Re: xbean release with asm 7 final?

[Jean-Baptiste Onofré]

+1

It makes sense to me. I already prepared Karaf upgrade to ASM7 (and pax
web as well). I'm ready to test xbean release.

Thanks.
Regards
JB

On 29/10/2018 09:02, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> asm 7 just got released, what about releasing xbean after the upgrade?
> If i get a few +1 i'll launch it today (worse case we can cancel it
> since it takes 3 days to pass ;))
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github
>  | LinkedIn
>  | Book
> 

Re: xbean release 4.8

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Oops, missed it. Can release another after without issue. Can just need a
reminder when all ready.

Le 15 avr. 2018 20:08, "Guillaume Nodet"  a écrit :

> I think there is a pending PR to open up the range on xbean-spring so that
> it can work with recent spring releases...
> If you could hold a bit until it's merged in, that would be nice...
>
> Guillaume
>
> 2018-04-14 17:47 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we upgraded xbean asm shade to asm 6.1.1 and projects will want to
>> start integrating with it. Some mjar enhancements are in as well.
>>
>> For these reasons I'd like to release xbean 4.8.
>>
>> I know Mark had some potential enhancement for ClasspathArchive but
>> I'm not sure we want to get them in for this one since they can need
>> some more thoughts - or just change the way OWB uses it.
>>
>> Anything else we want in before the release?
>>
>> @Mark: what about the issue ^^? Anything to hack before the release?
>>
>> If no objection I'll try to start the release tomorrow (before the
>> work week for me).
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>>
>
>
>
> --
> 
> Guillaume Nodet
>
>

Re: xbean release 4.8

[Guillaume Nodet]

I think there is a pending PR to open up the range on xbean-spring so that
it can work with recent spring releases...
If you could hold a bit until it's merged in, that would be nice...

Guillaume

2018-04-14 17:47 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :

> Hi guys,
>
> we upgraded xbean asm shade to asm 6.1.1 and projects will want to
> start integrating with it. Some mjar enhancements are in as well.
>
> For these reasons I'd like to release xbean 4.8.
>
> I know Mark had some potential enhancement for ClasspathArchive but
> I'm not sure we want to get them in for this one since they can need
> some more thoughts - or just change the way OWB uses it.
>
> Anything else we want in before the release?
>
> @Mark: what about the issue ^^? Anything to hack before the release?
>
> If no objection I'll try to start the release tomorrow (before the
> work week for me).
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>



-- 

Guillaume Nodet

Re: xbean release 4.8

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Ok, starting it then

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book


2018-04-14 22:11 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi Romain!
>
> We had some resourcebundle:// archive paths which xbean cannot yet handle.
> What I did for now in OWB is to simply skip those entries before passing it 
> to the xbean Archive.
>
> So I'm fine for now.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 14.04.2018 um 17:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we upgraded xbean asm shade to asm 6.1.1 and projects will want to
>> start integrating with it. Some mjar enhancements are in as well.
>>
>> For these reasons I'd like to release xbean 4.8.
>>
>> I know Mark had some potential enhancement for ClasspathArchive but
>> I'm not sure we want to get them in for this one since they can need
>> some more thoughts - or just change the way OWB uses it.
>>
>> Anything else we want in before the release?
>>
>> @Mark: what about the issue ^^? Anything to hack before the release?
>>
>> If no objection I'll try to start the release tomorrow (before the
>> work week for me).
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
>

Re: xbean release 4.8

[Mark Struberg]

Hi Romain!

We had some resourcebundle:// archive paths which xbean cannot yet handle.
What I did for now in OWB is to simply skip those entries before passing it to 
the xbean Archive.

So I'm fine for now.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 14.04.2018 um 17:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau :
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> we upgraded xbean asm shade to asm 6.1.1 and projects will want to
> start integrating with it. Some mjar enhancements are in as well.
> 
> For these reasons I'd like to release xbean 4.8.
> 
> I know Mark had some potential enhancement for ClasspathArchive but
> I'm not sure we want to get them in for this one since they can need
> some more thoughts - or just change the way OWB uses it.
> 
> Anything else we want in before the release?
> 
> @Mark: what about the issue ^^? Anything to hack before the release?
> 
> If no objection I'll try to start the release tomorrow (before the
> work week for me).
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: xbean release next week?

[Mark Struberg]

+1

The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do 
a release.


