Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 04.10.2012 05:15, Eric Covener wrote: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote Same here and thanks for the effort. Rainer
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/04/2012 05:15 AM, Eric Covener wrote: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote I like pb3 too.
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png > http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png pb3 has my vote
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/04/2012 04:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith: >> On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: >>> What about "Apache HTTPD"? >> +1 >> >> httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. >> Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right. >> Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too >> http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png > closer to what I meant; > of course the colored "APACHE" should stay; but I would suggest to have: > "Powered by httpd 2.4" > above "APACHE" just like "Powered" and "2.4" is already above: > > (feather) Powered by httpd 2.4 > A P A C H E > > Gün. > > Okay, seems we have a lot of options to choose from then :) I'll paste the links to gregg's proposal, my initial (wrong) one and two more which says "powered by httpd 2.4" in different ways: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb2.png http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb3.png Pick a card, any card ;) With regards, Daniel
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
Am 04.10.2012 04:26, schrieb Gregg Smith: On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: What about "Apache HTTPD"? +1 httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right. Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png closer to what I meant; of course the colored "APACHE" should stay; but I would suggest to have: "Powered by httpd 2.4" above "APACHE" just like "Powered" and "2.4" is already above: (feather) Powered by httpd 2.4 A P A C H E Gün.
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/3/2012 6:49 PM, Jie Gao wrote: What about "Apache HTTPD"? +1 httpd != Apache , but this is still part of the (Apache)SF last I looked. Maybe write over the bottom-right of Apache the HTTPD justified right. Like so maybe? HTTPD is syncopate too http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/httpd/apache_pb2copy.png Gregg
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
What about "Apache HTTPD"? * Guenter Knauf wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:35:56 +0200 > From: Guenter Knauf > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.2.28) > Gecko/20120306 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.20 > > Hi Daniel, > Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: > >Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: > >>I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) > >> > >>If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and > >>commit them to trunk later today. > >go ahead - thats overdue! > may I ask for another one? > We got some time back discussions that httpd != Apache, and in this > light it would probably more correct if the logo text would read: > "Powered by httpd 2.4" > and this then perhaps right-aligned ... > can you perhaps give that a try and show here how this looks? > > Thanks! > > Gün. > >
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/04/2012 03:35 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi Daniel, > Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: >> Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: >>> I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) >>> >>> If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and >>> commit them to trunk later today. >> go ahead - thats overdue! > may I ask for another one? > We got some time back discussions that httpd != Apache, and in this > light it would probably more correct if the logo text would read: > "Powered by httpd 2.4" > and this then perhaps right-aligned ... > can you perhaps give that a try and show here how this looks? > > Thanks! > > Gün. > > Sure! here's how it looks with "httpd" instead of "apache": http://www.humbedooh.com/apache/apache_pb.png I'm assuming that's what you meant? :) With regards, Daniel.
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
Hi Daniel, Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! may I ask for another one? We got some time back discussions that httpd != Apache, and in this light it would probably more correct if the logo text would read: "Powered by httpd 2.4" and this then perhaps right-aligned ... can you perhaps give that a try and show here how this looks? Thanks! Gün.
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/3/2012 1:31 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! +1
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
Am 03.10.2012 22:25, schrieb Guenter Knauf: Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! oh, I should read all mails before I post a reply ... :-P now would be cl if you commit new ones with '2.5' to trunk ;-) Gün.
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
Am 02.10.2012 15:58, schrieb Daniel Gruno: I can do a 260x30, I hope that's close enough :) If there are no objections, I'll create the various png/gif versions and commit them to trunk later today. go ahead - thats overdue! Gün.
