Re: User list? Bundle?
Kristian Köhler schrieb: Hi Peter 1. I've not found a user list - where can I find it? You can subsribe by mailing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is the user group hidden? I can't find any geronimo-userlist on gmane. Currently there is very low traffic. If others also cannot find the newsgroup, they will probably not post there ... (http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/SummarizeList?listName@M Î%õñiß ZÖ¡Ïñ¾·iÑ) Please see also the wiki pages at: http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo Kristian
Re: Calling all Early(?) adopters
Hi, I just want to try M3 with Tomcat and Apache web server. I've running Tomcat with the web server, now I'd need step-by-step instructions (1.) to get geronimo running with my installation (2.) how to deploy an application into geronimo (especially for additional geronimo configuration files). Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld Davanum Srinivas schrieb: Dear Early Adopters, If you have tried Geronimo already (or in the process of doing so), please let us know how we can make it easier Out-Of-The-Box for everyone...Here are some things we jotted down to get the ball rolling: http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/WishList/M3 thanks, dims
Re: ANN: Geronimo 1.0-M3 Release
Hi folks, Congratulations to the new Milestone !!! :-) However, I'd like to know if it would be possible to run Geronimo in combination with a standalone Tomcat server? BTW: The geronimo users list is still not accessible using gmane - could You please email to the Gmane admin? Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld Dain Sundstrom schrieb: The 1.0-M3 release is cut Download here: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/geronimo/v1.0-M3/geronimo-1.0-M3.zip http://cvs.apache.org/dist/geronimo/v1.0-M3/geronimo-1.0-M3.tar.gz Release notes: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/geronimo/v1.0-M3/RELEASE-NOTES-1.0-M3.txt Enjoy! The Geronimo Team
Re: M3 does not start
Hi Aaron, Thank You for the quick response - You've been right. Could You probably add something like 'Needed Resources' add to the wiki? Such a big stack output sometimes becomes confusing, particularly if the cause for it is in the middle of the output. ;-) Two more questions: 1. As Geronimo is currently an installation for testing with it, I'd like to change the default port - where can I do that? 2. I'll want to use my existing Tomcat installation with Geronimo - how can I disable Jetty? Best would be, if I could simply disable it and possibly re-enable later. Kind regards Peter Aaron Mulder schrieb: My guess is that this is the important part: On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: fully start: objectName=geronimo.server:container =Jetty,port=8080,type=WebConnector java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:359) at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:319) at java.net.ServerSocket.init(ServerSocket.java:185) In other words, it seems like something is already listening on port 8080 -- perhaps Tomcat or a different Geronimo instance? Aaron
Re: M3 does not start
Aaron Mulder schrieb: Peter, That's not so easy -- neither changing the default Jetty port nor disabling Jetty. You need to either build a new server configuration for yourself (replace the org/apache/geronimo/Server configuration) or edit the details of that configuration via JMX changes at runtime. We don't give you the source you need to do the first with the milestone (though you can get it from the SVN repository), and as far as I know we don't give you a good tool to make runtime JMX changes. I've noticed two serialized objects in config-store/4 - do they also contain the jetty config? Or is the information included in org.mortbay.jetty-5.1-SNAPSHOT.jar? In the first case, it should be easy to implement a tool (implied there is enough time ;-) ). In the second, there will be needed a patch to access configuration data either from serialized or xml data (last one preferred). BTW: I don't believe JMX would be a good idea to (initially) change port data, as this would make it impossible to install Geronimo into a life environment - You cannot force the admin to shutdown a probably large web site to install geronimo. We're hoping to provide some more robust management tools and configuration procedures in the next milestone release. In the mean time, let me know if you're interested in the manual procedure for altering your default server configuration. IMO, this is definitly the wrong way. If I'm succesful with some tools, I'd prefer to supply them back. However, please don't wait for them, as I'm not got much spare time currently. Kind regards Peter Aaron On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Hi