Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Daniel Gruno 
On 10/09/2015 11:12 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?
> 
No, nothing legal there...just that people didn't want GH integration ;)
If there's a desire to have it enabled, we can make it so..

With regards,
Daniel.

AW: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group 


> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Nick Kew [mailto:n...@webthing.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 12:01
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications
> 
> On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 11:12 +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> > Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?
> 
> Bugzilla activity doesn't get sent to dev@, even when
> it involves PatchAvailable (kind-of equivalent to a
> Pull Request, yesno)?
> 
> If we were to propagate pull requests, we should perhaps
> review bugzilla workflow (IMHO a weakness in how we
> work now) at the same time?

Good points.

Regards

Rüdiger

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Rainer Jung 

Am 09.10.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Nick Kew:

On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 11:12 +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:

Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?


Bugzilla activity doesn't get sent to dev@, even when
it involves PatchAvailable (kind-of equivalent to a
Pull Request, yesno)?

If we were to propagate pull requests, we should perhaps
review bugzilla workflow (IMHO a weakness in how we
work now) at the same time?


Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?

Rainer

GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Yann Ylavic 
Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Nick Kew 
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 11:12 +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?

Bugzilla activity doesn't get sent to dev@, even when
it involves PatchAvailable (kind-of equivalent to a
Pull Request, yesno)?

If we were to propagate pull requests, we should perhaps
review bugzilla workflow (IMHO a weakness in how we
work now) at the same time?

-- 
Nick Kew

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Yann Ylavic 
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Gruno  wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 11:12 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues?
>>
> No, nothing legal there...

ISTM that for patches to be donated-to/acceptable-by the ASF, they
must be sent to either bugs@ or dev@, but I can have misinterpreted
what I read (can't find it now...).

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Yann Ylavic 
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Jung  wrote:
>
> Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?

That would be equally valuable, and probably simpler.

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Mads Toftum 
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:42:44PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Jung  wrote:
> >
> > Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?
> 
> That would be equally valuable, and probably simpler.

And less noisy for those who would rather avoid the automated mails.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://flickr.com/photos/q42/

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Mads Toftum 
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:00:22PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Mads Toftum  wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:42:44PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Jung  
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?
> >>
> >> That would be equally valuable, and probably simpler.
> >
> > And less noisy for those who would rather avoid the automated mails.
> 
> Well, dev related stuff (patches) on dev@ is not really noise IMO...
> 
They are similar to the bugzilla messages - in many ways it's just the
lazy way of skipping the part about submitting an issue with
PatchAvailable. "Noise" may not be the best word for it, but it isn't
a discussion.

vh

Mads Toftum
-- 
http://flickr.com/photos/q42/

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Yann Ylavic 
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Jung  wrote:
>
> Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?

Looks like good (and simple) way to have even further contributors
(which is never bad).
Daniel seems to say it's quite easy to do at infra level (including
two-way integration, i.e. replies to bugs@ would reach GH's
requester), so personnaly:

+1

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

2015-10-09 Thread Yann Ylavic 
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Mads Toftum  wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 12:42:44PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Rainer Jung  wrote:
>> >
>> > Or send GH mails to bugs@ similar to the BZ workflow?
>>
>> That would be equally valuable, and probably simpler.
>
> And less noisy for those who would rather avoid the automated mails.

Well, dev related stuff (patches) on dev@ is not really noise IMO...

Regards,
Yann.