Re: svn commit: r551281 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
On 06/27/2007 09:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: fuankg Date: Wed Jun 27 12:21:05 2007 New Revision: 551281 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=551281 Log: Add 2 backport proposals. Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?view=diffrev=551281r1=551280r2=551281 == --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Jun 27 12:21:05 2007 @@ -220,6 +220,10 @@ http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_dbd_pools_groups/mod_dbd-4groups-2.2.x.patch +1: chrisd +* mod_dbd: added proper error message for NetWare + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=521230 + +1: fuankg + Not a real problem and maybe nitpicking from my side, but the policy is to add new proposals to the end of the file as you have done with your second proposal. Regards Rüdiger
Re: svn commit: r551281 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Hi Ruediger, Not a real problem and maybe nitpicking from my side, but the policy is to add new proposals to the end of the file as you have done with your second proposal. thanks, and sorry, but I wasnt aware. Just saw the two other mod_dbd related ones which suggested me that they were sort, and add mine there... Guenter.
Re: svn commit: r551281 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
On 06/27/2007 10:24 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Ruediger, Not a real problem and maybe nitpicking from my side, but the policy is to add new proposals to the end of the file as you have done with your second proposal. thanks, and sorry, but I wasnt aware. As said, no reason to worry. Just saw the two other mod_dbd related ones which suggested me that they were sort, and add mine there... I thought that. Regards Rüdiger