Aaron, Thank You for the quick response - You've been right. Could You probably add something like 'Needed Resources' add to the wiki? Such a big stack output sometimes becomes confusing, particularly if the cause for it is in the middle of the output. ;-) Two more questions: 1. As Geronimo is currently an installation for testing with it, I'd like to change the default port - where can I do that? 2. I'll want to use my existing Tomcat installation with Geronimo - how can I disable Jetty? Best would be, if I could simply disable it and possibly re-enable later. Kind regards Peter Aaron Mulder schrieb: My guess is that this is the important part: On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: fully start: objectName=geronimo.server:container =Jetty,port=8080,type=WebConnector java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.bind(PlainSocketImpl.java:359) at java.net.ServerSocket.bind(ServerSocket.java:319) at java.net.ServerSocket.init(ServerSocket.java:185) In other words, it seems like something is already listening on port 8080 -- perhaps Tomcat or a different Geronimo instance? Aaron
Re: Geronimo M3 Installer
Hi Aaron, I'm currently running the installer. After installation (11/11), the list of installed packages appears in the installer window. Next window tells me to read some information. I've tried to go to previous page then, just to look again at the installed modules: Now the installer says x/22 and installes modules once more. Is it possible, to set a flag in the installer Already installed and suppress this updating? Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld Aaron Mulder schrieb: All, I've created (and now posted!) an installer package of Geronimo. It's JAR you download, and then run java -jar installer.jar to install. When you do that, you get a little wizard that prompts you for license, install dir, default username/PW, default ports, etc. This is kind of a beta since it hasn't been widely tested. Which brings us to the point of this message. Please download this and give it a shot, and reply with any feedback. Thanks! Download: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/geronimo/v1.0-M3/geronimo-1.0-M3-installer.jar Install: java -jar geronimo-1.0-M3-installer.jar (must be JDK 1.4+) Aaron
Re: More features in tomcat module
Hello Jacek, I've got two remaining questions: 1. Will Geronimo deployment work with Tomcat 5.0.x? 2. As Jetty is geronimo's standard servlet container, I think it should be deactivated when using Tomcat - how do I achieve this? Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld Jacek Laskowski schrieb: Hi, Just committed the latest changes to the tomcat module that let deploy webapps and run them! Really, it's now possible. Just uncomment the sections in the just-committed files and voila - Apache Tomcat 5.5.4 will run itself and deployed webapps. I remember about updating http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Tomcat, but will be doing it tomorrow. Gonna sleep. The files that require changes before running Tomcat are: modules/assembly/project.xml modules/assembly/src/plan/j2ee-deployer-plan.xml modules/assembly/src/plan/j2ee-server-plan.xml You'll have to uncomment the sections marked: !-- the tomcat module's requirement - uncomment it to run Apache Tomcat as a web container - ... -- I keep hoping that I haven't broken the build. Dobrej nocy, Jacek
Why is geronimo-1.0-M3-src.tar.gz incomplete?
Hello, why is geronimo-1.0-M3-src.tar.gz incomplete? It has a size of only about 3MB and contains only the applications folder, while geronimo-1.0-M3-src.zip has a size of about 5.5MB and contains 9 folders and many more files. Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld
Re: Updated Wiki with Eclipse Deployment Information
I just see an empty page. Matt Hogstrom schrieb: Just a quick heads up. I added a page to help users get Geronimo into Eclipse for development. The page isn't finished but thought I'd ask for comments now. The link is at http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/EclipseDeployment There are some issues regarding building the projects that this page talks about how to curcumvent. Hopefully we'll remove that section soon. The next thing to add is how to start a Geronimo server remotely and debug using Eclipse. Stay tuned. Matt
How complete is JSR-88 support?
Hello, from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00 (obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) . So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the others? From the dev mailing list, I'd guess Geronimo is almost complete, so what (other than certification) is incomplete yet? Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld
Re: How complete is JSR-88 support?
