Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Cool! Many thanks :-) --jason On Apr 10, 2007, at 2:33 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: Okay, thanks for the update. It's done now - let me know of any issues. Conor
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Jason Dillon wrote: Okay, thanks for the update. It's done now - let me know of any issues. Conor
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped. Is this repo still syncing? Actually I stopped it. I attempted to set up the repo to import its state from the point where it was moved to the server dir. Unfortunately some operations to Apache timed out. I decided to rework a few things to make this more robust. I should be able to retry next weekend. Conor
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Okay, thanks for the update. --jason On Apr 3, 2007, at 5:43 AM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Jason Dillon wrote: Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped. Is this repo still syncing? Actually I stopped it. I attempted to set up the repo to import its state from the point where it was moved to the server dir. Unfortunately some operations to Apache timed out. I decided to rework a few things to make this more robust. I should be able to retry next weekend. Conor
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Hey, I noticed that fisheye6 is service pages now, but the geronimo_server repository is marked as stopped. Is this repo still syncing? --jason On 3/29/07, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll start with the Server project and see how we go from there. I'll start on the weekend. At the throttled rate, I assume it will take more than the weekend to index. Let me know if you are happy to let it run on at the throttled rate or you want me to restrict it to weekends. All Apache FishEye instances are now on a dedicated FishEye instance http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/ I've set up the project definition just now but it is not enabled yet. We set the refresh period to 2 hours for Apache repos, keep the restrictive throttle in place and prohibit all robots so the load after initial scan should be quite small - Joe can give a better picture. Conor On 30/03/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/ because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects, and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts of /geronimo. That is fine with me for the initial setup... though really it would be good to get fisheye to give us a view over the entire project repo. * * * Aside from the first scan of the repo... is there much overhead after it has been setup? I mean after the first sync, would it matter so much that its http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server or http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo ? --jason
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. --jason On Mar 28, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Conor MacNeill wrote: Hi Jason, Sorry for the delay. I'll add this this weekend if it is cool with infra. Cheers Conor Jason Dillon wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to get Fisheye setup for the Apache Geronimo tree? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ Fisheye is a wonderful tool and I believe that the Geronimo community would benefit greatly by having it available to us to grok our svn repository better. Is it possible to get this setup, similar to the openejb and servicemix folks? I, and most certainly the rest of the G community, would really appreciate it. :-) Thanks, --jason PS. Joe mentioned in #infra that I should just ping you and cc infra. If there is another channel I should use to get this done please let me know.
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/ because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects, and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts of /geronimo. -- Joe Schaefer
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/ because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects, and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts of /geronimo. That is fine with me for the initial setup... though really it would be good to get fisheye to give us a view over the entire project repo. * * * Aside from the first scan of the repo... is there much overhead after it has been setup? I mean after the first sync, would it matter so much that its http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server or http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo ? --jason
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Thank you very much :-) --jason On Mar 29, 2007, at 7:22 PM, Conor MacNeill wrote: I'll start with the Server project and see how we go from there. I'll start on the weekend. At the throttled rate, I assume it will take more than the weekend to index. Let me know if you are happy to let it run on at the throttled rate or you want me to restrict it to weekends. All Apache FishEye instances are now on a dedicated FishEye instance http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/ I've set up the project definition just now but it is not enabled yet. We set the refresh period to 2 hours for Apache repos, keep the restrictive throttle in place and prohibit all robots so the load after initial scan should be quite small - Joe can give a better picture. Conor On 30/03/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/ because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects, and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts of /geronimo. That is fine with me for the initial setup... though really it would be good to get fisheye to give us a view over the entire project repo. * * * Aside from the first scan of the repo... is there much overhead after it has been setup? I mean after the first sync, would it matter so much that its http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server or http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo ? --jason
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
I'll start with the Server project and see how we go from there. I'll start on the weekend. At the throttled rate, I assume it will take more than the weekend to index. Let me know if you are happy to let it run on at the throttled rate or you want me to restrict it to weekends. All Apache FishEye instances are now on a dedicated FishEye instance http://fisheye6.cenqua.com/ I've set up the project definition just now but it is not enabled yet. We set the refresh period to 2 hours for Apache repos, keep the restrictive throttle in place and prohibit all robots so the load after initial scan should be quite small - Joe can give a better picture. Conor On 30/03/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 29, 2007, at 1:13 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Cool! Many thanks. Please let us know what the URL is once it has been setup. AFAIK Infra is cool with this, I've not heard any objections as of yet. Actually I'd prefer it if Conor started with http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/ because /geronimo itself contains multiple projects, and we may need to go back to disallowing checkouts of /geronimo. That is fine with me for the initial setup... though really it would be good to get fisheye to give us a view over the entire project repo. * * * Aside from the first scan of the repo... is there much overhead after it has been setup? I mean after the first sync, would it matter so much that its http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server or http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo ? --jason
Re: Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Hi Jason, Sorry for the delay. I'll add this this weekend if it is cool with infra. Cheers Conor Jason Dillon wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to get Fisheye setup for the Apache Geronimo tree? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ Fisheye is a wonderful tool and I believe that the Geronimo community would benefit greatly by having it available to us to grok our svn repository better. Is it possible to get this setup, similar to the openejb and servicemix folks? I, and most certainly the rest of the G community, would really appreciate it. :-) Thanks, --jason PS. Joe mentioned in #infra that I should just ping you and cc infra. If there is another channel I should use to get this done please let me know.
Fisheye for Apache Geronimo?
Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to get Fisheye setup for the Apache Geronimo tree? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ Fisheye is a wonderful tool and I believe that the Geronimo community would benefit greatly by having it available to us to grok our svn repository better. Is it possible to get this setup, similar to the openejb and servicemix folks? I, and most certainly the rest of the G community, would really appreciate it. :-) Thanks, --jason PS. Joe mentioned in #infra that I should just ping you and cc infra. If there is another channel I should use to get this done please let me know.
