 Staging repo is here:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/
 
 Tag is here:
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/
 
 Vote open 72 hours
 
 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)
 
 thanks
 david jencks



Re: [VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-08 Thread Jarek Gawor
+1

Jarek

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:30 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the
 transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.

 The main changes in this release are:
 - connector 1.6 support
 - retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).
 The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to
 handling of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289) and some more tests, and a
 little more build cleanup.
 Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed
 incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.

 I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the
 manifests.

 Staging repo is here:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/

 Tag is here:

 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/

 Vote open 72 hours

 [ ] +1 release this
 [ ] 0 don't care
 [ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

 thanks
 david jencks



[VOTE] transaction manager component 3.0 #2

2010-05-07 Thread David Jencks
Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the 
transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.

The main changes in this release are:
- connector 1.6 support
- retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested yet).

The difference between this and the first release attempt is a fix to handling 
of heuristic exceptions (GERONIMO-5289) and some more tests, and a little more 
build cleanup.

Due to the retry support the interfaces between these two jars have changed 
incompatibly, thus the jump to version 3.

I've attempted to get reasonable osgi package version ranges in the manifests.

Staging repo is here:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-021/

Tag is here:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags/geronimo-txmanager-parent-3.0/

Vote open 72 hours

[ ] +1 release this
[ ] 0 don't care
[ ] -1 don't release this (please explain)

thanks
david jencks