Re: [PATCH] systemd socket activation
On 07/21/2013 11:14 PM, Paul Querna wrote: Hiya Y'all, long time no patches :-) Attached is a patch that would let httpd use systemd's socket activation feature: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/socket-activation.html Also online here: https://github.com/pquerna/httpd/compare/trunk...systemd_socket_activation Hi, I have tried the patch on F18 with httpd-2.4.6 and it works as expected. I really like it :). Regards, Jan Kaluza It isn't particularly pretty; Mostly it is working within how listener code already works. You can test it yourself very easily using something like: /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-activate -l 0.0.0.0:8080 -l 9080 /usr/local/httpd-dev/bin/httpd -DFOREGROUND You'll note it works with multiple listeners. I've been testing it on Fedora 19, and it seems fine there. Now, the patch is not part of mod_systemd. This is mostly because the listener.c code isn't exactly friendly to a non-core module messing around with the listeners. I'd definitely be +1 to a larger refactoring of listen.c, but not sure I have the time / energy to head that up. If there aren't any objections I'll commit it into trunk in a few days, Thanks, Paul
Re: Hey Steinar... Re: Revisiting the pre_htaccess hook
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 19:58:11 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:07:56PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: I guess it seems to work in the earlier e-mail is the validation that the API is sufficient for MPM-ITK. I see that 2.4.6 has been released, with no mention of open_htaccess in the source code. Was this reverted after 2.4.5? Or was it simply never applied to the 2.4.x branch? Unfortunately, it didn't get the necessary three +1 votes in time and hasn't been applied to the 2.4.x branch, yet.
[PATCH PR55304] mod_dav: COPY should not validate the parent of request.
This patch fixes a regression created by the PR54610. COPY does not modify the parent of the source, so it should not be validating the parent. This issue actually disallows the ability to COPY the root of a DAV repository since a properly implemented DAV provider will return NULL and dav_method_copymove() will error on that. We ran into this with Subversion, which actually revealed a security issue with our implementation of get_parent_resource() since it failed on the root. But beyond that we realized we were not properly returning NULL for some resources when the resource is the root and thus has no parent. If we fix this without this patch being made to mod_dav then HTTP 2.2.25 and 2.4.6 will lose the ability to COPY the root. If someone can apply it that would be appreciated. It's certainly been looked at by several eyes over on the Subversion side.
Re: Hey Steinar... Re: Revisiting the pre_htaccess hook
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 19:58:11 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:07:56PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: I guess it seems to work in the earlier e-mail is the validation that the API is sufficient for MPM-ITK. I see that 2.4.6 has been released, with no mention of open_htaccess in the source code. Was this reverted after 2.4.5? Or was it simply never applied to the 2.4.x branch? Unfortunately, it didn't get the necessary three +1 votes in time and hasn't been applied to the 2.4.x branch, yet. Now it is approved for 2.4.next. -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
Re: [PATCH PR55304] mod_dav: COPY should not validate the parent of request.
Fixed in r1506714, and proposed for backport to 2.2.x and 2.4.x. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote: This patch fixes a regression created by the PR54610. COPY does not modify the parent of the source, so it should not be validating the parent. This issue actually disallows the ability to COPY the root of a DAV repository since a properly implemented DAV provider will return NULL and dav_method_copymove() will error on that. We ran into this with Subversion, which actually revealed a security issue with our implementation of get_parent_resource() since it failed on the root. But beyond that we realized we were not properly returning NULL for some resources when the resource is the root and thus has no parent. If we fix this without this patch being made to mod_dav then HTTP 2.2.25 and 2.4.6 will lose the ability to COPY the root. If someone can apply it that would be appreciated. It's certainly been looked at by several eyes over on the Subversion side.