LieGrue,
strub



On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 



Hi

I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
the week end if I dont find time)

Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).

This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).

Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
scan you rarely want to leak on classloaders and more important: 3)
cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
for instance it x3 the execution time.

But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.

Any -1?+1?


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: xbean release next week?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

changes are on central ;) but work fine with tomee


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-08-28 9:25 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
 +1

 The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
 Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you
 do a release.

 LieGrue,
 strub


 On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 wrote:



 Hi

 I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
 the week end if I dont find time)

 Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
 and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).

 This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
 we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
 skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).

 Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
 scan you rarely want to leak on classloaders and more important: 3)
 cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
 for instance it x3 the execution time.

 But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.

 Any -1?+1?


 Romain Manni-Bucau
 Twitter: @rmannibucau
 Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
 LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
 Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

Re: xbean release next week?

[Mark Struberg]

+1

The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do 
a release.


LieGrue,
strub



On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 



Hi

I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
the week end if I dont find time)

Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).

This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).

Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
scan you rarely want to leak on classloaders and more important: 3)
cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
for instance it x3 the execution time.

But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.

Any -1?+1?


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau

RE: xbean release?

[stephen.hodges]

I think you have the wrong person.

Stephen Hodges
___
EMC Global Professional Services
Application Architecture, Design and Development
Phone: 334.796.1724
stephen.hod...@emc.commailto:stephen.hod...@emc.com

From: Romain Manni-Bucau [via Apache Geronimo] 
[mailto:ml-node+s328035n3987305...@n3.nabble.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:17 PM
To: Hodges, Stephen
Subject: xbean release?

Hi

Is it possible to release xbean 3.15?

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/xbean-release-tp3987305.html
To start a new topic under Development, email 
ml-node+s328035n342155...@n3.nabble.commailto:ml-node+s328035n342155...@n3.nabble.com
To unsubscribe from Apache Geronimo, click 
herehttp://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_codenode=328035code=c3RlcGhlbi5ob2RnZXNAZW1jLmNvbXwzMjgwMzV8MTAxODc0Mzc1Nw==.
NAMLhttp://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewerid=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.namlbase=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespacebreadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml




--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/xbean-release-tp3987305p3987306.html
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: xbean release?

[Mark Struberg]

Stephen, all is fine. This went to dev@g.a.o as expected.
You might have gotten this mail as you've being subscribed to dev@geronimo.a.o 


LieGrue,
strub



 From: stephen.hodges stephen.hod...@emc.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 17:28
Subject: RE: xbean release?
 


I think you have the wrong person.
 
Stephen Hodges
___
EMC Global Professional Services
Application Architecture, Design and Development
Phone: 334.796.1724
[hidden email]
 
From:Romain Manni-Bucau [via Apache Geronimo] [mailto:ml-node+[hidden email]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 12:17 PM
To: Hodges, Stephen
Subject: xbean release?
 
Hi 

Is it possible to release xbean 3.15? 

Romain Manni-Bucau 
Twitter: @rmannibucau 
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau




 
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/xbean-release-tp3987305.html
To start a new topic under Development, email [hidden email] 
To unsubscribe from Apache Geronimo, click here.
NAML 

 View this message in context: RE: xbean release?
Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XBean Release?

[Mark Struberg]

Just write the unit test for a scanning with spaces. Then we can let it run on 
a few CI boxes...

LieGrue,
strub






 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de; dev@geronimo.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 9:14 PM
Subject: Re: XBean Release?
 

Mark, how unit test it from linux?
Le 5 mars 2013 20:59, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :

Well, we need a unit test for this one. I'm not 100% confident that the change 
works on windows paths which contain spaces.

LieGrue,
strub







 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: XBean Release?
 

Hi,


would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could be 
included


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau




2013/3/5 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com

+1, we are waiting for it



Thanks Kevan.







2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in 
seeing a release…

--kevan



-- 
Jean-Louis 

Re: XBean Release?

[Jean-Louis MONTEIRO]

+1, we are waiting for it

Thanks Kevan.




2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

 Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in
 seeing a release…

 --kevan




-- 
Jean-Louis

Re: XBean Release?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Hi,

would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could
be included

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/3/5 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com

 +1, we are waiting for it

 Thanks Kevan.




 2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

 Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in
 seeing a release…

 --kevan




 --
 Jean-Louis

Re: XBean Release?

