Re: one problem processing config file
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:35 AM, Rui Hu tchrb...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I want to develop a module, which can implement simple function for each root directory like 1) set error document, 2) set default page, 3) simple url rewrite rules. In this function, I can design my own directive and rewrite rule expressions. But I not sure if those functionalities can be implemented in one module, should I also modified Apache core? You don't want to depend on changes to the core in your module.
Re: Event and simple
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing On Feb 22, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote: I hope to carve out cycles to work on the trunk rev's of event and simple in order to backport to 2.4... Thoughts? :) For event, I would recommend to move Paul's changes into a branch and revert trunk to the state of 2.4. Then we can do small changes and bug fixes in trunk and more radical changes in the branch. Of course it is up to you on which of the two you want to work ;)
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52748] New: build should blow up early with apr 1.3 or earlier?
On 23.02.2012 15:19, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748 Bug #: 52748 Summary: build should blow up early with apr 1.3 or earlier? Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Build AssignedTo: b...@httpd.apache.org ReportedBy: cove...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Two separate users on IRC reported build failures with APR 1.4 with build errors in rotatleogs for apr_file_link which is 1.4-and-up. I'm not sure what other 1.4-isms there are, but it might be reasonable to just bail out if an older APR is used rather than permitting it w/o default features X,Y,Z... +1 to apr 1.4. Never noticed such problem when using *apr-util* 1.3 apart from mod_session_crypto of course is not buildable. Since apr-util 1.4 is pretty fresh, I would prefer not to strictly require that. But the first release of apr 1.4 was in April 2010, so IMHO long enough to get used to it. Whoever wants to build httpd 2.4 on an outdated platform shouldn't find it to big a problem to include apr into srclib. The biggest problem might be educating users and formulating installation docs clear enough. Never tried to build with *apr* 1.3 myself. Regards, Rainer
worker slotmem_grab failed (2.4.1)
Hi together, I'm trying to get my reverse-proxy running with the new httpd 2.4.1, that aborts now with worker slotmem_grab failed. When looking at mod_proxy_balancer: It looks like each balancer creates the SHM for its number of workers (1 in my case) using its unique -sname. After that, each worker grabs a slot from this. I have several virtual hosts pointing to the same balancer (by rewrite [P]). So, the second time, the balancer calls shm's slotmem_create again with its name, that already exists - kind-of noop. Now, the SHM under the balancer's name has still only 1 slot (that is already occupied). When the worker now wants to (re-)grab its slot, I get: [slotmem_shm:debug] mod_slotmem_shm.c(575): AH02293: slotmem(...) grab failed. Num 1/num_free 0 [proxy_balancer:emerg] (22)Invalid argument: AH01186: worker slotmem_grab failed Please note that my explanation should only be considered as an educated guess for the reason of the error - there might be other obvious causes that I have overseen. Has anyone similar issues? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Florian $ httpd -V Server version: Apache/2.4.1 (Unix) Server built: Feb 23 2012 18:21:48 Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:0 Server loaded: APR 1.4.5, APR-UTIL 1.4.1 Compiled using: APR 1.4.5, APR-UTIL 1.4.1 Architecture: 32-bit Server MPM: event threaded: yes (fixed thread count) forked: yes (variable process count)
Apache 2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
Hi all, I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1, 2.2.3) with nginx. I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput. http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812 I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;) Regards, -- MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1229 at gmail.com http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
Re: Apache 2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
could you write it in English? 2012/2/24 MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com Hi all, I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1, 2.2.3) with nginx. I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput. http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812 I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;) Regards, -- MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1229 at gmail.com http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
Re: Apache 2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
Google Translate :-) On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:06, dreamice dreamice.ji...@gmail.com wrote: could you write it in English? 2012/2/24 MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com Hi all, I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1, 2.2.3) with nginx. I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput. http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812 I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;) Regards, -- MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1229 at gmail.com http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/
