Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Reindl Haraldwrote: > for user/admin/vendor it's nothing different than any of the other undrets > to thousands of packages on their system "yum/dnf upgrade, apt-get > upgrade.." and now they *really* are up-to-date That's already how it works for a vendor-packaged httpd too.
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
Am 24.05.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Reindl Haraldwrote: than also the source should not be bundeled and instead a requirement to have it installed for build Already covered ITT: "apr-util 1.6.0 will ship without an embedded copy of the expat software." sorry, i missed the "without" and "Obtaining expat and keeping it refreshed and up to date with respect to security patches will become an exercise for the user/admin/vendor" sound typically more like the usual problem of httpd, php and others having burried a random version inside the soorce tarball for user/admin/vendor it's nothing different than any of the other undrets to thousands of packages on their system "yum/dnf upgrade, apt-get upgrade.." and now they *really* are up-to-date
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Reindl Haraldwrote: > than also the source should not be bundeled and instead a requirement to > have it installed for build Already covered ITT: "apr-util 1.6.0 will ship without an embedded copy of the expat software." -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
Am 24.05.2017 um 17:46 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Reindl Haraldwrote: and why does it need to be an embedded copy? It's not required to be embedded than also the source should not be bundeled and instead a requirement to have it installed for build - problem is with the bundeling many people don't realize that their system updates for libraries don't cover the default build of random software - httpd/apr is just one of them
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Reindl Haraldwrote: > and why does it need to be an embedded copy? It's not required to be embedded
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
Am 24.05.2017 um 17:02 schrieb William A Rowe Jr: apr-util 1.6.0 will ship without an embedded copy of the expat software. Obtaining expat and keeping it refreshed and up to date with respect to security patches will become an exercise for the user/admin/vendor. This is scheduled for "RSN" - real soon now and why does it need to be an embedded copy? bundle libraries is the start of all evil [root@buildserver:~]$ rpm -qa |grep expat expat-2.1.1-2.fc24.x86_64 expat-devel-2.1.1-2.fc24.x86_64
Re: VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
apr-util 1.6.0 will ship without an embedded copy of the expat software. Obtaining expat and keeping it refreshed and up to date with respect to security patches will become an exercise for the user/admin/vendor. This is scheduled for "RSN" - real soon now. Bill On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AGwrote: > Hello list, > > while reading "http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/71.pdf; > they claim to have found unpatched security holes in apache httpd. While > reading further it seems that the only missing peace is the unpatched > xmlparse from expat. > > While searching on our build server it turns out to me that the bug is > not in apache httpd but in aprutil: > > # grep -nHr 'newHash = hash' apr-util-1.5.4 > > apr-util-1.5.4/xml/expat/lib/xmlparse.c:5431: unsigned long > newHash = hash(table->v[i]->name); > > Did i miss anything from the paper? Is a new apr-util version planned > which fixes the problem? Are there any special build options or modules > needed? > > Greets, > Stefan
VUDDY: unpatched CVEs in apache httpd
Hello list, while reading "http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2017/papers/71.pdf; they claim to have found unpatched security holes in apache httpd. While reading further it seems that the only missing peace is the unpatched xmlparse from expat. While searching on our build server it turns out to me that the bug is not in apache httpd but in aprutil: # grep -nHr 'newHash = hash' apr-util-1.5.4 apr-util-1.5.4/xml/expat/lib/xmlparse.c:5431: unsigned long newHash = hash(table->v[i]->name); Did i miss anything from the paper? Is a new apr-util version planned which fixes the problem? Are there any special build options or modules needed? Greets, Stefan