Re: Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

[Vegard Svanberg]

* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 05:15]:

  I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again
  since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further,
  possibly moved to other mailing lists, and/or if it's been added to a
  roadmap for future releases.
 
 None of the above.  There has been activity on the www.apache.org/wiki/httpd
 site w.r.t. setting up per-user hosts in parallel, but not much else.

OK. Say you have a server with 1000 vhosts, what performance penalties
must be expected from this solution? Just more memory (and if so,
roughly how much)?

 It takes a specific developer hacking at a solution, and for the developer
 to respond to the concerns/criticisms, to ultimately end up with code that
 we might incorporate in svn trunk.

Yes, I'm aware of that. One of the reasons for asking was to check if
this is the preferred way of fixing this problem or if there are other
(possibly better) suggestions out there.

Thank you for your replies.

-- 
Vegard Svanberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (EFnet)]

Vhosts running as different userids (was: Re: Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD)

[Vegard Svanberg]

In the thread Inclusion of mpm-itk into HEAD, Paul Querna
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Joshua Slive's
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posts on
June 25th brings up a streamlined proxy approach (my words) to
separate apache processes user ids, most commonly a very much
wanted/requested feature in (large) virtual hosted environments.

I've looked through the archives, but have not seen this mentioned again
since then. I was wondering if this has been discussed any further,
possibly moved to other mailing lists, and/or if it's been added to a
roadmap for future releases.

Thanks.

-- 
Vegard Svanberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (EFnet)]