Re: problems with proxy worker and name_ex
On 20/07/2022 11:09, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:43 AM jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I think we have something wrong: https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h#L719 and https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h#L601 How external modules can detect that 2.4.x has diverged from trunk? For 2.5.x/trunk (where PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE bumped to 384): #if AP_MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST(20211221, 0) For 2.4.x (where name_ex[PROXY_WORKER_EXT_NAME_SIZE] was added): #if MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR == 20120211 && MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MINOR >= 124 ? Oops too tired today... Sorry for the noises... Thanks ;-) Regards; Yann. -- Cheers Jean-Frederic
Re: problems with proxy worker and name_ex
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 10:43 AM jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Hi, > > I think we have something wrong: > https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h#L719 > and > https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h#L601 > > How external modules can detect that 2.4.x has diverged from trunk? For 2.5.x/trunk (where PROXY_WORKER_MAX_NAME_SIZE bumped to 384): #if AP_MODULE_MAGIC_AT_LEAST(20211221, 0) For 2.4.x (where name_ex[PROXY_WORKER_EXT_NAME_SIZE] was added): #if MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MAJOR == 20120211 && MODULE_MAGIC_NUMBER_MINOR >= 124 ? Regards; Yann.
problems with proxy worker and name_ex
Hi, I think we have something wrong: https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/trunk/include/ap_mmn.h#L719 and https://github.com/apache/httpd/blob/2.4.x/include/ap_mmn.h#L601 How external modules can detect that 2.4.x has diverged from trunk? -- Cheers Jean-Frederic