[Mark Struberg]

Well, we need a unit test for this one. I'm not 100% confident that the change 
works on windows paths which contain spaces.

LieGrue,
strub






 From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: XBean Release?
 

Hi,


would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could be 
included


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau




2013/3/5 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com

+1, we are waiting for it



Thanks Kevan.







2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in 
seeing a release…

--kevan



-- 
Jean-Louis 

Re: XBean Release?

[Romain Manni-Bucau]

Mark, how unit test it from linux?
Le 5 mars 2013 20:59, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :

 Well, we need a unit test for this one. I'm not 100% confident that the
 change works on windows paths which contain spaces.

 LieGrue,
 strub


   --
 *From:* Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
 *To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org
 *Sent:* Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:47 PM
 *Subject:* Re: XBean Release?

 Hi,

 would be perfect if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-241 could
 be included

 *Romain Manni-Bucau*
 *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
 *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
 *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
 *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



 2013/3/5 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com

 +1, we are waiting for it

 Thanks Kevan.




 2013/3/5 Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

 Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in
 seeing a release…

 --kevan




 --
 Jean-Louis

Re: XBean release

[Forrest Xia]

Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new
release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta
branch.

On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:

 I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release.


 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.comwrote:


 On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:

  Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
 
  Let me know if there's any reason to wait.

 Sounds good to me.

 I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g.
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't
 closed. If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order...

 --kevan




 --
 Shawn




-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Re: XBean release

[David Blevins]

It sounds like there's willingness, but I'm not sure who is doing what and when.

If I put the vote up tonight, would the standard 72 hour vote period be enough 
for you or Shawn to get the TCK run complete?

If not that's totally fine and we'll probably just use a patched version of 
xbean-finder instead as we're trying to get an OpenEJB/TomEE final release out 
this week.


-David

On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:

 Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new 
 release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta 
 branch.
 
 On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release.
 
 
 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
 
  Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
 
  Let me know if there's any reason to wait.
 
 Sounds good to me.
 
 I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. 
 If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order...
 
 --kevan
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Shawn
 
 
 
 -- 
 Thanks!
 
 Regards, Forrest
 

Re: XBean release

[David Blevins]

Alright, might be easier to just put the release up for vote and give people 
the time to do what they need.

Rolling


-David


On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:

 It sounds like there's willingness, but I'm not sure who is doing what and 
 when.
 
 If I put the vote up tonight, would the standard 72 hour vote period be 
 enough for you or Shawn to get the TCK run complete?
 
 If not that's totally fine and we'll probably just use a patched version of 
 xbean-finder instead as we're trying to get an OpenEJB/TomEE final release 
 out this week.
 
 
 -David
 
 On Apr 10, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
 
 Yep, a full profile tck run is preferable when we finalize the xbean new 
 release. I could help trigger a tck execution when the change into 3.0-beta 
 branch.
 
 On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
 I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release.
 
 
 On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
 
 Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
 
 Let me know if there's any reason to wait.
 
 Sounds good to me.
 
 I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. 
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. 
 If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order...
 
 --kevan
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Shawn
 
 
 
 -- 
 Thanks!
 
 Regards, Forrest
 
 

Re: XBean release

[Shawn Jiang]

I would like to see a full run of geronimo tck result before the release.

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:

  Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
 
  Let me know if there's any reason to wait.

 Sounds good to me.

 I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g.
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't
 closed. If that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order...

 --kevan




-- 
Shawn

Re: XBean release

[Kevan Miller]

On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:

 Hoping to get time to do an xbean release today or tomorrow.
 
 Let me know if there's any reason to wait.

Sounds good to me. 

I recall Jarek had some Jira's / commits (e.g. 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-204), but the Jira isn't closed. If 
that work is in a good state, I'd say a release is in order...

--kevan

Re: Xbean release

[Matt Hogstrom]

Thanks Guillaume.

On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:


Sure, I must admit I forgot about that and had not much
time last week.  I will release it and put it to vote
today or tomorrow.

On 4/16/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,

Any chance of getting Xbean 3.0 released soon?



--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: Xbean release

[Guillaume Nodet]

Sure, I must admit I forgot about that and had not much
time last week.  I will release it and put it to vote
today or tomorrow.

On 4/16/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Guillaume,

Any chance of getting Xbean 3.0 released soon?





--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/