Re: Vote: Remove old deployer, rename new deployer

2004-11-08 Thread Aaron Mulder
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
 God I hope not.  I spend a long long long time making sure our code 
 would work with unpacked archives.  People don't want to jar up a 
 deployment during development.  Having the tool jar it up, is a bit 
 better than no support at all, but the extra coping is unbearable when 
 dealing with a large web app (100 MB).  I actually hope we soon will 
 have support unpacked in place deployment, which involves no coping to 
 the config store.

Hmm...  Well, maybe I should rethink this.  I need to look at the 
API again.  If it just takes a File, there's no reason that couldn't be a 
directory...  Maybe I just need to adjust my assumptions.

Aaron


Re: Vote: Remove old deployer, rename new deployer

2004-11-07 Thread Gianny Damour
+1
As an aside, the new deployer can not distribute unpacked modules. Is it 
intentional?

Thanks,
Gianny
On 7/11/2004 4:35 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I'd like to remove the current deployer.jar tool, remove the
command-line processing logic from the Deployer class, rename
new-deployer.jar to deployer.jar and change the bootstrapper to build
the new one instead of the old one.  Currently there are two so we'd have
some sort of transition (fallback in case of problems), but since the
build script is pretty much only using the new one now, there are some
NPE's in the old one, and no one seems to have had any problems with the
new one, I'd like to go ahead and eliminate the old one.
Please indicate whether you agree.
Thanks,
Aaron
 




Re: Vote: Remove old deployer, rename new deployer

2004-11-07 Thread Aaron Mulder
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Gianny Damour wrote:
 +1
 
 As an aside, the new deployer can not distribute unpacked modules. Is it 
 intentional?

JSR-88 doesn't support unpacked modules.  If you like, we could 
assume any directory is an unpacked module, JAR it, distribute the JAR, 
then delete the JAR.  To be slightly fancier would could check for one of 
the standard DDs in the correct location before making that assumption...

Aaron


Re: Vote: Remove old deployer, rename new deployer

2004-11-06 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me.


On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:35:01 -0500 (EST), Aaron Mulder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I'd like to remove the current deployer.jar tool, remove the
 command-line processing logic from the Deployer class, rename
 new-deployer.jar to deployer.jar and change the bootstrapper to build
 the new one instead of the old one.  Currently there are two so we'd have
 some sort of transition (fallback in case of problems), but since the
 build script is pretty much only using the new one now, there are some
 NPE's in the old one, and no one seems to have had any problems with the
 new one, I'd like to go ahead and eliminate the old one.
 
 Please indicate whether you agree.
 
 Thanks,
 Aaron
 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/