Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
Mladen Turk wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: I'll look as soon as my Longhorn beta is up and running, I'm betting that this is all related to the permissions and 'no documents in the application tree' ruleset. Right, once when I added 'Full Control' to the 'Program Files' for Users group, the installer works. ... and with the latest patch ApacheMonitor works as well :) Great - it won't be so hard to create apache2.2\conf, htdocs\ as writable to the administrators group, and apache2.2\logs, \proxy (\cache?) as writable by the apache2.2 service user. Will work on this over the week, thanks for clarifying!
Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
what? - Original Message - From: Mario Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:47 AM Subject: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn Hello, I've tested apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi under Longhorn Beta 3 (VMware). Only thing that I changed from the default windows setup, was that I turned off the firewall to test it from my network. After installation I got an error message Process successfull executed. I got that message also after rebooting windows. But Apache works fine! I hadn't time to test that with PHP yet. regards Mario Brandt
Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
yacsha wrote: what? I think Mario's post below is quite clear. I am wondering, however, *where* he sees the error message he cites. A log? A popup command window? An ok box? Is there additional details (a window caption or other details?) Does it continue to happen on each reboot? But glad to hear this works just fine - it implies we are not far from working also on Vista, Longhorn's 'end user workstation' cousin. - Original Message - From: Mario Brandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:47 AM Subject: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn Hello, I've tested apache_2.2.4-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8d.msi under Longhorn Beta 3 (VMware). Only thing that I changed from the default windows setup, was that I turned off the firewall to test it from my network. After installation I got an error message Process successfull executed. I got that message also after rebooting windows. But Apache works fine! I hadn't time to test that with PHP yet. regards Mario Brandt
Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: yacsha wrote: what? I think Mario's post below is quite clear. I am wondering, however, *where* he sees the error message he cites. A log? A popup command window? An ok box? Is there additional details (a window caption or other details?) Does it continue to happen on each reboot? But glad to hear this works just fine - it implies we are not far from working also on Vista, Longhorn's 'end user workstation' cousin. Just tracking the Vista problems down. One problem is the installer. Every awk config rewrite fails so the installation ends up without config files. Didn't try with Administrator account directly, but with the member of the administrators group. The problem described is probably related to ApacheMonitor, and I'm still debugging why it fails. Hope I'll have some answers in few days. Regards, Mladen.
Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
Mladen Turk wrote: Just tracking the Vista problems down. One problem is the installer. Every awk config rewrite fails so the installation ends up without config files. Didn't try with Administrator account directly, but with the member of the administrators group. I'll look as soon as my Longhorn beta is up and running, I'm betting that this is all related to the permissions and 'no documents in the application tree' ruleset. I can't imagine awk's posix fopen/fwrite code is broken by vista.
Re: Apache 2.2.4 under Win32 Longhorn
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Just tracking the Vista problems down. One problem is the installer. Every awk config rewrite fails so the installation ends up without config files. Didn't try with Administrator account directly, but with the member of the administrators group. I'll look as soon as my Longhorn beta is up and running, I'm betting that this is all related to the permissions and 'no documents in the application tree' ruleset. Right, once when I added 'Full Control' to the 'Program Files' for Users group, the installer works. ... and with the latest patch ApacheMonitor works as well :) Regards, Mladen.