Jacek Laskowski schrieb: Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Hello, from the wiki, it seems nothing has changed since 2005-03-22 05:39:00 (obviously the roadmap hasn't been updated since then) ;-) . So just my question: Is JSR-88 support complete? And what about the others? From the dev mailing list, I'd guess Geronimo is almost complete, so what (other than certification) is incomplete yet? Hi Peter, Well, I'm just investigating the current status of Geronimo JSR88 support as I'm developing a NetBeans serverplugins module. I'm very happy about that :-) :-) :-) !!! I've just been looking around for some information about how to integrate geronimo myself, but I've not yet digged into geronimo (seems still not stable, documents about status are outdated etc. As I've not yet used J2EE, it would be horrible to do that). In addition I'd to dig into the j2ee module, which seems also not to have a stabilized api yet. Just as I've said: I'm very happy that You're doing this work! Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld NetBeans IDE already comes with several app servers and I decided to add Geronimo as well. I couldn't long settle on which Rich Client Platform to pick up to develop the module and after some rather general evaluation I decided to go with NetBeans RCP. I must admit I very liked the announcement that Eclipse has its own Geronimo plugin, too. As far as I understand Geronimo JSR88 support, there're some parts of JSR88 which aren't yet available. Most of the operations throws Unsupported operation or something alike. I'm going to start a thread about how much impact it might have on the current certification work so I'm happy I'm not alone who's interested in it :) As far as the NetBeans module (NBM) is concerned, it's not yet announced here (and actually anywhere else but NetBeans nbj2ee mailing list) as I don't actually know when it is going to be finished. At the moment, the module adds a Geronimo instance (downloaded or built from sources), once started up (it's mocked up at the moment to make sure I'm not distracted with Geronimo itself) it prints out available configurations, sets up one as default to be started up the next time. The last piece of the puzzle is to have modules deployed using DeploymentManager. I'm not yet using Geronimo's JMXDeploymentManager due to some class libraries constraints on my part. That's why I can't say exactly what's missing. Well, it's great you've asked about it - I should've written about it long ago, esp. having noticed Eclipse WDT support for Geronimo. It looks there're two IDEs which are heading towards the same goal, so sooner or later Geronimo DeploymentManager will surely be complete. Stay tuned. Peter Nabbefeld Jacek
Cannot start geronimo 1.1
Hi, I've already asked on the user channel for help, but it seems there's nobody today, so I am using this only as a forwarder. Please answer on the user list. Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld
Re: [DISCUSSION] Content for 1.2
Hello, what about an install dialog and better error reporting? * install dialog: - geronimo could check during installation, if everything needed is available as needed - if geronimo finds and can use different installed software packages, it could allow to choose * error reporting: - a stack trace for about 30 levels or even more (printed as e.g. ... 13 more // another trace // ... 15 more) isn't really helpful - better/more helpful error output would result in less questions, thus less work on user support :-) Kind regards Peter Nabbefeld Jason Dillon wrote: I'd like to get the m2 build finished... get a site setup... Feature-wise, I'd like to get GShell into 1.2, to allow users to telnet into the server and execute commands (including the script command to allow for integrated scripting support for administration/management). GShell currently has all of these features... just pending the GBean bits and then some refinement to make it more functional. I'd also like to get SSH support in, but I need some help from the Jsch folks to make that happen... so thats probably not going to happen for 1.2. --jason On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:48 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: All, Its time to start defining the content of what everyone is planning on doing for 1.2. The biggest change so far that I'm aware of are the refactoring of OEJB by Dain and the Maven 2 work done by JDillon, Prasad, Anita and others. Not too much content from an end-user perspective. I think DJencks was doing some work on pluggable JAAC as well. In the spirit of kicking 1.2 off can you post to this thread the things you'd like to get into 1.2? I've heard many folks indiciate that the community would like to time box releases so they don't go on forever so to kick it off I'd think development through the end of August (that's when we'd branch) with a release toward the end of September sounds about right. Here's a strawman format for the ideas with my 2c in there. Proposer Description HogstromImprove tomcat, Jetty and Connector instrumentation HogstromSPECjAppServer Performance improvements. Let the games begin...
