Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
No problem. I'll can keep up the 2.1 branch and squeeze some more releases out of it. Can do the branch-2.0 if we need one there too. S On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:13 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote: > Usually at least we will keep two minor release lines? I could also take > the release work of branch-2.1, until 2.3.0 is out. > > Allan Yang 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:45写道： > > > Why so soon... branch-2.2 is not stable yet. branch-2.1 is the only > stable > > branch in 2.x since branch-2.0 is already EOL’d. > > Best Regards > > Allan Yang > > > > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:23写道： > > > > > The next RC for 2.2.0 will be available soon... > > > > > > Sean Busbey 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:13写道： > > > > > > > Too early to EOL 2.1. > > > > > > > > Also we didn't EOL 2.0 at 2.0.5 because folks wanted a post 2.2.0 > > > release. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019, 18:26 Zach York > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think > > we > > > > can > > > > > quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If > > that's > > > > > 2.1.6, that's fine. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a > > review > > > of > > > > > > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up > on > > > two > > > > > > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ > > > changes. > > > > > > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > > > > > > > > > > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch > at > > > > > 2.0.5. > > > > > > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 > > isn't > > > > out > > > > > > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
Usually at least we will keep two minor release lines? I could also take the release work of branch-2.1, until 2.3.0 is out. Allan Yang 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:45写道： > Why so soon... branch-2.2 is not stable yet. branch-2.1 is the only stable > branch in 2.x since branch-2.0 is already EOL’d. > Best Regards > Allan Yang > > > 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:23写道： > > > The next RC for 2.2.0 will be available soon... > > > > Sean Busbey 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:13写道： > > > > > Too early to EOL 2.1. > > > > > > Also we didn't EOL 2.0 at 2.0.5 because folks wanted a post 2.2.0 > > release. > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019, 18:26 Zach York > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think > we > > > can > > > > quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If > that's > > > > 2.1.6, that's fine. > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > > > > > > > > > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a > review > > of > > > > > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up on > > two > > > > > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ > > changes. > > > > > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > > > > > > > > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch at > > > > 2.0.5. > > > > > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 > isn't > > > out > > > > > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
Why so soon... branch-2.2 is not stable yet. branch-2.1 is the only stable branch in 2.x since branch-2.0 is already EOL’d. Best Regards Allan Yang 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:23写道： > The next RC for 2.2.0 will be available soon... > > Sean Busbey 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:13写道： > > > Too early to EOL 2.1. > > > > Also we didn't EOL 2.0 at 2.0.5 because folks wanted a post 2.2.0 > release. > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019, 18:26 Zach York > > wrote: > > > > > I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think we > > can > > > quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If that's > > > 2.1.6, that's fine. > > > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > > > > > > > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a review > of > > > > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up on > two > > > > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ > changes. > > > > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > > > > > > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch at > > > 2.0.5. > > > > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 isn't > > out > > > > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > S > > > > > > > > > >
Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
The next RC for 2.2.0 will be available soon... Sean Busbey 于2019年5月17日周五 上午10:13写道： > Too early to EOL 2.1. > > Also we didn't EOL 2.0 at 2.0.5 because folks wanted a post 2.2.0 release. > > On Thu, May 16, 2019, 18:26 Zach York > wrote: > > > I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think we > can > > quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If that's > > 2.1.6, that's fine. > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > > > > > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a review of > > > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up on two > > > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ changes. > > > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > > > > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch at > > 2.0.5. > > > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 isn't > out > > > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > S > > > > > >
Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
Too early to EOL 2.1. Also we didn't EOL 2.0 at 2.0.5 because folks wanted a post 2.2.0 release. On Thu, May 16, 2019, 18:26 Zach York wrote: > I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think we can > quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If that's > 2.1.6, that's fine. > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > > > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a review of > > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up on two > > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ changes. > > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch at > 2.0.5. > > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 isn't out > > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > > > Thanks, > > S > > >
Re: DISCUSS: Heads-up 2.1.5 RC in next few days and suggest EOL'ing 2.1 branch
I like the proactive approach to EOLing branches, but I don't think we can quite EOL a branch when there is no newer branch (2.2.0) out. If that's 2.1.6, that's fine. On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:18 PM Stack wrote: > Was going to put up an RC for 2.1.5 in next day or so after a review of > unresolved JIRAs that have 2.1.5 as fix version. It is coming up on two > months since 2.1.4 and by the time we're done, there'll be 90+ changes. > Branch-2.1 nightlies have started to stabilize again. > > Was also thinking of EOL'ing the 2.1 branch. We EOL'd 2.0 branch at 2.0.5. > We have too many branches as it is. What do folks think? 2.2.0 isn't out > yet so maybe wait on 2.1.6? That'd be fine too. > > Thanks, > S >
