Re: Limited connectivity
On 7/23/2011 12:50 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > Sorry for being impatient, but I have now reverted it. You don't seem > to have enough time ATM and I think this was delaying the next beta. Hello Stefan, your assessment was correct... storm damage, work things and family polyopolized my schedule. Thank you for handling this so we can verify the end result and move forward!
Re: Limited connectivity
Am 23.07.2011 19:50, schrieb Stefan Fritsch: On Sunday 17 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 7/17/2011 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Hey Bill, was wondering how this is coming... On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, and it may be a day or two before that happens. I should be caught up on work later this afternoon, and jumping into the httpd svn tree trimming project (much easier than the storm damaged tree trimming projects of last week). So expect this to be wrapped up later today. Sorry for being impatient, but I have now reverted it. You don't seem to have enough time ATM and I think this was delaying the next beta. thanks Stefan for taking this over; I was close to suggest this too since you anyway did already research for the commits. Thanks again! Gün.
Re: Limited connectivity
It's been nearly two weeks, and we can't block on individuals like this. I think it was the right move. Cheers, -g On Jul 23, 2011 1:51 PM, "Stefan Fritsch" wrote: > On Sunday 17 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 7/17/2011 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> > Hey Bill, was wondering how this is coming... >> > >> > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >> Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches >> >> and sandbox them until I have something resembling stable >> >> connectivity, and it may be a day or two before that happens. >> >> I should be caught up on work later this afternoon, and jumping >> into the httpd svn tree trimming project (much easier than the >> storm damaged tree trimming projects of last week). So expect >> this to be wrapped up later today. > > Sorry for being impatient, but I have now reverted it. You don't seem > to have enough time ATM and I think this was delaying the next beta.
Re: Limited connectivity
On Sunday 17 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 7/17/2011 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hey Bill, was wondering how this is coming... > > > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches > >> and sandbox them until I have something resembling stable > >> connectivity, and it may be a day or two before that happens. > > I should be caught up on work later this afternoon, and jumping > into the httpd svn tree trimming project (much easier than the > storm damaged tree trimming projects of last week). So expect > this to be wrapped up later today. Sorry for being impatient, but I have now reverted it. You don't seem to have enough time ATM and I think this was delaying the next beta.
Re: Limited connectivity
On 7/17/2011 8:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hey Bill, was wondering how this is coming... > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > >> Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and >> sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, >> and it may be a day or two before that happens. I should be caught up on work later this afternoon, and jumping into the httpd svn tree trimming project (much easier than the storm damaged tree trimming projects of last week). So expect this to be wrapped up later today.
Re: Limited connectivity
Hey Bill, was wondering how this is coming... On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and > sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, > and it may be a day or two before that happens. >
Re: Limited connectivity
On 7/13/2011 1:41 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Wednesday 13 July 2011, Eric Covener wrote: >>> SSL issues rewrite, see post Win 2.3.13 :: SSL issues rewrite >> >> Did you provide the traces offline directly to sf? > > No. I think the idea was to fix the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue first, > and see if it also fixes the SSL/mod_rewrite issue. You mean the AcceptFilter feature ;-) Yes, that's on my plate, but I just got back some more effective connectivity. As soon as my work-work responsibilities are caught up, I'll take a deeper look at whats happening here.
Re: Limited connectivity
On Wednesday 13 July 2011, Eric Covener wrote: > > SSL issues rewrite, see post Win 2.3.13 :: SSL issues rewrite > > Did you provide the traces offline directly to sf? No. I think the idea was to fix the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue first, and see if it also fixes the SSL/mod_rewrite issue.
Re: Limited connectivity
> SSL issues rewrite, see post Win 2.3.13 :: SSL issues rewrite Did you provide the traces offline directly to sf?
Re: Limited connectivity
Should be nice also solve first: AcceptFilter issue, see post Windows 2.3.13 :: Win32DisableAcceptEx SSL issues rewrite, see post Win 2.3.13 :: SSL issues rewrite Then we can continue testing. The AH and AL communities want going to run 2.3/2.4 Steffen - Original Message - From: "Jim Jagielski" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel To: Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:10 PM Subject: Re: Limited connectivity Gotcha I'll hold off on the next beta until this issue is resolved for ldap. On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, and it may be a day or two before that happens.
Re: Limited connectivity
Gotcha I'll hold off on the next beta until this issue is resolved for ldap. On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and > sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, > and it may be a day or two before that happens. >
Limited connectivity
Just to let folks know, I won't be able to roll back our patches and sandbox them until I have something resembling stable connectivity, and it may be a day or two before that happens.