Re: YAML: httpd distro package managers
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 11:29:01AM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote: To that end, I'd like to request Yet Another Mailing List, called something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], or some such. The list would be public, although I'd be willing to moderate if needed. Thoughts? +1 - imo there's more than enough mutilated httpd packages out there to warrant such a list. Perhaps packagers@ would be better? vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
Re: YAML: httpd distro package managers
Mads Toftum wrote: +1 - imo there's more than enough mutilated httpd packages out there to warrant such a list. Perhaps packagers@ would be better? Would a packagers' list be restricted to httpd only, or would it include other projects like APR? I think it should. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: YAML: httpd distro package managers
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Would a packagers' list be restricted to httpd only, or would it include other projects like APR? I think it should. APR being a prerequisite for httpd certainly makes me think the same - but I don't think we should spread much further than that (ie. no need to cover the joys of jarfiles ;) just my $.02 vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
Re: YAML: httpd distro package managers
Mads Toftum wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: Would a packagers' list be restricted to httpd only, or would it include other projects like APR? I think it should. APR being a prerequisite for httpd certainly makes me think the same - but I don't think we should spread much further than that (ie. no need to cover the joys of jarfiles ;) just my $.02 +1 to that. packaging of httpd and directly related items. (ie how 3rd party modules are organized would fall nicely into this category). -Paul
