Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Hmmm... this has me thinking about maybe using the provider interface to 
implement the communication mechanism... let me mull this over.

> On Nov 30, 2018, at 8:27 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I looked for something else, esp various pubsub implementations, but 
> they really didn't fit in with what was needed.
> 
> 
>> On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:02 AM, jean-frederic clere  wrote:
>> 
>> On 29/11/2018 07:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
 Hi, Jim;
 I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY
 protocol. Any pointers you can share?
 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are looking for.
>>> Here are some links:
>>>   https://nanomsg.org/gettingstarted/survey.html and other resources on
>>> https://nanomsg.org/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> CJ
>>> 
>> 
>> So as I am looking to proxy tomcat using httpd I need a 'pure" java
>> implementation for tomcat, it seems that it is missing for the moment,
>> correct?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Jean-Frederic
> 



Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yeah, I looked for something else, esp various pubsub implementations, but they 
really didn't fit in with what was needed.


> On Nov 29, 2018, at 3:02 AM, jean-frederic clere  wrote:
> 
> On 29/11/2018 07:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit :
>>> Hi, Jim;
>>> I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY
>>> protocol. Any pointers you can share?
>>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are looking for.
>> Here are some links:
>>https://nanomsg.org/gettingstarted/survey.html and other resources on
>> https://nanomsg.org/
>> 
>> 
>> CJ
>> 
> 
> So as I am looking to proxy tomcat using httpd I need a 'pure" java
> implementation for tomcat, it seems that it is missing for the moment,
> correct?
> 
> -- 
> Cheers
> 
> Jean-Frederic