Re: svn commit: r1393564 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event/event.c
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 03 Oct 2012, at 5:49 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: minfrin >> Date: Wed Oct 3 15:49:17 2012 >> New Revision: 1393564 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393564&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix spelling mistakes. > > I understand that fixing spelling mistakes doesn't need to be voted on for > back port, is this correct? correct > If no objections, will back port this to v2.4. > > Regards, > Graham > -- > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd
+1 on concept, but Im on vacation so cant actually review the code Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On October 3, 2012 12:51:56 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: +1 On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: >> attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is >> service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, >> systemd provides sd_notify(...) function [2] to inform service manager >> about current status of the service. Status message passed to service >> manager using this function is later visible in "systemctl status >> httpd.service" output and can provide useful information about current >> httpd status. > > Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a > nice feature. > > [root@virt-f18e ~]# systemctl status httpd.service > httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; enabled) > Active: active (running) since Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:24:58 +0100; 2min 17s ago >Main PID: 403 (httpd) > Status: "Total requests: 1100; Current requests/sec: 80.1; Current traffic: 350KB/sec" > CGroup: name=systemd:/system/httpd.service > ├ 403 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 441 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 444 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 445 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 446 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 447 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 448 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > └ 470 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND >
Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd
NICE On Oct 3, 2012 5:28 AM, "Joe Orton" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > > attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is > > service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, > > systemd provides sd_notify(...) function [2] to inform service manager > > about current status of the service. Status message passed to service > > manager using this function is later visible in "systemctl status > > httpd.service" output and can provide useful information about current > > httpd status. > > Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a > nice feature. > > [root@virt-f18e ~]# systemctl status httpd.service > httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; enabled) > Active: active (running) since Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:24:58 +0100; > 2min 17s ago > Main PID: 403 (httpd) > Status: "Total requests: 1100; Current requests/sec: 80.1; > Current traffic: 350KB/sec" > CGroup: name=systemd:/system/httpd.service > ├ 403 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 441 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 444 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 445 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 446 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 447 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 448 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > └ 470 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > >
Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd
+1 On Oct 3, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: >> attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is >> service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, >> systemd provides sd_notify(...) function [2] to inform service manager >> about current status of the service. Status message passed to service >> manager using this function is later visible in "systemctl status >> httpd.service" output and can provide useful information about current >> httpd status. > > Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a > nice feature. > > [root@virt-f18e ~]# systemctl status httpd.service > httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; enabled) > Active: active (running) since Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:24:58 +0100; 2min > 17s ago > Main PID: 403 (httpd) > Status: "Total requests: 1100; Current requests/sec: 80.1; Current > traffic: 350KB/sec" > CGroup: name=systemd:/system/httpd.service > ├ 403 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 441 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 444 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 445 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 446 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 447 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > ├ 448 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND > └ 470 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND >
Re: "Powered by" icon for httpd-2.4 needs update
On 10/03/2012 08:20 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
>
> Really thank for that. I see the images are already in trunk, would it
> be possible to have them also in 2.4 branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Jan Kaluza
>
Even though this is under the jurisdiction of the docs project, it is
still commit-then-review, which is why I didn't just steamroll it
through to 2.4 right away. That being said, if no one objects, I'll
backport the new images to 2.4 today and get rid of the animated gif
('cause we really don't need that one, do we? ;) ).
With regards,
Daniel.
Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd
On 03 Oct 2012, at 10:28 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a > nice feature. Very much so, +1. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [PATCH] mod_systemd
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:10:07AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > attached patch adds new module called mod_systemd. Systemd [1] is > service manager for Linux. Although httpd works with systemd normally, > systemd provides sd_notify(...) function [2] to inform service manager > about current status of the service. Status message passed to service > manager using this function is later visible in "systemctl status > httpd.service" output and can provide useful information about current > httpd status. Any objections from the list to adding this? systemd integration is a nice feature. [root@virt-f18e ~]# systemctl status httpd.service httpd.service - The Apache HTTP Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service; enabled) Active: active (running) since Wed, 03 Oct 2012 08:24:58 +0100; 2min 17s ago Main PID: 403 (httpd) Status: "Total requests: 1100; Current requests/sec: 80.1; Current traffic: 350KB/sec" CGroup: name=systemd:/system/httpd.service ├ 403 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 441 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 444 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 445 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 446 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 447 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND ├ 448 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND └ 470 /usr/sbin/httpd -DFOREGROUND
Re: [PATCH] More useful data in ap_sload_t
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:46:04AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote: > attached patch adds more variables (bytes_served and access_count) > into ap_sload_t struct introduced in revision 1389481. > > The intention is to have standard method to get number of total > bytes_served and access_count without code duplication. Thanks Jan! I've committed this in r1393338. Regards, Joe
