Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
I guess branches\2.0-M4 can be deleted now. --vamsi On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll delete it. On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
Removed in Revision: 563088 --vamsi On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll delete it. On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P --jason On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Removed in Revision: 563088 --vamsi On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll delete it. On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
Yes, it does :o) Vamsi On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P --jason On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Removed in Revision: 563088 --vamsi On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll delete it. On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
I concur...if there are no objections by the end of the week I'll delete it. On May 3, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
Re: 2.0-M4 is still under branches
m4 never got cooked fully, which is why the branch is still there. it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4 branch. The branch should probably be removed. --jason On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still under branches. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.0-M4/ . We should tag the release as we have done for other milestone releases. Vamsi
